Literature DB >> 29590138

Effect of multiple drug resistance on total medical costs among patients with intra-abdominal infections in China.

Xuemei Zhen1, Yuanyuan Li1, Yixi Chen2, Peng Dong2, Stephanie Liu1, Hengjin Dong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple drug resistant (MDR) intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are associated with notable direct and societal costs. As previous studies have not considered the impact of MDR on the total medical costs (TMCs) of IAIs, the present one examines this, as well as further estimates the additional costs at a national level.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Firstly, we randomly selected a sample of 40% of all inpatients discharged between 2014 and 2015 from a teaching hospital, due to limits in budget and the large number of patients. Then, we manually selected 254 patients with IAIs according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, using electronic medical records. Eventually, 101 patients with IAIs (64 MDR patients and 37 non-MDR patients) were included after excluding cases without laboratory test results, any pathogens detected, or antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Univariate analysis and a generalized linear model were applied to assess the parameters associated with TMCs.
RESULTS: Compared to non-MDR patients, those with MDR pathogens were significantly associated with higher TMCs, higher antimicrobial costs, higher antimicrobial usage, larger number of pathogens, and longer length of stay and were more likely to have insurance and combination antimicrobial therapy. In addition, the average TMC among patients with MDR pathogens was ¥ 131801, which is ¥ 90201 higher than those without MDR pathogens. If our results are applied to the whole country, the sum of all attributable TMCs was ¥ 37 billion. The societal costs, furthermore, were ¥111 billion in 2015.
CONCLUSION: Our results provide information that should lead to increased efforts to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, in order to decrease the emergence of MDR pathogens and to reduce their economic burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29590138      PMCID: PMC5873998          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) represent a vast variety of diseases, including infections of single organs (e.g. cholecystitis, appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and salpingitis), peritonitis, and intra-abdominal abscesses [1,2]. Inpatients with IAIs often possess infections that are dangerous, abnormal, and accompanied by significant mortality; complicated IAIs are associated with 10.5% of mortality worldwide [3]. Patients with both complicated and uncomplicated IAIs may be commonly treated with antimicrobial therapy [4]. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy may give rise to poor patient outcomes, such as higher mortality, longer hospitalization, and increased economic burden. Furthermore, there is an increased risk that future antimicrobial therapy will be less effective for both previous and new inpatients, because of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [1]. AMR occurs when medications used to cure infections become ineffective [5]. AMR includes multiple drug resistance (MDR), resistance to three or more types of antimicrobial agents and non-MDR, and resistance to less than three types of antimicrobial agents [6]. Inappropriate antimicrobial usage is widespread and contributes to the rapid spread of AMR pathogens, particularly in developing countries [7]. It is widely accepted that there is a direct association between antimicrobial usage and the development of AMR, which poses significant risks to human health. In 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the coming of a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries that had been treatable for decades can once again spread and kill [8]. It was estimated that 10 million deaths each year would occur worldwide, with one million deaths occurring in China in 2050. Additionally, the global costs were estimated to be $100 trillion USD, with costs to China accounting for $20 trillion USD [9]. Recently, AMR is becoming more complicated and MDR pathogens are increasingly serious. There is a dramatically increasing trend in the incidence of IAIs caused by MDR pathogens, which creates a major challenge in the treatment of IAIs [10]. In the past few decades, a growing number of MDR pathogens have been detected from IAIs, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) [11]. In addition, MDR IAIs further increase medical costs, stemming from the prolonged length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and poor patient outcomes because of antimicrobial treatment failures [12]. Many studies have investigated the cost analysis of antimicrobial therapy for treatment of IAIs [13,14,15,16]. Studies on clinical characteristics and pathogen distribution of IAIs have also been conducted [17,18]. However, very few studies have examined the association between MDR and total medical costs (TMCs) among patients with IAIs [19]. Compared to previous studies, the present study takes both AMR and TMCs into consideration, focusing on the impact of MDR on TMCs. This study, conducted at a teaching hospital located in the Zhejiang province of China, aims to compare the TMCs among patients with IAIs between MDR and non-MDR groups, and to estimate the additional costs at a national level in China.

Methods

Study site

This study was conducted in a tertiary teaching and general hospital in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, which has a total of 3200 beds and approximately 121,900 discharged patients each year. We specifically chose this hospital as our study site because it is in the provincial capital city, which is the political and cultural center of Zhejiang province. In addition, a high quality hospital information system (HIS) is existent, which makes the collection of complete and reliable data possible.

Study design, sample, and sampling

This is a retrospective study. Patients with IAIs and AMR pathogens were included in our analysis, and were divided into MDR and non-MDR groups based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Firstly, we randomly selected a sample of 40% of all inpatients discharged between 2014 and 2015 in the hospital, due to limiting budget and the large number of patients. Then, two researchers independently manually collected disease diagnosis. Subsequently, we screened in 254 patients according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes for IAIs and 230 patients were truly patients with IAIs by systematic manual review of electronic medical records. Moreover, we identified antimicrobial resistant pathogens based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eventually, 101 patients with IAIs were included (64 MDR patients and 37 non-MDR patients) after excluding those without laboratory test results, as well as those without any pathogens detected and those without antimicrobial resistant pathogens based on the hypothesis and the objective in the analysis (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Sample collection procedure.

In the sampling, we used the following procedures. Firstly, the identification numbers of all discharged patients were collected from the HIS and serial numbers corresponding to the identification numbers were generated in Excel 2013. Then, random-between (bottom, top) command was applied to randomly select the patients. If one patient has multiple visits, we regarded this patient as multiple unique patients.

Data collection

Demographic and clinical parameters influencing medical costs were collected from electronic medical records. Any disagreements were resolved with consultation from an experienced physician. The demographic parameters included identification number, age, sex, medical insurance, and health outcome. Clinical parameters included discharge department, disease diagnosis, susceptibility testing results, antimicrobial usage, surgery, LOS, and ICU admission. Based on the existing parameters, we determined more parameters that may influence medical costs, as follows: combination antimicrobial therapy, carbapenem usage, number of administered antimicrobial agents, and number of pathogens. The TMC for each patient’s entire admission was calculated. TMC includes ward stays, ICU stays, laboratory tests, medical tests, microbiological cultures, surgical procedures, antimicrobial therapy and other drugs during the period of hospital stay [20]. Since the study was conducted over a span of 2 years, we adjusted TMCs to the year 2015’s currency using the Consumer Price Index for China [20]. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Zhejiang University School of Public Health, and owing to the retrospective nature of the study, informed consent was not deemed necessary. All patient data were anonymized prior to analysis.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 17.0 for Windows. The Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical parameters. The Student t-test was conducted for analyzing age, while a Mann-Whitney U test was used for analyzing other parameters of non-normal distribution. Then, the effect of each parameter on the TMCs was evaluated by univariate analysis and a Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test was employed to assess categorical parameters on TMCs, because it was confirmed to be non-normally distributed. In order to control the effects of parameters on TMCs, a generalized linear model was performed, which included the following parameters: outcome, insurance, age, sex, surgery, combination antimicrobial therapy, carbapenem usage, LOS, ICU admission, number of administered antimicrobial agents, and number of pathogens. Finally, all tests were two-tailed and P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. To correct for the non-normal distribution of the TMCs, a logarithmic transformation was specified. The parameters in the generalized linear model were selected due to our hypothesis and previous research [17,19,21]. We assumed that TMCs are associated with demographic parameters such as age, sex, insurance, outcome, and clinical parameters such as surgery, combination antimicrobial therapy, carbapenem usage, LOS, ICU admission, number of administered antimicrobial agents, and number of pathogens. Moreover, clinical parameters positively influenced TMCs.

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 101 patients with IAIs caused by AMR pathogens were included, 63.4% of which were MDR patients. The average age of all patients was 57.2 years and most of the patients were men. About half of the patients were covered by insurance, received combination antimicrobial therapy, or admitted to the ICU. Most of them had been previously treated with carbapenems and had undergone surgery. The main outcome (67.3%) upon hospital discharge was an improvement in health (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics among patients with intra-abdominal infections.

ParametersTotal(n = 101)MDR(n = 64)Non-MDR(n = 37)P-value
Age, mean±SD, years57.2(20.4)58.4(20.1)55.1(20.9)0.434
Male, (%)72.370.375.70.562
Insurance, (%)58.450730.024*
Outcome, (%)0.675
Cure14.912.518.9
Improvement67.368.864.9
Else17.818.816.2
Number of administered antimicrobial agents3.4(2.1)4.02(2.3)2.4(1.3)<0.000*
Carbapenem usage, (%)79.282.8730.24
Combination antimicrobial therapy, (%)44.656.224.30.002*
Number of pathogens2.4(2.1)3.0(2.4)1.4(0.6)<0.000*
Surgery, (%)81.284.475.70.281
ICU, (%)61.476.635.1<0.000*
LOS, mean±SDb, days25.4(25.3)31.0(28.8)15.59(13.1)<0.000*

* Significance was determined at the 0.05 level.

SD: standard deviation; LOS: length of stay; ICU: intensive care unit; MDR: multiple drug resistance

* Significance was determined at the 0.05 level. SD: standard deviation; LOS: length of stay; ICU: intensive care unit; MDR: multiple drug resistance Compared to non-MDR patients, a larger number of administered antimicrobial agents, a larger number of pathogens, and a longer LOS were observed in the MDR patients. Additionally, there were significantly more patients in the MDR group who were covered by insurance, received combination antimicrobial therapy, or admitted to the ICU. However, there were no significant differences between the MDR and non-MDR groups with regard to age, sex, carbapenem usage, surgery, and outcome (Table 1). Pathogens used for analysis were strains collected in the susceptibility tests, with duplicate isolates (the same pathogen from the same patient) being excluded [18,19]. A total of 262 pathogens were detected from 101 patients with IAIs. Out of all pathogens, 35 were non-resistant pathogens, 126 were non-MDR pathogens, and 101 were MDR pathogens. CRAB was the most frequently isolated MDR pathogen, followed by MRSA, ESBL-producing pathogen, CRE, methicillin-resistant coagulase negative Staphylococci (MRCNS), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (MRSE), and CRPA. For MDR pathogens, the most frequently submitted sample type was sputum, followed by pus and drainage fluid. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated out of the non-MDR pathogens, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecalis, Morganella morganii, and other pathogens (S1 Table). For non-MDR pathogens, drainage fluid was the most common sample type, followed by sputum, ascites, pus, and other types (S2 Table).

Total medical costs

Patients with MDR pathogens were associated with a mean TMC of ¥ 90201 higher than that of non-MDR patients. Other parameters with a significant association with TMC were age ≤65 years, age >65 years, female, male, insurance, combination antimicrobial therapy, treatment with carbapenems, number of administered antimicrobial agents >3 agents, surgery, LOS >15 days, and admission to the ICU. There were no significant differences in other parameters on TMCs (Table 2).
Table 2

Total medical costs.

ParametersMDRNon-MDRP-value
MeanSDMeanSD
Total medical costs1318011350974160031974<0.000*
Antimicrobial costs249143640947344417<0.000*
Age
≤651125081226835050327890.004*
>6515824914922953693276080.002*
Sex
Female13513012970340841383020.008*
Male13039613872141844304660.001*
Insurance
No11832712133235470303630.006*
Yes14527514830743871328120.001*
Outcome
Cure743365863523065162560.054
Improvement12910414001446610352900.008*
Else18000114402543184266550.002*
Number of administered antimicrobial agents
≤3592195967138982337060.22
>31958441506625282121488<0.000*
Combination antimicrobial therapy
No637426021435686308050.101
Yes18473615319059999299110.001*
Carbapenem usage
No130241157517695151490.434
Yes1564531359505045432170<0.000*
Number of pathogens
≤1471054094835249281440.482
>11761661460155332636321<0.000*
Surgery
No411206310926922191280.87
Yes1485941384914631834056<0.000*
ICU
No222252536428688198050.001*
Yes1653451373556543836962<0.000*
LOS
1~399584299933179224330.906
15~1034285647749172296060.004*
30~23757016624175090619500.017*

All costs are expressed in 2015 constant Chinese Yuan

* Significance was determined at the 0.05 level

SD: standard deviation; LOS: length of stay; MDR: multi drug resistance; ICU: intensive care unit

All costs are expressed in 2015 constant Chinese Yuan * Significance was determined at the 0.05 level SD: standard deviation; LOS: length of stay; MDR: multi drug resistance; ICU: intensive care unit

Factors influencing total medical costs

In the generalized linear model, in the MDR group, the most significant parameters affecting TMCs for patients with IAIs included admission to the ICU, carbapenem usage, number of pathogens, and LOS. The most influential parameter was admission to the ICU. Moreover, in the non-MDR group, the most significant parameters affecting TMCs for patients with IAIs included carbapenem usage, admission to the ICU, number of administered antimicrobial agents, LOS, and age. Carbapenem usage was the most influential parameter. In the MDR group, we found that TMCs among patients with carbapenem usage, or admission to the ICU were 2.42 times or 2.52 times as high as that among patients without, respectively. TMCs increased by 1.09 times or 1.01 times when the number of pathogens increased by one pathogen or LOS increased by one day, respectively. In the non-MDR group, we found that TMCs among patients with carbapenem usage or admission to the ICU were 1.55 times or 1.50 times of that among patients without, respectively. TMCs increased by 1.17 times, 1.11 times or 1.02 times when the number of administered antimicrobial agents increased by one agent, LOS increased by one day, or the age increased by one year (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors influencing total medical costs.

ParametersMDRNon-MDR
bSD95% CIP-valuebSD95% CIP-value
(Intercept)9.200.318.589.81<0.000*7.630.346.958.30<0.000*
SexMale-0.030.14-0.300.250.8590.270.16-0.040.590.090
Female00
InsuranceYes-0.160.13-0.410.090.2150.030.17-0.310.370.864
No00
OutcomeElse-0.190.24-0.670.290.431-0.130.26-0.640.380.616
Improvement-0.360.20-0.750.020.066-0.190.21-0.600.210.351
Cure00
Combination antimicrobial therapyYes0.220.15-0.080.520.1450.040.21-0.360.450.836
No00
Carbapenem usageYes0.890.320.261.510.005*0.440.170.100.770.011*
No00
SurgeryYes-0.160.23-0.620.290.4850.300.18-0.070.660.109
No00
ICUYes0.930.280.391.470.001*0.400.160.080.720.013*
No00
Age0.000.000.000.010.2690.020.000.010.03<0.000*
Number of administered antimicrobial agents0.040.04-0.030.110.2620.150.070.020.290.023*
Number of pathogens0.080.030.020.150.008*0.140.12-0.110.380.367
LOS0.010.000.010.02<0.000*0.110.12-0.120.34<0.000*

*Significance was determined at the 0.05 level

MDR: multi-drug resistant; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; LOS: length of stay

*Significance was determined at the 0.05 level MDR: multi-drug resistant; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; LOS: length of stay

Total medical costs in whole country

The mean TMC difference between the MDR and non-MDR groups was ¥ 90201. The rates of MDR IAIs (number of patients with MDR IAIs / number of patients with IAIs) or non-MDR IAIs (number of patients with non-MDR IAIs / number of patients with IAIs) were 27.83% or 16.09%, respectively. Additionally, the rate of IAIs (number of patients with IAIs / number of patients) was 0.587%. In China, there were nearly 1,235,870 cases of IAIs, including 343,943 cases with MDR pathogens and 198,851 cases with non-MDR pathogens [22]. If our results are applied to the whole country, the sum of all attributable TMC was ¥ 37 billion. The societal costs, furthermore, were ¥ 111 billion in 2015, based on WHO suggestion that the societal costs may be more than 3 times the direct costs caused by AMR [23].

Discussion

Few studies have investigated the impact of MDR on TMCs among patients with IAIs, despite its heavy burden on the Chinese health system. One study focused on the ESBL-producing pathogens but the published data were from 2000 [19]. To our knowledge, our study is the first investigation to provide an overall view of the attributable costs of MDR IAIs in China. Moreover, this is one of few real-world data analyses on Chinese patients, especially in the face of the emergence and spread of MDR pathogens in China. Our study reveals that MDR is an important driver of TMCs, as results show that MDR inpatients with IAIs are associated with larger number of administered antimicrobial agents, larger number of pathogens, and less likely to have insurance, which are the factors contributing mostly to both TMCs and antimicrobial costs. Several systematic reviews suggest that TMCs attributable to MDR pathogens [24] and due to IAIs [25,26] were considerably high. Moreover, Bijie Hu et al. found that IAIs caused by ESBL-positive producing pathogens were significantly associated with longer LOS, higher TMCs and higher antimicrobial costs [19]. In generalized linear model, it was also noted that admission to the ICU has a strong positive correlation with TMCs. Indeed, the majority of previous studies have shown that ICU patients are more likely to undergo surgery and receive more kinds of antimicrobial agents [27,28]. All the above factors could lead to acquiring resistant pathogens. A reduction in admissions to the ICU may improve inpatient safety, in addition to increasing the quality of care and potentially hospital turnover, and reducing economic burden. It is known that patients with MDR pathogens are associated with longer LOS compared with patients with non-MDR pathogens, which suggests that differences in costs may be related to LOS. Some studies also indicated that even a one day reduction in hospitalization may result in substantial cost-savings [29,30]. Patients with MDR pathogens were associated with a significant increase in TMCs, because they were treated with carbapenems, admitted to the ICU, stayed longer in hospital, and had more pathogens present. Carbapenems are often considered as drugs of a last resort in strategies for MDR infections, and exposure to carbapenems was associated with carbapenem resistance [31,32]. Moreover, empirical antimicrobial therapy is essential to improving patient outcomes, but it could potentially lead to unnecessary exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents [33], resulting in MDR and thus increasing TMCs [34]. In addition, the emergence of MDR pathogens can also lead to higher frequencies of failure for empirical antimicrobial therapy, resulting in even higher TMCs [34]. In China, there is a trend of AMR increasing across multiple antimicrobial agents. Between 2005 and 2014, rates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli were between 51.7% and 55.8%. Carbapenem resistance among Klebdiella pneumonia and Acinetobacter baumannii increased from 2.4% to 13.4%, and from 31% to 66.7%, respectively [35]. In this study, IAIs were mostly caused by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which is consistent with other studies. However, it has been revealed that these pathogens often fail to be treated with various β-lactam agents but carbapenems continue to retain activity [36]. Moreover, this study has a higher proportion of patients with CRAB, compared to other pathogens, indicating that the efficacy of carbapenems against ESBL-producing pathogens is decreasing and CRAB is becoming an increasingly serious matter [37]. Several limitations are worth noting. Firstly, due to the nature of retrospective study, we cannot distinguish colonization or infection, which incur significantly different costs. IAIs, however, unlike bloodstream infection or pneumonia, have less chance of colonization. Secondly, future studies should be carried out to directly estimate the societal costs. In this study, we only estimated direct medical costs, and used the relationship between medical costs and societal costs suggested by WHO to estimate the societal costs. This estimate may overestimate the economic burden and may not apply to the Chinese situation nationally. In addition, since this study was conducted only in one tertiary teaching and general hospital in Zhejiang province, generalization of the direct costs to a national level may be overestimated. Thus, multicenter and prospective studies are needed in the future. Lastly, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score is a powerful instrument for stratifying risk that is often used for evaluating the severity of patients [2], which was not obtainable in the present HIS.

Conclusions

This retrospective study shows the heavy burden associated with MDR among patients with IAIs. We conservatively estimate that a large amount of medical costs per hospitalization can be saved, if MDR pathogens can be substantially reduced. The enormous economic burden imposed by MDR IAIs should attract the attention of decision makers in various fields. Moreover, our results provide information that should lead to increased efforts to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial therapy in clinical practice, in order to prevent the emergence and spread of MDR pathogens and to further reduce their economic burden.

Isolation of pathogens.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Isolation of sample types.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: The Old Antimicrobials and the New Players.

Authors:  Young R Lee; Danni McMahan; Catherine McCall; Gregory K Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost minimisation analysis of antimicrobial treatment for intra-abdominal infections: a multicentre retrospective study from Taiwan.

Authors:  Po-Ren Hsueh; Cheng-Yi Liu; Zhi-Yuan Shi; Ming-Hsun Lee; Feng-Yee Chang; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Aerobic and Facultative Gram-Negative Bacilli from Intra-abdominal Infections in Patients from Seven Regions in China in 2012 and 2013.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Qiwen Yang; Kang Liao; Yuxing Ni; Yunsong Yu; Bijie Hu; Ziyong Sun; Wenxiang Huang; Yong Wang; Anhua Wu; Xianju Feng; Yanping Luo; Zhidong Hu; Yunzhuo Chu; Shulan Chen; Bin Cao; Jianrong Su; Bingdong Gui; Qiong Duan; Shufang Zhang; Haifeng Shao; Haishen Kong; Robert E Badal; Yingchun Xu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Costs and possible benefits of a two-tier infection control management strategy consisting of active screening for multidrug-resistant organisms and tailored control measures.

Authors:  N T Mutters; F Günther; U Frank; A Mischnik
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Clinical and economic impact of meropenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected patients.

Authors:  William R Judd; Patrick D Ratliff; Ryan P Hickson; Dana M Stephens; Charles A Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Clinical characteristics and antimicrobial patterns in complicated intra-abdominal infections: a 6-year epidemiological study in southern China.

Authors:  Wenwei Ouyang; Huiling Xue; Yunqin Chen; Weiguo Gao; Xiaoyan Li; Jia Wei; Zehuai Wen
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Impact of a Dynamic Microbiological Environment on the Clinical Efficacy of Ertapenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Community-Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection in Spain: A Cost-Consequence Analysis.

Authors:  Santiago Grau; Virginia Lozano; Amparo Valladares; Rafael Cavanillas; Yang Xie; Gonzalo Nocea
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 8.  Impact of antimicrobial multidrug resistance on inpatient care cost: an evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Giannoula S Tansarli; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Anastasios Kapaskelis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Cost analysis of five antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  John G Carson; Robin S Turpin; Henry Hu; Larry Ma; Samuel E Wilson
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.150

10.  Understanding Length of Stay after Spinal Cord Injury: Insights and Limitations from the Access to Care and Timing Project.

Authors:  Anthony S Burns; Argelio Santos; Christiana L Cheng; Elaine Chan; Nader Fallah; Derek Atkins; Marcel F Dvorak; Chester Ho; Henry Ahn; Jerome Paquet; Brian K Kwon; Vanessa K Noonan
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.269

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Nano-Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Tong-Xin Zong; Ariane Pandolfo Silveira; José Athayde Vasconcelos Morais; Marina Carvalho Sampaio; Luis Alexandre Muehlmann; Juan Zhang; Cheng-Shi Jiang; Shan-Kui Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 2.  The Clinical and Economic Impact of Antibiotic Resistance in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuemei Zhen; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg; Xueshan Sun; Xiaoqian Hu; Hengjin Dong
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-10

3.  A Sub-Micromolar MraYAA Inhibitor with an Aminoribosyl Uridine Structure and a (S,S)-Tartaric Diamide: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Modeling.

Authors:  Martin Oliver; Laurent Le Corre; Mélanie Poinsot; Michaël Bosco; Hongwei Wan; Ana Amoroso; Bernard Joris; Ahmed Bouhss; Sandrine Calvet-Vitale; Christine Gravier-Pelletier
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.