Literature DB >> 29602110

Degradation and dispersion limit environmental DNA detection of rare amphibians in wetlands: Increasing efficacy of sampling designs.

Caren S Goldberg1, Katherine M Strickler2, Alexander K Fremier2.   

Abstract

The detection of rare macroorganisms using environmental DNA (eDNA) is a powerful new method for conservation and management; the efficacy of this method is affected by physiological, ecological, and hydrological processes. Understanding the processes limiting eDNA detection and accounting for those factors with optimized sampling designs is critical for realizing the potential of this tool. Amphibians are a focus of conservation programs globally and are often difficult to detect, presenting a challenge for effective action. To increase the ability of eDNA techniques to inform conservation and management programs, we investigated the eDNA detection of amphibians compared with field surveys for six species across a gradient of environmental factors expected to affect eDNA detection in three different systems: perennial wetlands, intermittent wetlands, and acidic intermittent wetlands. We applied a baseline sampling design in each wetland and used an occupancy modeling approach to evaluate evidence for processes limiting detection for each species given the presence of the target species. Evidence weights indicated that limiting processes varied across systems and included those associated with increased degradation (pH<5, temperature>25°C) and limited dispersion (wetland area>1200m2, sample volume<200mL). Optimized sampling protocols based on model results included an increased number of sampling locations in large and highly degradative (acidic) wetlands and increased filter pore size in high-particulate systems. These improved designs compensated for the previously limiting factors and yielded average detection rates of 0.62-0.86 per water sample. Degradation and dispersion processes appear to strongly influence the detection of amphibians in wetlands. Optimized, adaptive sampling designs can greatly increase the efficacy of eDNA monitoring approaches.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Amphibian; Degradation; Detection; Dispersion; Environmental DNA; Wetland

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29602110     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  14 in total

1.  Environmental DNA for improved detection and environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Mita E Sengupta; Micaela Hellström; Henry C Kariuki; Annette Olsen; Philip F Thomsen; Helena Mejer; Eske Willerslev; Mariam T Mwanje; Henry Madsen; Thomas K Kristensen; Anna-Sofie Stensgaard; Birgitte J Vennervald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).

Authors:  Ivan P Y Lam; Yik-Hei Sung; Jonathan J Fong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental DNA analysis confirms extant populations of the cryptic Irwin's turtle within its historical range.

Authors:  Cecilia Villacorta-Rath; Thomas Espinoza; Bernie Cockayne; Jason Schaffer; Damien Burrows
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 5.  Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Maciej Pabijan; Gemma Palomar; Bernardo Antunes; Weronika Antoł; Piotr Zieliński; Wiesław Babik
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Pooled samples and eDNA-based detection can facilitate the "clean trade" of aquatic animals.

Authors:  Jesse L Brunner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Concurrent visual encounter sampling validates eDNA selectivity and sensitivity for the endangered wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta).

Authors:  Thomas S Akre; Lillian D Parker; Ellery Ruther; Jesus E Maldonado; Lorien Lemmon; Nancy Rotzel McInerney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An optimised eDNA protocol for detecting fish in lentic and lotic freshwaters using a small water volume.

Authors:  Teja Petra Muha; Chloe Victoria Robinson; Carlos Garcia de Leaniz; Sofia Consuegra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Odds, challenges and new approaches in the control of helminthiasis, an Asian study.

Authors:  Marcello Otake Sato; Poom Adsakwattana; Ian Kendrich C Fontanilla; Jun Kobayashi; Megumi Sato; Tiengkhan Pongvongsa; Raffy Jay C Fornillos; Jitra Waikagul
Journal:  Parasite Epidemiol Control       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  The effects of spatial and temporal replicate sampling on eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Kevin K Beentjes; Arjen G C L Speksnijder; Menno Schilthuizen; Marten Hoogeveen; Berry B van der Hoorn
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.