Literature DB >> 29589810

Visuomotor learning is dependent on direction-specific error saliency.

Wanying Jiang1,2,3, Xianzhi Yuan4,1,2, Cong Yin5, Kunlin Wei4,1,2,3.   

Abstract

People perceive better in cardinal directions compared with oblique ones. This directional effect, called oblique effect, has been documented in perception studies for a long time. However, typical motor studies do not differentiate learning in different directions. In this study we identify a significant directional effect in motor learning using visuomotor rotation paradigms. We find that adaptation to visual perturbations yields more savings when both initial learning and relearning are performed in cardinal directions than in oblique directions. We hypothesize that this directional effect arises from relatively higher error saliency in cardinal directions. Consistent with this hypothesis, we successfully increased savings in the oblique directions, which showed no saving effect before, by enhancing the error saliency with augmented visual feedback during learning. Our findings suggest that movement direction plays an important role in motor learning, especially when learning signals are direction specific. Our results also provide new insights about the role of motor errors in the formation and retrieval of motor memory and practical implications for promoting learning in motor rehabilitation and athletic training. NEW & NOTEWORTHY People perceive better when the stimulus is in cardinal directions than in oblique directions. Whether a similar directional effect exists in motor learning is unknown. Using a motor learning paradigm, we show that people relearn to compensate for a previously encountered perturbation faster when they move in cardinal directions than when they move in oblique directions. Further experimentation supports that this motor directional effect likely results from better sensory saliency of motor errors in cardinal directions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  error saliency; motor adaptation; motor generalization; oblique effect; visuomotor rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589810     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00787.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.

Authors:  Katrina P Nguyen; Weiwei Zhou; Erin McKenna; Katrina Colucci-Chang; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Eghbal A Hosseini; Laith Alhussein; Meena Rezazad; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hutter; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The subconscious impact of line orientations in background images on memory of Chinese written characters.

Authors:  Yanqun Huang; Yi Zhang; Xu Li; Jie Zhang; Yuzhen Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhou; Elizabeth A Kruse; Rylee Brower; Ryan North; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Visuomotor perturbation in a continuous circle tracing task: novel approach for quantifying motor adaptation.

Authors:  Erez James Cohen; Kunlin Wei; Diego Minciacchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Accuracy of hand localization is subject-specific and improved without performance feedback.

Authors:  Tianhe Wang; Ziyan Zhu; Inoue Kana; Yuanzheng Yu; Hao He; Kunlin Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.