N T Mutters1, F Günther2, U Frank2, A Mischnik2. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: nico.mutters@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are an economic burden, and infection control (IC) measures are cost- and labour-intensive. A two-tier IC management strategy was developed, including active screening, in order to achieve effective use of limited resources. Briefly, high-risk patients were differentiated from other patients, distinguished according to type of MDRO, and IC measures were implemented accordingly. AIM: To evaluate costs and benefits of this IC management strategy. METHODS: The study period comprised 2.5 years. All high-risk patients underwent microbiological screening. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Expenses consisted of costs for staff, materials, laboratory, increased workload and occupational costs. FINDINGS: In total, 39,551 patients were screened, accounting for 24.5% of all admissions. Of all screened patients, 7.8% (N=3,104) were MDRO positive; these patients were mainly colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (37.3%), followed by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (30.3%) and MDR-GNB (28.3%). The median length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 10 days (interquartile range 3-20); LOS was twice as long in colonized patients (P<0.001). Screening costs totalled 255,093.82€, IC measures cost 97,701.36€, and opportunity costs were 599,225.52€. The savings of this IC management strategy totalled 500,941.84€. Possible transmissions by undetected carriers would have caused additional costs of 613,648.90-4,974,939.26€ (i.e. approximately 600,000-5 million €). CONCLUSION: Although the costs of a two-tier IC management strategy including active microbiological screening are not trivial, these data indicate that the approach is cost-effective when prevented transmissions are included in the cost estimate.
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are an economic burden, and infection control (IC) measures are cost- and labour-intensive. A two-tier IC management strategy was developed, including active screening, in order to achieve effective use of limited resources. Briefly, high-risk patients were differentiated from other patients, distinguished according to type of MDRO, and IC measures were implemented accordingly. AIM: To evaluate costs and benefits of this IC management strategy. METHODS: The study period comprised 2.5 years. All high-risk patients underwent microbiological screening. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Expenses consisted of costs for staff, materials, laboratory, increased workload and occupational costs. FINDINGS: In total, 39,551 patients were screened, accounting for 24.5% of all admissions. Of all screened patients, 7.8% (N=3,104) were MDRO positive; these patients were mainly colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (37.3%), followed by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (30.3%) and MDR-GNB (28.3%). The median length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 10 days (interquartile range 3-20); LOS was twice as long in colonized patients (P<0.001). Screening costs totalled 255,093.82€, IC measures cost 97,701.36€, and opportunity costs were 599,225.52€. The savings of this IC management strategy totalled 500,941.84€. Possible transmissions by undetected carriers would have caused additional costs of 613,648.90-4,974,939.26€ (i.e. approximately 600,000-5 million €). CONCLUSION: Although the costs of a two-tier IC management strategy including active microbiological screening are not trivial, these data indicate that the approach is cost-effective when prevented transmissions are included in the cost estimate.
Authors: E Kousouli; O Zarkotou; L Politi; K Polimeri; G Vrioni; K Themeli-Digalaki; A Tsakris; S Pournaras Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Juri Katchanov; Lucia Asar; Eva-Maria Klupp; Anna Both; Camilla Rothe; Christina König; Holger Rohde; Stefan Kluge; Florian P Maurer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sabine Engler-Hüsch; Thomas Heister; Nico T Mutters; Jan Wolff; Klaus Kaier Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 2.655