| Literature DB >> 29592809 |
Ali Imran1, Masood Sadiq Butt2, Muhammad Sajid Arshad3, Muhammad Umair Arshad1, Farhan Saeed1, Muhammad Sohaib4, Rizwan Munir5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent decade, Hyperlipidemia related disorders like obesity, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes are considered as the leading killers for mankind. Fundamental nexus between nutrition and health diverting the consumers focus towards plant based natural products as a remedy against various metabolic syndrome. Considering this, present study was conducted to explicate the role of black tea polyphenols such as Theaflavins and thearubigins therapeutic potential to tackle targeted maladies especially oxidative stress related disorders like hypercholesterolemia and diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary interventions; Flavonoids; Hyperlipidemia; Thearubigins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29592809 PMCID: PMC5872535 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0688-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Diets and functional drinks plan
| Studies | (Study I) | (Study II) | (Study III) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal diet | High cholesterol diet | High sucrose diet | ||||||||||
| Groups | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Drinks | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
Each group consist of 5 male wistar rats in each (20 for one study). All studies were independent and in all animal were provided 250 mL of respective drink for a period of 56 days alongside respective diets
T0: Control
T1: Drink containing theaflavin
T2: Drink containing thearubigins
T3: Drink containing theaflavin+thearubigins
Fig. 1Absolute values for Extraction yield for isolated theaflavins and thearubigins from Black tea (QI-Men)
HPLC characterization of isolated theaflavin
| Solvents | Time | Means | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | ||
| Theaflavin1 (mg/g) | ||||
| Ethanol | 2.01 ± 0.03 | 2.42 ± 0.01 | 2.11 ± 0.04 | 2.18 ± 0.06a |
| Methanol | 1.89 ± 0.05 | 2.03 ± 0.03 | 1.96 ± 0.01 | 1.96 ± 0.03b |
| Water | 0.562 ± 0.006 | 0.933 ± 0.003 | 0.761 ± 0.009 | 0.751 ± 0.001c |
| 1.48 ± 0.001c | 1.79 ± 0.006a | 1.61 ± 0.004b | ||
| Theaflavin2A (mg/g) | ||||
| Ethanol | 3.01 ± 0.36 | 3.92 ± 0.03 | 3.31 ± 0.01 | 3.41 ± 0.03a |
| Methanol | 2.69 ± 0.02 | 3.12 ± 0.06 | 2.91 ± 0.03 | 2.90 ± 0.09b |
| Water | 0.963 ± 0.003 | 1.45 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.03c |
| 2.22 ± 0.02c | 2.83 ± 0.05a | 2.44 ± 0.03b | ||
| Theaflavin 2B (mg/g) | ||||
| Ethanol | 1.26 ± 0.02 | 1.92 ± 0.03 | 1.59 ± 0.02 | 1.59 ± 0.03a |
| Methanol | 0.981 ± 0.06 | 1.22 ± 0.05 | 1.13 ± 0.07 | 1.11 ± 0.09b |
| Water | 0.691 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.01 | 0.878 ± 0.03 | 0.864 ± 0.006c |
| 0.971 ± 0.001c | 1.39 ± 0.03a | 1.18 ± 0.06b | ||
| Theaflavin 3 (mg/g) | ||||
| Ethanol | 2.99 ± 0.03 | 3.61 ± 0.06 | 3.36 ± 0.02 | 3.32 ± 0.06a |
| Methanol | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 2.96 ± 0.04 | 2.41 ± 0.09 | 2.47 ± 0.01b |
| Water | 0.998 ± 0.004 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 1.04 ± 0.03c |
| 2.01 ± 0.09b | 2.56 ± 0.03a | 2.27 ± 0.09a | ||
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 03). Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other
Pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity (%) of ethanolic, methanolic and water fractions of theaflavins and thearubigins
| Concentration (μg/mL) | % pancreatic inhibitory activity | Means | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFW | TFM | TFE | TRW | TRM | TRE | ||
| 0 | 8 ± 0.05 | 12 ± 0.02 | 14 ± 0.84 | 6 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 0.3 | 11 ± 0.73 | 10.00 ± 0.06 g |
| 100 | 22 ± 1.6 | 26 ± 0.9 | 32 ± 1.2 | 15 ± 0.4 | 18 ± 0.6 | 24 ± 1.4 | 22.83 ± 0.89f |
| 200 | 36 ± 1.8 | 44 ± 1.5 | 52 ± 2.1 | 30 ± 0.4 | 32 ± 2.1 | 41 ± 2.1 | 39.17 ± 1.26e |
| 300 | 42 ± 1.2 | 52 ± 3.1 | 63 ± 2.5 | 35 ± 1.1 | 48 ± 2.6 | 52 ± 2.3 | 48.67 ± 2.26d |
| 400 | 50 ± 3.3 | 62 ± 2.7 | 72 ± 4.5 | 40 ± 2.5 | 52 ± 4.1 | 59 ± 2.8 | 55.83 ± 2.44c |
| 500 | 55 ± 2.9 | 78 ± 5.4 | 82 ± 3.7 | 49 ± 2.2 | 58 ± 3.7 | 65 ± 4.2 | 64.50 ± 4.53b |
| 600 | 65 ± 3.1 | 82 ± 4.5 | 91 ± 5.1 | 62 ± 4.5 | 75 ± 3.4 | 81 ± 6.7 | 76.00 ± 5.40a |
| Means | 39.71 ± 1.26e | 50.86 ± 3.66b | 58.00 ± 4.36a | 33.86 ± 1.6f | 41.71 ± 2.58d | 47.57 ± 3.75c | |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 03). Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other
TFW Theaflavin water extract, TRW thearubigins water extract, TFM Theaflavin methanolic extract, TRM thearubigins methanolic extract, TFE Theaflavin ethanolic extract, TRE Thearubigins ethanolic extract
Fig. 2Agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) of different studied attributes (dendogram)
Fig. 3PCA analysis of the studied attributes showing the % share of two main factors (F1 and F2) in total variability
Fig. 4Diet plan used in all studies
Effect of theaflavin and thearubigins and their combination based intervention on body weight serum triglycerides (TG), low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), glucose and insulin in normal, hypercholestrolemic and hyperglycemic rats at the termination of the study
| Parameters | Baseline values | Treatments | Normal rats | Hypocholestrolemic rats | Hyperglycemic rats | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | |||
| Body weight (at termination of study) | 128 ± 10.25 | T0 (Control) | 225 ± 4.21a | 228 ± 5.01a | 255 ± 7.51a | 253 ± 6.25a | 243 ± 6.21a | 240 ± 7.25a |
| T1 | 215.30 ± 4.14c | 216.13 ± 5.21c | 231.74 ± 7.12d | 227.17 ± 6.12d | 224.78 ± 7.23c | 223.24 ± 9.21c | ||
| T2 | 220.48 ± 5.52ab | 220.21 ± 4.13ab | 242.28 ± 6.12b | 240.20 ± 5.43b | 232.94 ± 5.34ab | 228.74 ± 6.21ab | ||
| T3 | 218.22 ± 7.25b | 217.30 ± 8.42b | 237.12 ± 6.91c | 235.57 ± 5.62c | 230.34 ± 7.21b | 228.02 ± 5.21b | ||
| TC (mg/dL) | 77.80 ± 3.56 | T0 (Control) | 80.25 ± 4.21 | 83.27 ± 5.01 | 148 ± 7.51a | 145 ± 6.25a | 97 ± 3.21a | 95 ± 4.25a |
| T1 | 77.24 ± 4.14 | 80.81 ± 5.21 | 131.67 ± 7.02d | 129.58 ± 6.14d | 89.60 ± 5.21c | 87.35 ± 3.21c | ||
| T2 | 78.68 ± 5.52 | 82.08 ± 4.13 | 141.50 ± 6.12b | 136.53 ± 5.43b | 92.96 ± 5.34b | 90.65 ± 6.21b | ||
| T3 | 77.87 ± 2.25 | 81.23 ± 3.41 | 137.65 ± 6.91c | 134.60 ± 5.62c | 91.05 ± 7.21b | 90.00 ± 5.21b | ||
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 26.56 ± 3.56 | T0 (Control) | 30.08 ± 1.26 | 28.09 ± 2.31 | 61.74 ± 2.31a | 59.45 ± 3.13a | 48.36 ± 3.51a | 46.86 ± 4.13a |
| T1 | 28.91 ± 1.83 | 26.95 ± 1.98 | 52.94 ± 3.92d | 50.47 ± 2.13d | 43.31 ± 2.91c | 41.19 ± 2.33c | ||
| T2 | 29.69 ± 1.32 | 27.54 ± 1.96 | 57.02 ± 4.14b | 54.61 ± 3.90b | 45.93 ± 2.92b | 44.00 ± 2.57b | ||
| T3 | 29.11 ± 1.64 | 26.97 ± 1.43 | 55.42 ± 2.51c | 52.21 ± 3.12c | 44.50 ± 3.63b | 43.05 ± 3.54b | ||
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 32.56 ± 3.56 | T0 (Control) | 35.76 ± 2.35 | 37.47 ± 3.35 | 57.67 ± 4.11b | 59.22 ± 3.62b | 40.55 ± 1.09b | 41.56 ± 2.03b |
| T1 | 36.83 ± 2.61 | 38.47 ± 1.09 | 60.70 ± 5.32a | 62.45 ± 5.62a | 42.31 ± 3.22a | 43.33 ± 4.54a | ||
| T2 | 36.22 ± 2.51 | 38.04 ± 2.11 | 58.96 ± 5.12b | 60.58 ± 3.63b | 41.28 ± 3.12ab | 42.35 ± 2.90ab | ||
| T3 | 36.76 ± 2.11 | 38.31 ± 1.61 | 60.06 ± 3.92a | 61.80 ± 4.11a | 42.17 ± 3.91a | 43.12 ± 2.80a | ||
| TG (mg/dL) | 58.26 ± 3.56 | T0 (Control) | 65.73 ± 5.21 | 67.47 ± 4.23 | 98.88 ± 7.02a | 95.01 ± 6.52a | 78.99 ± 5.13a | 76.14 ± 6.31a |
| T1 | 63.76 ± 2.03 | 65.44 ± 4.12 | 90.43 ± 7.05d | 87.45 ± 6.35d | 73.82 ± 5.10c | 70.79 ± 3.19c | ||
| T2 | 64.68 ± 3.20 | 66.11 ± 4.01 | 95.13 ± 5.81b | 91.19 ± 6.02b | 76.01 ± 6.21b | 73.09 ± 5.69b | ||
| T3 | 64.01 ± 3.08 | 65.88 ± 4.02 | 92.26 ± 7.01c | 88.35 ± 5.03c | 74.94 ± 4.15b | 71.56 ± 5.21b | ||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 79.63 ± 3.72 | T0 (Control) | 85.13 ± 6.23 | 87.60 ± 5.03 | 100.34 ± 8.52a | 98.02 ± 7.13a | 135.19 ± 9.99a | 140.91 ± 8.54a |
| T1 | 82.57 ± 4.52 | 85.10 ± 6.12 | 93.95 ± 8.25b | 90.76 ± 8.56b | 122.85 ± 9.63c | 128.49 ± 9.25c | ||
| T2 | 82.61 ± 6.02 | 85.84 ± 5.86 | 92.13 ± 6.98b | 94.41 ± 7.45b | 126.04 ± 9.45b | 132.18 ± 7.46b | ||
| T3 | 81.74 ± 3.25 | 84.22 ± 4.86 | 91.49 ± 7.84c | 88.44 ± 6.98c | 120.28 ± 8.51d | 123.67 ± 6.35d | ||
| Insulin μU/Ml | 6.23 ± 0.56 | T0 (Control) | 7.59 ± 0.65 | 8.74 ± 0.70 | 9.56 ± 0.36b | 10.89 ± 0.35b | 12.02 ± 1.01bc | 13.37 ± 1.12bc |
| T1 | 7.81 ± 0.15 | 9.01 ± 0.32 | 10.03 ± 0.92a | 11.33 ± 0.45a | 12.97 ± 1.22a | 14.39 ± 1.32a | ||
| T2 | 7.75 ± 0.61 | 8.94 ± 0.81 | 9.83 ± 0.94a | 11.19 ± 0.84a | 12.47 ± 1.21b | 13.85 ± 1.23b | ||
| T3 | 7.84 ± 0.45 | 9.10 ± 0.41 | 10.09 ± 0.15a | 11.59 ± 0.86a | 13.02 ± 1.02a | 14.55 ± 1.13a | ||
| Glutathione mg/L | 49.01 ± 2.01 | T0 (Control) | 48.49 ± 3.12c | 49.51 ± 2.98c | 38.27 ± 3.12c | 39.45 ± 3.15d | 41.23 ± 2.09c | 40.28 ± 3.06c |
| T1 | 50.43 ± 2.92ab | 51.97 ± 3.15ab | 41.72 ± 2.35b | 43.40 ± 3.55b | 44.22 ± 3.47b | 43.59 ± 3.12b | ||
| T2 | 49.49 ± 2.10b | 51.41 ± 2.12b | 40.23 ± 2.98bc | 41.81 ± 2.12c | 43.30 ± 3.71bc | 42.36 ± 3.51bc | ||
| T3 | 51.47 ± 1.21a | 52.46 ± 3.91a | 45.73 ± 2.98a | 46.93 ± 4.12a | 48.24 ± 4.01a | 46.99 ± 4.11a | ||
| TBARS μmol/L | T0 (Control) | 6.97 ± 0.02a | 7.51 ± 0.05a | 10.15 ± 0.07a | 9.30 ± 0.09a | 8.08 ± 0.10a | 8.63 ± 0.14a | |
| T1 | 6.57 ± 0.01b | 7.09 ± 0.51b | 8.31 ± 0.42c | 7.71 ± 0.01c | 6.93 ± 0.42c | 7.44 ± 0.53c | ||
| T2 | 6.76 ± 0.04a | 7.28 ± 0.01a | 9.64 ± 0.02b | 8.88 ± 0.01b | 7.75 ± 0.03b | 8.21 ± 0.02b | ||
| T3 | 6.63 ± 0.01b | 7.14 ± 0.03b | 9.26 ± 0.01bc | 8.54 ± 0.05bc | 7.51 ± 0.04b | 7.85 ± 0.03c | ||
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 05). Descriptive Statistics were applied to check the overall behavior of the study parameter to elaborate the effect of treatments on selected parameter of rats. Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other
NS Non Significant
Study I: Normal rats
Study II: Hypercholestrolemic rats
Study III: Hyperglycemic rats
T0: Control drink (without active ingredients)
T1: Drink containing Theaflavin
T2: Drink containing Thearubigins
T3: Drink containing Theaflavin + Thearubigins
Fig. 5Drink plan used in all studies
Fig. 6Average body weight at the termination of all studies
Fig. 7Percent reduction in cholesterol in all studies (both trials) by administration of theaflavin, thearubigins and combination of theaflavin & thearubigins based drink in rats
Fig. 8Percent increase in HDL in all studies (both trials) by administration of theaflavin, thearubigins and combination of theaflavin & thearubigins based drink in rats
Fig. 9Percent decrease in LDL in all studies (both trials) caused by theaflavin, thearubigins and combination of theaflavin & thearubigins based drink in rats
Fig. 10Percent diminish in triglycrides levels in all studies (both trials) caused by theaflavin, thearubigins and combination of theaflavin & thearubigins based drink in rats
Pearson coefficient correlations (r-values) among different studied attributes
| Variables | B.W | TC | LDL-C | HDL-C | TG | Glucose | Insulin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.W | 1.000 | ||||||
| TC | 0.791*** | 1.000 | |||||
| LDL-C | 0.875*** | 0.898*** | 1.000 | ||||
| HDL-C | 0.650*** | 0.969*** | 0.856*** | 1.000 | |||
| TG | 0.851*** | 0.985*** | 0.951*** | 0.939*** | 1.000 | ||
| Glucose | 0.297 ns | −0.107 ns | 0.322 ns | −0.127 ns | 0.041 ns | 1.000 | |
| Insulin | 0.275 ns | 0.098 ns | 0.450** | 0.160 ns | 0.201 ns | 0.876*** | 1.000 |
*** and ** = significant at 0.001 and 0.01 levels respectively
ns non-significant
Fig. 11Percent reduction in glucose as compared to control in all studies
Fig. 12Percent increase in insulin as compared to control in all studies