Literature DB >> 29604453

Bayesian uncertainty quantification in linear models for diffusion MRI.

Jens Sjölund1, Anders Eklund2, Evren Özarslan3, Magnus Herberthson4, Maria Bånkestad5, Hans Knutsson3.   

Abstract

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a valuable tool in the assessment of tissue microstructure. By fitting a model to the dMRI signal it is possible to derive various quantitative features. Several of the most popular dMRI signal models are expansions in an appropriately chosen basis, where the coefficients are determined using some variation of least-squares. However, such approaches lack any notion of uncertainty, which could be valuable in e.g. group analyses. In this work, we use a probabilistic interpretation of linear least-squares methods to recast popular dMRI models as Bayesian ones. This makes it possible to quantify the uncertainty of any derived quantity. In particular, for quantities that are affine functions of the coefficients, the posterior distribution can be expressed in closed-form. We simulated measurements from single- and double-tensor models where the correct values of several quantities are known, to validate that the theoretically derived quantiles agree with those observed empirically. We included results from residual bootstrap for comparison and found good agreement. The validation employed several different models: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), Mean Apparent Propagator MRI (MAP-MRI) and Constrained Spherical Deconvolution (CSD). We also used in vivo data to visualize maps of quantitative features and corresponding uncertainties, and to show how our approach can be used in a group analysis to downweight subjects with high uncertainty. In summary, we convert successful linear models for dMRI signal estimation to probabilistic models, capable of accurate uncertainty quantification.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion MRI; Signal estimation; Uncertainty quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604453      PMCID: PMC6419970          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  53 in total

1.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution.

Authors:  J-Donald Tournier; Fernando Calamante; Alan Connelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Using the model-based residual bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in fiber orientations from Q-ball analysis.

Authors:  Hamied A Haroon; David M Morris; Karl V Embleton; Daniel C Alexander; Geoffrey J M Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Tractography gone wild: probabilistic fibre tracking using the wild bootstrap with diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  Derek K Jones
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A theoretical study of the effect of experimental noise on the measurement of anisotropy in diffusion imaging.

Authors:  M E Bastin; P A Armitage; I Marshall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Ziad S Saad; Audrey R Nath; Michael S Beauchamp; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data.

Authors:  M B Wilk; R Gnanadesikan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging.

Authors:  P J Basser; J Mattiello; D LeBihan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: the OpenfMRI project.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Deanna M Barch; Jason P Mitchell; Tor D Wager; Anthony D Wagner; Joseph T Devlin; Chad Cumba; Oluwasanmi Koyejo; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Non-parametric representation and prediction of single- and multi-shell diffusion-weighted MRI data using Gaussian processes.

Authors:  Jesper L R Andersson; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tensor-valued diffusion encoding for diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE): Technical feasibility in clinical MRI systems.

Authors:  Filip Szczepankiewicz; Jens Sjölund; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of Six Phase Encoding Based Susceptibility Distortion Correction Methods for Diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Xuan Gu; Anders Eklund
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.081

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.