| Literature DB >> 29590155 |
Rita Sorrentino1,2, Eugenio Bortolini2,3, Federico Lugli4, Giuseppe Mancuso2, Laura Buti2, Gregorio Oxilia2,5, Antonino Vazzana2, Carla Figus2, Maria Cristina Serrangeli6, Cristiana Margherita2, Annachiara Penzo7, Giorgio Gruppioni2, Antonio Gottarelli7, Klaus Peter Jochum8,9, Maria Giovanna Belcastro1, Anna Cipriani4,10, Robin N M Feeney6, Stefano Benazzi2,11.
Abstract
The 4th century BC marks the main entrance of Celtic populations in northern Italy. Their arrival has been suggested based on the presence of Celtic customs in Etruscan mortuary contexts, yet up to now few bioarchaeological data have been examined to support or reject the arrival of these newcomers. Here we use strontium isotopes, non-metric dental traits and funerary patterns to unravel the biocultural structure of the necropolis of Monterenzio Vecchio (Bologna, Italy). Subsamples of our total sample of 38 individuals were analyzed based on different criteria characterizing the following analyses: 1) strontium isotope analysis to investigate migratory patterns and provenance; 2) non-metric dental traits to establish biological relationships between Monterenzio Vecchio, 13 Italian Iron age necropolises and three continental and non-continental Celtic necropolises; 3) grave goods which were statistically explored to detect possible patterns of cultural variability. The strontium isotopes results indicate the presence of local and non-local individuals, with some revealing patterns of mobility. The dental morphology reveals an affinity between Monterenzio Vecchio and Iron Age Italian samples. However, when the Monterenzio Vecchio sample is separated by isotopic results into locals and non-locals, the latter share affinity with the sample of non-continental Celts from Yorkshire (UK). Moreover, systematic analyses demonstrate that ethnic background does not retain measurable impact on the distribution of funerary elements. Our results confirm the migration of Celtic populations in Monterenzio as archaeologically hypothesized on the basis of the grave goods, followed by a high degree of cultural admixture between exogenous and endogenous traits. This contribution shows that combining different methods offers a more comprehensive perspective for the exploration of biocultural processes in past and present populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29590155 PMCID: PMC5874009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1a) Location of Monterenzio Vecchio in relation to the Italian and Celtic comparative sample. b) Plan of the Etruscan-Celtic necropolis of Monterenzio Vecchio (Cartographic Archive—Museum "Luigi Fantini" of Monterenzio). c) Grave 36: adult male burial with rich grave goods (Photo archive of the Museum "L. Fantini" of Monterenzio).
Individuals analyzed from the Monterenzio Vecchio necropolis.
| Individual | Sex | Age | Ritual | Strontium isotopes | Non-metric dental trait | Funerary data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MV 1 | M | MA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 2 | F | MA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 3 | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 4 | F | OA | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 5 | M | OA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 6 | - | - | cremation | - | - | x |
| MV 7 | PF | OA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 8 | M | MA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 9 | F | OA | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 10 | - | C | inhumation | x | - | x |
| MV 12 | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV13 | - | I | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 14 | F | OA | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 15 | M | MA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 16 | - | - | cremation | - | - | x |
| MV 17 | - | I | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 18 | - | C | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 19 | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 20 | F | OA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 21 | F | MA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 22 | M | A | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 23 | - | I | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 24 | - | C | inhumation | x | - | x |
| MV 25 | - | C | inhumation | x | - | x |
| MV 26 | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 27 | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 28 | - | - | cremation | - | - | x |
| MV 29 | - | C | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 30 | M | A | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV 31 | F | OA | inhumation | x | - | x |
| MV 32 | - | - | cremation | - | - | x |
| MV 33 | - | C | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 35 | - | C | inhumation | x | - | x |
| MV 36 | M | MA | inhumation | - | x | x |
| MV 37 | - | C | inhumation | - | - | x |
| MV 39 | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | x |
| MV TA | F | YA | inhumation | x | x | - |
| MV TB | M | YA | inhumation | x | x | - |
aSex: M: male; F: female; PF: probable female.
bAge categories: I: infant (0–3 years); C: child (3–12 years); A: adolescent (12–20 years); YA: young adult (20–35 years); MA: middle adult (35–50 years); OA: old adult (>50 years).
87Sr/86Sr ratio of the individuals from Monterenzio Vecchio.
| Individual | Material | Tooth sampled | 87Sr/86Sr | 2SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MV 1 | enamel | LM1 | 0.708856 | 0.000005 |
| MV 2 | enamel | RM2 | 0.708974 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.709032 | 0.000006 | |
| MV 3 | enamel | LM1 | 0.708977 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.708779 | 0.000007 | |
| MV 5 | enamel | LM3 | 0.709108 | 0.000006 |
| MV 7 | enamel | LM1 | 0.708896 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | LM2 | 0.709337 | 0.000006 | |
| MV 8 | bone | - | 0.708733 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | LM1 | 0.708914 | 0.000007 | |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.708838 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 10 | enamel | Ldm2 | 0.708793 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.708866 | 0.000006 | |
| MV 12 | enamel | RM1 | 0.709257 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | RM2 | 0.708980 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 15 | enamel | LM1 | 0.709266 | 0.000005 |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.709319 | 0.000007 | |
| MV 19 | enamel | LM1 | 0.709070 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | LM3 | 0.709192 | 0.000006 | |
| MV 20 | enamel | LM1 | 0.709478 | 0.000008 |
| enamel | LM2 | 0.709482 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 21 | enamel | LP4 | 0.708501 | 0.000008 |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.708533 | 0.000007 | |
| MV 22 | bone | - | 0.708685 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | LP4 | 0.709043 | 0.000006 | |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.709032 | 0.000006 | |
| MV 24 | enamel | Rdm2 | 0.708757 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.708814 | 0.000006 | |
| MV 25 | enamel | Rdm2 | 0.708755 | 0.000005 |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.708810 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 26 | bone | - | 0.708701 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | LM1 | 0.709143 | 0.000006 | |
| enamel | LM2 | 0.708997 | 0.000004 | |
| MV 27 | bone | - | 0.708691 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.709354 | 0.000008 | |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.708812 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 30 | enamel | LM1 | 0.708944 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.708743 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 31 | bone | - | 0.708826 | 0.000007 |
| enamel | LM1 | 0.709363 | 0.000007 | |
| enamel | LM3 | 0.709289 | 0.000004 | |
| MV 35 | enamel | Ldm2 | 0.708806 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | LM1 | 0.708740 | 0.000005 | |
| MV 39 | enamel | LM1 | 0.708763 | 0.000005 |
| enamel | RM3 | 0.708749 | 0.000005 | |
| MV A | enamel | LM3 | 0.708850 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | RM1 | 0.709101 | 0.000004 | |
| MV B | enamel | LM1 | 0.708879 | 0.000006 |
| enamel | LM2 | 0.708947 | 0.000005 |
*2SE: 2 Standard Error
Samples used in the analysis of regional biological distance.
| Group | Sample | Abbreviation | Chronological periods | Number of individuals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient Etruscans | ETB | B | 95 | |
| Recent Etruscans | ETC | C | 102 | |
| Archaic Latini | LAA | A | 33 | |
| Ancient Latini | LAB | B | 41 | |
| Recent Latini | LAC | C | 94 | |
| Ancient Piceni | PCB | B | 136 | |
| Recent Piceni | PCC | C | 211 | |
| Montani | MON | A/B | 40 | |
| Sulmona | SUL | C | 52 | |
| Samnites | SAM | B | 163 | |
| Archaic Campani | CAA | A | 65 | |
| Ancient Campani | CAB | B | 28 | |
| Recent Campani | CAC | C | 54 | |
| Hallstatt | HalD | Hallstatt D | 30 | |
| Munsingen-Rain | MunRain | La Tène A, B, C | 33 | |
| Yorkshire | BRIT | La Tène A, B, first half of C | 31 | |
| Monterenzio Vecchio | MV | La Tène B2 | 19 | |
1Italic data are taken from Coppa et al.(1998).
2Celtic sample presented in Anctil (2016).
3Italic/Celts listed in this study.
4A: early 9th to 8th century BC; B: middle 7th to 5th century BC; C: late 4th to 2nd century BC; Hallstatt D: middle 7th to early 5th century BC; La Tène: 4th to 1st century BC.
Percentages (%) of discrete dental traits and number of individuals (n) of in the samples.
| Traits | MV | MVL | MVNL | BRIT | MunRain | HalD | LAA | LAB | LAC | ETB | ETC | PCB | PCC | CAA | CAB | CAC | SUL | SAM | MON | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double shovel UI1 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16.7 | 9.1 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 0.0 | |
| (+ = ASU 2–6) | 18 | 7 | 10 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 8 | 5 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 32 | 41 | 14 | 7 | 21 | 12 | 30 | 9 | |
| Interruption groove UI2 | 44.4 | 85.7 | 20.0 | 38.7 | 30.3 | 40.0 | 66.7 | 75.0 | 63.6 | 54.5 | 70.8 | 77.5 | 65.8 | 63.2 | 90.9 | 30.4 | 58.3 | 65.5 | 64.7 | |
| (+ = ASU +) | 18 | 7 | 10 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 9 | 8 | 22 | 11 | 24 | 40 | 73 | 19 | 11 | 23 | 12 | 58 | 17 | |
| Tuberculum dentale UI2 | 47.1 | 57.1 | 44.4 | 58.1 | 60.6 | 30.0 | 66.7 | 42.9 | 65.4 | 50.0 | 43.5 | 62.2 | 57.5 | 65.0 | 53.8 | 24.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 58.8 | |
| (+ = ASU 2–6) | 17 | 7 | 9 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 9 | 7 | 26 | 10 | 23 | 45 | 80 | 20 | 13 | 25 | 10 | 50 | 17 | |
| Distal accessory ridge UC | 25.0 | 33.3 | 20.0 | 29.0 | 57.6 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 62.5 | 70.4 | 81.8 | 58.3 | 73.0 | 66.1 | 92.9 | 60.0 | 66.7 | 63.6 | 74.3 | 57.1 | |
| (+ = ASU 2–5) | 8 | 3 | 5 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 9 | 8 | 27 | 11 | 12 | 37 | 59 | 14 | 5 | 15 | 11 | 35 | 14 | |
| Carabelli's trait UM1 | 43.8 | 71.4 | 25.0 | 25.8 | 24.2 | 10.0 | 71.4 | 62.5 | 78.6 | 58.2 | 50.0 | 58.2 | 62.8 | 70.8 | 53.8 | 48.3 | 37.5 | 71.7 | 63.2 | |
| (+ = ASU 2–7) | 16 | 7 | 8 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 14 | 16 | 42 | 12 | 20 | 55 | 94 | 24 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 60 | 19 | |
| Parastyle UM3 | 15.4 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 25.8 | 27.3 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 6.7 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 23.8 | 20.3 | 30.0 | 9.1 | 13.8 | 0.0 | 8.2 | 0.0 | |
| (+ = ASU 1–5) | 13 | 7 | 5 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 40 | 18 | 20 | 42 | 69 | 20 | 11 | 29 | 12 | 49 | 20 | |
| Premolar root number UP1 | 42.9 | 60.0 | 37.5 | 32.3 | 27.3 | 43.3 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 73.3 | 57.1 | 63.6 | 69.8 | 47.1 | 81.8 | 47.4 | 63.6 | 78.3 | 52.6 | |
| (+ = ASU 2+) | 14 | 5 | 8 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 28 | 55 | 86 | 17 | 11 | 19 | 22 | 46 | 19 | |
| Molar root number UM2 | 94.1 | 100.0 | 88.9 | 35.5 | 30.3 | 63.3 | 70.0 | 62.5 | 75.0 | 73.7 | 69.6 | 72.9 | 69.1 | 84.2 | 84.2 | 69.2 | 44.4 | 73.5 | 61.1 | |
| (+ = ASU 3+) | 17 | 7 | 9 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 48 | 81 | 19 | 19 | 13 | 18 | 49 | 18 | |
| Lingual cusp LP2 | 72.2 | 75.0 | 77.8 | 61.3 | 27.3 | 23.3 | 50.0 | 41.7 | 54.3 | 24.0 | 39.4 | 43.8 | 46.2 | 65.0 | 58.3 | 37.8 | 58.3 | 62.7 | 36.8 | |
| (+ = ASU 2–9) | 18 | 8 | 9 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 12 | 12 | 35 | 25 | 33 | 48 | 65 | 20 | 12 | 37 | 12 | 59 | 19 | |
| Groove pattern LM2 | 7.1 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 36.7 | 26.7 | 44.4 | 27.8 | 33.3 | 19.6 | 28.1 | 23.6 | 39.4 | 23.5 | 15.2 | 13.6 | 12.7 | 16.0 | |
| (+ = ASU Y) | 14 | 8 | 5 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 15 | 18 | 36 | 36 | 51 | 64 | 110 | 33 | 17 | 33 | 22 | 63 | 25 | |
| Cusp number LM1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 6.2 | 8.1 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 12.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 0.0 | |
| (+ = ASU 6+) | 18 | 8 | 9 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 13 | 14 | 34 | 31 | 45 | 44 | 93 | 33 | 16 | 25 | 22 | 69 | 23 | |
| Deflecting wrinkle LM1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.8 | 54.5 | 20.0 | 12.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 11.4 | 15.6 | 21.1 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 11.1 | 5.0 | 12.5 | |
| (+ = ASU 2–3) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 8 | 35 | 45 | 19 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 20 | 8 | |
| Trigonid crest LM1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29.0 | 42.4 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 6.7 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 4.3 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16.7 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 0.0 | |
| (+ = ASU +) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 9 | 13 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 46 | 63 | 26 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 35 | 19 | |
| Protostylid LM1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 14.3 | 19.4 | 27.3 | 23.3 | 81.8 | 85.7 | 74.2 | 62.5 | 48.5 | 74.5 | 75.3 | 65.4 | 63.6 | 10.5 | 58.8 | 65.9 | 93.8 | |
| (+ = ASU 1–6) | 15 | 7 | 7 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 11 | 14 | 31 | 24 | 33 | 51 | 81 | 26 | 11 | 38 | 17 | 44 | 16 |
*Traits used in MMD analysis.
Fig 2Strontium isotope results on provenance and mobility patterns of individuals of Monterenzio Vecchio.
Pig enamel data are from Scheeres et al. (2013).
MMD value (below) and SD (above) for 10 dental traits among Monterenzio Vecchio, MV locals and non-locals, Celtic and Italian Iron Age samples.
| MV | MVL | MVNL | BRIT | MunRain | HalD | LAA | LAB | LAC | ETB | ETC | PCB | PCC | CAA | CAB | CAC | SUL | SAM | MON | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MV | 0.109 | 0.097 | 0.046 | 0.045 | 0.047 | 0.078 | 0.08 | 0.101 | 0.066 | 0.054 | 0.042 | 0.038 | 0.055 | 0.077 | 0.053 | 0.064 | 0.042 | 0.059 | |
| MVL | -0.123 | 0.14 | 0.091 | 0.09 | 0.092 | 0.123 | 0.124 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.099 | 0.087 | 0.083 | 0.1 | 0.123 | 0.098 | 0.108 | 0.087 | 0.103 | |
| MVNL | -0.138 | 0.005 | 0.079 | 0.078 | 0.079 | 0.109 | 0.11 | 0.125 | 0.097 | 0.086 | 0.074 | 0.071 | 0.087 | 0.108 | 0.085 | 0.096 | 0.074 | 0.09 | |
| BRIT | 0.056 | 0.028 | 0.029 | 0.061 | 0.064 | 0.089 | 0.05 | 0.037 | 0.024 | 0.021 | 0.038 | 0.059 | 0.035 | 0.046 | 0.024 | 0.042 | |||
| MunRain | 0.05 | 0.028 | 0.06 | 0.063 | 0.089 | 0.049 | 0.036 | 0.024 | 0.02 | 0.037 | 0.059 | 0.034 | 0.046 | 0.023 | 0.041 | ||||
| HalD | 0.061 | 0.064 | 0.089 | 0.05 | 0.037 | 0.025 | 0.021 | 0.038 | 0.06 | 0.036 | 0.047 | 0.024 | 0.042 | ||||||
| LAA | -0.009 | -0.011 | -0.026 | 0.108 | 0.096 | 0.118 | 0.082 | 0.069 | 0.057 | 0.053 | 0.07 | 0.091 | 0.068 | 0.078 | 0.056 | 0.074 | |||
| LAB | 0.1 | -0.025 | 0.186 | 0.086 | -0.036 | 0.116 | 0.086 | 0.073 | 0.06 | 0.056 | 0.073 | 0.094 | 0.07 | 0.081 | 0.059 | 0.077 | |||
| LAC | 0.165 | 0.046 | 0.062 | 0.004 | 0.103 | 0.093 | 0.086 | 0.084 | 0.096 | 0.11 | 0.096 | 0.099 | 0.086 | 0.097 | |||||
| ETB | 0.084 | 0.127 | -0.07 | 0.19 | 0.059 | 0.046 | 0.043 | 0.059 | 0.081 | 0.056 | 0.067 | 0.046 | 0.064 | ||||||
| ETC | 0.027 | -0.018 | 0.06 | -0.026 | -0.09 | 0.088 | -0.029 | 0.033 | 0.03 | 0.046 | 0.069 | 0.044 | 0.055 | 0.033 | 0.051 | ||||
| PCB | 0.056 | 0.142 | -0.029 | -0.041 | 0.121 | 0.005 | -0.022 | 0.016 | 0.033 | 0.056 | 0.031 | 0.042 | 0.02 | 0.038 | |||||
| PCC | 0.018 | 0.019 | -0.052 | 0.114 | 0.071 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.052 | 0.027 | 0.039 | 0.016 | 0.034 | ||||||
| CAA | 0.116 | 0.062 | 0.025 | 0.058 | 0.108 | 0.013 | 0.069 | 0.044 | 0.055 | 0.033 | 0.051 | ||||||||
| CAB | -0.003 | -0.135 | 0.076 | -0.024 | -0.095 | 0.137 | -0.015 | -0.067 | -0.037 | -0.064 | 0.065 | 0.066 | 0.077 | 0.055 | 0.073 | ||||
| CAC | 0.068 | 0.05 | 0.092 | 0.048 | -0.048 | 0.106 | 0.035 | -0.059 | 0.039 | 0.042 | -0.013 | 0.052 | 0.031 | 0.048 | |||||
| SUL | 0.126 | 0.056 | 0.157 | 0.09 | 0.095 | -0.048 | 0.142 | 0.012 | -0.028 | 0.051 | 0.061 | -0.011 | 0.043 | 0.042 | 0.059 | ||||
| SAM | -0.027 | 0.089 | -0.004 | 0.051 | 0.021 | 0.017 | -0.067 | 0.06 | 0.045 | 0.037 | |||||||||
| MON | 0.107 | -0.032 | 0.05 | -0.073 | 0.038 | -0.008 | -0.042 | 0.049 | 0.013 | -0.038 | -0.001 | -0.032 | 0.022 |
1Bold values indicate significant distances at the 0.025 level.
Fig 3Two-dimensional MDS and cluster dendrogram based on MMD values for Italics and Celts: (a, b) Monterenzio Vecchio (MV; pooled) and (c, d) Monterenzio Vecchio locals (MVL) and non-locals (MVNL), respectively.
Fig 4Complete linkage hierarchical cluster of all individuals.
The analysis is based on pairwise Jaccard distances computed based on presence-absence values of funerary items as indicated in Table 5.