Theodore W Laetsch1, Steven G DuBois2, Leo Mascarenhas3, Brian Turpin4, Noah Federman5, Catherine M Albert6, Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian7, Jessica L Davis6, Erin Rudzinski6, Angela M Feraco2, Brian B Tuch8, Kevin T Ebata8, Mark Reynolds8, Steven Smith8, Scott Cruickshank8, Michael C Cox8, Alberto S Pappo9, Douglas S Hawkins6. 1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center/Children's Health, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: ted.laetsch@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 5. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA, USA. 7. Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA. 8. Loxo Oncology Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 9. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gene fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 (TRK fusions) are found in a broad range of paediatric and adult malignancies. Larotrectinib, a highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of the TRK kinases, had shown activity in preclinical models and in adults with tumours harbouring TRK fusions. This study aimed to assess the safety of larotrectinib in paediatric patients. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study was done at eight sites in the USA and enrolled infants, children, and adolescents aged 1 month to 21 years with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours or CNS tumours that had relapsed, progressed, or were non-responsive to available therapies regardless of TRK fusion status; had a Karnofsky (≥16 years of age) or Lansky (<16 years of age) performance status score of 50 or more, adequate organ function, and full recovery from the acute toxic effects of all previous anticancer therapy. Following a protocol amendment on Sept 12, 2016, patients with locally advanced infantile fibrosarcoma who would require disfiguring surgery to achieve a complete surgical resection were also eligible. Patients were enrolled to three dose cohorts according to a rolling six design. Larotrectinib was administered orally (capsule or liquid formulation), twice daily, on a continuous 28-day schedule, in increasing doses adjusted for age and bodyweight. The primary endpoint of the phase 1 dose escalation component was the safety of larotrectinib, including dose-limiting toxicity. All patients who received at least one dose of larotrectinib were included in the safety analyses. Reported here are results of the phase 1 dose escalation cohort. Phase 1 follow-up and phase 2 are ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02637687. FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2015, and April 13, 2017, 24 patients (n=17 with tumours harbouring TRK fusions, n=7 without a documented TRK fusion) with a median age of 4·5 years (IQR 1·3-13·3) were enrolled to three dose cohorts: cohorts 1 and 2 were assigned doses on the basis of both age and bodyweight predicted by use of SimCyp modelling to achieve an area under the curve equivalent to the adult doses of 100 mg twice daily (cohort 1) and 150 mg twice daily (cohort 2); and cohort 3 was assigned to receive a dose of 100 mg/m2 twice daily (maximum 100 mg per dose), regardless of age, equating to a maximum of 173% of the recommended adult phase 2 dose. Among enrolled patients harbouring TRK fusion-positive cancers, eight (47%) had infantile fibrosarcoma, seven (41%) had other soft tissue sarcomas, and two (12%) had papillary thyroid cancer. Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2 (occurring in 21 [88%] of 24 patients); the most common larotrectinib-related adverse events of all grades were increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ten [42%] of 24 each), leucopenia (five [21%] of 24), decreased neutrophil count (five [21%] of 24), and vomiting (five [21%] of 24). Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation was the only dose-limiting toxicity and occurred in one patient without a TRK fusion and with progressive disease. No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Two larotrectinib-related serious adverse events were observed: grade 3 nausea and grade 3 ejection fraction decrease during the 28-day follow-up after discontinuing larotrectinib and while on anthracyclines. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and 100 mg/m2 (maximum of 100 mg per dose) was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. 14 (93%) of 15 patients with TRK fusion-positive cancers achieved an objective response as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1; the remaining patient had tumour regression that did not meet the criteria for objective response. None of the seven patients with TRK fusion-negative cancers had an objective response. INTERPRETATION: The TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was well tolerated in paediatric patients and showed encouraging antitumour activity in all patients with TRK fusion-positive tumours. The recommended phase 2 dose was defined as 100mg/m2 (maximum 100 mg per dose) for infants, children, and adolescents, regardless of age. FUNDING: Loxo Oncology Inc.
BACKGROUND: Gene fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 (TRK fusions) are found in a broad range of paediatric and adult malignancies. Larotrectinib, a highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of the TRK kinases, had shown activity in preclinical models and in adults with tumours harbouring TRK fusions. This study aimed to assess the safety of larotrectinib in paediatric patients. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study was done at eight sites in the USA and enrolled infants, children, and adolescents aged 1 month to 21 years with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours or CNS tumours that had relapsed, progressed, or were non-responsive to available therapies regardless of TRK fusion status; had a Karnofsky (≥16 years of age) or Lansky (<16 years of age) performance status score of 50 or more, adequate organ function, and full recovery from the acute toxic effects of all previous anticancer therapy. Following a protocol amendment on Sept 12, 2016, patients with locally advanced infantile fibrosarcoma who would require disfiguring surgery to achieve a complete surgical resection were also eligible. Patients were enrolled to three dose cohorts according to a rolling six design. Larotrectinib was administered orally (capsule or liquid formulation), twice daily, on a continuous 28-day schedule, in increasing doses adjusted for age and bodyweight. The primary endpoint of the phase 1 dose escalation component was the safety of larotrectinib, including dose-limiting toxicity. All patients who received at least one dose of larotrectinib were included in the safety analyses. Reported here are results of the phase 1 dose escalation cohort. Phase 1 follow-up and phase 2 are ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02637687. FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2015, and April 13, 2017, 24 patients (n=17 with tumours harbouring TRK fusions, n=7 without a documented TRK fusion) with a median age of 4·5 years (IQR 1·3-13·3) were enrolled to three dose cohorts: cohorts 1 and 2 were assigned doses on the basis of both age and bodyweight predicted by use of SimCyp modelling to achieve an area under the curve equivalent to the adult doses of 100 mg twice daily (cohort 1) and 150 mg twice daily (cohort 2); and cohort 3 was assigned to receive a dose of 100 mg/m2 twice daily (maximum 100 mg per dose), regardless of age, equating to a maximum of 173% of the recommended adult phase 2 dose. Among enrolled patients harbouring TRK fusion-positive cancers, eight (47%) had infantile fibrosarcoma, seven (41%) had other soft tissue sarcomas, and two (12%) had papillary thyroid cancer. Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2 (occurring in 21 [88%] of 24 patients); the most common larotrectinib-related adverse events of all grades were increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ten [42%] of 24 each), leucopenia (five [21%] of 24), decreased neutrophil count (five [21%] of 24), and vomiting (five [21%] of 24). Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation was the only dose-limiting toxicity and occurred in one patient without a TRK fusion and with progressive disease. No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Two larotrectinib-related serious adverse events were observed: grade 3 nausea and grade 3 ejection fraction decrease during the 28-day follow-up after discontinuing larotrectinib and while on anthracyclines. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and 100 mg/m2 (maximum of 100 mg per dose) was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. 14 (93%) of 15 patients with TRK fusion-positive cancers achieved an objective response as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1; the remaining patient had tumour regression that did not meet the criteria for objective response. None of the seven patients with TRK fusion-negative cancers had an objective response. INTERPRETATION: The TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was well tolerated in paediatric patients and showed encouraging antitumour activity in all patients with TRK fusion-positive tumours. The recommended phase 2 dose was defined as 100mg/m2 (maximum 100 mg per dose) for infants, children, and adolescents, regardless of age. FUNDING: Loxo Oncology Inc.
Authors: W Q Sheng; M Hisaoka; S Okamoto; A Tanaka; J M Meis-Kindblom; L G Kindblom; T Ishida; T Nojima; H Hashimoto Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Alexander Drilon; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; James F Blake; Nora Ku; Brian B Tuch; Kevin Ebata; Steve Smith; Veronique Lauriault; Gabrielle R Kolakowski; Barbara J Brandhuber; Paul D Larsen; Karyn S Bouhana; Shannon L Winski; Robyn Hamor; Wen-I Wu; Andrew Parker; Tony H Morales; Francis X Sullivan; Walter E DeWolf; Lance A Wollenberg; Paul R Gordon; Dorothea N Douglas-Lindsay; Maurizio Scaltriti; Ryma Benayed; Sandeep Raj; Bethany Hanusch; Alison M Schram; Philip Jonsson; Michael F Berger; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Barry S Taylor; Steve Andrews; S Michael Rothenberg; David M Hyman Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: G M Brodeur; J Pritchard; F Berthold; N L Carlsen; V Castel; R P Castelberry; B De Bernardi; A E Evans; M Favrot; F Hedborg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James W Varni; Christine A Limbers; Katie Neighbors; Kris Schulz; Judith E C Lieu; Robert W Heffer; Krista Tuzinkiewicz; Rita Mangione-Smith; Jerry J Zimmerman; Estella M Alonso Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-08-22 Impact factor: 3.440
Authors: A Drilon; G Li; S Dogan; M Gounder; R Shen; M Arcila; L Wang; D M Hyman; J Hechtman; G Wei; N R Cam; J Christiansen; D Luo; E C Maneval; T Bauer; M Patel; S V Liu; S H I Ou; A Farago; A Shaw; R F Shoemaker; J Lim; Z Hornby; P Multani; M Ladanyi; M Berger; N Katabi; R Ghossein; A L Ho Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ahmed Gilani; Andrew Donson; Kurtis D Davies; Susan L Whiteway; Jessica Lake; John DeSisto; Lindsey Hoffman; Nicholas K Foreman; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Adam L Green Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ezra Y Rosen; Debra A Goldman; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Ryma Benayed; Alison M Schram; Emiliano Cocco; Sophie Shifman; Yixiao Gong; Ritika Kundra; James P Solomon; Alberto Bardelli; Maurizio Scaltriti; Alexander Drilon; Alexia Iasonos; Barry S Taylor; David M Hyman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael J Pishvaian; Edik M Blais; Jonathan R Brody; Emily Lyons; Patricia DeArbeloa; Andrew Hendifar; Sam Mikhail; Vincent Chung; Vaibhav Sahai; Davendra P S Sohal; Sara Bellakbira; Dzung Thach; Lola Rahib; Subha Madhavan; Lynn M Matrisian; Emanuel F Petricoin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: David S Hong; Steven G DuBois; Shivaani Kummar; Anna F Farago; Catherine M Albert; Kristoffer S Rohrberg; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; Jordan D Berlin; Noah Federman; Leo Mascarenhas; Birgit Geoerger; Afshin Dowlati; Alberto S Pappo; Stefan Bielack; François Doz; Ray McDermott; Jyoti D Patel; Russell J Schilder; Makoto Tahara; Stefan M Pfister; Olaf Witt; Marc Ladanyi; Erin R Rudzinski; Shivani Nanda; Barrett H Childs; Theodore W Laetsch; David M Hyman; Alexander Drilon Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jaclynne H Nader; Dylan V Neel; David S Shulman; Clement Ma; Florence Bourgeois; Steven G DuBois Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 3.167