Samantha J Danielson1, Charles A Rappaport2, Michael K Loher3, Brian K Gehlbach4. 1. University of Iowa, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: danielson.sam@gmail.com. 2. University of Iowa, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: charles-rappaport@uiowa.edu. 3. University of Iowa, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: lohemi01@luther.edu. 4. University of Iowa, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; University of Iowa, Department of Neurology, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: brian-gehlbach@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Critically ill patients exhibit profound disturbances of circadian rhythmicity, most commonly in the form of a phase delay. We investigated the specific zeitgeber properties of a medical intensive care unit to develop a model that explained these abnormalities. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Prospective, observational study conducted during 2013-2014. Twenty-four-hour ambient light (lux, 672 hours) and sound pressure levels (dBA, 504 hours) were measured in patient rooms. Patients and families were surveyed regarding their perceptions of the environment. SETTING: University-based adult medical intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The timing and intensity of the ambient light-dark cycle and sound environment and the relationship of these measurements to patient/family perceptions. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour light-dark cycles were extremely weak and phase delayed relative to the solar cycle. Morning light averaged 12.1 (4.8, 37.2) lux, when only 24.9% ± 10.9% of available light was utilised; yet patients and families did not identify low daytime light levels as problematic. Median noise levels were invariably excessive (nighttime 47.9 [45.0, 51.3] dBA) with minimal variation, consistent with the absence of a defined rest period. CONCLUSION: The intensive care unit functions as a near-constant routine protocol disconnected from solar time. Behavioural interventions to promote entrainment should be supported by objective measurements of light and sound.
OBJECTIVE:Critically illpatients exhibit profound disturbances of circadian rhythmicity, most commonly in the form of a phase delay. We investigated the specific zeitgeber properties of a medical intensive care unit to develop a model that explained these abnormalities. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Prospective, observational study conducted during 2013-2014. Twenty-four-hour ambient light (lux, 672 hours) and sound pressure levels (dBA, 504 hours) were measured in patient rooms. Patients and families were surveyed regarding their perceptions of the environment. SETTING: University-based adult medical intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The timing and intensity of the ambient light-dark cycle and sound environment and the relationship of these measurements to patient/family perceptions. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour light-dark cycles were extremely weak and phase delayed relative to the solar cycle. Morning light averaged 12.1 (4.8, 37.2) lux, when only 24.9% ± 10.9% of available light was utilised; yet patients and families did not identify low daytime light levels as problematic. Median noise levels were invariably excessive (nighttime 47.9 [45.0, 51.3] dBA) with minimal variation, consistent with the absence of a defined rest period. CONCLUSION: The intensive care unit functions as a near-constant routine protocol disconnected from solar time. Behavioural interventions to promote entrainment should be supported by objective measurements of light and sound.
Authors: Mathias Basner; Wolfgang Babisch; Adrian Davis; Mark Brink; Charlotte Clark; Sabine Janssen; Stephen Stansfeld Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C A Czeisler; J F Duffy; T L Shanahan; E N Brown; J F Mitchell; D W Rimmer; J M Ronda; E J Silva; J S Allan; J S Emens; D J Dijk; R E Kronauer Journal: Science Date: 1999-06-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jane E Ferrie; Martin J Shipley; Tasnime N Akbaraly; Michael G Marmot; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Margaret A Pisani; Randall S Friese; Brian K Gehlbach; Richard J Schwab; Gerald L Weinhouse; Shirley F Jones Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Brian K Gehlbach; Shruti B Patel; Eve Van Cauter; Anne S Pohlman; Jesse B Hall; Joseph Zabner Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405