Literature DB >> 29588748

Understanding and Minimising Occupational Radiation in the Catheterisation Laboratory with PISAX and the ACIST CVi® Contrast Delivery System.

Olivier Bar1.   

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of radiation exposure and its associated risks in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory (cath lab), as well as strategies to minimise radiation exposure for operators, cath lab staff and patients. The benefits of using a mobile 2 mm lead equivalent radiation shield (PISAX) and adoption of an automated contrast injection system (the ACIST CVi® Contrast Delivery System) are discussed, and the potential advantages of their combination are reviewed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACIST CVi®; PISAX; catheterisation; combination approaches; contrast delivery system; occupational radiation; radiation protection

Year:  2013        PMID： 29588748      PMCID： PMC5808475          DOI： 10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Cardiol        ISSN： 1756-1485


  16 in total

1.  Radiation protection principles.

Authors:  John R Cooper
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  ICRP Publication 113. Education and training in radiological protection for diagnostic and interventional procedures.

Authors:  E Vañó; M Rosenstein; J Liniecki; M M Rehani; C J Martin; R J Vetter
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2011-04-15

4.  Automated contrast injection in contemporary practice during cardiac catheterization and PCI: effects on contrast-induced nephropathy.

Authors:  Jason Call; Matthew Sacrinty; Robert Applegate; William Little; Renato Santos; Talal Baki; Sanjay Gandhi; Frederic Kahl; Michael Kutcher
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.022

Review 5.  Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Jacob Goldstein; Olivier Bar
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.534

6.  Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.

Authors:  Antonio E Gómez-Menchero; José F Díaz; Carlos Sánchez-González; Rosa Cardenal; Amit B Sanghvi; Jessica Roa-Garrido; José L Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2012-04-01

7.  A multicentre survey of patient exposure to ionising radiation during interventional cardiology procedures in France.

Authors:  Olivier Bar; Carlo Maccia; Pierre Pagès; Didier Blanchard
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.534

8.  Occupational cataracts and lens opacities in interventional cardiology (O'CLOC study): are X-Rays involved? Radiation-induced cataracts and lens opacities.

Authors:  Sophie Jacob; Morgane Michel; Christian Spaulding; Serge Boveda; Olivier Bar; Antoine P Brézin; Maté Streho; Carlo Maccia; Pascale Scanff; Dominique Laurier; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  S Betsou; E P Efstathopoulos; D Katritsis; K Faulkner; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Traditional versus automated injection contrast system in diagnostic and percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: comparison of the contrast volume delivered.

Authors:  Ganeshkumar Anne; Luis Gruberg; Akiva Huber; Eugenia Nikolsky; Ehud Grenadier; Monther Boulus; Shlomo Amikam; Walter Markiewicz; Rafael Beyar
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.022
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.