Mariana Barbosa Câmara-Souza1, Olívia Maria Costa de Figueredo1, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues Garcia2. 1. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil. 2. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Avenida Limeira, No. 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13414-903, Brazil. regarcia@fop.unicamp.br.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and sleep quality of subjects with and without sleep bruxism (SB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants of both genders were assigned as bruxers (n = 30, age 21-45 years) and non-bruxers (n = 30, age 24-40 years). SB was clinically diagnosed and confirmed with an electromyography/electrocardiograph portable device (Bruxoff). The OHRQoL was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). The sleep quality was determined using the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaires. OHIP-14, PSQI, and ESS data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, considering a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Bruxers had worse OHRQoL (mean = 16.43) than controls (mean = 4.1), with an effect size (ES) of 1.58. Moreover, SB volunteers showed the highest PSQI scores (mean = 7.07; ES = 0.82) and excessive daytime sleepiness (mean = 10.33; ES = 0.65), compared to non-bruxers (means = 4.7 and 7.8, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SB may be associated with a negative impact on OHRQoL and sleep quality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determining that SB may have a marked role in OHRQoL and sleep quality is important for dental professionals establish proper multifactorial management, and understand patient-related psychosocial aspects.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and sleep quality of subjects with and without sleep bruxism (SB). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Participants of both genders were assigned as bruxers (n = 30, age 21-45 years) and non-bruxers (n = 30, age 24-40 years). SB was clinically diagnosed and confirmed with an electromyography/electrocardiograph portable device (Bruxoff). The OHRQoL was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). The sleep quality was determined using the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaires. OHIP-14, PSQI, and ESS data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, considering a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Bruxers had worse OHRQoL (mean = 16.43) than controls (mean = 4.1), with an effect size (ES) of 1.58. Moreover, SB volunteers showed the highest PSQI scores (mean = 7.07; ES = 0.82) and excessive daytime sleepiness (mean = 10.33; ES = 0.65), compared to non-bruxers (means = 4.7 and 7.8, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SB may be associated with a negative impact on OHRQoL and sleep quality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determining that SB may have a marked role in OHRQoL and sleep quality is important for dental professionals establish proper multifactorial management, and understand patient-related psychosocial aspects.
Authors: Monika Michalek-Zrabkowska; Mieszko Wieckiewicz; Piotr Macek; Pawel Gac; Joanna Smardz; Anna Wojakowska; Rafal Poreba; Grzegorz Mazur; Helena Martynowicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Helena Martynowicz; Pawel Dymczyk; Marzena Dominiak; Klaudia Kazubowska; Robert Skomro; Rafal Poreba; Paweł Gac; Anna Wojakowska; Grzegorz Mazur; Mieszko Wieckiewicz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Nguyen Thi Thu Phuong; Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc; Le My Linh; Nguyen Minh Duc; Nguyen Thu Tra; Le Quynh Anh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Magdalini Thymi; Frank Lobbezoo; Ghizlane Aarab; Jari Ahlberg; Kazuyoshi Baba; Maria Clotilde Carra; Luigi M Gallo; Antoon De Laat; Daniele Manfredini; Gilles Lavigne; Peter Svensson Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 3.558