Literature DB >> 29596411

Common occurrence of Cryptosporidium hominis in asymptomatic and symptomatic calves in France.

Romy Razakandrainibe1, El Hadji Ibrahima Diawara1, Damien Costa1, Laetitia Le Goff1, Denis Lemeteil1, Jean Jacques Ballet1, Gilles Gargala1, Loïc Favennec1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryptosporidium spp. infections are the most frequent parasitic cause of diarrhea in humans and cattle. However, asymptomatic cases are less often documented than symptomatic cases or cases with experimentally infected animals. Cryptosporidium (C.) hominis infection accounts for the majority of pediatric cases in several countries, while C. parvum is a major cause of diarrhea in neonatal calves. In cattle Cryptosporidium spp. infection can be caused by C. parvum, C. bovis, C.andersoni and C. ryanae, and recently, reports of cattle cases of C. hominis cryptosporidiosis cases suggest that the presence of C. hominis in calves was previously underestimated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: From February to November 2015, Cryptosporidium spp. infected calves were detected in 29/44 randomly included farms from 5 geographic regions of France. C. hominis and C. parvum were found in 12/44 and 26/44 farms, respectively with higher C. hominis prevalence in the western region. In 9 farms, both C. parvum and C. hominis were detected. Eighty-six of 412 (73/342 asymptomatic and 13/70 symptomatic) one to nine-week-old calves shed C. hominis or C. parvum oocysts (15 and 71 calves, respectively), with no mixed infection detected. The predominant C. hominis IbA9G3 genotype was present in all regions, and more frequent in the western region. An incompletely characterized Ib, and the IbA13G3, IbA9G2 and IbA14G2 genotypes were present only in the western region. For C. parvum, the most frequent genotype was IIaA16G3R1 with no geographic clustering. Most C. hominis infected calves were asymptomatic, with some exceptions of IbA9G2 and IbA9G3 isolates, while C. parvum IIaA16G3R1 was associated with symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Present results indicate for the first time that in several geographic regions of France, C. hominis was present in about one fifth of both asymptomatic and symptomatic infected calves, with isolated genotypes likely associated with human infection. Further investigations are aimed at documenting direct or indirect transmissions between livestock and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29596411      PMCID: PMC5892941          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are Apicomplexa which include parasite species causing asymptomatic to severe gastrointestinal infections in a wide range of vertebrate hosts, and exhibiting varying degrees of host adaptation [1]. Previously, information on cryptosporidial host restriction of natural cryptosporidial infection was usually obtained from animal and human cases for which clinical symptoms, ages and immune statuses were recorded. However, evidence of asymptomatic sustained or transitory infection, and the role of additional parameters such as parasite detection methods, host’s genetic background, co-infection and environmental factors such as climate, seasons and socioeconomic status were less documented [2]. For some cryptosporidial host specialisations, information is presently limited to experimentally infected immunocompetent or immunosuppressed laboratory animals [3]. In humans, cryptosporidiosis is presently identified as the most frequent zoonotic cause of parasitic diarrhea, especially severe in immunocompromised individuals and infants in both developed and developing countries [4-7]. In addition to 8 others sporadically observed species, C. hominis, once considered to be restricted to humans, and C. parvum, of which some isolate genotypes also infect ruminants, account for more than 90% of reported human cases worldwide [8-10]. There is equal or higher prevalence of C. hominis than C. parvum in humans in many parts of the world except in Europe where C. parvum largely prevails, likely reflecting the ratios of human to animal sources of anthroponotic C. hominis and anthropozoonotic C. parvum contamination, respectively [11-15]. In cattle, the main symptom of cryptosporidiosis is watery and profuse acute diarrhea which can be associated with dehydration, anorexia, and impaired growth [16]. It was previously established that cattle can be infected by at least 4 Cryptosporidium species, i.e. C. parvum, C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C ryanae [17, 18]. In France, C. parvum, C. bovis and C. andersoni predominate in newborn and older calves, respectively, C. parvum infection is identified as a major cause of diarrhea in newborn calves of less than one month old, with economically significant morbidity and mortality. However, detailed epidemiology on the occurrence of viable oocysts from normal feces of asymptomatic calves is unknown [19, 20]. Recently, a limited number of observations reported of cattle cryptosporidiosis due to C. hominis have been reported in Australasia, Asia, Africa and Europe, suggesting that the presence of C. hominis in calves was previously underestimated in studies on diarrheic and adult animals [21-27]. The aim of this work was to document the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp oocysts in calves from five different geographic regions of Metropolitan France. Farms were randomly included in the study, the clinical status of each animal was recorded, and the presence of calves with Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in feces was investigated. Isolates were genetically characterized for their synzootic and zoonotic potentials.

Methods

Calves and fecal samples

From February to November 2015, 412 calves aged from 1 to 9 weeks were selected in 44 farms from a national list of farms under regular veterinarian survey (16 veterinary offices, from 1 to 4 farm(s) per office). Farms were randomly selected, and within farms, calves aged from 1 to 9 weeks were randomly selected. Selected farms were situated in 14 “départements” (an administrative sub-region) distributed in 5 geographic regions of Metropolitan France: western (Côtes d'Armor, Ille-et-Vilaine, Morbihan), central western (Vendée, Deux Sèvres, Mayenne), northeastern (Pas-de- Calais, Moselle), southwestern (Landes, Pyrénées atlantiques, Tarn, Hautes-Pyrénées), and central (Puy-de-Dôme, Allier). For each calf, the clinical status was evaluated and recorded by all veterinarians at the time of sampling as follows: presence or absence of digestive symptoms such as diarrhea and abdominal bloating and/or respiratory symptoms, and evaluation of the general condition as follows: "Normal general condition: shiny hair coat, regular appetite; impaired general condition: delayed growth, dull hair coat, capricious appetite; Poor general condition: dull hair coat, capricious appetite, marked growth retardation." From each farm (housing from 11 to 50 calves), feces samples were obtained by veterinarians from 5–10 calves by rectal stimulation. Most farms were dairy farms and breeds consisted of Salers, Holstein, Charolais, Montbeliard, Blonde d'Aquitaine, Parthenaise, Limousine and the Belgian Blue Breed (BBB). In all farms, calves were kept in semi-intensive farming systems and separated from their dams.

Microscopic detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in calf feces

The presence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts was microscopically determined by the same experienced clinical parasitologists using Bailenger type feces concentration method [28] and Heine staining [29]. The presence of other intestinal parasites (Giardia, Strongyloides, and coccidia) detected in some of the calves using various methodologies was not considered in the present study.

Cryptosporidium speciation and genotyping

All samples were subjected to molecular analysis for speciation and genotyping of speciation positive samples. Before DNA isolation, feces were subjected to a pre-treatment with a mechanical lysis in Lysing Matrix A Tubes (garnet matrix and ¼ ceramic spheres) (Qiagen, CA, USA) with the Fastprep-24 device and transferred into 2 ml Eppendorf tube prior to thermal shock lysis (6 freeze-thaw cycles). Samples were placed in an ultrasonic bath for sonication (3x20 sec bursts). In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, a modified QIAamp Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) was used to isolate DNA from the pre-treated samples. All centrifugation steps were performed at RT (20–25°C), at 14.000 rpm. Eight hundred μL/tube of ASL buffer was added, and tubes were heated at 99°C for 15 min. For speciation, a 18S rRNA gene sequence was amplified using a nested PCR and restriction digestion of the secondary product with SspI (NEB, MA, USA) and VspI (NEB, MA, USA) was performed [30]. Briefly, for the primary PCR step, a PCR product (about 1,325 bp long) was amplified by using primers 5-TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG-3 and 5-CCCTAATCCTTCGAAACAGGA-3. For the secondary PCR step, by using 5 μl of the primary PCR product and primers 5-GGAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG-3’ and 5-AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA-3 a PCR product (819 to 825 bp long, depending on the species) was amplified. Each PCR mixture (total volume, 50 μl) contained 5 μl of 10X DreamTaq Buffer, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.2mM, each primer at a concentration of 100 nM, 2.5 U of DreamTaq polymerase, and 5μL of DNA template. Then, 1.25μL of DMSO (100%) was added to the mixture. A total of 40 cycles, each consisting of 94°C for 45 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min, were performed. An initial hot start at 94°C for 3 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min were also included. Each amplification run included a negative control (PCR water) and two positive controls (genomic DNA from C. parvum oocysts purchased from Waterborne Inc., and C. hominis genomic DNA from fecal specimen collected at Rouen University Hospital). Products were visualized in 2% agarose gels using ethidium bromide staining and identification was confirmed by sequencing. Positive samples were further genotyped by DNA sequencing of the gp60 gene amplified by a nested PCR following the protocol described by Sulaiman et al. [31] (2005). All Amplification experiments were repeated at least thrice to check reproducibility. Purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions on an ABI 3500 sequencer analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) by using the secondary PCR primers and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The obtained sequences were inspected using the 4 peaks software (https://nucleobytes.com/4peaks/index.html), edited with the BioEdit sequence alignment editor (version 7.2.5), and analyzed for DNA database search and comparisons using the BLAST server (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Genotypes were named using the established gp60 genotype nomenclature [31].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate using the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS), version 2000 to determine the association between the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection vs regions, and sampling periods. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

Before carrying out this work, informed written authorization to perform and anonymously publish the present epidemiological study was obtained from all cattle owners and veterinarians. Clinical examination of calves and stool harvest were part of routine breeding and veterinary procedures, without any invasive, traumatic or specific containment method. Such procedures are not qualified as animal experimentation involving vertebrate according to French laws, and no specific ethical clearing was required.

Results

As shown in Table 1, infected calves were detected in 29/44 farms from all geographic regions and “départements” except Puy-de-Dôme and Mayenne, with no inter-regional difference in the ratios of the number of infected farms to the number of included farms. C. hominis and C. parvum were found in calves from 12/44 and 26/44 farms, respectively. In 9/44 farms, both C. parvum and C. hominis infected calves were found with no mixed infection in any animal. No mixed infection of C. hominis and C. parvum was noted in any animal.
Table 1

Geographic distribution of 15 Cryptosporidium hominis and 71 Cryptosporidium parvum infected calves from 44 farms in 5 regions.

RegionDépartement/Region subtotalIncluded farmsIncluded calvesC. hominis infected farmsC. parvum infected farmsCryptospordium infected farmsC. hominis infected calvesC. parvum infected calvesCryptosporidium infected calves
CentralAllier33113311213
Puy-de-Dôme440000000
region subtotal74113311213
WesternCôtes d'Armor110011022
Ile-et-Vilaine651424549
Morbihan6584446713
Region subtotal13119879111122
SouthwesternPyrénées Atlantiques217011022
Hautes-Pyrénées110011022
Landes219011022
Tarn439133145
Region subtotal98516611011
Central westernMayenne15000000
Deux-Sèvres435033099
Vendée330122156
Region subtotal87015511415
NorthwesternMoselle43703301313
Pas-de Calais33012311112
Region subtotal76715612425
Total44412122629157186

Results given in numbers of farms or calves.

Results given in numbers of farms or calves. Eighty-six of 412 included calves exhibited Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in feces, of which 15 and 71 had C. hominis and C. parvum infection respectively. There were no inter-regional differences in the ratio of the number of infected calves to the number of included calves (p = 0.839). In the western region, the ratio of C. hominis infected farms (8/13) was higher than in all other geographic regions (p = 0.018), while no interregional difference was found for C. parvum (p = 0.122). Infections were found in calves from 2 weeks to 7 weeks of age (3 to 7 weeks and 2 to 7 weeks for C. hominis and C. parvum cases, respectively). As shown in Table 2, C. hominis IbA9G3 genotype isolates were predominant and present in all geographic regions. The incompletely characterized Ib and the IbA13G3, Ib A9G2 and IbA14G2 genotypes were only represented in the western region.
Table 2

Geographic distribution of 15 Cryptosporidium hominis genotypes from infected calves in 5 regions.

Geographic regionDépartementCalves with C. hominis genotype
RegionIbA9G3IbIbA13G3IbA9G2IbA14G2
CentralAllier1
Puy-de-Dôme
WesternCôtes d'Armor
Ille-et-Vilaine2111
Morbihan231
SouthwesternPyrenees-Atlantiques
Landes
Tarn1
Central westernMayenne
Deux-Sèvres
Vendee1
NorthwesternMoselle
Pas-de-Calais1
 Total84111

Results given in numbers of calves

Results given in numbers of calves For C. parvum, IIaA16G3R1 genotype was the most frequent with no geographic clustering (p = 0.574), and the limited number of isolates exhibiting other genotypes precluded further investigation on their geographic representation (Table 3).
Table 3

Geographic distribution of 71 Cryptosporidium parvum genotypes from infected calves in 5 regions.

RegionDépartementIIaA15G3R1IIaA16G1R1IIaA16G3R1IIaA17G2R1IIaA18G3IIaA17G1IIaA17G2IIaA17G3IIaA14GR1IIaA19G2R1IIaA15G2R1
CentralAllier13521
Puy-de-Dôme
Region subtotal13521
WesternCôtes d'Armor11
Ille-et-Vilaine11
Morbihan13111
Region subtotal24212
South-westernPyrenees-Atlantiques2
Hautes-Pyrenees2
Tarn4
Landes11
Region subtotal181
Central westernMayenne
Deux-Sèvres612
Vendee11111
Region subtotal16112111
North westernMoselle9112
Pas-de-Calais101
Region subtotal191112
Total264253134113

Results given in numbers of calves.

Results given in numbers of calves. No C. hominis infected calves exhibited diarrhea during the week before or at the time of stool sampling (Table 4). Two infected calves, one with genotype IbA9G2 and one with genotype IbA9G3 presented with general state alteration and non-diarrheal digestive symptoms. Ten calves infected with the most frequent C. parvum IIaA16G3R1 genotype presented with digestive symptoms, respiratory symptoms, or both, and 12 exhibited an impaired or poor general state. The limited number of observations, precluded from investigating further associations between symptoms and genotypes.
Table 4

Symptoms and general conditions of Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum infected calves.

Isolate genotypeInfected calvesSymptomsGeneral condition
AsymptomaticDigestiveRespiratoryDigestive and respiratoryNormalImpairedPoor
C. hominisIb444
IbA13G3111
IbA14G2111
IbA9G2111
IbA9G387171
Total15132132
C. parvumIIaA15G3R1222
IIaA16G1R176161
IIaA16G3R142343413822
IIaA17G2R154141
IIaA18G33321
IIaA15G2R13312
IIaA17G1111
IIaA17G2222
IIaA17G343122
IIaA14G1R1111
IIaA19G2R1111
Total716064159102

Results given in number(s) of calves. Each number corresponds to one calf except for calves with genotype IIaA16G3R1 of which 2/3 presented with both symptoms and impaired general state or poor conditions.

Results given in number(s) of calves. Each number corresponds to one calf except for calves with genotype IIaA16G3R1 of which 2/3 presented with both symptoms and impaired general state or poor conditions. The ratios of the number of infected calves to the number of sampled calves observed during the August-September (50/216) and October-November (28/106) periods were higher than those during February to March (3/45) and April to June (5/42) periods (p = 0.010) with no difference in the respective C. hominis and C. parvum representations (the corresponding values for C. hominis were 9/50, 4/28, 2/3, and 0/5, respectively, p>0.05). No seasonal effect on Cryptosporidium infection prevalence, however, could be unambiguously established, taking into account that due to the yearly calving cycle, most calves were sampled during summer and autumn, and that no feces sample was obtained in January, July and December. The age distribution of C.parvum infected calves is similar to that of C. hominis infected calves (Fig 1)
Fig 1

Age distribution of uninfected, C. parvum and C. hominis infected calves.

Discussion

In this work, the presence of C. hominis in calves was addressed for the first time in France by investigating both asymptomatic and symptomatic calves from randomly chosen farms in several geographic regions. Surprisingly, C. hominis was identified in about one fifth of Cryptosporidium spp. infected animals, a figure which to our knowledge has not been reported previously in Europe. The random selection of farms resulted in a variety of geographic regions corresponding to different geologic and climatic characteristics with oceanic, or humid continental influences. Due to breeding procedures, most calves from all regions were sampled during summer and autumn. For each calf, age, clinical condition, farm and sampling date were recorded by veterinarians. The study was focused on calves, and unbiased sampling was confirmed by similar C. hominis infection rates of calves aged between 2 and 7 weeks. Most animals were clinically asymptomatic, none of them presenting diarrhea in the week before, or at the time of sampling, and a exhibiting digestive or respiratory symptoms and/or impaired or poor general condition consistent with clinical cryptosporidiosis. Sampling and preservation of samples were adapted to oocyst detection in calf feces: Heine-stained oocysts were detected microscopically by experienced parasitologists, and oocyst species and genotypes were determined using previously validated DNA amplification methods. C. hominis was unexpectedly detected in 15 calves. Four out of 15 C. hominis positive samples could not be identified at the genotype level, with unreadable superimposition of electrophoregrams which might result from amplification and sequencing of different genetic fragments from several genotypes present in the same sample. For both C. hominis and C. parvum, several subtypes were not seen in the same sample (32). Farms from all “départements” except 2 presented both C. hominis and C. parvum-infected animals. C. hominis was present in about half of the “départements” with Cryptosporidium spp. infected calves, and C. parvum was present in all of them. Both the ratios of C. hominis infected farms and animals were higher in the western geographic region compared with other regions. In 9/44 farms, both C. parvum and C. hominis were detected in different calves. Although no data concerning the origin of water given to calves was available, a waterborne transmission of C. hominis is possible as illustrated by the recent occurrence of a C. hominis waterborne outbreak in France. All samples were obtained during the calving period; thus, no seasonal variation of Cryptosporidium species nor genotypes could be ascertained. The present unexpected high proportion of C. hominis infected calves compares with previously reported figures in New-Zealand Australia, Africa, China and Europe [21, 24, 25, 32, 33]. Several studies have established that cattle can be infected with at least 4 species (C. parvum, C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C. ryanae). C. hominis and C. parvum were the only species detected in the present study, likely due to the age of the calves, and possibly to the masking of concurrent infections by C. bovis, C. ryanae or C. andersoni by the predominant shedding of oocysts of other species, or to preferential PCR amplification of predominant species [17, 18, 35]. It was once generally accepted that C hominis primarily infects humans while C. parvum infects both human and non-human hosts, and reports of cattle C. hominis infections are few. Early observations based on 18S rDNA gene analysis revealed mixed cases with C. hominis in heifers and cows from 2001 to 2003, and C. hominis cases in domestic cattle and goats [22, 26]. More recently, limited numbers of C. hominis isolates from cattle have been genotyped in Africa, China, New Zealand, Australia, the UK and Italy [21, 23–25, 34, 36, 37]. Besides cattle, C. hominis has been reported in sheep and goats in the UK and in foals in Brazil [38, 39]. In addition to species identification, gp60 genotyping was performed to provide clues to symptomatic, epidemiologic, and zoonotic characteristics of isolates. Genotypes included IbA13G3, IbA9G2, and IbA9G3 and the newly described IbA14G2, and for 4 isolates, only attribution to the Ib genotype family was obtained, due to unreadable superimposition of electrophoregrams. No association between genotypes and symptoms could be determined. While 1bA9G3 was only detected in one human patient from the western region, no evidence for C. hominis case clustering and no seasonal variation could be established using genotypes. To our knowledge, none of the above gp60 genotype sequences (IbA13G3, IbA9G2, and IbA9G3) has been previously reported in cattle. C. hominis gp60 IbA10G2 genotype has been detected in Australia and New Zealand [21, 34]. The present genotyping data suggest the existence of potentially zoonotic C. hominis isolates in calves, since the 3 genotypes mentioned above have been previously described in human and non-human primates. Genotype IbA13G3 was reported in wastewaters from a densely populated urban region (Shanghai, China) [40], genotype IbA9G2 was reported in humans and genotype IbA9G3 was found in non-human primates in Kenya and China [41-43]. Such data aim at investigating associations between genotypes found in cattle and humans from the same geographic region, as reported in India for C. hominis genotype IdA15G1 found in one calf, and children from the same geographic region [44].

Conclusions

Present results indicate for the first time that in several geographic regions of France, C. hominis was present in about one fifth of both asymptomatic and symptomatic calves, and exhibited genotypes likely linked to human infection. Cattle have been considered to be a primary reservoir for Cryptosporidium spp. and to play a role in transmitting zoonotic C. parvum organisms to humans [44, 45]. Results of the present study suggest that calves in France also frequently harbor C. hominis isolates which might be cause of human infections. Further investigations are aimed at determining whether the source of cattle infections was other livestock or humans, and whether the transmission was direct or indirect.
  40 in total

1.  Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections.

Authors:  R C A Thompson; A Ash
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.342

2.  Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1-2-year-old dairy cattle in the eastern United States.

Authors:  Ronald Fayer; Mónica Santín; James M Trout; Ellis Greiner
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in children in Kuwait.

Authors:  Irshad M Sulaiman; Parsotam R Hira; Ling Zhou; Faiza M Al-Ali; Fatima A Al-Shelahi; Hussein M Shweiki; Jamshaid Iqbal; Nabila Khalid; Lihua Xiao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Cryptosporidiosis: an update in molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Lihua Xiao; Una M Ryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.915

5.  Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in mature dairy cattle on farms in eastern United States compared with younger cattle from the same locations.

Authors:  Ronald Fayer; Monica Santin; James M Trout
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Cryptosporidium species detected in calves and cattle in Dagoretti, Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Erastus K Kang'ethe; Erastus K Mulinge; Robert A Skilton; Moses Njahira; Joseph G Monda; Concepta Nyongesa; Cecilia K Mbae; Stanley K Kamwati
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 7.  Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium.

Authors:  Ronald Fayer
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.011

8.  An investigation of parasitic infections and review of molecular characterization of the intestinal protozoa in nonhuman primates in China from 2009 to 2015.

Authors:  Junqiang Li; Haiju Dong; Rongjun Wang; Fuchang Yu; Yayun Wu; Yankai Chang; Chenrong Wang; Meng Qi; Longxian Zhang
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 9.  Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: a review.

Authors:  Chao Gong; Xue-Feng Cao; Lei Deng; Wei Li; Xiang-Ming Huang; Jing-Chao Lan; Qi-Cheng Xiao; Zhi-Jun Zhong; Fan Feng; Yue Zhang; Wen-Bo Wang; Ping Guo; Kong-Ju Wu; Guang-Neng Peng
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Case-control study of environmental and social factors influencing cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  Iain R Lake; Florence C D Harrison; Rachel M Chalmers; Graham Bentham; Gordon Nichols; Paul R Hunter; R Sari Kovats; Chris Grundy
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium species in Njoro Sub County, Nakuru, Kenya.

Authors:  Walter Miding'a Essendi; Charles Muleke; Manfred Miheso; Elick Otachi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2021-08-28

2.  Overview on Cryptosporidium bovis and Its Effect on Calves in Some Governorates in Egypt.

Authors:  Amer R Abdelaziz; Amin Tahoun; Hanem El-Sharkawy; Moustafa M Abd El-Salam; Mohammed Alorabi; Ahmed M El-Shehawi; Rasha A El Meghanawy; Essam E Toukhy; Ahmed M Abd El-Salam; Shimaa S G Sorour
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium: an emerging parasite in different water sources of 2010 flood-affected district Nowshera, Pakistan.

Authors:  Shaukat Ali Khan; Imran Khan; Izaz Ali; Amir Muhammad Khan; Muhammad Anees; Khurshaid Ali Khan; Wajid Rashid; Noorul Akbar
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Molecular detection and epidemiological risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium infection among cattle in Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  D A Abdullah; S D Ola-Fadunsin; K Ruviniyia; F I Gimba; P Chandrawathani; Y A L Lim; F F A Jesse; R S K Sharma
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2019-01-26

5.  Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from diarrheal dairy calves in France.

Authors:  Mohamed Mammeri; Aurélie Chevillot; Ilham Chenafi; Myriam Thomas; Christine Julien; Isabelle Vallée; Bruno Polack; Jérôme Follet; Karim Tarik Adjou
Journal:  Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports       Date:  2019-07-24

6.  Molecular characterisation and risk factor analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves from Italy.

Authors:  P Díaz; A Varcasia; A P Pipia; C Tamponi; G Sanna; A Prieto; A Ruiu; P Spissu; P Díez-Baños; P Morrondo; A Scala
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Asymptomatic Cryptosporidium infections in ewes and lambs are a source of environmental contamination with zoonotic genotypes of Cryptosporidium parvum.

Authors:  Léa Bordes; Pauline Houert; Damien Costa; Loïc Favennec; Corinne Vial-Novella; Francis Fidelle; Christelle Grisez; Françoise Prévot; Philippe Jacquiet; Romy Razakandrainibe
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 8.  Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis: The Perspective from the Gulf Countries.

Authors:  Shahira A Ahmed; Panagiotis Karanis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium ryanae, and Cryptosporidium bovis in samples from calves in Austria.

Authors:  Katharina Lichtmannsperger; Josef Harl; Katharina Freudenthaler; Barbara Hinney; Thomas Wittek; Anja Joachim
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Transmission of Cryptosporidium Species Among Human and Animal Local Contact Networks in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Study.

Authors:  Ralf Krumkamp; Cassandra Aldrich; Oumou Maiga-Ascofare; Joyce Mbwana; Njari Rakotozandrindrainy; Steffen Borrmann; Simone M Caccio; Raphael Rakotozandrindrainy; Ayola Akim Adegnika; John P A Lusingu; John Amuasi; Jürgen May; Daniel Eibach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.