Literature DB >> 29602863

The Coming-of-Age of Subcutaneous Injectable Contraception.

Kimberly Cole1, Abdulmumin Saad2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29602863      PMCID: PMC5878064          DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract        ISSN: 2169-575X


× No keyword cloud information.
See related articles by Stout et al. and by Georges et al. Thirty-one years ago, Uniject—a prefilled, single-dose syringe and needle package that features a collapsible blister—was conceptualized. Seventeen years later Uniject was approved to administer 104 mg of the contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneously (DMPA-SC). DMPA-SC is still nascent in many countries, but in others it has transitioned to prominence even where there is already an intramuscular DMPA (DMPA-IM) product on the market. DMPA-SC is now coming of age, and offering it alongside a broad range of other contraceptive options, including fertility awareness methods, long-acting reversible methods, and permanent methods, increases choice and access to voluntary family planning. This issue of GHSP includes 2 articles that present data on DMPA-SC introduction experiences in 4 countries that were among the earliest to introduce DMPA-SC and have shown great progress: Burkina Faso (Stout et al. and Georges et al.), and Niger, Senegal, and Uganda (Stout et al.).

THE CONTEXT

In developing regions, 214 million women of reproductive age want to avoid pregnancy but are not using a modern contraceptive method. The Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) global partnership has set an ambitious goal to reach more than half of these women with voluntary family planning, yet we are not on track to achieve this goal., Given the great challenge, adding another voluntary contraceptive option to the method mix will help women and couples to optimally time and space their pregnancies for the safest and healthiest outcomes. It cannot be overemphasized that voluntarism, informed choice, and a respect for clients' rights must be central to any family planning program.

WHAT'S NEW?

Globally, there is a strong association between the range of voluntary contraceptive choices and contraceptive use: use increases when more methods are available and also when current methods are improved. DMPA-SC is an improvement upon the intramuscular DMPA formulation. The subcutaneous formulation features a 30% lower dose of DMPA, yet provides the same efficacy and length of protection as DMPA-IM. In a growing number of countries, the client herself can self-inject. Where women can self-inject, DMPA-SC offers the most effective woman-controlled contraceptive option available. It is important that providers counsel clients on all methods they might wish to discuss. It is also important that both provider and client understand the differences between DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM (Table).
TABLE.

A Comparison Between DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM Injectables

CharacteristicDMPA-SCDMPA-IM
Formulation104 mg/0.65 mL of DMPA in the Uniject injection system; all-in-one Uniject system simplifies procurement and logistics150 mg/mL of DMPA, administered by intramuscular injection, available in vials or prefilled syringes
Needle3/8” needle; 23 gauge ultra-thin1” needle; 22 gauge with a 21–23 gauge range option
AdministrationWhere permitted, can be administered by CHWs, pharmacists, or by the woman herselfTypically administered by a provider, but can be administered by CHWs and pharmacists where permitted
Shelf life3 years5 years
Efficacy99% contraceptive efficacy
SafetySimilar safety profile
Duration and mechanism of actionProvides 3 months of contraceptive protection per dose by preventing ovulation and thickening cervical mucus
Safety during breastfeedingSafe for breastfeeding mothers at 6 weeks postpartum
Health benefits

Reduces the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer

Protects from uterine fibroids, endometrial cancer, ectopic pregnancy, and symptomatic pelvic inflammatory disease

May reduce sickle cell crises in some women with sickle cell anemia

Prevents seizures in some women with epilepsy

Prevents iron deficiency anemia in some women

Side effectsMay cause headaches, bleeding irregularities, weight gain, injection-site reactions
Protection against HIV or other STIsDoes not protect against HIV or other STIs

Abbreviations: CHW, community health worker; DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; DMPA-IM, intramuscular DMPA; DMPA-SC, subcutaneous DMPA; STI, sexually transmitted infection.

Source: Spieler (2010)1 and Family Health International (2010).

A Comparison Between DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM Injectables Reduces the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer Protects from uterine fibroids, endometrial cancer, ectopic pregnancy, and symptomatic pelvic inflammatory disease May reduce sickle cell crises in some women with sickle cell anemia Prevents seizures in some women with epilepsy Prevents iron deficiency anemia in some women Abbreviations: CHW, community health worker; DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; DMPA-IM, intramuscular DMPA; DMPA-SC, subcutaneous DMPA; STI, sexually transmitted infection. Source: Spieler (2010)1 and Family Health International (2010).

DMPA-SC HAS THE POTENTIAL TO REACH MORE CLIENTS AND IMPROVE SATISFACTION

Both articles included in this issue of GHSP demonstrate that DMPA-SC offers more women (especially those who face barriers when interacting with the health system) access to a new voluntary contraceptive method that could meet their needs and reproductive intentions. Of the 120 million women that FP2020 seeks to reach, 75 million have never used a contraceptive method (never-users) and 45 million have used a method in the past but have discontinued (discontinuers)., DMPA-SC has been shown through introduction experiences, such as the ones described in this issue, to be attractive to never-users. Like past studies, the Stout article was able to show that many new acceptors of voluntary family planning (i.e., never-users) have shown a preference for DMPA-SC. New acceptors often include younger clients, and younger clients may prefer DMPA-SC if it is available closer to their homes and because the needle is smaller than the intramuscular needle, although proximity and needle size are traits that many users find attractive. Previous studies have also established the acceptability of DMPA-SC, and many clients prefer it to other methods., One reason that clients are attracted to DMPA-SC is the cost and time savings that it offers. In community-based distribution settings, a woman wouldn't need to travel to a clinic since it is offered in her community. In self-injection settings, clients are often given 2 to 3 doses, reducing the number of trips they would need for resupply. DMPA-SC may also ameliorate the high contraceptive discontinuation rates that are typical of injectables. The typical discontinuation rate at 12 months for DMPA-IM is 40% to 50%, but studies have found that DMPA-SC self-injectors have a more than 50% increase in continuation through 12 months compared with a provider-administered injection.– Program data demonstrate that the process of introducing DMPA-SC into the method mix can increase voluntary uptake of contraceptive methods overall, not just of DMPA-SC. This is likely happening because when programs are introducing DMPA-SC they are taking the opportunity to retrain providers on all voluntary family planning methods and reinforcing the importance of voluntarism and informed choice. Introducing DMPA-SC into the method mix can increase voluntary uptake of contraceptive methods overall, not just of DMPA-SC.

ADVANCING ACCESS AND QUALITY

DMPA-SC can be programmed in a health system through a variety of delivery channels. By introducing the product at different levels and types of health facilities, in pharmacies and drug shops, and through community health workers, clients have more voluntary contraceptive options. In most parts of the world, community-based family planning programs and the private sector are important segments of the market., DMPA-SC is an ideal product for these sectors, but it requires an enabling environment for success. The articles in GHSP highlight the importance of task sharing. This product has been shown to be especially acceptable and in demand at the community level and through pharmacies. Task sharing can increase contraceptive access by expanding the range of methods that community health workers, lay health workers, and pharmacists can offer. Programs have faced common challenges that include ensuring high-quality training and adequate supportive supervision. Misunderstandings and inconsistencies, even among experienced providers, may persist even after training. Additional coaching at both the facility and community levels can mitigate this weakness. Providers often need additional time and support to become comfortable counseling on new methods.

PROGRAMMING TAKEAWAYS FOR SUCCESSFUL INTRODUCTION AND SCALE UP OF DMPA-SC

The Stout article describes a variety of different introduction approaches, illustrating the many options a country may consider. Globally, countries tend to co-position DMPA-SC alongside DMPA-IM, transition from IM to SC, or roll out targeted introduction by piloting different approaches. There is no “right” introduction approach; country-level decisions around programming and procurement of contraceptive methods are complex, involve multiple stakeholders, and require thoughtful planning. However the intended outcome should be that more women have voluntary access to this method if it meets their needs. The Box summarizes some of the conditions necessary for successful introduction, many drawn from the Stout and Georges articles. Policy Encourage strong Ministry of Health leadership. Promote task sharing: Countries can achieve high impact without including task sharing, but policies that allow for community health worker or pharmacist administration and/or self-injection maximize its potential. Service Delivery Use a rapid, cascade approach to provider training. Counsel on all voluntary family planning methods, including those available through referral while ensuring comprehensible information is provided on the method chosen. Counsel on the method's characteristics including bleeding changes as well as the need for simultaneous use of condoms for dual protection to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Offer the method through community channels, mobile outreach, and the private sector, supported by extensive demand-generation activities. Integration Integrate with maternal and child health and other health and non-health services. Quickly make DMPA-SC a normal part of commodity planning to increase commodity security and leverage existing distribution systems. Monitoring and Evaluation Disaggregate health information system data by injectable type (IM vs. SC) and collect data more frequently than semiannually. Disaggregate users by age to better understand user dynamics, and by prior contraceptive use to track new users. Share data openly, especially between the public and private sectors.

PROGRAMMING UNKNOWNS AND WORDS OF CAUTION AROUND HIV

There is evidence of a possible increased risk of acquiring HIV among progestin-only injectable users. Uncertainty exists about whether this is due to methodological issues with the evidence or to a real biological effect. Currently there are no epidemiological data available on possible association between DMPA-SC specifically and risk of acquiring HIV. On March 2, 2017, the World Health Organization, in its Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, changed use of DMPA injectable products among women at high risk of HIV acquisition from category 1 to category 2. This means that for women at high risk of HIV, the advantages of using DMPA products generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risk. Women should not be denied progestin-only injectables because of concerns about the possible increased risk of HIV. Rather, women considering progestin-only injectables should be advised about these concerns, about the uncertainty over whether there is a causal relationship, and about how to minimize their risk of acquiring HIV, including correct and consistent use of condoms, antiretroviral therapy initiation for partners living with HIV where appropriate, and pre-exposure prophylaxis where available. A wide range of voluntary family planning methods must be available, and when introducing a new method such as DMPA-SC, consideration should be given to retraining providers on clinical and counseling skills for all contraceptive methods and HIV risks., Given the inconclusive data, the question of whether DMPA increases women's risk of HIV is a critical public health issue requiring the strongest evidence possible. The ongoing Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) study is designed to fill this gap and provide robust evidence on the relative risks (HIV acquisition) and benefits (pregnancy prevention) between 3 effective contraceptive methods (DMPA-IM; levonorgestrel implant; copper intrauterine device). It is important to note that the study does not include DMPA-SC, but the results may affect the introduction and rollout of DMPA-SC.

ACCESSIBILITY OVER THE LONG TERM

Countries and implementers understandably want long-term access to affordable DMPA-SC before initiating a program at scale. For the DMPA-SC product marketed under the brand name Sayana Press and manufactured by Pfizer, the current price is $0.85 per dose for the next 6 years in the 69 FP2020 countries. Those countries can currently procure DMPA-IM for $0.88 per dose, or less. A partnership of global donors and other stakeholders is committed to ensuring long-term sustainability and access to an affordable DMPA-SC product. These organizations are working toward ensuring a healthy market for DMPA-SC supply, including supplier diversity, sufficient demand, and increasingly affordable pricing for DMPA-SC in FP2020 countries. Another requirement for long-term accessibility is supply chain security. Supply chain systems should be strengthened to mitigate negative outcomes (stock-outs occurred in half of the country experiences described in this issue). The product itself enables simplified logistics because of its all-in-one packaging. This translates into easier transportation and storage due to reduced weight and volume, and there is less waste to dispose. To strengthen commodity security, the Stout article offers the Senegal experience where stock-outs were negligible due in part to the Informed Push Model. DMPA-SC enables simplified logistics because of its all-in-one packaging.

CONCLUSION

Decades of research and development led to the approval of DMPA-SC approximately 14 years ago. This product is now coming of age. Countries are adding it to their basket of voluntary contraceptive methods so more women will have access to a new choice. As more women of reproductive age learn about healthy timing and spacing of pregnancies, they are well served by the affordable availability of better and more contraceptive options to enable them to achieve their desired family size. DMPA-SC is one more option to help them do it.
  11 in total

1.  Contribution of Contraceptive Discontinuation to Unintended Births in 36 Developing Countries.

Authors:  Anrudh K Jain; William Winfrey
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2017-04-11

2.  Observational study of the acceptability of Sayana® Press among intramuscular DMPA users in Uganda and Senegal.

Authors:  Holly M Burke; Monique P Mueller; Brian Perry; Catherine Packer; Leonard Bufumbo; Daouda Mbengue; Ibrahima Mall; Bocar Mamadou Daff; Anthony K Mbonye
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Acceptability and discontinuation of Depo-Provera, IUCD and combined pill in Kenya.

Authors:  C Sekadde-Kigondu; E G Mwathe; J K Ruminjo; D Nichols; K Katz; K Jessencky; J Liku
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  1996-12

4.  Preference for Sayana® Press versus intramuscular Depo-Provera among HIV-positive women in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Gertrude F Nakigozi; Hadijja Nakawooya; George Mondo; Fredrick Makumbi; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Effect of self-administration versus provider-administered injection of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on continuation rates in Malawi: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Holly M Burke; Mario Chen; Mercy Buluzi; Rachael Fuchs; Silver Wevill; Lalitha Venkatasubramanian; Leila Dal Santo; Bagrey Ngwira
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 26.763

6.  Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need.

Authors:  Anrudh K Jain; Francis Obare; Saumya RamaRao; Ian Askew
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-09

7.  Use of modern contraception increases when more methods become available: analysis of evidence from 1982-2009.

Authors:  John Ross; John Stover
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2013-07-26

8.  Rationale and design of a multi-center, open-label, randomised clinical trial comparing HIV incidence and contraceptive benefits in women using three commonly-used contraceptive methods (the ECHO study).

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Charles S Morrison; Jared M Baeten; Tsungai Chipato; Deborah Donnell; Peter Gichangi; Nelly Mugo; Kavita Nanda; Helen Rees; Petrus Steyn; Douglas Taylor
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2018-03-13

9.  Rapid Uptake of the Subcutaneous Injectable in Burkina Faso: Evidence From PMA2020 Cross-Sectional Surveys.

Authors:  Guiella Georges; Turke Shani; Coulibaly Hamadou; Scott Radloff; Choi Yoonjoung
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 10.  An updated systematic review of epidemiological evidence on hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition in women.

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Kathryn M Curtis; Philip C Hannaford; Sharon J Phillips; Tsungai Chipato; James N Kiarie; Daniel J Westreich; Petrus S Steyn
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 4.177

View more
  7 in total

1.  Trends in subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) use in Burkina Faso, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda.

Authors:  Philip Anglewicz; Pierre Akilimali; Georges Guiella; Patrick Kayembe; Simon P S Kibira; Fredrick Makumbi; Amy Tsui; Scott Radloff
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019-11-09

2.  Injectable Depot Medroxy Progesterone Acetate: A Safe Contraceptive Choice in Public Health System of India.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Suraj Chawla; Pawan K Goel
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2020-11-26

3.  Characteristics associated with use of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) in Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Uganda.

Authors:  Philip Anglewicz; Elizabeth Larson; Pierre Akilimali; Georges Guiella; Patrick Kayembe; Simon P S Kibira; Fredrick Makumbi; Scott Radloff
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 4.  Strategies for vaccine-product innovation: Creating an enabling environment for product development to uptake in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Birgitte Giersing; Natasha Shah; Debra Kristensen; Jean-Pierre Amorij; Anna-Lea Kahn; Kristoffer Gandrup-Marino; Courtney Jarrahian; Darin Zehrung; Marion Menozzi-Arnaud
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Resilient and Accelerated Scale-Up of Subcutaneously Administered Depot-Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Nigeria (RASuDiN): A Mid-Line Study in COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Kehinde Osinowo; Fintirimam Sambo-Donga; Oluwaseun Ojomo; Segun Emmanuel Ibitoye; Philip Oluwayemi; Morounfola Okunfulure; Oladapo Alabi Ladipo; Michael Ekholuenetale
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2021-12-02

6.  Commodity security frameworks for health planning.

Authors:  Ebenezer Kwabena Tetteh
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  DMPA-SC stock: Cross-site trends by facility type.

Authors:  Sophia Magalona; Shannon N Wood; Frederick Makumbi; Funmilola M OlaOlorun; Elizabeth Omoluabi; Akilimali Z Pierre; Georges Guiella; Jane Cover; Philip Anglewicz
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2022-04-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.