Jiantao Ma1, Rachel Hennein1, Chunyu Liu1, Michelle T Long2, Udo Hoffmann3, Paul F Jacques4, Alice H Lichtenstein5, Frank B Hu6, Daniel Levy7. 1. Population Sciences Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts. 2. Section of Gastroenterology, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Nutrition Epidemiology Program, USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Population Sciences Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts. Electronic address: levyd@nhlbi.nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dietary modification has been recommended for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), although it is not clear whether improving diet quality can prevent its development. We performed a prospective study to examine the association between diet quality change and change in liver fat. We also examined the association between genetic risk score and liver fat change in individuals with different levels of diet quality change. METHODS: Our study included 1521 participants who attended the seventh and eighth examinations (1998-2001 and 2005-2008) of the second-generation cohort or attended the first and second examinations (2002-2005 and 2008-2011) of the third-generation cohort in the Framingham Heart Study. The self-administered semiquantitative 126-item Harvard food frequency questionnaire was used to determine dietary intake in the year leading up to an examination. We assessed levels of liver fat using liver-phantom ratio (LPR) on computed tomography images from 2002 through 2005 and again from 2008 through 2011. LPR values are inversely related to liver fat: increased LPR indicates decreased liver fat. We examined associations of changes in 2 diet scores, the Mediterranean-style diet score (MDS) and Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), with changes in liver fat and new-onset fatty liver. We evaluated interactions between diet score change and a weighted genetic risk score for NAFLD, determined based on multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association studies of NAFLD. The primary outcome was change in LPR between baseline and follow-up measurement. RESULTS: For each 1 standard deviation increase in MDS, the LPR increased (meaning liver fat decreased) by 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.86; P < .001) and the odds for incident fatty liver decreased by 26% (95% CI 10%-39%; P = .002). For each 1 standard deviation increase in AHEI, LPR increased by 0.56 (95% CI 0.29-0.84; P < .001) and the odds for incident fatty liver decreased by 21% (95% CI 5%-35%; P = .02). Increased diet scores were also associated with reduced odds of developing more-advanced fatty liver. Higher genetic risk scores were associated with increased liver fat accumulation in participants who had decreased MDS (P < .001) or AHEI scores (P = .001), but not in those with stable or improved diet scores (P for gene-diet interaction <.001). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of participants in the Framingham Heart Study, increasing diet quality, determined based on MDS and AHEI scores, is associated with less liver fat accumulation and reduced risk for new-onset fatty liver. An improved diet is particularly important for individuals with a high genetic risk for NAFLD.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dietary modification has been recommended for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), although it is not clear whether improving diet quality can prevent its development. We performed a prospective study to examine the association between diet quality change and change in liver fat. We also examined the association between genetic risk score and liver fat change in individuals with different levels of diet quality change. METHODS: Our study included 1521 participants who attended the seventh and eighth examinations (1998-2001 and 2005-2008) of the second-generation cohort or attended the first and second examinations (2002-2005 and 2008-2011) of the third-generation cohort in the Framingham Heart Study. The self-administered semiquantitative 126-item Harvard food frequency questionnaire was used to determine dietary intake in the year leading up to an examination. We assessed levels of liver fat using liver-phantom ratio (LPR) on computed tomography images from 2002 through 2005 and again from 2008 through 2011. LPR values are inversely related to liver fat: increased LPR indicates decreased liver fat. We examined associations of changes in 2 diet scores, the Mediterranean-style diet score (MDS) and Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), with changes in liver fat and new-onset fatty liver. We evaluated interactions between diet score change and a weighted genetic risk score for NAFLD, determined based on multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association studies of NAFLD. The primary outcome was change in LPR between baseline and follow-up measurement. RESULTS: For each 1 standard deviation increase in MDS, the LPR increased (meaning liver fat decreased) by 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.86; P < .001) and the odds for incident fatty liver decreased by 26% (95% CI 10%-39%; P = .002). For each 1 standard deviation increase in AHEI, LPR increased by 0.56 (95% CI 0.29-0.84; P < .001) and the odds for incident fatty liver decreased by 21% (95% CI 5%-35%; P = .02). Increased diet scores were also associated with reduced odds of developing more-advanced fatty liver. Higher genetic risk scores were associated with increased liver fat accumulation in participants who had decreased MDS (P < .001) or AHEI scores (P = .001), but not in those with stable or improved diet scores (P for gene-diet interaction <.001). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of participants in the Framingham Heart Study, increasing diet quality, determined based on MDS and AHEI scores, is associated with less liver fat accumulation and reduced risk for new-onset fatty liver. An improved diet is particularly important for individuals with a high genetic risk for NAFLD.
Authors: Jaimie N Davis; Kim-Anne Lê; Ryan W Walker; Susanna Vikman; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Marc J Weigensberg; Hooman Allayee; Michael I Goran Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Michael Charlton; Kenneth Cusi; Mary Rinella; Stephen A Harrison; Elizabeth M Brunt; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Greta Lee Splansky; Diane Corey; Qiong Yang; Larry D Atwood; L Adrienne Cupples; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Caroline S Fox; Martin G Larson; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Daniel Levy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: R V Shah; V L Murthy; M A Allison; J Ding; M Budoff; A C Frazier-Wood; J A C Lima; L Steffen; D Siscovick; K L Tucker; P Ouyang; S A Abbasi; K Danielson; M Jerosch-Herold; D Mozaffarian Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Robert J Wong; Maria Aguilar; Ramsey Cheung; Ryan B Perumpail; Stephen A Harrison; Zobair M Younossi; Aijaz Ahmed Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Teresa T Fung; An Pan; Tao Hou; Stephanie E Chiuve; Deidre K Tobias; Dariush Mozaffarian; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Kathryn M Rexrode; Christos S Mantzoros; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mathias Plauth; William Bernal; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Manuela Merli; Lindsay D Plank; Tatjana Schütz; Stephan C Bischoff Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Maura E Walker; Rebecca J Song; Xiang Xu; Robert E Gerszten; Debby Ngo; Clary B Clish; Laura Corlin; Jiantao Ma; Vanessa Xanthakis; Paul F Jacques; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Michelle T Long; Ellen B Gurary; Joseph M Massaro; Jiantao Ma; Udo Hoffmann; Raymond T Chung; Emelia J Benjamin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Liver Int Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Jacob T Mey; Melissa L Erickson; Christopher L Axelrod; William T King; Chris A Flask; Arthur J McCullough; John P Kirwan Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Moriah P Bellissimo; Erika L Bettermann; Phong H Tran; Benjamin H Crain; Erin P Ferranti; Jose N Binongo; Terryl J Hartman; Dean P Jones; Thomas R Ziegler; Jessica A Alvarez Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Maura E Walker; Vanessa Xanthakis; Linda R Peterson; Meredith S Duncan; Joowon Lee; Jiantao Ma; Sherman Bigornia; Lynn L Moore; Paula A Quatromoni; Ramachandran S Vasan; Paul F Jacques Journal: J Nutr Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 4.798