Literature DB >> 29606586

Larotrectinib for paediatric solid tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions: phase 1 results from a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study.

Theodore W Laetsch1, Steven G DuBois2, Leo Mascarenhas3, Brian Turpin4, Noah Federman5, Catherine M Albert6, Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian7, Jessica L Davis6, Erin Rudzinski6, Angela M Feraco2, Brian B Tuch8, Kevin T Ebata8, Mark Reynolds8, Steven Smith8, Scott Cruickshank8, Michael C Cox8, Alberto S Pappo9, Douglas S Hawkins6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 (TRK fusions) are found in a broad range of paediatric and adult malignancies. Larotrectinib, a highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of the TRK kinases, had shown activity in preclinical models and in adults with tumours harbouring TRK fusions. This study aimed to assess the safety of larotrectinib in paediatric patients.
METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study was done at eight sites in the USA and enrolled infants, children, and adolescents aged 1 month to 21 years with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours or CNS tumours that had relapsed, progressed, or were non-responsive to available therapies regardless of TRK fusion status; had a Karnofsky (≥16 years of age) or Lansky (<16 years of age) performance status score of 50 or more, adequate organ function, and full recovery from the acute toxic effects of all previous anticancer therapy. Following a protocol amendment on Sept 12, 2016, patients with locally advanced infantile fibrosarcoma who would require disfiguring surgery to achieve a complete surgical resection were also eligible. Patients were enrolled to three dose cohorts according to a rolling six design. Larotrectinib was administered orally (capsule or liquid formulation), twice daily, on a continuous 28-day schedule, in increasing doses adjusted for age and bodyweight. The primary endpoint of the phase 1 dose escalation component was the safety of larotrectinib, including dose-limiting toxicity. All patients who received at least one dose of larotrectinib were included in the safety analyses. Reported here are results of the phase 1 dose escalation cohort. Phase 1 follow-up and phase 2 are ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02637687.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2015, and April 13, 2017, 24 patients (n=17 with tumours harbouring TRK fusions, n=7 without a documented TRK fusion) with a median age of 4·5 years (IQR 1·3-13·3) were enrolled to three dose cohorts: cohorts 1 and 2 were assigned doses on the basis of both age and bodyweight predicted by use of SimCyp modelling to achieve an area under the curve equivalent to the adult doses of 100 mg twice daily (cohort 1) and 150 mg twice daily (cohort 2); and cohort 3 was assigned to receive a dose of 100 mg/m2 twice daily (maximum 100 mg per dose), regardless of age, equating to a maximum of 173% of the recommended adult phase 2 dose. Among enrolled patients harbouring TRK fusion-positive cancers, eight (47%) had infantile fibrosarcoma, seven (41%) had other soft tissue sarcomas, and two (12%) had papillary thyroid cancer. Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2 (occurring in 21 [88%] of 24 patients); the most common larotrectinib-related adverse events of all grades were increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ten [42%] of 24 each), leucopenia (five [21%] of 24), decreased neutrophil count (five [21%] of 24), and vomiting (five [21%] of 24). Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation was the only dose-limiting toxicity and occurred in one patient without a TRK fusion and with progressive disease. No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Two larotrectinib-related serious adverse events were observed: grade 3 nausea and grade 3 ejection fraction decrease during the 28-day follow-up after discontinuing larotrectinib and while on anthracyclines. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and 100 mg/m2 (maximum of 100 mg per dose) was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. 14 (93%) of 15 patients with TRK fusion-positive cancers achieved an objective response as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1; the remaining patient had tumour regression that did not meet the criteria for objective response. None of the seven patients with TRK fusion-negative cancers had an objective response.
INTERPRETATION: The TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was well tolerated in paediatric patients and showed encouraging antitumour activity in all patients with TRK fusion-positive tumours. The recommended phase 2 dose was defined as 100mg/m2 (maximum 100 mg per dose) for infants, children, and adolescents, regardless of age. FUNDING: Loxo Oncology Inc.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29606586      PMCID: PMC5949072          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30119-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  29 in total

Review 1.  Trk receptor tyrosine kinases: a bridge between cancer and neural development.

Authors:  A Nakagawara
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  Congenital-infantile fibrosarcoma. A clinicopathologic study of 10 cases and molecular detection of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion transcripts using paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  W Q Sheng; M Hisaoka; S Okamoto; A Tanaka; J M Meis-Kindblom; L G Kindblom; T Ishida; T Nojima; H Hashimoto
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  A human oncogene formed by the fusion of truncated tropomyosin and protein tyrosine kinase sequences.

Authors:  D Martin-Zanca; S H Hughes; M Barbacid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Feb 27-Mar 5       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Molecular detection of the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion differentiates congenital fibrosarcoma from other childhood spindle cell tumors.

Authors:  J M Bourgeois; S R Knezevich; J A Mathers; P H Sorensen
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Radiologic Response Assessment in Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Computed-Assisted Volume Evaluation.

Authors:  Giovanna Orsatti; Valeria Beltrame; Filippo Crimì; Anna Chiara Frigo; Gianni Bisogno; Roberto Stramare
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  A Next-Generation TRK Kinase Inhibitor Overcomes Acquired Resistance to Prior TRK Kinase Inhibition in Patients with TRK Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Alexander Drilon; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; James F Blake; Nora Ku; Brian B Tuch; Kevin Ebata; Steve Smith; Veronique Lauriault; Gabrielle R Kolakowski; Barbara J Brandhuber; Paul D Larsen; Karyn S Bouhana; Shannon L Winski; Robyn Hamor; Wen-I Wu; Andrew Parker; Tony H Morales; Francis X Sullivan; Walter E DeWolf; Lance A Wollenberg; Paul R Gordon; Dorothea N Douglas-Lindsay; Maurizio Scaltriti; Ryma Benayed; Sandeep Raj; Bethany Hanusch; Alison M Schram; Philip Jonsson; Michael F Berger; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Barry S Taylor; Steve Andrews; S Michael Rothenberg; David M Hyman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.

Authors:  G M Brodeur; J Pritchard; F Berthold; N L Carlsen; V Castel; R P Castelberry; B De Bernardi; A E Evans; M Favrot; F Hedborg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Michael Seid; Douglas Skarr
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

9.  The PedsQL™ Infant Scales: feasibility, internal consistency reliability, and validity in healthy and ill infants.

Authors:  James W Varni; Christine A Limbers; Katie Neighbors; Kris Schulz; Judith E C Lieu; Robert W Heffer; Krista Tuzinkiewicz; Rita Mangione-Smith; Jerry J Zimmerman; Estella M Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.440

10.  What hides behind the MASC: clinical response and acquired resistance to entrectinib after ETV6-NTRK3 identification in a mammary analogue secretory carcinoma (MASC).

Authors:  A Drilon; G Li; S Dogan; M Gounder; R Shen; M Arcila; L Wang; D M Hyman; J Hechtman; G Wei; N R Cam; J Christiansen; D Luo; E C Maneval; T Bauer; M Patel; S V Liu; S H I Ou; A Farago; A Shaw; R F Shoemaker; J Lim; Z Hornby; P Multani; M Ladanyi; M Berger; N Katabi; R Ghossein; A L Ho
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  123 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and Opportunities for Childhood Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Raushan T Kurmasheva
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Targetable molecular alterations in congenital glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ahmed Gilani; Andrew Donson; Kurtis D Davies; Susan L Whiteway; Jessica Lake; John DeSisto; Lindsey Hoffman; Nicholas K Foreman; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Adam L Green
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  TRK Fusions Are Enriched in Cancers with Uncommon Histologies and the Absence of Canonical Driver Mutations.

Authors:  Ezra Y Rosen; Debra A Goldman; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Ryma Benayed; Alison M Schram; Emiliano Cocco; Sophie Shifman; Yixiao Gong; Ritika Kundra; James P Solomon; Alberto Bardelli; Maurizio Scaltriti; Alexander Drilon; Alexia Iasonos; Barry S Taylor; David M Hyman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial.

Authors:  Michael J Pishvaian; Edik M Blais; Jonathan R Brody; Emily Lyons; Patricia DeArbeloa; Andrew Hendifar; Sam Mikhail; Vincent Chung; Vaibhav Sahai; Davendra P S Sohal; Sara Bellakbira; Dzung Thach; Lola Rahib; Subha Madhavan; Lynn M Matrisian; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs.

Authors:  Dylan V Neel; David S Shulman; Steven G DuBois
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  How Technology Is Improving the Multidisciplinary Care of Sarcoma.

Authors:  Inga-Marie Schaefer; Kelvin Hong; Anusha Kalbasi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2020-05

7.  Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials.

Authors:  David S Hong; Steven G DuBois; Shivaani Kummar; Anna F Farago; Catherine M Albert; Kristoffer S Rohrberg; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; Jordan D Berlin; Noah Federman; Leo Mascarenhas; Birgit Geoerger; Afshin Dowlati; Alberto S Pappo; Stefan Bielack; François Doz; Ray McDermott; Jyoti D Patel; Russell J Schilder; Makoto Tahara; Stefan M Pfister; Olaf Witt; Marc Ladanyi; Erin R Rudzinski; Shivani Nanda; Barrett H Childs; Theodore W Laetsch; David M Hyman; Alexander Drilon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Ethical Challenges in Pediatric Oncology Care and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Benedetti; Jonathan M Marron
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

9.  Landscape of phase 1 clinical trials for minors with cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Jaclynne H Nader; Dylan V Neel; David S Shulman; Clement Ma; Florence Bourgeois; Steven G DuBois
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 10.  TRK Inhibition: A New Tumor-Agnostic Treatment Strategy.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Ulrik N Lassen
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.