Literature DB >> 29604850

Improving estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic force spectroscopy using cluster analysis.

Chi-Fu Yen1, Sanjeevi Sivasankar1.   

Abstract

Dynamic Force Spectroscopy (DFS) is a widely used technique to characterize the dissociation kinetics and interaction energy landscape of receptor-ligand complexes with single-molecule resolution. In an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)-based DFS experiment, receptor-ligand complexes, sandwiched between an AFM tip and substrate, are ruptured at different stress rates by varying the speed at which the AFM-tip and substrate are pulled away from each other. The rupture events are grouped according to their pulling speeds, and the mean force and loading rate of each group are calculated. These data are subsequently fit to established models, and energy landscape parameters such as the intrinsic off-rate (koff) and the width of the potential energy barrier (xβ) are extracted. However, due to large uncertainties in determining mean forces and loading rates of the groups, errors in the estimated koff and xβ can be substantial. Here, we demonstrate that the accuracy of fitted parameters in a DFS experiment can be dramatically improved by sorting rupture events into groups using cluster analysis instead of sorting them according to their pulling speeds. We test different clustering algorithms including Gaussian mixture, logistic regression, and K-means clustering, under conditions that closely mimic DFS experiments. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we benchmark the performance of these clustering algorithms over a wide range of koff and xβ, under different levels of thermal noise, and as a function of both the number of unbinding events and the number of pulling speeds. Our results demonstrate that cluster analysis, particularly K-means clustering, is very effective in improving the accuracy of parameter estimation, particularly when the number of unbinding events are limited and not well separated into distinct groups. Cluster analysis is easy to implement, and our performance benchmarks serve as a guide in choosing an appropriate method for DFS data analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604850      PMCID: PMC5648546          DOI: 10.1063/1.5001325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  28 in total

1.  Cadherin interaction probed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  W Baumgartner; P Hinterdorfer; W Ness; A Raab; D Vestweber; H Schindler; D Drenckhahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Kinetics from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments.

Authors:  Gerhard Hummer; Attila Szabo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Hidden multiple bond effects in dynamic force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sebastian Getfert; Peter Reimann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  How does gene expression clustering work?

Authors:  Patrik D'haeseleer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Intrinsic rates and activation free energies from single-molecule pulling experiments.

Authors:  Olga K Dudko; Gerhard Hummer; Attila Szabo
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Correction of systematic errors in single-molecule force spectroscopy with polymeric tethers by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Chad Ray; Jason R Brown; Boris B Akhremitchev
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Theory, analysis, and interpretation of single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments.

Authors:  Olga K Dudko; Gerhard Hummer; Attila Szabo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interpreting the widespread nonlinear force spectra of intermolecular bonds.

Authors:  Raymond W Friddle; Aleksandr Noy; James J De Yoreo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Practical single molecule force spectroscopy: how to determine fundamental thermodynamic parameters of intermolecular bonds with an atomic force microscope.

Authors:  Aleksandr Noy; Raymond W Friddle
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Theory of rapid force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jakob T Bullerjahn; Sebastian Sturm; Klaus Kroy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inside-out regulation of E-cadherin conformation and adhesion.

Authors:  Ramesh Koirala; Andrew Vae Priest; Chi-Fu Yen; Joleen S Cheah; Willem-Jan Pannekoek; Martijn Gloerich; Soichiro Yamada; Sanjeevi Sivasankar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  E-cadherin binds to desmoglein to facilitate desmosome assembly.

Authors:  Omer Shafraz; Matthias Rübsam; Sara N Stahley; Amber L Caldara; Andrew P Kowalczyk; Carien M Niessen; Sanjeevi Sivasankar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.