Nicola Russo1, Leonida Compostella2, Giuseppe Tarantini3, Tiziana Setzu2, Massimo Napodano3, Tomaso Bottio3, Augusto D'Onofrio3, Gianbattista Isabella3, Gino Gerosa3, Sabino Iliceto3, Fabio Bellotto4. 1. Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Istituto Codivilla-Putti, Cortina d'Ampezzo (BL), Italy Dept of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padua University Medical School, Italy nicola.russo.doc@gmail.com. 2. Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Istituto Codivilla-Putti, Cortina d'Ampezzo (BL), Italy. 3. Dept of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padua University Medical School, Italy. 4. Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Istituto Codivilla-Putti, Cortina d'Ampezzo (BL), Italy Dept of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padua University Medical School, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation plays a leading role in the management of aortic stenosis in patients with comorbidities but no data are available about cardiac rehabilitation in these subjects. This study aimed to compare safety and efficacy of an early, exercise-based, cardiac rehabilitation programme in octogenarians after a traditional surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients were studied in order to evaluate the effect of an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in comparison to 80 of a similar age having surgical aortic valve replacement. Functional capacity was assessed by a 6 min walking test on admission and at the end of the programme. When possible, a cardiopulmonary exercise test was also performed before discharge. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in terms of gender and length of stay in cardiac rehabilitation; as expected, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group had more comorbidities but no major complications occurred in either group during rehabilitation. All patients enhanced autonomy and mobility and were able to walk at least with the assistance of a stick. In those patients who were able to perform the 6 min walking test, the distance walked at discharge did not significantly differ between the groups (272.7 ± 108 vs. 294.2 ± 101 m, p = 0.42), neither did the exercise capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test (peak-VO2 12.5 ± 3.6 vs. 13.9 ± 2.7 ml/kg/min, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation is feasible, safe and effective in octogenarian patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation as well as after traditional surgery. An early cardiac rehabilitation programme enhances independence, mobility and functional capacity and should be highly encouraged.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation plays a leading role in the management of aortic stenosis in patients with comorbidities but no data are available about cardiac rehabilitation in these subjects. This study aimed to compare safety and efficacy of an early, exercise-based, cardiac rehabilitation programme in octogenarians after a traditional surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients were studied in order to evaluate the effect of an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in comparison to 80 of a similar age having surgical aortic valve replacement. Functional capacity was assessed by a 6 min walking test on admission and at the end of the programme. When possible, a cardiopulmonary exercise test was also performed before discharge. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in terms of gender and length of stay in cardiac rehabilitation; as expected, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group had more comorbidities but no major complications occurred in either group during rehabilitation. All patients enhanced autonomy and mobility and were able to walk at least with the assistance of a stick. In those patients who were able to perform the 6 min walking test, the distance walked at discharge did not significantly differ between the groups (272.7 ± 108 vs. 294.2 ± 101 m, p = 0.42), neither did the exercise capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test (peak-VO2 12.5 ± 3.6 vs. 13.9 ± 2.7 ml/kg/min, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation is feasible, safe and effective in octogenarian patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation as well as after traditional surgery. An early cardiac rehabilitation programme enhances independence, mobility and functional capacity and should be highly encouraged.
Authors: S Schwarz; A Boscheri; J Christle; A Duvinage; K Esefeld; H Fricke; N Pitsch; A Pressler; M Weichenberger; M Halle Journal: Herz Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Nabil Ghorayeb; Ricardo Stein; Daniel Jogaib Daher; Anderson Donelli da Silveira; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Daniel Fernando Pellegrino Dos Santos; Ana Paula Rennó Sierra; Artur Haddad Herdy; Claúdio Gil Soares de Araújo; Cléa Simone Sabino de Souza Colombo; Daniel Arkader Kopiler; Filipe Ferrari Ribeiro de Lacerda; José Kawazoe Lazzoli; Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos; Marcelo Bichels Leitão; Ricardo Contesini Francisco; Rodrigo Otávio Bougleux Alô; Sérgio Timerman; Tales de Carvalho; Thiago Ghorayeb Garcia Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Naila Ijaz; Brian Buta; Qian-Li Xue; Denise T Mohess; Archana Bushan; Henry Tran; Wayne Batchelor; Christopher R deFilippi; Jeremy D Walston; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Daniel E Forman; Jon R Resar; Christopher M O'Connor; Gary Gerstenblith; Abdulla A Damluji Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 24.094