Literature DB >> 29600293

USP8 Mutations in Pituitary Cushing Adenomas-Targeted Analysis by Next-Generation Sequencing.

Cora Ballmann1, Anne Thiel1, Hannah E Korah1, Anna-Carinna Reis2, Wolfgang Saeger3, Stefanie Stepanow4, Karl Köhrer4, Guido Reifenberger5,6, Christiane B Knobbe-Thomsen5, Ulrich J Knappe7, Ute I Scholl1,8.   

Abstract

Gain-of-function somatic mutations in the ubiquitin specific protease 8 (USP8) gene have recently been reported as a cause of pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease. Molecular diagnostic testing of tumor tissue may aid in the diagnosis of specimens obtained through therapeutic transsphenoidal surgery; however, for small tumors, availability of fresh tissue is limited, and contamination with normal tissue is frequent. We performed molecular testing of DNA isolated from single formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections of 42 pituitary adenomas from patients with Cushing disease (27 female patients and 15 male patients; mean age at surgery, 42.5 years; mean tumor size, 12.2 mm). By Sanger sequencing, we identified previously reported USP8 missense mutations in six tumors. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed known or previously undescribed missense mutations in three additional tumors (two with two different mutations each), with mutant allele frequencies as low as 3%. Of the nine tumors with USP8 mutations (mutation frequency, 21.4%), seven were from female patients (mutation frequency, 25.9%), and two were from male patients (mutation frequency, 13.3%). Mutant tumors were on average 11.4 mm in size, and patients with mutations were on average 43.9 years of age. The overall USP8 mutation frequency in our cohort was lower than in previously described cohorts, and we did not observe USP8 deletions that were frequent in other cohorts. We demonstrate that testing for USP8 variants can be performed from small amounts of FFPE tissue. NGS showed higher sensitivity for USP8 mutation detection than did Sanger sequencing. Assessment for USP8 mutations may complement histopathological diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FFPE; molecular diagnostic testing; ubiquitin specific protease

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600293      PMCID: PMC5838826          DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocr Soc        ISSN: 2472-1972


Corticotropin (ACTH) is generated by cleavage of proopiomelanocortin in the anterior part of the pituitary gland in response to the release of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone. ACTH then increases cortisol secretion from the adrenal zona fasciculata. Excess production of ACTH by pituitary corticotroph adenomas causes Cushing disease, the most common form of endogenous Cushing syndrome [1, 2], characterized by the signs and symptoms of hypercortisolism, such as moon face, central obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and fragile skin. Over the past few years, molecular genetic studies have provided novel insight into the pathophysiology of these tumors. Whereas germline variants in tumor syndromes (including McCune-Albright syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia, Carney complex, and tuberous sclerosis) and mutations in classic proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are found in a very small fraction of pituitary adenomas [3, 4], somatic mutations in the USP8 gene, encoding the ubiquitin specific protease 8, were recently found to account for a substantial fraction of tumors. Two groups performed exome and Sanger sequencing of corticotroph adenomas and independently reported somatic mutations in the USP8 gene as a cause of 35% (6 of 17) and 63% (75 of 120), respectively, of pituitary corticotroph adenomas [5, 6]. These findings were confirmed by targeted sequencing in several cohorts, with 35% (21 of 60) [7], 36% (48 of 134) [8], 17% (5 of 30) [9], and 31% (13 of 42) [10] USP8 mutation frequencies. Mutations were more common in female (43% to 68% mutation frequency) than in male (0% to 36% mutation frequency) patients [5-8], which is unexplained. Initially, age at peak incidence for female patients was suggested to range from 30 to 50 years [11], but a more recent study has shown similar prevalence among pediatric cases [10]. Apart from this association with sex, clinical and biochemical correlates (such as tumor size and hormonal parameters) of patients with somatic USP8 mutations have been conflicting [10]. The deubiquitinase activity of USP8 prevents the degradation of ubiquitinylated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the lysosome [12]. Because EGFR signaling increases POMC transcription and secretion of ACTH [5], increased USP8 activity causes elevated ACTH production. Importantly, USP8 activity is regulated by the binding of 14-3-3 proteins [13], which may prevent proteolytic cleavage and activation. Recurrent gain-of-function mutations in USP8 cluster at the 14-3-3 binding site and impair the binding of 14-3-3 proteins. The resulting increased proteolytic cleavage of USP8 produces USP8 fragments with higher deubiquitinase activity [5]. This is thought to increase EGFR stability and EGFR-mediated ACTH secretion. Prior studies have typically used fresh-frozen adenoma tissue for DNA extraction and sequencing [6-9]. However, fresh-frozen tissue is often not available, in particular for small tumors, for which the entire specimen is formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) for diagnostic purposes [7]. Thus, such cohorts may be biased toward larger specimens. Here we investigate a cohort of 42 corticotroph adenomas from two centers in Germany and perform molecular genetic analysis from single sections of FFPE tissue.

1. Material and Methods

A. Patients and Clinical Data

We included 42 specimens from two cohorts of patients. Thirty-eight patients had undergone surgery for Cushing disease at the Johannes Wesling Hospital, Minden, Germany, between 2008 and 2014 (Table 1; these patients are labeled as HYP001 to HYP047, and missing numbers reflect duplicate samples or those for which no tumor tissue was identified on the slide), and four patients (labeled HYP050 to HYP055) were operated at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany, between 2009 and 2014 (Table 1). Düsseldorf cases were selected in pathology on the basis of ACTH positivity, and clinical presentation was reviewed. Tumors with insufficient tumor tissue were excluded after assessment by an experienced neuropathologist.
Table 1.

Clinical Data and Experimental Results in the Investigated Corticotroph Adenoma Patient Cohort

HYP No.SexAge (y)Size (mm)Repli-GSanger ResultNGS ResultEGFR IHC
Cushing disease
 002F155YesWTp.P720R
p.S716Y
 005F145YesWTp.S716F
p.S718P
 006F3613Yesp.S718PNA
 019M503YesWTp.P720R
 024aF5113Yesp.P720QNA
 026F466Yesp.P720RNA
 029F3611Yesp.P720Rp.P720R
 039F6618Yesp.P720QNA
 051M8129Nop.P720RNA
 001M348YesWTWT
 003bM2150YesWTWT(+)
 004F48Below detectionYesWTWT
 007F254YesWTWT
 009F6120YesWTWT
 011F426YesWTWT
 013F45Below detectionYesWTWT
 015F563 (ultrasonography)YesWTWT
 016F3014YesWTWT(+)
 017bF43NAYesWTWT
 018F653YesWTWT
 020F528YesWTWT
 021F246YesWTWT
 022F523 (surgery)YesWTWT
 023M5728YesWTWT
 025F4226YesWTWT
 027M5230YesWTWT
 028cF369YesWTWT
 030bM36NAYesWTWT
 032F548YesWTWT
 033M493YesWTWT
 036dF355YesWTWT
 037M203YesWTWT
 038M354YesWTWT
 041M404YesWTWT
 043F293YesWTWT
 044M389 (ultrasonography)YesWTWT
 045F47Below detectionYesWTWT
 046F477YesWTWT
 047aM4424YesWTWT
 050F3516NoWTWT
 053M328NoWTWT
 055aM6436NoWTWT
Silent corticotroph adenomasNo
 056M5913NoWTWT
 063M5715NoWTWT

Abbreviations: F, female; IHC, immunohistochemistry; M, male; Repli-G, whole-genome amplification of DNA; NA, not available; −, no positivity by immunohistochemistry; (+), possible very weak positivity by immunohistochemistry.

Atypical adenoma.

Studied tissue from recurrence, age and tumor size at first surgery are given.

Crooke cell adenoma.

Ectopic, sinus cavernosus (patient 2 in Knappe et al. [25]).

Clinical Data and Experimental Results in the Investigated Corticotroph Adenoma Patient Cohort Abbreviations: F, female; IHC, immunohistochemistry; M, male; Repli-G, whole-genome amplification of DNA; NA, not available; −, no positivity by immunohistochemistry; (+), possible very weak positivity by immunohistochemistry. Atypical adenoma. Studied tissue from recurrence, age and tumor size at first surgery are given. Crooke cell adenoma. Ectopic, sinus cavernosus (patient 2 in Knappe et al. [25]). Cushing disease was diagnosed according to clinical signs and/or typical laboratory parameters [8]. Tumor size was determined on cross-sectional imaging. For tumors that were undetectable by cross-sectional imaging, size was determined by intraoperative ultrasonography or assessment during surgery (Table 1). The largest diameter was recorded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed in most patients. Pathologic specimens were independently evaluated by at least two experienced neuropathologists, and pituitary ACTH cell adenoma was diagnosed in each instance. Two silent corticotroph adenomas from Düssseldorf (HYP056 and HYP063) were diagnosed on the basis of positive immunoreactivity for ACTH without clinical or biochemical evidence of hypercortisolism. Molecular and immunohistochemical analyses of FFPE tissue specimens were performed with approval of the institutional review board of the Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (study number 4938).

B. DNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification, and Sanger Sequencing

One fresh 10-µm-thick section of FFPE tumor tissue per sample mounted on a glass slide was scraped off and used for DNA isolation. In most cases, whole genome amplification was performed with the REPLI-g FFPE kit (Qiagen) from FFPE tissue directly, without prior DNA purification, according to the manufacturer's instructions. For large specimens, the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen) was used for DNA extraction. Routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of USP8 exon 14 was performed by using primers USP8_F and _R (Table 2) and the KAPA2G Fast Hot Start PCR kit (KapaBiosystems) following a step-down protocol. PCR products were verified by gel electrophoresis. For select cases, products were excised, and DNA was extracted by using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen). PCR purification and direct bidirectional Sanger sequencing were performed at the Genewiz Sequencing Service facility (Takeley, United Kingdom). Results were analyzed with Sequencher version 4.7 software (Genecodes).
Table 2.

Primer Sequences

PrimerSequence 5′ > 3′Product Size (bp)
USP8_FAGCCACAGATTCCTGCTGAG124
USP8_RACTGTTGGAGTTACTGTTGGCT
USP8big_FaAAAGCCAAGCCACAGATTCC234
USP8big_RaTCCCTGACACTAACATACTGACA
USP8bigadap_FaTCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGAAAGCCAAGCCACAGATTCC301
USP8bigadap_RaGTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGTCCCTGACACTAACATACTGACA

Used for NGS.

Primer Sequences Used for NGS.

C. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing and Data Analysis

Samples were prepared for ultradeep sequencing of USP8 exon 14 on the MiSeq sequencer (Illumina) according to the manufacturer's protocols. For barcoding of samples, the Nextera Index kit (Illumina) was used. The MiSeq run was performed with the MiSeq Reagent Nano kit version 2 for 300 cycles (Illumina), which comprises 150-bp paired-end reads. Fastq files were loaded as pairs in the CLC Genomic Workbench version 9.5.1 (Qiagen) and analyzed by merging the overlapping pairs, mapping them to the USP8 reference sequence, and applying the low-frequency variant detection tool. For a second evaluation, the data were reanalyzed according to the PCR Amplicon workflow guide of the Illumina MiSeq Reporter Software. A list of variants was generated with VariantCaller and sample sheet settings for detecting somatic variants. Called single nucleotide polymorphisms were assessed with the Integrative Genomics Viewer version 2.3.88 (Broad Institute). Protein-changing variants with minor allele frequency >2% within the previously described hotspot area (amino acids 713 to 735 in NP_005145.3) [11] were extracted.

D. Immunohistochemistry

Routine EGFR immunostaining was performed at the Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen [Zytomed clone 2.1E1, mouse monoclonal, 1:1000, Research Resource Identifier (RRID): AB_2721106] for samples from Minden or at the Department of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (pronase antigen retrieval, #M7239, DAKO, 1:300, RRID: AB_2721108) for samples from Düsseldorf. Antibody reactivity was confirmed by the use of a positive control. Images were recorded on a CTR500 microscope with a DFC 380 camera (both Leica).

E. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by using the Prism 7 program (GraphPad). Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean, unless otherwise indicated. Normality was assessed by the D’Agostino and Pearson normality test. Comparisons between two groups were performed by using the indicated statistical tests, and P values < 0.05 were considered to indicate significant differences.

2. Results

A. Characterization of the Patient Cohort

Among the 42 patients with Cushing disease, 15 were male and 27 were female. Tumors were typically excised by transnasal transsphenoidal surgery; patient 3 underwent right fronto-orbital craniotomy. Pathologic evaluation revealed pituitary adenomas in all cases. At the time of surgery, patients were age 42.5 ± 14.4 [mean ± standard deviation (SD); range, 14 to 81; median, 42.5] years. With the exception of two patients, all patients were adults (age >18 years). The tumor size was 12.2 ± 11.2 (mean ± SD; range, 3 to 50; median, 8) mm (tumors below detection are not included in analysis). Notably, 16 tumors were very small (≤5 mm, including the three that were undetectable by imaging); 26 tumors were microadenomas (<10 mm), and 14 were macroadenomas (≥10 mm). Data on tumor size at initial presentation were unavailable for two patients operated for recurrence. Clinical data are summarized in Table 1.

B. Sanger Sequencing Reveals USP8 Variants in 6 of 42 Cases

To determine the frequency of mutations in the USP8 gene, we initially extracted DNA from FFPE tissue and performed targeted PCR and direct Sanger sequencing of exon 14 of USP8, containing the previously described 14-3-3 binding site affected by gain-of-function variants [5]. We identified previously described variants in tumors of six patients (14.3% mutation frequency; three with p.P720R, one with p.S718P, two with p.P720Q variants) (Fig. 1; Table 3). All occurred in tumors >5 mm. In HYP029, only variant p.P720R and no wild-type (WT) sequence was detected, whereas all other variants appeared to be heterozygous.
Figure 1.

USP8 variants in corticotroph adenomas identified by Sanger sequencing. Sanger sequences of pituitary adenomas demonstrate USP8 variants in six tumors. Encoded protein sequences are shown in one-letter code, with mutant amino acids in red. The variant in HYP29 appears to be homozygous or hemizygous. Reverse sequence is shown as reverse complement. Fwd, forward; rev, reverse.

Table 3.

Identified USP8 Variants

rs No. or COSMIC No.Chromosomal PositionNucleotide ChangeAmino Acid Change
rs67260131115:50490450C>GP720R
rs67260130715:50490443C>TS718P
Identified in this study15:50490438C>AS716Y
COSM41690515:50490450C>AP720Q
rs75361546215:50490438C>TS716F

Chromosomal position refers to GRCh38.p7. Amino acid change refers to NP_005145.3.

Abbreviations: COSMIC number, catalog of somatic mutations in cancer database identifier, provided for variants without unique Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database identifier; Rs number, reference single-nucleotide polymorphism in Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database build 150.

USP8 variants in corticotroph adenomas identified by Sanger sequencing. Sanger sequences of pituitary adenomas demonstrate USP8 variants in six tumors. Encoded protein sequences are shown in one-letter code, with mutant amino acids in red. The variant in HYP29 appears to be homozygous or hemizygous. Reverse sequence is shown as reverse complement. Fwd, forward; rev, reverse. Identified USP8 Variants Chromosomal position refers to GRCh38.p7. Amino acid change refers to NP_005145.3. Abbreviations: COSMIC number, catalog of somatic mutations in cancer database identifier, provided for variants without unique Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database identifier; Rs number, reference single-nucleotide polymorphism in Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database build 150.

C. Next-Generation Sequencing of USP8 Reveals Three Additional Cases With USP8 Variants

Because the prevalence of USP8 mutations detected by Sanger sequencing in our cohort was lower than in previous reports [5–8, 10], we performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of USP8 exon 14 on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer in samples without mutations detected by Sanger sequencing and sample HYP029 (positive control) (Fig. 2). In line with results of Sanger sequencing, the p.P720R variant in HYP029 showed an allele frequency of 98.5%, suggesting loss of heterozygosity or biallelic mutation. Further analysis revealed three additional samples with previously described USP8 variants. HYP019 with the p.P720R variant showed a low variant allele frequency of 7.09%, which is below the Sanger sequencing detection threshold. Two other tumors carried two different USP8 variants each. HYP005 carried the p.S716F variant previously described in skin cutaneous melanoma (ICGC MU4520263) (17.55% mutant allele frequency) and the p.S718P variant (26.33% mutant allele frequency) on the same allele. HYP002 carried the known p.P720R variant (32.67%) and the p.S716Y variant (3.30%, not found in public databases) on distinct alleles [HYP002 sequencing data have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRR6448768 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP128409)] (Fig. 3; Table 3). The three tumors in which variants were detected only by NGS were all ≤5 mm in size. No variants were detected in the two silent corticotroph adenoma controls, as previously reported [8].
Figure 2.

USP8 variants in corticotroph adenomas identified by NGS. Shown are variant allele frequencies of four tumors with USP8 variants detected by NGS. Frequencies were determined in the CLC Workbench program. A 98.5% mutant allele frequency in HYP029 confirms homozygosity or hemizygosity of the variant. HYP002 and HYP005 show two USP8 variants each.

Figure 3.

NGS reads in tumors with two concurrent USP8 variants. Analysis of mutant reads using Integrative Genomics Viewer demonstrates two variants on independent alleles or independent tumor subpopulations for HYP002 and two variants on the same allele for HYP005.

USP8 variants in corticotroph adenomas identified by NGS. Shown are variant allele frequencies of four tumors with USP8 variants detected by NGS. Frequencies were determined in the CLC Workbench program. A 98.5% mutant allele frequency in HYP029 confirms homozygosity or hemizygosity of the variant. HYP002 and HYP005 show two USP8 variants each. NGS reads in tumors with two concurrent USP8 variants. Analysis of mutant reads using Integrative Genomics Viewer demonstrates two variants on independent alleles or independent tumor subpopulations for HYP002 and two variants on the same allele for HYP005. NGS analysis increased the number of tumors with somatic USP8 variants to nine and the total mutation frequency to 21.4%. Although female patients were overrepresented in the group with USP8 mutations (seven of nine mutant tumors were from female patients), there was no significant difference compared with the group without mutations (20 of 33 nonmutant tumors from female patients; P = 0.45, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test). The mutation frequency in female patients was 25.9%, and that in male patients was 13.3% (Fig. 4). There was no significant difference between mutant and WT tumors in terms of size [mutant tumors: 11.4 ± 8.2 (mean ± SD) mm; WT tumors: 12.1 ± 12.0 (mean ± SD) mm; P = 0.63 (two-tailed Mann-Whitney test)]. Similarly, patients with tumors bearing USP8 mutations did not significantly differ in age from those without such variants [mutant tumors: 43.9 ± 21.8 (mean ± SD) years; WT tumors: 42.1 ± 12.0 (mean ± SD) mm; P = 0.82 (unpaired two-tailed t test with Welch correction)]. One of the two pediatric patients (HYP005) carried two USP8 variants (Figs. 2 and 3).
Figure 4.

Clinical characteristics of individuals with USP8-mutant or WT tumors. Upper panels show sex distribution among mutant and WT tumors. Lower panel shows size and age in mutant and WT tumors (line, median; box, interquartile range; whiskers, 1.5x interquartile range). No significant differences were observed for either characteristic shown (see text for statistical analysis).

Clinical characteristics of individuals with USP8-mutant or WT tumors. Upper panels show sex distribution among mutant and WT tumors. Lower panel shows size and age in mutant and WT tumors (line, median; box, interquartile range; whiskers, 1.5x interquartile range). No significant differences were observed for either characteristic shown (see text for statistical analysis).

D. EGFR Expression Levels are Not Upregulated in USP8 Mutant Tumors

To assess EGFR expression levels in tumors, we performed immunohistochemistry with antibodies against EGFR. Interestingly, none of the mutation-positive corticotroph adenomas were EGFR-positive (Fig. 5); very weak EGFR positivity of connective tissue was occasionally observed.
Figure 5.

EGFR immunohistochemistry. HYP050 is shown as a representative EGFR-negative WT tumor. The positive control represents a glioblastoma. All mutant tumors stained negative for EGFR; representative pictures are shown. Some tumors showed very weak EGFR positivity of connective tissue, as demonstrated for HYP051. Scale bars, 100 µm.

EGFR immunohistochemistry. HYP050 is shown as a representative EGFR-negative WT tumor. The positive control represents a glioblastoma. All mutant tumors stained negative for EGFR; representative pictures are shown. Some tumors showed very weak EGFR positivity of connective tissue, as demonstrated for HYP051. Scale bars, 100 µm.

3. Discussion

Our analysis of a cohort of 42 ACTH-producing pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease demonstrates the utility of a targeted NGS approach in detecting USP8 variants, specifically in small tumors with a size of ≤5 mm. When such small tumors are resected, in particular, fragmented tumors from transsphenoidal surgery, the distinction between normal pituitary tissue and adenoma tissue can be histologically challenging on hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections; several histochemical and immunohistochemical stains are typically performed [14]. Obtaining fresh tissue for DNA extraction and Sanger sequencing is not advised when small tumors are excised. Even with use of FFPE tissue for DNA extraction, separating tumor from normal tissue for DNA extraction can be challenging. Under these circumstances, targeted NGS can reveal low-frequency variants due to contamination with normal tissue or due to tumor heterogeneity. We show that this analysis can be performed by using DNA extracted from a single 10-µm-thick section of FFPE tissue, enabling a molecular diagnosis after routine histology. Such an analysis may complement clinical assessment, histology, and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of pituitary adenomas causing Cushing disease. The USP8 mutation frequency in our cohort was lower than in most published cohorts. Only one smaller study (mostly on macroadenomas) reported a lower frequency [9], whereas most studies found USP8 mutations in about 35% of ACTH cell adenomas [5, 7, 8, 10], and a single study from Asia reported mutations in 62% of these tumors [6]. The higher frequency in the Asian cohort may be due to differences in patient ascertainment or to ethnic differences—mutations in the KCNJ5 potassium channel gene in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas are also more common in European women and more prevalent in most Asian cohorts [15, 16]. Many factors may explain the lower prevalence of USP8 mutations in our cohort. First, female patients were only about twofold overrepresented in our cohort (27 female and 15 male patients), whereas female patients were about three-to fivefold enriched compared with male patients in several published cohorts [6–8, 17]. The higher prevalence of mutations in female patients in these studies would therefore have contributed to a higher overall mutation prevalence. Whereas the mutation frequency in male patients was in a similar range as previously reported (although numbers were small) [8, 10], the mutation frequency in female patients was lower than previously reported (25% vs approximately 40%). The inclusion of a high number of very small tumors (38% of tumors were ≤5 mm in size) may have contributed to this divergence as well. We initially suspected that contamination with normal tissue may have led to a lower mutation detection rate in our cohort; however, mutation frequencies remained lower than in other cohorts even after NGS, which detected variants with allele frequencies as low as 3%. Surprisingly, we observed only missense mutations in our cohort, whereas one common deletion (p.S718del) accounted for >20% of mutations in other cohorts, with other rare deletions reported [6-8]. Manual assessment of Illumina reads in our cohort confirmed the absence of deletions. Of note, the p.S718del variant showed the highest deubiquitinase activity of all assessed variants in vitro [5]. Whether clinical correlations led to the exclusion of tumors with this variant from our cohort is unknown. Last, mutations that are present in only a fraction of the tumor can be missed when only limited tumor material is used for DNA extraction. We note that several pituitary adenomas, both in previously published cohorts [5, 6] and in our cohort, carried two USP8 variants in a single tumor. The finding of an apparently homozygous or hemizygous USP8 variant in HYP029 supports this notion and may be due to loss of the WT allele or mitotic recombination, although we cannot exclude an FFPE artifact. Of note, all previously described variants were heterozygous [5-8]. The finding of a second USP8 variant with lower allele frequency in HYP002 demonstrates that tumors with USP8 variants are not necessarily clonal; independent hits may contribute to tumor heterogeneity [18, 19]. Variants with low allele frequency in particular could represent FFPE or whole-genome amplification artifacts, although the low-frequency variants in HYP002 and HYP019 did not match the C>T pattern caused by cytosine deamination in FFPE tissue [20]. We did not perform functional studies to assess whether the previously unidentified variant (p.S716Y) causes increased USP8 activity. Further studies would be required to assess the pathogenicity of this variant. The percentage of EGFR-positive tumors was much lower in our cohort than in a published cohort, in which USP8 mutations were associated with higher EGFR expression [6]. Interestingly, this association did not replicate in another cohort [7]. Whereas USP8 variants increase EGFR signaling in cultured cells, such an effect has not been consistently shown in vivo, suggesting that the effect is small or temporary or that other factors [21] are involved in increased ACTH production and/or proliferation of USP8 mutation-positive tumors. The use of antibodies with different specificities or different staining protocols may in part account for inconsistent findings [17]; the antibodies used in our study are also used in clinical routine analysis, and a positive control was performed. A limitation of our study is the incomplete retrospective availability of endocrine workup for some of the cases. This prevents a more detailed analysis of hormonal characteristics within our cohort. Nonetheless, we can demonstrate the utility of NGS in the diagnosis of small corticotroph adenomas. Importantly, many Cushing adenomas in large surgical series are very small, sometimes below the threshold for magnetic resonance imaging detection [22]. Molecular diagnosis by NGS could be particularly suitable for such cases. This could be beneficial for patients with recurrence [23] if USP8 mutations can be associated with response to specific therapies, such as those blocking EGFR or activating the somatostatin receptor [7, 24]. The presence of such associations is supported by the finding that USP8 knockdown or EGFR inhibition attenuates ACTH secretion in primary USP8-mutated tumor cells [7]. In conclusion, we suggest that NGS has diagnostic potential for pituitary Cushing adenomas.
  25 in total

1.  An algorithmic approach to sellar region masses.

Authors:  B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; M B S Lopes; Richard A Prayson
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Clonal composition of pituitary adenomas in patients with Cushing's disease: determination by X-chromosome inactivation analysis.

Authors:  H M Schulte; E H Oldfield; B Allolio; D A Katz; R A Berkman; I U Ali
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  EGFR as a therapeutic target for human, canine, and mouse ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Hidenori Fukuoka; Odelia Cooper; Anat Ben-Shlomo; Adam Mamelak; Song-Guang Ren; Dave Bruyette; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Sequence artifacts in DNA from formalin-fixed tissues: causes and strategies for minimization.

Authors:  Hongdo Do; Alexander Dobrovic
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Genetics of Cushing's disease: an update.

Authors:  L G Perez-Rivas; M Reincke
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Decoding the genetic basis of Cushing's disease: USP8 in the spotlight.

Authors:  Marily Theodoropoulou; Martin Reincke; Martin Fassnacht; Masayuki Komada
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.664

7.  K+ channel mutations in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas and hereditary hypertension.

Authors:  Murim Choi; Ute I Scholl; Peng Yue; Peyman Björklund; Bixiao Zhao; Carol Nelson-Williams; Weizhen Ji; Yoonsang Cho; Aniruddh Patel; Clara J Men; Elias Lolis; Max V Wisgerhof; David S Geller; Shrikant Mane; Per Hellman; Gunnar Westin; Göran Åkerström; Wenhui Wang; Tobias Carling; Richard P Lifton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  The New Molecular Landscape of Cushing's Disease.

Authors:  Silviu Sbiera; Timo Deutschbein; Isabel Weigand; Martin Reincke; Martin Fassnacht; Bruno Allolio
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 12.015

9.  Recurrent gain-of-function USP8 mutations in Cushing's disease.

Authors:  Zeng-Yi Ma; Zhi-Jian Song; Jian-Hua Chen; Yong-Fei Wang; Shi-Qi Li; Liang-Fu Zhou; Ying Mao; Yi-Ming Li; Rong-Gui Hu; Zhao-Yun Zhang; Hong-Ying Ye; Ming Shen; Xue-Fei Shou; Zhi-Qiang Li; Hong Peng; Qing-Zhong Wang; Dai-Zhan Zhou; Xiao-Lan Qin; Jue Ji; Jie Zheng; Hong Chen; Yin Wang; Dao-Ying Geng; Wei-Jun Tang; Chao-Wei Fu; Zhi-Feng Shi; Yi-Chao Zhang; Zhao Ye; Wen-Qiang He; Qi-Lin Zhang; Qi-Sheng Tang; Rong Xie; Jia-Wei Shen; Zu-Jia Wen; Juan Zhou; Tao Wang; Shan Huang; Hui-Jia Qiu; Ni-Dan Qiao; Yi Zhang; Li Pan; Wei-Min Bao; Ying-Chao Liu; Chuan-Xin Huang; Yong-Yong Shi; Yao Zhao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Transcriptome Analysis Showed a Differential Signature between Invasive and Non-invasive Corticotrophinomas.

Authors:  Leonardo Jose Tadeu de Araújo; Antonio Marcondes Lerario; Margaret de Castro; Clarissa Silva Martins; Marcello Delano Bronstein; Marcio Carlos Machado; Ericka Barbosa Trarbach; Maria Candida Barisson Villares Fragoso
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.555

View more
  20 in total

1.  Cushing's disease due to somatic USP8 mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ingrid Quevedo Wanichi; Beatriz Marinho de Paula Mariani; Fernando Pereira Frassetto; Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira; Nina Rosa de Castro Musolino; Malebranche Berardo Carneiro Cunha-Neto; Gilberto Ochman; Valter Angelo Sperling Cescato; Marcio Carlos Machado; Ericka Barbosa Trarbach; Marcello Delano Bronstein; Maria Candida Barisson Villares Fragoso
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome in USP8-mutated human adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Marco Losa; Pietro Mortini; Angela Pagnano; Mario Detomas; Maria Francesca Cassarino; Francesca Pecori Giraldi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 8 Mutant Corticotrope Adenomas Present Unique Secretory and Molecular Features and Shed Light on the Role of Ubiquitylation on ACTH Processing.

Authors:  Antonella Sesta; Maria Francesca Cassarino; Mariarosa Terreni; Alberto G Ambrogio; Laura Libera; Donatella Bardelli; Giovanni Lasio; Marco Losa; Francesca Pecori Giraldi
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.914

Review 4.  Genomics and Epigenomics of Pituitary Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know?

Authors:  Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete; Shereen Ezzat
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.943

5.  Germline USP8 Mutation Associated With Pediatric Cushing Disease and Other Clinical Features: A New Syndrome.

Authors:  Michal Cohen; Rebecca Persky; Rachel Stegemann; Laura C Hernández-Ramírez; Deena Zeltser; Maya B Lodish; Anlu Chen; Margaret F Keil; Christina Tatsi; Fabio R Faucz; David A Buchner; Constantine A Stratakis; Dov Tiosano
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  USP8, USP48, and BRAF mutations differ in their genotype-phenotype correlation in Asian Indian patients with Cushing's disease.

Authors:  Ananth P Abraham; Rekha Pai; Daniel L Beno; Geeta Chacko; Hesarghatta Shyamasunder Asha; Simon Rajaratnam; Nitin Kapoor; Nihal Thomas; Ari G Chacko
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Cushing syndrome: Old and new genes.

Authors:  Christina Tatsi; Chelsi Flippo; Constantine A Stratakis
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.690

Review 8.  Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a model for neuroendocrine tumor classification.

Authors:  Ashley B Grossman; Shereen Ezzat; Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete; Michael D Cusimano; Ian E McCutcheon; Arie Perry; Shozo Yamada; Hiroshi Nishioka; Olivera Casar-Borota; Silvia Uccella; Stefano La Rosa
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 9.  Recent Understanding and Future Directions of Recurrent Corticotroph Tumors.

Authors:  José Miguel Hinojosa-Amaya; César Ernesto Lam-Chung; Daniel Cuevas-Ramos
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Recent advances in understanding corticotroph pituitary tumor initiation and progression.

Authors:  Ulrich Renner; Denis Ciato; Günter K Stalla
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.