| Literature DB >> 29596356 |
Jin-Jing Xiao1,2, Jin-Sheng Duan3, Yan-Can Wu4,5, Yan-Hong Shi6,7, Qing-Kui Fang6,7, Min Liao8,9, Ri-Mao Hua7, Hai-Qun Cao10,11.
Abstract
In order to ensure raw consumption safety the dissipation behavior, migration, postharvest processing, and dietary risk assessment of five pyrethroids in mushroom (Auricularia polytricha Mont.) cultivated under Chinese greenhouse-field conditions. Half-lives (t1/2) of pyrethroids in fruiting body and substrate samples were 3.10-5.26 and 17.46-40.06 d, respectively. Fenpropathrin dissipated rapidly in fruiting bodies (t1/2 3.10 d); bifenthrin had the longest t1/2. At harvest, pyrethroid residues in A. polytricha (except fenpropathrin) were above the respective maximum residue limits (MRLs). Some migration of lambda-cyhalothrin was observed in the substrate-fruit body system. In postharvest-processing, sun-drying and soaking reduced pyrethroid residues by 25-83%. We therefore recommend that consumers soak these mushrooms in 0.5% NaHCO₃ at 50 °C for 90 min. Pyrethroids exhibit a particularly low PF value of 0.08-0.13%, resulting in a negligible exposure risk upon mushroom consumption. This study provides guidance for the safe application of pyrethroids to edible fungi, and for the establishment of MRLs in mushrooms to reduce pesticide exposure in humans.Entities:
Keywords: migration; mushroom; processing factors; pyrethroids; residue behavior
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29596356 PMCID: PMC6017079 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Recoveries (%) and relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the five pyrethroids in A. polytricha and substrate samples at three spiking levels (n = 5).
| Pesticides | Fortified Level (mg·kg−1) | Dried Mushroom | Fresh Mushroom | Fortified Level (mg·kg−1) | Substrate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Recovery (%) a | RSD (%) b | LQD/LOQ (μg·kg−1) | Average Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | LQD/LOQ (μg·kg−1) | Average Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | LQD/LOQ (μg·kg−1) | |||
| Bifenthrin | 0.005 | 82.51 ± 3.65 c | 3.99 | 0.91/2.93 | 95.02 ± 5.74 | 2.82 | 0.86/2.87 | 0.01 | 82.66 ± 4.01 | 2.58 | 0.85/2.44 |
| 0.05 | 76.89 ± 2.54 | 1.76 | 90.42 ± 4.52 | 3.64 | 0.1 | 93.93 ± 4.15 | 4.33 | ||||
| 0.5 | 83.56 ± 4.12 | 0.49 | 81.68 ± 3.25 | 2.30 | 1 | 88.52 ± 3.87 | 2.76 | ||||
| Fenpropathrin | 0.005 | 103.09 ± 5.31 | 2.16 | 0.75/2.61 | 94.71 ± 3.34 | 3.89 | 0.79/2.64 | 0.01 | 101.02 ± 3.65 | 1.67 | 0.66/2.55 |
| 0.05 | 80.44 ± 4.33 | 2.78 | 90.60 ± 4.26 | 4.35 | 0.1 | 93.22 ± 3.77 | 2.00 | ||||
| 0.5 | 82.66 ± 3.87 | 0.95 | 85.30 ± 3.39 | 3.45 | 1 | 87.93 ± 2.96 | 2.19 | ||||
| Lambda-cyhalothrin | 0.005 | 80.12 ± 3.26 | 1.72 | 0.50/1.62 | 85.96 ± 3.46 | 2.92 | 0.53/1.77 | 0.01 | 101.01 ± 3.82 | 2.49 | 0.50/1.61 |
| 0.05 | 76.04 ± 2.57 | 1.01 | 93.24 ± 4.55 | 3.73 | 0.1 | 96.74 ± 3.54 | 3.73 | ||||
| 0.5 | 90.13 ± 4.57 | 1.71 | 96.39 ± 4.12 | 1.87 | 1 | 87.07 ± 2.99 | 2.21 | ||||
| β-cypermethrin | 0.005 | 98.63 ± 5.44 | 3.71 | 1.60/5.34 | 84.73 ± 1.41 | 4.30 | 1.61/5.34 | 0.01 | 102.83 ± 5.54 | 2.87 | 1.63/5.37 |
| 0.05 | 98.13 ± 4.75 | 2.31 | 87.16 ± 3.25 | 3.26 | 0.1 | 94.22 ± 4.93 | 1.11 | ||||
| 0.5 | 82.67 ± 3.52 | 0.61 | 89.61 ± 5.75 | 2.35 | 1 | 87.07 ± 4.43 | 2.45 | ||||
| Deltamethrin | 0.005 | 93.57 ± 5.11 | 2.26 | 1.39/4.68 | 90.49 ± 3.76 | 3.62 | 1.42/4.73 | 0.01 | 101.47 ± 5.86 | 4.99 | 1.30/4.11 |
| 0.05 | 81.96 ± 3.57 | 2.70 | 86.52 ± 3.13 | 1.93 | 0.1 | 96.53 ± 4.37 | 3.63 | ||||
| 0.5 | 80.13 ± 2.54 | 0.87 | 92.08 ± 4.84 | 5.36 | 1 | 84.88 ± 2.58 | 2.55 | ||||
a Five replicate extractions were performed for each treatment; b Relative standard deviation for reproducibility in %; c Standard deviation.
Figure 1The dissipation curve of the five pyrethroid residues in the substrate (a) and fruiting body of A. polytricha (b). Percentage digestion represent the percentage reduction of residues. Results are reported as mean ± standard error (S.D.) (calculated from three independent experiments).
Final residues of the five pyrethroids in A. polytricha (n = 3).
| Pesticides | Application Dosage (ai. a g/m2) | Spray Times | Days after Application (Mean ± SD b) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 5 | 7 | |||
| Bifenthrin | 1.25 | 1 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | ||
| 0.83 c | 1 | 0.64 ± 0.10 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | |
| 2 | 077 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | ||
| Fenpropathrin | 1.25 | 1 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.04 |
| 2 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | ||
| 0.83 | 1 | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | |
| 2 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | ||
| Lambda-cyhalothrin | 1.25 | 1 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | ||
| 0.83 | 1 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | |
| 2 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | ||
| β-cypermethrin | 1.25 | 1 | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| 2 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | ||
| 0.83 | 1 | 1.29 ± 0.17 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | |
| 2 | 1.59 ± 0.06 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | ||
| Deltamethrin | 1.25 | 1 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.03 |
| 2 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | ||
| 0.83 | 1 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | |
| 2 | 1.34 ± 0.10 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | ||
a ai., active ingredient; b Standard deviation; c Not registered in China for use on edible fungi. The recommended dosages of these compounds referred to pesticides for use in other plants.
Figure 2Effects of autoclaving process on residue levels of the five pyrethroids in A. polytricha. Results are reported as mean ± standard error (S.D.) (calculated from three independent experiments). Percentage digestion represent the percentage reduction of residues. The asterisks indicate significant differences in the percentage digestion among the five pyrethroids or different parameters in processed A. polytricha. (* p value < 0.05).
Figure 3Effects of sun- and oven-drying at low (a) and high level (b). Results are reported as mean ± standard error (S.D.) (calculated from three independent experiments). Percentage digestion represent the percentage reduction of residues. The asterisks indicate significant differences in the percentage digestion among the five pyrethroids or different parameters in processed A. polytricha. (* p value < 0.05 and ** p value < 0.01).
Figure 4Effects of storage of fresh A. polytricha at low temperature (0–5 °C) (a) and dried A. polytricha at room temperature (25 °C) (b). Results are reported as mean ± standard error (S.D.) (calculated from three independent experiments).
Figure 5Effects of soaking temperatures (a), soaking intervals (b), and soaking times (c). Results are reported as mean ± standard error (S.D.) (calculated from three independent experiments). Percentage digestion represent the percentage reduction of residues. The asterisks indicate significant differences in the percentage digestion among the five pyrethroids or different parameters in processed A. polytricha. (* p value < 0.05).
Figure 6Effects of sodium chloride (NaCl) (a), acetic acid (C2H4O2) (b), and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) (c) solutions on the removal percent of the five pyrethroid residues in A. polytricha during household-soaking. Percentage digestion represent the percentage reduction of residues. Different minor case letters at the top of the columns indicate significant differences at a p value of 0.05.
Processing factors (PFs) for the five pyrethroids after different processes (n = 3).
| Process | Bifenthrin | Fenpropathrin | Lambda-Cyhalothrin | β-Cypermethrin | Deltamethrin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drying | 0.49 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.53 |
| Storage | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.67 |
| Soaking | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Overall process | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.09 |