Literature DB >> 29589494

Intercalary reconstruction of femur after tumour resection: is a vascularized fibular autograft plus allograft a long-lasting solution?

D A Campanacci1, F Totti1, S Puccini1, G Beltrami2, G Scoccianti1, L Delcroix3, M Innocenti3, R Capanna4.   

Abstract

Aims: After intercalary resection of a bone tumour from the femur, reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and massive allograft is considered a reliable method of treatment. However, little is known about the long-term outcome of this procedure. The aims of this study were to determine whether the morbidity of this procedure was comparable to that of other reconstructive techniques, if it was possible to achieve a satisfactory functional result, and whether biological reconstruction with a VFG and massive allograft could achieve a durable, long-lasting reconstruction. Patients and
Methods: A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 16 years (five to 40) who had undergone resection of an intercalary bone tumour of the femur and reconstruction with a VFG and allograft were reviewed clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up was 141 months (24 to 313). The mean length of the fibular graft was 18 cm (12 to 29). Full weight-bearing without a brace was allowed after a mean of 13 months (seven to 26).
Results: At final follow-up, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score of 22 evaluable patients was 94% (73 to 100). Eight major complications, five fractures (21.7%), and three nonunions (13%) were seen in seven patients (30.4%). Revision-free survival was 72.3% at five, ten, and 15 years, with fracture and nonunion needing surgery as failure endpoints. Overall survival, with removal of allograft or amputation as failure endpoints, was 94.4% at five, ten, and 15 years. Discussion: There were no complications needing surgical revision after five years had elapsed from surgery, suggesting that the mechanical strength of the implant improves with time, thereby decreasing the risk of complications. In young patients with an intercalary bone tumour of the femur, combining a VFG and massive allograft may result in a reconstruction that lasts a lifetime. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:378-86.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Femur; Intercalary reconstruction; Limb salvage; Tumour resection; Vascularized fibular graft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589494     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0283.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  11 in total

1.  Failure rates and functional results for intercalary femur reconstructions after tumour resection.

Authors:  J I Albergo; L C Gaston; G L Farfalli; M Laitinen; M Parry; M A Ayerza; M Risk; L M Jeys; L A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-08

Review 2.  Joint-preservation surgery for bone sarcoma in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Norio Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Araki; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Bony Hypertrophy in Vascularized Fibular Grafts.

Authors:  Lewis L Shi; Rohit Garg; Andrew Jawa; Qiaojie Wang; Yimin Chai; Bingfang Zeng; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-01-27

4.  Do Massive Allograft Reconstructions for Tumors of the Femur and Tibia Survive 10 or More Years after Implantation?

Authors:  Luis A Aponte-Tinao; Miguel A Ayerza; Jose I Albergo; German L Farfalli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Does the Addition of a Vascularized Fibula Improve the Results of a Massive Bone Allograft Alone for Intercalary Femur Reconstruction of Malignant Bone Tumors in Children?

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Patricio A Alfaro; Virginia Ponz; Marco Colangeli; Davide Maria Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Intercalary Allograft to Reconstruct Large-Segment Diaphysis Defects After Resection of Lower Extremity Malignant Bone Tumor.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Hongbo He; Zhixi Duan; Hao Zeng; Yuhao Yuan; Zhiwei Wang; Wei Luo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Intercalary reconstruction following resection of diaphyseal bone tumors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Shinji Tsukamoto; Nusaibah Almunhaisen; Andreas Mavrogenis; Davide Donati
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-07

8.  Does Osteoarticular Allograft Reconstruction Achieve Long-term Survivorship after En Bloc Resection of Grade 3 Giant Cell Tumor of Bone?

Authors:  Jose I Albergo; German L Farfalli; Angeles Cabas-Geat; Pablo Roitman; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Is three-dimensional-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure an acceptable reconstructive alternative in peri-knee metaphysis for the tumorous bone defect?

Authors:  Jie Wang; Jingjing An; Li Min; Chongqi Tu; Minxun Lu; Yuqi Zhang; Jingqi Lin; Yi Luo; Yong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Gerardo La Padula; Ernesto Torsiello; Filippo Spiezia; Francesco Oliva; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.