Husam Abdel-Qadir1, Josee-Lyne Ethier2, Douglas S Lee3, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan4, Eitan Amir5. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: h.abdel.qadir@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular risk of angiogenesis inhibitors is not well-quantified. We hypothesized that, compared to direct vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (anti-VEGF antibodies or decoy receptors), small molecule agents have higher risk due to their less specific mechanism. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for phase III randomised controlled trials comparing angiogenesis inhibitor-based therapy to other systemic therapy. Outcomes evaluated were hypertension, severe hypertension, cardiac dysfunction, congestive heart failure, cardiac ischemia, arterial thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, and fatal cardiovascular events. Data were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects method to generate odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: We identified 77 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Compared to routine care, angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of hypertension (OR 5.28 [4.53-6.15], number needed to harm [NNH] 6), severe hypertension (OR 5.59 [4.67-6.69], NNH 17), cardiac ischemia (OR 2.83 [1.72-4.65], NNH 85) and cardiac dysfunction (OR 1.35 [1.06-1.70], NNH 139). VEGF inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism (OR 1.52 [1.17-1.98], NNH 141). No significant interaction was observed between the two drug subgroups for any outcomes. We identified no significant increase in the risk of the other outcomes evaluated. CONCLUSION: Angiogenesis inhibitors increase the risk of hypertension, arterial thromboembolism, cardiac ischemia and cardiac dysfunction. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular risk between direct VEGF inhibitors and small molecule agents.
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular risk of angiogenesis inhibitors is not well-quantified. We hypothesized that, compared to direct vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (anti-VEGF antibodies or decoy receptors), small molecule agents have higher risk due to their less specific mechanism. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for phase III randomised controlled trials comparing angiogenesis inhibitor-based therapy to other systemic therapy. Outcomes evaluated were hypertension, severe hypertension, cardiac dysfunction, congestive heart failure, cardiac ischemia, arterial thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, and fatal cardiovascular events. Data were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects method to generate odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: We identified 77 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Compared to routine care, angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of hypertension (OR 5.28 [4.53-6.15], number needed to harm [NNH] 6), severe hypertension (OR 5.59 [4.67-6.69], NNH 17), cardiac ischemia (OR 2.83 [1.72-4.65], NNH 85) and cardiac dysfunction (OR 1.35 [1.06-1.70], NNH 139). VEGF inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism (OR 1.52 [1.17-1.98], NNH 141). No significant interaction was observed between the two drug subgroups for any outcomes. We identified no significant increase in the risk of the other outcomes evaluated. CONCLUSION: Angiogenesis inhibitors increase the risk of hypertension, arterial thromboembolism, cardiac ischemia and cardiac dysfunction. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular risk between direct VEGF inhibitors and small molecule agents.
Authors: Rhian M Touyz; Ninian N Lang; Joerg Herrmann; Anton H van den Meiracker; A H Jan Danser Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Saamir A Hassan; Nicolas Palaskas; Peter Kim; Cezar Iliescu; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Elie Mouhayar; Rohit Mougdil; Kara Thompson; Jose Banchs; Syed Wamique Yusuf Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Hui-Ming Chang; Rohit Moudgil; Tiziano Scarabelli; Tochukwu M Okwuosa; Edward T H Yeh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A Inkeri Lokki; Emma Daly; Michael Triebwasser; Mitja I Kurki; Elisha D O Roberson; Paavo Häppölä; Kirsi Auro; Markus Perola; Seppo Heinonen; Eero Kajantie; Juha Kere; Katja Kivinen; Anneli Pouta; Jane E Salmon; Seppo Meri; Mark Daly; John P Atkinson; Hannele Laivuori Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: G Curigliano; D Lenihan; M Fradley; S Ganatra; A Barac; A Blaes; J Herrmann; C Porter; A R Lyon; P Lancellotti; A Patel; J DeCara; J Mitchell; E Harrison; J Moslehi; R Witteles; M G Calabro; R Orecchia; E de Azambuja; J L Zamorano; R Krone; Z Iakobishvili; J Carver; S Armenian; B Ky; D Cardinale; C M Cipolla; S Dent; K Jordan Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 32.976