Tze-Yi Low1, Ye-Xin Koh1, Jin-Yao Teo1, Brian K P Goh1,2. 1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery recently published a consensus statement on the definition of extended pancreatectomy (EP). We aimed to determine the safety profile and short-term outcomes of EP compared to standard pancreatectomy (SP). To mitigate surgeon bias, only pancreatectomies performed by a single surgeon were included. METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy by a single surgeon over a period of 5 years and who met our study criteria were classified into an SP or an EP group. Sixty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), including total pancreatectomy, and 28 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: The 25 patients who underwent EP had significantly increased operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, and postoperative stay compared to the 65 patients who underwent SP. There was 1 (1.1%) 30-day mortality and 4 (4.4%) in-hospital mortalities. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis of the patients who underwent PD demonstrated that the EP group (n = 22) had significantly increased operation time and postoperative ICU transfers. CONCLUSION: Although patients who underwent EP experienced significantly increased operative time, blood loss, and postoperative stay, they did not experience significantly higher postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to patients who underwent SP.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery recently published a consensus statement on the definition of extended pancreatectomy (EP). We aimed to determine the safety profile and short-term outcomes of EP compared to standard pancreatectomy (SP). To mitigate surgeon bias, only pancreatectomies performed by a single surgeon were included. METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy by a single surgeon over a period of 5 years and who met our study criteria were classified into an SP or an EP group. Sixty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), including total pancreatectomy, and 28 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: The 25 patients who underwent EP had significantly increased operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, and postoperative stay compared to the 65 patients who underwent SP. There was 1 (1.1%) 30-day mortality and 4 (4.4%) in-hospital mortalities. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis of the patients who underwent PD demonstrated that the EP group (n = 22) had significantly increased operation time and postoperative ICU transfers. CONCLUSION: Although patients who underwent EP experienced significantly increased operative time, blood loss, and postoperative stay, they did not experience significantly higher postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to patients who underwent SP.
Authors: Helmut Oettle; Stefan Post; Peter Neuhaus; Klaus Gellert; Jan Langrehr; Karsten Ridwelski; Harald Schramm; Joerg Fahlke; Carl Zuelke; Christof Burkart; Klaus Gutberlet; Erika Kettner; Harald Schmalenberg; Karin Weigang-Koehler; Wolf-Otto Bechstein; Marco Niedergethmann; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Lars Roll; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Aaron R Sasson; John P Hoffman; Eric A Ross; Steven A Kagan; James F Pingpank; Burton L Eisenberg Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jennifer F Tseng; Chandrajit P Raut; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mehrdad Nikfarjam; Mandeep Sehmbey; Eric T Kimchi; Niraj J Gusani; Serene Shereef; Diego M Avella; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-02-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Werner Hartwig; Charles M Vollmer; Abe Fingerhut; Charles J Yeo; John P Neoptolemos; Mustapha Adham; Ake Andrén-Sandberg; Horacio J Asbun; Claudio Bassi; Max Bockhorn; Richard Charnley; Kevin C Conlon; Christos Dervenis; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Clem W Imrie; Keith D Lillemoe; Miroslav N Milićević; Marco Montorsi; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Yogesh K Vashist; Jakob R Izbicki; Markus W Büchler Journal: Surgery Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Kai Siang Chan; Nandhini Srinivasan; Ye Xin Koh; Ek Khoon Tan; Jin Yao Teo; Ser Yee Lee; Peng Chung Cheow; Prema Raj Jeyaraj; Pierce Kah Hoe Chow; London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi; Chung Yip Chan; Alexander Yaw Fui Chung; Brian Kim Poh Goh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 3.240