| Literature DB >> 29593308 |
Christopher Schneider1, Markus Wallner1,2, Ewald Kolesnik1, Viktoria Herbst1, Heinrich Mächler3, Martin Pichler4,5, Dirk von Lewinski1, Simon Sedej1,6, Peter P Rainer7,8.
Abstract
Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy in recent years. Although more targeted than conventional chemotherapy, TKIs exhibit substantial cardiotoxicity, often manifesting as hypertension or heart failure. Here, we assessed myocyte intrinsic cardiotoxic effects of the TKI sorafenib and investigated underlying alterations of myocyte calcium homeostasis. We found that sorafenib reversibly decreased developed force in auxotonically contracting human myocardia (3 µM: -25 ± 4%, 10 µM: -29 ± 7%, 30 µM: -43 ± 12%, p < 0.01), reduced peak cytosolic calcium concentrations in isolated cardiomyocytes (10 µM: 52 ± 8.1% of baseline, p < 0.001), and slowed cytosolic calcium removal kinetics (RT50, RT10, Tau, p < 0.05). Beta-adrenergic stimulation induced augmentation of calcium transient (CaT) amplitude was attenuated in sorafenib-treated cells (2.7 ± 0.3-fold vs. 3.6 ± 0.2-fold in controls, p < 0.001). Sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium content was reduced to 67 ± 4% (p < 0.01), and SR calcium re-uptake slowed (p < 0.05). Sorafenib significantly reduced serine 16 phosphorylation of phospholamban (PLN, p < 0.05), while PLN threonine 17 and CaMKII (T286) phosphorylation were not altered. Our data demonstrate that sorafenib acutely impairs cardiac contractility by reducing S16 PLN phosphorylation, leading to reduced SR calcium content, CaT amplitude, and slowed cytosolic calcium removal. These results indicate myocyte intrinsic cardiotoxicity irrespective of effects on the vasculature and chronic cardiac remodeling.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593308 PMCID: PMC5871797 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23630-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Concentration-dependent decline of cardiac contractility in auxotonically contracting human atrial trabeculae upon sorafenib administration. Original analogue recordings of developed force with increasing (1–30 µM) concentrations of sorafenib (a) and after sorafenib wash-out (b). Summary data (c). n = 9/10 trabeculae (control/sorafenib) from 11 hearts; *p < 0.05 vs. baseline (Lmax) by Friedman’s repeated measures one-way ANOVA on ranks (ANOVA p < 0.001) and p < 0.01 vs. control by Student’s t-test, #p < 0.05 vs. 30 µM sorafenib and p = 0.68 vs. baseline (Lmax) by paired t-test.
Figure 2Reduced calcium transient amplitude and slowed calcium re-uptake in sorafenib (10 µM) treated murine ventricular cardiomyocytes. Representative calcium transients (above) and original 2D calcium wave line-scan (below) (a) and summary data for calcium transient amplitude (b), time to 50 and 90% (RT10) decay of calcium transient signal (c,d), and relaxation constant Tau (e). n = 17 cells/10 hearts, *p < 0.001 for treatment/time interaction and p < 0.05 vs. control by 2-way mixed ANOVA with Welch’s post hoc t-test.
Figure 3Attenuated beta-adrenergic responsiveness in sorafenib (10 µM) treated cardiomyocytes exposed to isoproterenol. Representative calcium transients (above), original 2D calcium wave line-scan (below) (a), and summary data (b). n = 14–15 cells/3–5 hearts per time point. *p < 0.001 for treatment/time interaction and p < 0.005 vs. control by 2-way mixed ANOVA with Welch’s post hoc t-test.
Figure 4Reduced SR calcium content and cytosolic calcium removal in sorafenib treated cardiomyocytes. Sorafenib (10 µM) reduces SR calcium content as assessed by rapid caffeine (30 mM) application (a), and reduces the rate constant of cytosolic calcium removal through SERCA (1/TauSR) (b). n = 3–10 cells/3–5 hearts. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01 vs. control by t-test.
Figure 5Decreased phosphorylation of phospholamban (PLN) at serine 16 in sorafenib (10 µM) treated cardiomyocytes. Isoproterenol (10 nM) induced phosphorylation of phospholamban at serine 16 is attenuated by sorafenib (a). Threonine 17 phosphorylation is borderline significantly (p = 0.098) reduced (b). Summary data (above) and representative blots (below). n = 6 hearts per group. *p < 0.05 vs. control and #p < 0.05 vs. isoproterenol by Kruskal Wallis ANOVA (ANOVA p = 0.013). For complete western blots see Supplementary Fig. S4.