Literature DB >> 29601901

3D-printing porosity: A new approach to creating elevated porosity materials and structures.

A E Jakus1, N R Geisendorfer2, P L Lewis3, R N Shah4.   

Abstract

We introduce a new process that enables the ability to 3D-print high porosity materials and structures by combining the newly introduced 3D-Painting process with traditional salt-leaching. The synthesis and resulting properties of three 3D-printable inks comprised of varying volume ratios (25:75, 50:50, 70:30) of CuSO4 salt and polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA), as well as their as-printed and salt-leached counterparts, are discussed. The resulting materials are comprised entirely of PLGA (F-PLGA), but exhibit porosities proportional to the original CuSO4 content. The three distinct F-PLGA materials exhibit average porosities of 66.6-94.4%, elastic moduli of 112.6-2.7 MPa, and absorbency of 195.7-742.2%. Studies with adult human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) demonstrated that elevated porosity substantially promotes cell adhesion, viability, and proliferation. F-PLGA can also act as carriers for weak, naturally or synthetically-derived hydrogels. Finally, we show that this process can be extended to other materials including graphene, metals, and ceramics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Porosity plays an essential role in the performance and function of biomaterials, tissue engineering, and clinical medicine. For the same material chemistry, the level of porosity can dictate if it is cell, tissue, or organ friendly; with low porosity materials being far less favorable than high porosity materials. Despite its importance, it has been difficult to create three-dimensionally printed structures that are comprised of materials that have extremely high levels of internal porosity yet are surgically friendly (able to handle and utilize during surgical operations). In this work, we extend a new materials-centric approach to 3D-printing, 3D-Painting, to 3D-printing structures made almost entirely out of water-soluble salt. The structures are then washed in a specific way that not only extracts the salt but causes the structures to increase in size. With the salt removed, the resulting medical polymer structures are almost entirely porous and contain very little solid material, but the maintain their 3D-printed form and are highly compatible with adult human stem cells, are mechanically robust enough to use in surgical manipulations, and can be filled with and act as carriers for biologically active liquids and gels. We can also extend this process to three-dimensionally printing other porous materials, such as graphene, metals, and even ceramics.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; Alloys; Ceramics; Foams; Metals; Porosity; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29601901     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  9 in total

1.  3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Adam E Jakus; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Chawon Yun; Gurmit Singh; Andrew D Schneider; Karina M Katchko; Carmen Soriano; Michael Newton; Tristan Maerz; Xin Li; Kevin Baker; Wellington K Hsu; Ramille N Shah; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Medical Applications of Porous Biomaterials: Features of Porosity and Tissue-Specific Implications for Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Jamie L Hernandez; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 11.092

3.  Gaseous sulfur trioxide induced controllable sulfonation promoting biomineralization and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone implants.

Authors:  Teng Wan; Zixue Jiao; Min Guo; Zongliang Wang; Yizao Wan; Kaili Lin; Qinyi Liu; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-07-04

4.  On the damage tolerance of 3-D printed Mg-Ti interpenetrating-phase composites with bioinspired architectures.

Authors:  Mingyang Zhang; Ning Zhao; Qin Yu; Zengqian Liu; Ruitao Qu; Jian Zhang; Shujun Li; Dechun Ren; Filippo Berto; Zhefeng Zhang; Robert O Ritchie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  Building Organs Using Tissue-Specific Microenvironments: Perspectives from a Bioprosthetic Ovary.

Authors:  Nathaniel F C Henning; Adam E Jakus; Monica M Laronda
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 21.942

Review 6.  Decellularization Strategies for Regenerating Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Tissues.

Authors:  Yong How Tan; Haylie R Helms; Karina H Nakayama
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Inclusion of a 3D-printed Hyperelastic Bone mesh improves mechanical and osteogenic performance of a mineralized collagen scaffold.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Andrey V Nosatov; Kiran Subedi; Ramille Shah; Adam Jakus; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaqing Zhou; Gan Zhou; Radoslaw Junka; Ningxiao Chang; Aneela Anwar; Haoyu Wang; Xiaojun Yu
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 5.268

9.  Influence of Geometry and Architecture on the In Vivo Success of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell Hallman; J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Soyeon Jeong; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Adam Jakus; Richard Pahapill; Chawon Yun; Ramille Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.