Literature DB >> 29587254

Evaluation of the FreeStyle® Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.

Guy G Massa1, Inge Gys1, Anniek Op 't Eyndt1, Esmiralda Bevilacqua1, Anne Wijnands1, Peter Declercq2, Renate Zeevaert1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The FreeStyle® Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FGM, Abbott) measures glucose concentrations in the interstitial fluid for up to 14 days. It has been approved for use in children aged > 4 years in January 2016. Experience in children is still limited. We evaluated the accuracy and usability of the FGM in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).
METHODS: 67 children with type 1 DM (35 girls), aged 4-18 years, were included. Subjects wore a sensor on the back of their upper arm. For the first 14 days, they regularly measured capillary blood glucose (BG) with their usual BG meter (Accu-Chek® Mobile [ACM], Roche [n = 24]; Contour® Next Link [CNL], Bayer [n = 26]; OneTouch® Verio® IQ [OTV], LifeScan [n = 17]) followed by a sensor glucose (SG) scanning. SG readings were compared to BG measurements by consensus error grid (CEG) analysis; the mean difference (MD), the mean relative difference (MRD), the mean absolute difference (MAD), and the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) were calculated. After 14 days, subjects were asked to fill in a questionnaire on the usability of the FGM.
RESULTS: 2,626 SG readings were paired with BG results. FGM readings were highly correlated with BG (r = 0.926, p < 0.001). 80.3% of the data pairs were in zone A (= no effect on clinical action) and 18.4% were in zone B (= altered clinical action with little or no effect on the clinical outcome) of the CEG. Overall MD was +7.5 mg/dL; MD varied with the BG meter: ACM +10.4 mg/dL, CNL +14.2 mg/dL, OTV -3.6 mg/dL (p < 0.001). Overall, MARD was 16.7%. We observed a large interindividual variability in the accuracy parameters. MD and MRD were inversely related to BMI (r = -0.261 [p < 0.05]; r = -0.266 [p < 0.05], respectively). MARD was inversely related to age (r = -0.266 [p < 0.05]). Twenty-nine patients (43.3%) reported sensor problems, mainly early detachment of the sensor. Nonetheless, the usability questionnaire indicated high levels of satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a reasonable agreement between the FGM SG readings and capillary BG measurements in children. There was, however, a large interindividual variability. The wearing of the sensor requires special attention. Further studies in children are imperative in order to document the accuracy and safety of the FGM in the paediatric population.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Child; Diabetes mellitus; Flash glucose monitoring; Usability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29587254     DOI: 10.1159/000487361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr        ISSN: 1663-2818            Impact factor:   2.852


  14 in total

1.  Estimating plasma glucose with the FreeStyle Libre Pro continuous glucose monitor during oral glucose tolerance tests in youth without diabetes.

Authors:  Nejla Ghane; Miranda M Broadney; Elisabeth K Davis; Robert W Trenschel; Shavonne M Collins; Sheila M Brady; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  The Potential Impact of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Mental Well-Being and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Mohamed A Al Dawish
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: A comparison with self-monitoring blood glucose.

Authors:  Naru Babaya; Shinsuke Noso; Yoshihisa Hiromine; Yasunori Taketomo; Fumimaru Niwano; Sawa Yoshida; Sara Yasutake; Yumiko Kawabata; Hiroshi Ikegami
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.232

Review 4.  Flash Glucose Monitoring: A Review of the Literature with a Special Focus on Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Giulia Mancini; Maria Giulia Berioli; Elisa Santi; Francesco Rogari; Giada Toni; Giorgia Tascini; Roberta Crispoldi; Giulia Ceccarini; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  A Web-Based Coping Intervention by and for Parents of Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: User-Centered Design.

Authors:  Tim Wysocki; Jessica Pierce; Cindy Caldwell; Karen Aroian; Louis Miller; Rebecca Farless; Ivy Hafezzadeh; Terri McAninch; Joyce M Lee
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2018-12-17

6.  Patient-Generated Health Data Integration and Advanced Analytics for Diabetes Management: The AID-GM Platform.

Authors:  Elisa Salvi; Pietro Bosoni; Valentina Tibollo; Lisanne Kruijver; Valeria Calcaterra; Lucia Sacchi; Riccardo Bellazzi; Cristiana Larizza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Continuous Glucose and Heart Rate Monitoring in Young People with Type 1 Diabetes: An Exploratory Study about Perspectives in Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Detection.

Authors:  Valeria Calcaterra; Pietro Bosoni; Lucia Sacchi; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti; Savina Mannarino; Riccardo Bellazzi; Cristiana Larizza
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-12-24

8.  Safety and feasibility of a factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring system in term and near-term infants at risk of hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Eri Nishimura; Shuntaro Oka; Junichi Ozawa; Kosuke Tanaka; Taichi Momose; Kazuhiko Kabe; Fumihiko Namba
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-12

9.  The Accuracy and Precision of the Continuously Stored Data from Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Type 2 Diabetes Patients during Standard Meal Tolerance Test.

Authors:  Rengna Yan; Huiqin Li; Xiaocen Kong; Xiaofang Zhai; Maoyuan Chen; Yixuan Sun; Lei Ye; Xiaofei Su; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.257

10.  Performance of three different continuous glucose monitoring systems in children with type 1 diabetes during a diabetes summer camp.

Authors:  Katrin Nagl; Gabriele Berger; Felix Aberer; Haris Ziko; Katharina Weimann; Ina Bozic; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Julia K Mader
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.