Leanne M Ward1, Frank Rauch2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada. lward@cheo.on.ca. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, and Shriners Hospital for Children, 1003 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, H4A 0A9, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Numerous forms of osteoporosis in childhood are characterized by low bone turnover (for example, osteoporosis due to neuromuscular disorders and glucocorticoid exposure). Anti-resorptive therapy, traditionally used to treat osteoporosis in the young, is associated with further reductions in bone turnover, raising concerns about the long-term safety and efficacy of such therapy. These observations have led to increasing interest in the role of anabolic therapy to treat pediatric osteoporosis. RECENT FINDINGS: While growth hormone and androgens appears to be relatively weak anabolic modulators of bone mass, emerging therapies targeting bone formation pathways (anti-transforming growth factor beta antibody and anti-sclerostin antibody) hold considerable promise. Teriparatide remains an attractive option that merits formal study for patients post-epiphyseal fusion, although it must be considered that adult studies have shown its effect is blunted when administered following bisphosphonate therapy. Mechanical stimulation of bone through whole body vibration therapy appears to be much less effective than bisphosphonate therapy for treating osteoporosis in children. New anabolic therapies which target important pathways in skeletal metabolism merit further study in children, including their effects on fracture risk reduction and after treatment discontinuation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Numerous forms of osteoporosis in childhood are characterized by low bone turnover (for example, osteoporosis due to neuromuscular disorders and glucocorticoid exposure). Anti-resorptive therapy, traditionally used to treat osteoporosis in the young, is associated with further reductions in bone turnover, raising concerns about the long-term safety and efficacy of such therapy. These observations have led to increasing interest in the role of anabolic therapy to treat pediatric osteoporosis. RECENT FINDINGS: While growth hormone and androgens appears to be relatively weak anabolic modulators of bone mass, emerging therapies targeting bone formation pathways (anti-transforming growth factor beta antibody and anti-sclerostin antibody) hold considerable promise. Teriparatide remains an attractive option that merits formal study for patients post-epiphyseal fusion, although it must be considered that adult studies have shown its effect is blunted when administered following bisphosphonate therapy. Mechanical stimulation of bone through whole body vibration therapy appears to be much less effective than bisphosphonate therapy for treating osteoporosis in children. New anabolic therapies which target important pathways in skeletal metabolism merit further study in children, including their effects on fracture risk reduction and after treatment discontinuation.
Authors: Rene Przkora; David N Herndon; Oscar E Suman; Marc G Jeschke; Walter J Meyer; David L Chinkes; Ronald P Mlcak; Ted Huang; Robert E Barrow Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert Lindsay; Wim H Scheele; Robert Neer; Gerhardt Pohl; Silvano Adami; Carlos Mautalen; Jean-Yves Reginster; Jan J Stepan; Stephen L Myers; Bruce H Mitlak Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004-10-11
Authors: John L Vahle; Masahiko Sato; Gerald G Long; Jamie K Young; Paul C Francis; Jeffery A Engelhardt; Michael S Westmore; Yanfei Linda; James B Nold Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Barbara M Obermayer-Pietsch; Fernando Marin; Eugene V McCloskey; Peyman Hadji; Jordi Farrerons; Steven Boonen; Maurice Audran; Clare Barker; Athanasios D Anastasilakis; William D Fraser; Thomas Nickelsen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Alison Eddleston; Massimo Marenzana; Adrian R Moore; Paul Stephens; Mariusz Muzylak; Diane Marshall; Martyn K Robinson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Johanna Korvala; Harald Jüppner; Outi Mäkitie; Etienne Sochett; Dirk Schnabel; Stefano Mora; Cynthia F Bartels; Matthew L Warman; Donald Deraska; William G Cole; Heini Hartikka; Leena Ala-Kokko; Minna Männikkö Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Rosa M R Pereira; Mariana O Perez; Ana Patrícia Paula; Caio Moreira; Charlles H M Castro; Cristiano A F Zerbini; Diogo S Domiciano; Elaine de Azevedo; Laura M C Mendonca; Marcia Midore Shinzato; Marco Antonio A da Rocha-Loures; Sebastião Radominski; Vera L Szejnfeld Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: W H Nijhuis; D M Eastwood; J Allgrove; I Hvid; H H Weinans; R A Bank; R J Sakkers Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 1.548