| Literature DB >> 29599942 |
B I Kuznik1, Y N Smolyakov1, S O Davydov2, N N Tsybikov1, O G Maksimova1, A V Malinina1, L Shenkman3, A Kaminsky3, I Fine3.
Abstract
The physiological characteristics of skin blood flow can be described in terms of the hemodynamic indices (HI). The HI is derived from the laser speckle characteristics, which are governed by the cutaneous blood flow. A miniaturized dynamic light-scattering sensor was used to measure the speckle pattern from the finger root. Three groups of subjects from 15 to 25 years of age were tested. The first group included subjects who are actively engaged in sport activities; the second group included subjects with low level of physical activity; and the third group included healthy controls with moderate physical activity. The HI parameters were measured prior to and after the performance of a determined physical load. As a marker of cardiovascular fitness (CVF), we used the postload decay rate of HI. We found that the hemodynamic response to the physical load provides a statistically significant correlation with the postload heart rate decay. It was also found that postocclusion increase of the arterial HI is more prominent in the group with higher physical activity. These results indicate that hemodynamic indices can be used as an additional marker for cardiovascular fitness level.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29599942 PMCID: PMC5823415 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1674931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Schematic geometry of the mDLS sensor.
Figure 2Device application.
Figure 3HIs represent different blood flow components. The first graph is HI1, the second is HI2, and the third is HI3.
Figure 4Waveform of the signal and intervals between the peaks.
Figure 5Distribution of the Δ(HR) and α over the subjects.
Figure 6Mean value of α for three groups of the subjects.
Figure 7Correspondence between (RHI2 (T1)) and ΔHR and between RHI2 (T1) and α.
Figure 8Hyperemia response for three hemodynamic indexes.
Figure 9Total perfusion at sessions T1 and T3 versus RHI2.