Literature DB >> 29602342

Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.

Tarek Elshebiny1, Juan Martin Palomo1, Sebastian Baumgaertel2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cortical bone thickness, bone width, insertion depth, and proximity to nerves are important factors when planning and placing orthodontic miniscrews. The objective of this study was to anatomically assess the mandibular buccal shelf in a white patient population as the insertion site for orthodontic miniscrews by investigating these 4 variables.
METHODS: Measurements were made on cone-beam computed tomography scans of 30 white patients (18 girls, 12 boys; mean age, 14.5 ± 2 years). All measurements were taken adjacent to the distobuccal cusp of the first molar, and the mesiobuccal and distobuccal cusps of the second molar. Additionally, bone depth was measured at 2 height levels, 4 and 8 mm from the cementoenamel junction. Stereolithographic models of patients were superimposed on the cone-beam computed tomography volumes to virtually create an outline of the soft tissue on the cone-beam computed tomography image to allow identification of the purchase point height (mucogingival junction). The inferior alveolar nerve was digitally traced. Miniscrews (1.6 × 10 mm) were virtually placed at the buccal shelf, and their insertion depths and relationships to the nerve were assessed. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Insertion sites and measurement levels had significant impacts on both cortical bone thickness and bone width. Cortical bone thickness was typically greatest at the distobuccal cusp of the second molar. Bone width was also greatest at the distobuccal cusp of the second molar 8 mm from the cementoenamel junction. The greatest insertion depth was found again at the distobuccal cusp to the second molar, whereas the miniscrews had the greatest proximity to the nerve at this site also.
CONCLUSIONS: The distobuccal cusp level of the mandibular second molar is the most appropriate site for miniscrew insertion at the buccal shelf in white patients.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29602342     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews after repeated insertion cycles.

Authors:  Felipe Nenen; Nicolás Garnica; Víctor Rojas; Rodrigo Oyonarte
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Quantitative Assessment of Posterior Maxillary Arch for Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Solmaz Valizadeh; A Hamid Zafarmand; Sara Hassan Yazdi; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Mandibular Anterior Region for Application of Orthodontic Mini-Screws.

Authors:  Majid Shalchi; Zahra Dalili Kajan; Mohammad Shabani; Negar Khosravifard; Samar Khabbaz; Farnoosh Khaksari
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-06

4.  Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT.

Authors:  Haibo Liu; Xiaoxue Wu; Jun Tan; Xiao Li
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Natalia Escobar-Correa; Maria Antonia Ramírez-Bustamante; Luis Alejandro Sánchez-Uribe; Juan Carlos Upegui-Zea; Patricia Vergara-Villarreal; Diana Milena Ramírez-Ossa
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Murilo Matias; Carlos Flores-Mir; Márcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Bruno da Silva Vieira; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Daniela Calabrese Nunes; Marcos Cezar Ferreira; Weber Ursi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Management of Class III Malocclusion and Maxillary Transverse Deficiency with Microimplant-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE): A Case Report.

Authors:  Sin-Ni Shih; Kwok-Hing Ho; Chih-Wei Wang; Kai-Long Wang; Shun-Chu Hsieh; Heng-Ming Chang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.948

8.  Biomechanics of extra-alveolar mini-implants.

Authors:  Marcio R Almeida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.