| Literature DB >> 30021615 |
Ali Imran1, Muhammad Umair Arshad2, Muhammad Sajid Arshad2, Muhammad Imran3, Farhan Saeed2, Muhammad Sohaib4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently oxidative stress induced maladies have amplified owing to sedentary lifestyle and monotonous diet. Introduction of plant based biomolecules may be a suitable strategy to cope with the lipid peroxidation. In this context, black tea polyphenols (theaflavin & thearubigins) are in fame among the scientific community as cost effective therapeutic agents owing to their safety, economics, structural diversity and ability to modulate various lipid peroxidation responses by halting the expression of different metabolic targets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30021615 PMCID: PMC6052712 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0808-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Extraction yield of theaflavin and thearubigins
| Solvents | Time | Means | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | ||
| Theaflavin (g/100 g black tea) | ||||
| Ethanol | 3.11 ± 0.20 | 4.05 ± 0.19 | 3.12 ± 0.10 | 3.42 ± 0.27a |
| Methanol | 2.05 ± 0.16 | 3.25 ± 0.15 | 3.01 ± 0.08 | 2.77 ± 0.25b |
| Water | 1.99 ± 0.04 | 2.95 ± 0.19 | 2.02 ± 0.04 | 2.32 ± 0.13c |
| 2.38 ± 0.1c | 3.41 ± 0.1a | 2.71 ± 0.1b | ||
| Thearubigins (g/100 g black tea) | ||||
| Ethanol | 12.11 ± 0.20 | 15.32 ± 0.19 | 12.12 ± 0.10 | 13.18 ± 1.07a |
| Methanol | 11.05 ± 0.16 | 13.25 ± 0.15 | 12.01 ± 0.08 | 12.10 ± 1.05b |
| Water | 8.99 ± 0.04 | 10.95 ± 0.19 | 9.32 ± 0.04 | 9.75 ± 0.42c |
| 10.71 ± 0.4b | 13.17 ± 0.5a | 11.15 ± 0.9c | ||
Values are mean ± SD. Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0. 05)
Fig. 1Absolute values for different isolated theaflavin fractions characterize through reverse phase HPLC in mg/g. Three solvents and time intervals were applied, and comparison were made between solvents and time intervals. Values with different letters were significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0. 05)
Antioxidant indices of isolated theaflavin and thearubigins
| Solvents | Time | Means | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | ||
| DPPH activity (theaflavin)% | ||||
| Ethanol | 80.21 ± 2.31 | 87.51 ± 4.21 | 82.11 ± 5.91 | 83.27 ± 1.23a |
| Methanol | 75.10 ± 2.60 | 81.08 ± 4.30 | 78.03 ± 3.60 | 78.08 ± 3.74b |
| Water | 72.37 ± 3.12 | 79.49 ± 4.92 | 75.97 ± 4.92 | 75.94 ± 2.65c |
| 75.89 ± 3.92c | 82.69 ± 5.10a | 78.03 ± 4.31b | ||
| DPPH activity (thearubigins)% | ||||
| Ethanol | 62.58 ± 3.21 | 74.26 ± 1.90 | 69.33 ± 4.01 | 68.72 ± 3.61a |
| Methanol | 60.75 ± 3.26 | 63.26 ± 1.42 | 61.03 ± 1.36 | 61.68 ± 2.69b |
| Water | 58.18 ± 4.32 | 62.03 ± 1.93 | 60.13 ± 3.02 | 60.11 ± 1.36b |
| 60.50 ± 2.36c | 66.51 ± 1.32a | 63.49 ± 2.13b | ||
| ß-carotene (theaflavin)% | ||||
| Ethanol | 63.16 ± 2.31c | 73.23 ± 3.60a | 69.85 ± 3.42b | 68.74 ± 4.31a |
| Methanol | 60.15 ± 3.62e | 67.35 ± 2.91d | 65.12 ± 4.13d | 64.20 ± 4.72b |
| Water | 59.61 ± 4.12 h | 64.16 ± 3.12 g | 61.04 ± 1.94f | 61.27 ± 2.30c |
| 62.61 ± 3.12c | 68.91 ± 2.42a | 65.33 ± 4.22b | ||
| ß-carotene (thearubigins)% | ||||
| Ethanol | 60.16 ± 2.31c | 70.23 ± 2.81a | 66.85 ± 3.10b | 63.74 ± 1.22a |
| Methanol | 58.15 ± 1.52e | 68.35 ± 2.33d | 62.12 ± 4.31d | 62.87 ± 3.20b |
| Water | 56.61 ± 2.90 h | 65.16 ± 1.92 g | 61.04 ± 3.62f | 60.93 ± 4.16b |
| 59.30 ± 3.13c | 67.91 ± 2.31a | 63.33 ± 4.23b | ||
Values are mean ± SD. Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0. 05)
FRAP and Glucose diffusion of isolated theaflavin and thearubigins
| Solvents | Time | Means | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | ||
| FRAP (theaflavin) | ||||
| Ethanol | 811.67 ± 10.21 | 958.33 ± 8.48 | 799.33 ± 12.31 | 856.44 ± 9.06a |
| Methanol | 698.67 ± 10.36 | 704.00 ± 8.65 | 658.67 ± 11.32 | 687.11 ± 12.03b |
| Water | 489.67 ± 10.56 | 612.25 ± 8.23 | 586.67 ± 13.01 | 562.86 ± 11.01c |
| 666.67 ± 10.54c | 758.19 ± 8.21a | 681.55 ± 9.06b | ||
| FRAP (thearubigins) | ||||
| Ethanol | 690.02 ± 1.23 | 845.01 ± 7.45 | 701.33 ± 12.23 | 745.44 ± 8.21a |
| Methanol | 538.67 ± 1.56 | 665.00 ± 7.49 | 591.67 ± 11.32 | 598.44 ± 11.20b |
| Water | 429.67 ± 10.23 | 537.33 ± 7.52 | 503.67 ± 10.25 | 490.22 ± 12.20c |
| 552.70 ± 10.21c | 682.40 ± 12.23a | 598.89 ± 9.12b | ||
| Glucose diffusion (theaflavin)% | ||||
| Ethanol | 90.37 ± 3.60 | 95.99 ± 6.34 | 90.88 ± 4.13 | 91.74 ± 4.16 |
| Methanol | 89.87 ± 4.21 | 93.69 ± 4.21 | 89.22 ± 6.12 | 89.96 ± 2.31 |
| Water | 87.30 ± 2.62 | 90.36 ± 5.32 | 88.40 ± 3.21 | 87.02 ± 3.12 |
| 89.18 ± 5.20 | 93.34 ± 3.12 | 89.50 ± 4.13 | ||
| Glucose diffusion (thearubigins)% | ||||
| Ethanol | 85.27 ± 2.3 | 89.99 ± 2.9 | 87.88 ± 4.2 | 87.71 ± 6.12 |
| Methanol | 83.87 ± 1.3 | 87.69 ± 3.2 | 83.22 ± 3.6 | 84.92 ± 6.42 |
| Water | 81.30 ± 3.6 | 85.36 ± 2.9 | 82.40 ± 4.2 | 83.02 ± 7.12 |
| 83.48 ± 4.32 | 87.68 ± 4.13 | 84.50 ± 6.34 | ||
Values are mean ± SD. Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0. 05)
Effect of theaflavin and thearubigins and their combination based intervention on selected traits of normal and renal malfunctional rats at the termination of the study (56th day)
| Parameters | Base line values | Treatments | Post treatment values at termination of study | Post treatment values at termination of study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (at the termination of study) | 128 ± 10.25 | T0 | 224.18 ± 10.25a | 223 ± 9.61a |
| T1 | 212.14 ± 9.23d | 213.10 ± 6.11c | ||
| T2 | 216.41 ± 8.56b | 217.74 ± 5.61b | ||
| T3 | 213.12 ± 9.22c | 214.17 ± 4.25c | ||
| TC (mg/dL) | 77.80 ± 3.56 | T0 | 85.14 ± 4.12a | 86.31 ± 4.63a |
| T1 | 82.13 ± 3.25c | 81.14 ± 2.12c | ||
| T2 | 84.15 ± 2.212b | 82.99 ± 5.63b | ||
| T3 | 83.1 ± 3.14c | 82.29 ± 4.25b | ||
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 26.56 ± 3.56 | T0 | 27.10 ± 0.96a | 33.36 ± 2.13a |
| T1 | 26.01 ± 1.01c | 30.94 ± 1.22c | ||
| T2 | 26.65 ± 0.95b | 32.20 ± 3.61b | ||
| T3 | 26.30 ± 1.02b | 31.49 ± 2.81b | ||
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 32.56 ± 3.56 | T0 | 38.45 ± 1.1 | 38.54 ± 2.36 |
| T1 | 39.21 ± 0.96 | 39.70 ± 2.32 | ||
| T2 | 39.01 ± 0.85 | 38.92 ± 1.09 | ||
| T3 | 39.14 ± 0.89 | 39.64 ± 1.56 | ||
| TG (mg/dL) | 58.26 ± 3.56 | 69.45 ± 1.20a | 67.15 ± 4.20 | |
| T1 | 67.12 ± 1.14c | 64.96 ± 5.15 | ||
| T2 | 68.01 ± 1.05b | 65.20 ± 4.12 | ||
| T3 | 67.65 ± 1.08c | 65.13 ± 2.12 | ||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 79.63 ± 3.72 | T0 | 85.65 ± 2.2a | 89.18 ± 6.14a |
| T1 | 83.15 ± 1.96b | 84.70 ± 6.13b | ||
| T2 | 83.69 ± 1.12b | 85.60 ± 3.20b | ||
| T3 | 82.38 ± 1.23c | 83.98 ± 7.14b | ||
| Insulin μU/Ml | 6.23 ± 0.56 | T0 | 8.25 ± 0.01b | 7.76 ± 0.22b |
| T1 | 8.91 ± 0.25a | 8.06 ± 0.41a | ||
| T2 | 8.80 ± 0.31b | 7.96 ± 0.52ab | ||
| T3 | 8.99 ± 0.21a | 8.11 ± 0.12a | ||
| Serum Urea mg/Dl | 32.56 ± 1.03 | T0 | 26.14 ± 1.01a | 37.83 ± 2.46a |
| T1 | 25.96 ± 1.04b | 34.09 ± 2.56b | ||
| T2 | 26.01 ± 0.96a | 34.95 ± 2.91b | ||
| T3 | 25.78 ± 0.88b | 33.44 ± 1.45c | ||
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.01 ± 0.02 | T0 | 0.719 ± 0.01 | 1.15 ± 0.03a |
| T1 | 0.715 ± 0.02 | 1.08 ± 0.01b | ||
| T2 | 0.716 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.021b | ||
| T3 | 0.701 ± 0.03 | 1.04 ± 0.05c | ||
| Serum glutathione (mg/L) | 42.32 ± 1.02 | T0 | 50.52 ± 1.01b | 43.12 ± 3.01c |
| T1 | 52.99 ± 1.45ab | 46.19 ± 2.56b | ||
| T2 | 52.14 ± 1.21ab | 44.91 ± 4.14bc | ||
| T3 | 53.01 ± 1.24a | 47.87 ± 4.12a | ||
| Malonialdehyde (MDA) | 6.23 ± 0.59 | T0 | 7.85 ± 0.14a | 8.01 ± 0.21a |
| T1 | 6.23 ± 0.18b | 6.78 ± 0.24c | ||
| T2 | 7.15 ± 0.12a | 7.55 ± 0.01a | ||
| T3 | 6.85 ± 0.13ab | 6.95 ± 0.42b | ||
| AST (IU/L) | 6.23 ± 0.59 | T0 | 7.85 ± 0.14a | 8.01 ± 0.21a |
| T1 | 6.23 ± 0.18b | 6.78 ± 0.24c | ||
| T2 | 7.15 ± 0.12a | 7.55 ± 0.01a | ||
| T3 | 6.85 ± 0.13ab | 6.95 ± 0.42b | ||
| ALT(IU/L) | 6.23 ± 0.59 | T0 | 7.85 ± 0.14a | 8.01 ± 0.21a |
| T1 | 6.23 ± 0.18b | 6.78 ± 0.24c | ||
| T2 | 7.15 ± 0.12a | 7.55 ± 0.01a | ||
| T3 | 6.85 ± 0.13ab | 6.95 ± 0.42b | ||
| ALP(IU/L) | 6.23 ± 0.59 | T0 | 7.85 ± 0.14a | 8.01 ± 0.21a |
| T1 | 6.23 ± 0.18b | 6.78 ± 0.24c | ||
| T2 | 7.15 ± 0.12a | 7.55 ± 0.01a | ||
| T3 | 6.85 ± 0.13ab | 6.95 ± 0.42b |
T0: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet
T1: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ theaflavins supplementation @ 1 g
T2: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ Thearubigins supplementation @ 1 g
T3: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ Supplementation of theaflavins+ thearubigins @ 0.5 + 0.5 g, respectively
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 10)
One way anova was applied to check the overall behavior of the study parameter to elaborate the effect of treatments on selected parameter of rats at the termination of study. To evaluate the differences among the mean LSD test was applied. Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0. 05)
Fig. 2Absolute values for Hematological indices (Red blood cell indices and White cell indices) of normal & arginine induced renal malfunction rats at the termination of study (56th days). The experimental diets T0 (Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet), T1 (Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ theaflavins supplementation @ 1 g) T2 (Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ Thearubigins supplementation @ 1 g) & T3 (Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ Supplementation of theaflavins+ thearubigins @ 0.5 + 0.5 g, respectively) were given through entire study period. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 10) and level of significance were determined at (p ≤ 0. 05)