| Literature DB >> 29587635 |
Alison T Isaacs1, Henry D Mawejje2, Sean Tomlinson3, Daniel J Rigden4, Martin J Donnelly3,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To combat malaria transmission, the Ugandan government has embarked upon an ambitious programme of indoor residual spraying (IRS) with a carbamate class insecticide, bendiocarb. In preparation for this campaign, we characterized bendiocarb resistance and associated transcriptional variation among Anopheles gambiae s.s. mosquitoes from two sites in Uganda.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles gambiae; Bendiocarb; Indoor residual spraying; Long-lasting insecticidal nets; Malaria control; Pyrethroids; Salivary gland proteins; Whole-genome microarray
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29587635 PMCID: PMC5870100 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4605-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Map of Uganda showing study sites. Larval collections were completed in both Kihihi and Nagongera in January–May 2014. Larval collections were completed in Nagongera in January–May 2015. The geographical origin of the Kisumu laboratory strain of susceptible mosquito is also indicated. The figure was made by the authors using Google Maps (maps.google.com)
Genes highly overexpressed in bendiocarb-resistant An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes, as measured by whole-genome microarrays
| Location | Transcript ID | Gene name | Fold change resistant vs. unexposed | Fold change resistant vs. Kisumu | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nagongera | AGAP003334-RA |
| 2.4 | 2.97E-03 | 2.4 | 2.92E-03 |
| AGAP008282-RA |
| 2.4 | 4.95E-02 | 7.2 | 9.22E-05 | |
| AGAP002198-RA |
| 2.1 | 6.79E-03 | 2.5 | 1.34E-03 | |
| AGAP000603-RA | Unknown | 1.9 | 3.32E-02 | 2.5 | 3.84E-03 | |
| AGAP008281-RA |
| 1.9 | 1.97E-02 | 2.8 | 3.98E-04 | |
| AGAP000611-RA | gSG1a | 1.7 | 2.49E-04 | 1.8 | 8.17E-05 | |
| AGAP011971-RA |
| 1.7 | 2.01E-02 | 3.1 | 3.28E-05 | |
| AGAP009623-RA |
| 1.7 | 4.63E-03 | 2.0 | 8.13E-04 | |
| AGAP008216-RA |
| 1.7 | 4.99E-04 | 1.8 | 2.34E-04 | |
| AGAP011368-RA |
| 1.5 | 4.18E-02 | 1.9 | 4.97E-03 | |
| Kihihi | AGAP010240-RA |
| 2.5 | 1.06E-04 | 4.6 | 6.77E-08 |
| AGAP008212-RA |
| 2.3 | 1.75E-03 | 3.7 | 1.01E-05 | |
| AGAP004382-RA |
| 2.2 | 1.25E-03 | 3.0 | 4.82E-05 | |
| AGAP008281-RA |
| 2.1 | 6.84E-03 | 2.8 | 3.24E-04 | |
| AGAP008358-RA |
| 2.0 | 2.01E-03 | 2.9 | 1.86E-05 | |
| AGAP001956-RA |
| 2.0 | 7.01E-03 | 5.1 | 2.93E-07 | |
| AGAP005501-RA |
| 2.0 | 1.08E-03 | 3.4 | 6.42E-07 | |
| AGAP005498-RB |
| 1.9 | 2.78E-06 | 3.0 | 2.87E-10 | |
| AGAP005645-RA |
| 1.9 | 7.48E-04 | 2.8 | 2.03E-06 | |
| AGAP010066-RA | Unknown | 1.9 | 1.38E-05 | 2.4 | 6.83E-08 |
Microarray results were filtered to select genes whose expression was highest in resistant mosquitoes, intermediate in unexposed mosquitoes (of which an estimated 79–95% are susceptible), and lowest in the fully susceptible strain. Furthermore, genes with less than 1.2-fold overexpression in resistant vs. unexposed control mosquitoes or those with an ANOVA F-test P value > 0.05 were excluded. The 10 most highly overexpressed genes (resistant vs. unexposed) from each location are displayed above.
Fig. 2Expression of insecticide resistance candidates in An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes collected in 2014, measured by real-time quantitative PCR. Gene expression in mosquitoes collected from Kihihi (a) and Nagongera (b). Bendiocarb-resistant mosquitoes were selected using a standard WHO tube bioassay. Unexposed mosquitoes were placed in a tube with a control paper. Each RNA sample was extracted from pools of five mosquitoes. The y-axis depicts the level of transcript in each sample relative to the unexposed control group. The median value for each treatment is indicated by a line. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney p < 0.05 (*) or p < 0.01 (**)
Fig. 3Expression of insecticide resistance candidates in An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes collected in Nagongera in January–May 2015, measured by real-time quantitative PCR. Resistant and unexposed mosquitoes were selected as described in Fig. 2. Each RNA sample was extracted from an individual mosquito. The y-axis depicts the level of transcript in each sample relative to the unexposed control group. The median value for each treatment is indicated by a line. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney p < 0.01 (**)
Fig. 4Comparison between serotonin binding to D7r4 protein and the predicted mode of binding of bendiocarb. Serotonin, as visualised in the crystal structure (PDB code 2qeh; [15]), is displayed on the left, and the ROSIE server [16, 17] predicted pose of bendiocarb for the same protein on the right, each in a stick representation. Ligand atoms are coloured white (carbon), red (oxygen) or blue (nitrogen). Solvent-accessible protein surfaces were calculated within PyMOL using the default solvent molecule radius of 1.4 Å. Surface contributed by carbon atoms is coloured green in the serotonin complex and yellow in the bendiocarb complex. In both, red and blue are used for surface contributed by oxygen or nitrogen atoms, respectively. The figure was made with PyMOL (pymol.org)
Whole-genome microarray studies in which D7 expression was associated with insecticide resistance
| Mosquito Species | Country of collection | Insecticide | D7 gene | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Malawi | Bendiocarb, Permethrin | [ | |
|
| Mozambique, Malawi | Permethrin |
| [ |
|
| Zambia | Deltamethrin |
| [ |
|
| Zambia | Etofenprox, Lambda-cyhalothrin | [ | |
|
| Senegal | Lambda-cyhalothrin |
| [ |
|
| Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire | Deltamethrin |
| [ |
|
| Zambia | Deltamethrin |
| [ |
|
| Sudan | Permethrin |
| [ |
|
| Uganda | Permethrin |
| [ |
|
| Zanzibar | Lambda-cyhalothrin |
| [ |
aD7r2 overexpressed in bendiocarb-resistant vs. unexposed control, overexpressed in pyrethroid-resistant vs. unexposed control, and underexpressed in unexposed control vs. susceptible colony
bD7r3 overexpressed in bendiocarb-resistant vs. unexposed control, underexpressed in unexposed control vs. susceptible colony
cD7r2 and long form D7 underexpressed in resistant vs. susceptible colony