Literature DB >> 29604508

Conventional digital subtractional vs non-invasive MR angiography in the assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation.

Nguyen Ngoc Cuong1, Vu Dang Luu2, Tran Anh Tuan2, Le Tuan Linh1, Kieu Dinh Hung3, Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc4, Kulbhushan Sharma5, Van Huy Pham6, Dinh-Toi Chu7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Digital subtractional angiography (DSA) is the standard method for diagnosis, assessment and management of arteriovenous malformation in the brain. Conventional DSA (cDSA) is an invasive imaging modality that is often indicated before interventional treatments (embolization, open surgery, gamma knife). Here, we aimed to compare this technique with a non-invasive MR angiography (MRI DSA) for brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with ruptured brain AVM underwent embolization treatment pre-operation. Imaging was performed for all patients using MRI (1.5 T). After injecting contrast Gadolinium, dynamic MRI was performed with 40 phases, each phase of a duration of 1.2 s and having 70 images. The MRI results were independently assessed by experienced radiologist blinded to the cDSA.
RESULTS: The AVM nidus was depicted in all patients using cDSA and MRI DSA; there was an excellent correlation between these techniques in terms of the maximum diameter and Spetzler Martin grading. Of the fourteen patients, the drainage vein was depicted in 13 by both cDSA and MRI DSA showing excellent correlation between the techniques used.
CONCLUSION: MRI DSA is a non-invasive imaging modality that can give the images in dynamic view. It can be considered as an adjunctive method with cDSA to plan the strategy treatment for bAVM.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain arteriovenous malformation; Non-invasive MRI DSA for bAVM; Radioimaging of the brain AVM

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604508     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  2 in total

1.  MRI and MR angiography evaluation of pulsatile tinnitus: A focused, physiology-based protocol.

Authors:  Daniel D Cummins; Michael T Caton; Vinil Shah; Karl Meisel; Christine Glastonbury; Matthew R Amans
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  A Systematic Review Comparing Digital Subtraction Angiogram With Magnetic Resonance Angiogram Studies in Demonstrating the Angioarchitecture of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Aishwarya Raman; Manish Uprety; Maria Jose Calero; Maria Resah B Villanueva; Narges Joshaghani; Nicole Villa; Omar Badla; Raman Goit; Samia E Saddik; Sarah N Dawood; Ahmad M Rabih; Ahmad Mohammed; Tharun Yadhav Selvamani; Jihan Mostafa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.