Literature DB >> 29592635

How Inaccurate Metrics Hide the True Potential for Organ Donation in the United States.

Laura A Siminoff1, Heather M Gardiner2, Maureen Wilson-Genderson1, Teresa J Shafer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a discrepancy between the reported increase in donor conversion rates and the number of organs available for transplant.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of data obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from January 2003 through December 2015 was performed. The primary outcomes were the (1) number of brain-dead donors from whom solid organs were recovered and (2) number of the organs transplanted. Descriptive statistics and growth plots were used to examine the trajectory of organ donation, recovery, and transplantation outcomes over the 11-year period.
RESULTS: From 2003 to 2006, the number of brain-dead donors increased from 6187 to 7375, remaining relatively stable at approximately 7200 thereafter. The average eligible deaths per organ procurement organization dropped from 182.7 (standard deviation [SD]: 131.3) in 2003 to 149.3 (SD: 111.4) in 2015. This suggests a total of 12 493 unrealized potential donors (2006-2015).
CONCLUSIONS: Since 2006, a steady decline in the number of donor-eligible deaths was reported. In 2003, the reported eligible deaths was 11 326. This number peaked in 2004 at 11 346, tumbling to 9781 eligible donors in 2015, despite a 9% increase in the US population. From 2006 to 2015, the data indicate an artificial depression and underestimation of the true potential of brain-dead donors in the United States of conservatively 12 493 donors or 39 728 missing organs. New metrics providing objective but verifiable counts of the donor pool are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OPO performance; conversion rate; deceased donor; donor pool; eligible donor; metrics; organ allocation; organ donor; organ transplantation; potential donor

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29592635     DOI: 10.1177/1526924818757939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.187


  6 in total

1.  Wide variation in the percentage of donation after circulatory death donors across donor service areas - a potential target for improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Comparing Deceased Organ Donation Performance in Two Countries that Use Different Metrics: Comparing Apples With Apples.

Authors:  Luke Milross; Chloe Brown; Laura Gladkis; Kylie Downes; Melissa Goodwin; Susanna Madden; Mark McDonald; Lucinda Barry; Helen Opdam; Alex Manara; Dale Gardiner
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Implementing of Active Brain-Dead Donor Identification Strategy in a Single Donor Center: One Year Experience.

Authors:  Akvilina Trilikauskienė; Irena Maraulaitė; Diana Damanskytė; Dovilė Lukminaitė; Neringa Balčiūnienė; Tomas Tamošuitis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Evaluating Spatial Associations in Inpatient Deaths Between Organ Procurement Organizations.

Authors:  Joel T Adler; Tanujit Dey
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-02-11

5.  Wide Variation in the Percentage of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Across Donor Service Areas: A Potential Target for Improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David S Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.385

6.  Estimating the effect of focused donor registration efforts on the number of organ donors.

Authors:  James H Cardon; Jordan C Holbrook; Mark H Showalter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.