Literature DB >> 29586622

Sperm Digestion and Reciprocal Sperm Transfer Can Drive Hermaphrodite Sex Allocation to Equality.

Jaco M Greeff, Nico K Michiels.   

Abstract

The intensity of sperm competition determines how much reproductive effort should be invested in sperm. One important factor affecting sperm competition in internally fertilizing organisms is the mating frequency of females, since it determines the extent of competition between ejaculates. In simultaneous hermaphrodites, energy spent on sperm has to be traded off against energy expended on ova production. By extending an existing model, we consider how the number of matings affects sperm competition and, thus, sex allocation in internally fertilizing simultaneous hermaphrodites. We then go on to explore the consequences of two common characteristics of hermaphroditic mating systems, namely, sperm digestion and reciprocal insemination. Since sperm digestion reduces the competitive ability of a given ejaculate, it selects for increased sperm investment. As a result, the amount of sperm digested and male allocation can enter a coevolutionary cycle in which both will increase up to the point of equal investment in male and female gametes and in high rates of digestion. Because of this high degree of sperm digestion, fitness through the male function becomes more dependent on the amount of resources invested in sperm than on the number of matings. As a result, sperm digestion reduces Bateman's principle. Hence, hermaphrodites with sperm digestion should be less likely to display traits that increase the number of matings. Once ejaculates are large and costly, animals insisting on reciprocal sperm transfer will be favored since they receive some compensation for their investment. Under reciprocity, an even higher investment in sperm is favored. This is the result of the compensation received in the form of the partner's ejaculate and a nuptial gift effect by increasing a partner's production of eggs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coevolution; hermaphrodites; reciprocity; sex allocation; sexual selection; sperm digestion

Year:  1999        PMID: 29586622     DOI: 10.1086/303184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  5 in total

1.  Resource Availability Drives Mating Role Selection in a Simultaneous Hermaphrodite Aplysia californica.

Authors:  Kyle T David; Philip Tanabe; Lynne A Fieber
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.818

Review 2.  Intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic animals.

Authors:  Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails.

Authors:  Joris M Koene; Hinrich Schulenburg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Evolution of sex allocation plasticity in a hermaphroditic flatworm genus.

Authors:  Pragya Singh; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.516

5.  The unlimited potential of the great pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis.

Authors:  Joris M Koene; Zsolt Pirger; István Fodor; Ahmed Aa Hussein; Paul R Benjamin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.