Literature DB >> 29581849

Urinary cell-free nucleic acid IQGAP3: a new non-invasive diagnostic marker for bladder cancer.

Won Tae Kim1,2,3, Ye Hwan Kim1, Pildu Jeong1, Sung-Pil Seo1,2, Ho-Won Kang1,2, Yong-June Kim1,2, Seok Joong Yun1,2, Sang-Cheol Lee1,2, Sung-Kwon Moon4, Yung-Hyun Choi5, Geun Taek Lee3, Isaac Yi Kim3, Wun-Jae Kim1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in developing new non-invasive diagnostic tools for bladder cancer (BC) that have better sensitivity and specificity than cystoscopy and cytology. This study examined the value of urinary cell-free nucleic acid (NA) as a diagnostic marker for BC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 81 patients (74 BC and 7 normal controls) were used for a tissue set, and 212 patients (92 BC and 120 normal controls) were used as a urine set. Expression of tissue mRNA and urinary cell-free NAs was then examined.
RESULTS: Four candidate genes were top-ranked in the tissue microarray. Expression levels of two of these (IQGAP3 and TOP2A) in BC tissue and urine samples from BC patients were significantly higher than those in samples from the control groups. Binary logistic regression analysis of cell-free NA levels in urine samples revealed that IQGAP3 was significantly associated with BC: PicoGreen-adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.434; confidence interval (CI), 2.999-4.180; P<0.001; RiboGreen-adjusted OR, 2.242; CI, 1.793-2.840; P<0.001. Further analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NAs with respect to tumor invasiveness and grade also yielded a high AUC, suggesting that IQGAP3 can discriminate between BC patients and non-cancer patients with hematuria.
CONCLUSIONS: Levels of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA in BC patients were significantly higher than those in normal controls or patients with hematuria. High levels of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA also reflected high expression in BC tissues. Therefore, IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA may be a complementary diagnostic biomarker for BC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; nucleic acids; urinary bladder neoplasms; urine

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581849      PMCID: PMC5865675          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer (BC) is the ninth most common cancer worldwide [1]. In 2012, an estimated 430,000 new cases were diagnosed globally. The highest incidence rates are observed in North America, Southern/Western Europe, Northern Africa, and Western Asia. Although the mortality rates in the most developed countries have fallen, BC ranks 13th in terms of global cancer-related deaths [1]. More than 90% of BCs comprise transitional cell carcinoma, and most of these are papillary non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) [2]. However, approximately 20% of NMIBCs progress to muscle invasive BC (MIBC); 25% of newly diagnosed BC patients have MIBC. At the time of diagnosis, nearly 50% of MIBC cases have occult distant metastases [2]; thus early diagnosis of BC is very important. At the present time, the gold standard diagnostic methods for BC are cystoscopy and urine cytology. However, urine cytology has poor sensitivity (except for high grade tumors) [3] and, although flexible cystoscopy has been introduced recently, the procedure is both invasive and uncomfortable [4]. To solve these problems, a number of urine-based diagnostic markers, such as bladder tumor antigen, nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), have been developed [5, 6]. Unfortunately, none are superior to cystoscopy and cytology. Therefore, there is growing interest in new non-invasive diagnostic tools that have better sensitivity and specificity for BC. Several reports and reviews have examined/discussed urinary nucleic acids (NAs) [7-9]. The main source of urinary cell-free NAs is thought to be apoptotic and necrotic cancer cells [9]. Urinary cell-free NAs might be gathered as a result of renal cell-free NA transport from the blood or direct contact from urinary tracts. Most of the cancer-specific cell-free NA present in the urine of patients with urinary tract cancers is not derived from the blood; rather, it is derived directly from the tumor cells [9]. Therefore, the main aims of the present study were to identify candidate tissue mRNAs from BC microarrays, examine differences in expression of these candidate mRNAs in tissue from BC patients and controls, and investigate the levels of selected cell-free NAs in urine samples from BC patients and normal or hematuria controls (Figure 1). The overall aim was to assess the value of urinary cell-free NA as a diagnostic marker for BC.
Figure 1

Schematic showing the study design

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the study patients in the tissue and urine sets

The baseline characteristics of all patients and controls are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patients in the tissue and urine sets

Variable (%)Tissue setUrine set
BC casesControlsBC casesControlsHealthy controlsHematuria controls
Number747921206654
Mean age (y) ± SD65.26 ± 13.8750.14 ± 10.4365.62 ± 12.8966.72 ± 9.6368.77 ± 8.0664.22 ± 10.82
Gender
 Male59 (79.7)1 (14.3)73 (79.3)98 (81.7)61 (92.4)37 (68.5)
 Female15 (20.3)6 (85.7)19 (20.7)22 (18.3)5 (7.6)17 (31.5)
Grade
 G117 (23.0)19 (20.7)
 G234 (45.9)41 (44.6)
 G323 (31.1)32 (34.8)
T stage
 Ta16 (21.6)22 (23.9)
 T132 (43.3)36 (39.1)
 T26 (8.1)8 (8.7)
 T38 (10.8)7 (7.6)
 T412 (16.2)19 (20.7)
N stage
 N065 (87.8)80 (87.0)
 N (1–3)9 (12.2)12 (13.0)
M stage
 M067 (90.5)85 (92.4)
 M17 (9.5)7 (7.6)

BC, bladder cancer.

BC, bladder cancer.

Validation of BC tissue candidate mRNA identified from microarray data

Table 2 lists the four candidate tissue mRNAs selected from tissue mRNA array data derived from BC patients and normal controls. Four candidate genes were identified as top-ranked based on their increased expression in BC tissues compared with that in normal controls. Expression of cell-division cycle protein 20 (CDC20), isoleucine glutamine motif-containing GTAase-activating proteins (IQGAP3), DNA topoisomerase 2-alpha (TOP2A), and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 C (UBE2C) in BC tissue samples from BC patients was significantly higher than that in tissue samples from controls (P=0.011, P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.003, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 2). IQGAP3 and TOP2A were selected as candidate markers for BC detection because the difference in expression between patients and controls was the most significant.
Table 2

Candidate mRNAs in tissues*

Gene symbolTissue mRNA arrayTissue real-time PCR expression data
(normal vs. BC)Normal controlsBC
P-value-fold change(expression level, × 104 copies/μg) Median (IQR)a(expression level, × 104 copies/μg) Median (IQR)aP-valueb
CDC200.0013.93231976.2 (2.8–19.8)32.0 (9.0–77.2)0.011
IQGAP30.0013.36733842.6 (1.6–10.4)86.6 (32.6–201.9)<0.001
TOP2A0.0013.21668366.7 (3.8–24.6)428.0 (143.3–1030.3)<0.001
UBE2C0.0012.9033677111.9 (82.8–140.7)340.1 (161.5–643.6)0.003

* These tissue mRNAs were chosen because they showed the greatest increase in expression in bladder cancer tissue compared with control tissue in microarrays.

IQR, interquartile range; BC, bladder cancer.

a Copy number of corresponding transcripts (per μg of total RNA) used for cDNA synthesis.

b Mann-Whitney U test.

Figure 2

Comparison of gene expression levels in tissue samples from bladder cancer patients and normal controls

Real-time PCR analysis of CDC20, IQGAP3, TOP2A, and UBE2C mRNA expression in BC and control tissues (P=0.011, P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.003, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). BC, bladder cancer.

* These tissue mRNAs were chosen because they showed the greatest increase in expression in bladder cancer tissue compared with control tissue in microarrays. IQR, interquartile range; BC, bladder cancer. a Copy number of corresponding transcripts (per μg of total RNA) used for cDNA synthesis. b Mann-Whitney U test.

Comparison of gene expression levels in tissue samples from bladder cancer patients and normal controls

Real-time PCR analysis of CDC20, IQGAP3, TOP2A, and UBE2C mRNA expression in BC and control tissues (P=0.011, P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.003, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). BC, bladder cancer.

Expression of urinary cell-free NAs in BC patients and normal controls

As shown in Figure 3, the levels of NAs of IQGAP3 and TOP2A in urine samples from BC patients were significantly higher than those in samples from normal controls (each P<0.001) (Table 3). In particular, the selected NAs were significantly higher in cancer patients than controls after PicoGreen and RiboGreen adjustment.
Figure 3

Comparison of urinary cell-free NA levels in samples from bladder cancer patients and normal controls

Real-time PCR analysis of urinary cell-free NAs IQGAP3 (A, B) and TOP2A (C, D) was performed using PicoGreen (A, C) and RiboGreen (B, D) (all P<0.001; Mann-Whitney U test). BC, bladder cancer.

Table 3

Levels of urinary cell-free nucleic acid in BC and normal controls

Urinary cell-free nucleic acidsNormal controlsBCP-valueb
(expression levels, × 103 copies/μg) Median (IQR)a(expression levels, × 103 copies/μg) Median (IQR)a
PicoGreen adjustmentIQGAP3223.6 (119.6–1317.5)4200.5 (2322.7–8348.6)<0.001
TOP2A175.8 (60.8–572.7)1293.8 (446.4–2178.1)<0.001
RiboGreen adjustmentIQGAP39.8 (3.3–56.3)221.9 (69.2–1109.0)<0.001
TOP2A9.5 (2.2–33.6)61.3 (20.3–325.0)<0.001

IQR, interquartile range.

a Copy number of corresponding transcripts (per μg of total nucleic acids).

b Mann-Whitney U test; BC, bladder cancer.

Comparison of urinary cell-free NA levels in samples from bladder cancer patients and normal controls

Real-time PCR analysis of urinary cell-free NAs IQGAP3 (A, B) and TOP2A (C, D) was performed using PicoGreen (A, C) and RiboGreen (B, D) (all P<0.001; Mann-Whitney U test). BC, bladder cancer. IQR, interquartile range. a Copy number of corresponding transcripts (per μg of total nucleic acids). b Mann-Whitney U test; BC, bladder cancer.

Selection of candidate urinary cell-free NAs by ROC analysis

ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA was above the selected cut-off value of 0.8 (the AUCs for IQGAP3 after PicoGreen and RiboGreen adjustment were 0.897 and 0.853, respectively) (Figure 4). The cut-off values for PicoGreen- and RiboGreen-adjusted IQGAP3 (14.5156 and 10.7485, respectively) that yielded the highest combined sensitivity (80.0% and 84.4%, respectively) and specificity (83.8% and 70.4%, respectively) for BC detection were selected for further analysis.
Figure 4

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of candidate urinary cell-free NAs selected from tissue mRNA expression data

The AUCs for IQGAP3 were 0.897 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 0.853 (RiboGreen-adjusted) (A). The AUCs for TOP2A were 0.786 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 0.743 (RiboGreen-adjusted) (B). AUC, area under the curve.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of candidate urinary cell-free NAs selected from tissue mRNA expression data

The AUCs for IQGAP3 were 0.897 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 0.853 (RiboGreen-adjusted) (A). The AUCs for TOP2A were 0.786 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 0.743 (RiboGreen-adjusted) (B). AUC, area under the curve.

IQGAP3 as a diagnostic marker that differentiates between BC and hematuria

Urinary levels of IQGAP3 showed good utility as a diagnostic marker that can differentiate between BC patients and non-cancer patients with hematuria (PicoGreen-adjusted AUC, 0.910; sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 90.7%; RiboGreen-adjusted AUC, 0.854; sensitivity, 92.2%; specificity, 65.2%) (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in bladder cancer patients and hematuria controls

The AUC for IQGAP3 was 0.910 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 0.854 (RiboGreen-adjusted) (comparison made between BC patients and hematuria controls). AUC, area under the curve.

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in bladder cancer patients and hematuria controls

The AUC for IQGAP3 was 0.910 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 0.854 (RiboGreen-adjusted) (comparison made between BC patients and hematuria controls). AUC, area under the curve.

Binary logistic regression analysis to confirm urinary cell-free NAs as markers of BC

Binary logistic regression analysis of cell-free NA levels in urine samples revealed that PicoGreen-adjusted and RiboGreen-adjusted IQGAP3 levels were significantly associated with BC (odds ratio (OR), 3.434; confidence interval (CI), 2.999–4.180; P<0.001 and OR, 2.242; CI, 1.793–2.840; P<0.001, respectively) (Table 4). These data suggest that urinary IQGAP3 levels can discriminate BC patients from patients with hematuria and healthy controls.
Table 4

Binary logistic regression analysis of urinary IQGAP3 cell-free nucleic acids as a biomarker for bladder cancer

Urinary cell-free nucleic acidsBC
(IQGAP3)OR (95% CI)P-value
PicoGreen adjustment
vs. normal controls3.434 (2.459–4.795)<0.001
vs. hematuria controls3.740 (2.430–5.755)<0.001
RiboGreen adjustment
vs. normal controls2.242 (1.793–2.840)<0.001
vs. hematuria controls2.384 (1.770–3.212)<0.001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

BC, bladder cancer.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. BC, bladder cancer.

IQGAP3 is a valuable diagnostic marker for both NMIBC and MIBC

As shown in Figure 2, levels of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA in samples from both NMIBC and MIBC patients were significantly higher than those from normal controls (P<0.001, each) (Table 5). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that IQGAP3 urinary NA levels were significantly associated with NMIBC (PicoGreen adjustment: OR, 2.999; CI, 2.152–4.180; P<0.001; RiboGreen adjustment: OR, 2.016; CI, 1.609–2.524; P<0.001) and MIBC (PicoGreen adjustment: OR, 6.416; CI: 2.866–14.365; P<0.001; RiboGreen adjustment: OR, 2.977; CI, 1.982–4.470; P<0.001) (Table 6). ROC curve analysis revealed that the PicoGreen-adjusted AUCs for IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NAs in NMIBC and MIBC and the RiboGreen-adjusted AUCs for IQGAP3 in NMIBC and MIBC were 0.878 and 0.944, respectively, and 0.822 and 0.928, respectively (Figure 6). The highest combined sensitivity of IQGAP3 for NMIBC and MIBC was 80% (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 93.8% (RiboGreen-adjusted) and 88.5% (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 96.2% (RiboGreen-adjusted), respectively, whereas the greatest specificity was 90.7% (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 60.2% (RiboGreen-adjusted) and 89.5% (PicoGreen-adjusted) and 79.6% (RiboGreen-adjusted), respectively.
Table 5

Levels of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free nucleic acids in NMIBC, MIBC, and normal controls

Urinary cell-free nucleic acidsNormal controlsNMIBCMIBC
(expression levels, × 103 copies/μg) Median (IQR)a(expression levels, × 103 copies/μg) Median (IQR)aP-valueb(expression levels, × 103 copies/μg) Median (IQR)aP-valueb
PicoGreen adjustment223.6 (119.6–1317.5)3813.0 (1816.7–8499.3)<0.0014873.3 (3407.7–8632.2)<0.001
RiboGreen adjustment9.8 (3.3–56.3)153.2 (46.5–874.1)<0.001893.5 (167.5–1956.7)<0.001

IQR, interquartile range; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer.

a Copy number of corresponding transcripts (per μg of total nucleic acids).

b Mann-Whitney U test.

Table 6

Binary logistic regression analysis of urinary IQGAP3 cell-free nucleic acids as a biomarker for NMIBC and MIBC

Urinary cell-free nucleic acidsNMIBCMIBC
(IQGAP3)OR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value
PicoGreen adjustment
vs. normal controls2.999 (2.152–4.180)<0.0016.416 (2.866–14.365)<0.001
vs. hematuria controls3.280 (2.141–5.025)<0.00112.654 (3.098–51.686)<0.001
RiboGreen adjustment
vs. normal controls2.016 (1.609–2.524)<0.0012.977 (1.982–4.470)<0.001
vs. hematuria controls2.153 (1.601–2.895)<0.0013.084 (1.828–5.204)<0.001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Figure 6

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA expression in NMIBC and MIBC

Expression of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA in NMIBC and MIBC patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls (PicoGreen- and RiboGreen-adjusted groups; each P<0.001) (A, D). In the PicoGreen-adjusted group, the AUC values for NMIBC and MIBC were 0.878 and 0.949, respectively (B, C). In the RiboGreen-adjusted group, the AUC values for NMIBC and MIBC were 0.822 and 0.9928, respectively (E, F). AUC, area under the curve; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer.

IQR, interquartile range; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer. a Copy number of corresponding transcripts (per μg of total nucleic acids). b Mann-Whitney U test. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA expression in NMIBC and MIBC

Expression of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA in NMIBC and MIBC patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls (PicoGreen- and RiboGreen-adjusted groups; each P<0.001) (A, D). In the PicoGreen-adjusted group, the AUC values for NMIBC and MIBC were 0.878 and 0.949, respectively (B, C). In the RiboGreen-adjusted group, the AUC values for NMIBC and MIBC were 0.822 and 0.9928, respectively (E, F). AUC, area under the curve; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Urinary levels of IQGAP3 according to tumor grade

IQGAP3 urinary NA levels were significantly higher in BC patients at all tumor grades (PicoGreen-adjusted: (all, P<0.001) and RiboGreen-adjusted values: G1 (P=0.001), and G2 and G3 (P<0.001)) than in normal controls. ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUCs for IQGAP3 at tumor grades G1, G2, and G3 (PicoGreen-adjusted) were 0.805, 0.915, and 0.929, respectively, whereas the RiboGreen-adjusted AUCs were 0.742, 0.880, and 0.885, respectively (Figure 7). In addition, IQGAP3 urinary NA levels were significantly higher in BC patients at all tumor grades (PicoGreen-adjusted: (all, P<0.001) and RiboGreen-adjusted: G1 (P=0.002), and G2 and G3 (P<0.001)) than in hematuria controls. ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUCs for PicoGreen-adjusted IQGAP3 urinary NAs in BC patients with tumor grades G1, G2, and G3 were 0.819, 0.927, and 0.943, respectively, whereas those for RiboGreen-adjusted IQGAP3 were 0.745, 0.881, and 0.886, respectively (Figure 8).
Figure 7

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA expression in bladder cancer patients and normal controls according to tumor grade

IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in the BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were significantly higher than those in normal controls (PicoGreen-adjusted values) (A). The AUCs for IQGAP3 in G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.805, 0.915, and 0.929, respectively (B-D). IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in the BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were also significantly higher than those in normal controls (RiboGreen-adjusted values) (E). The AUCs for IQGAP3 in G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.742, 0.880, and 0.885, respectively (F-H). AUC, area under the curve. *: P<0.001, #: P=0.001

Figure 8

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA expression in bladder cancer patients and those with hematuria according to tumor grade

IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were significantly higher than those in hematuria controls (PicoGreen-adjusted values) (A). The AUCs for IQGAP3 in G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.819, 0.927, and 0.943, respectively (B-D). IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were also significantly higher than those in hematuria controls (RiboGreen-adjusted values) (E). The AUCs of IQGAP3 for G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.745, 0.881, and 0.886, respectively (F-H). AUC, area under the curve. *: P<0.001, ¶: P=0.002

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA expression in bladder cancer patients and normal controls according to tumor grade

IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in the BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were significantly higher than those in normal controls (PicoGreen-adjusted values) (A). The AUCs for IQGAP3 in G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.805, 0.915, and 0.929, respectively (B-D). IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in the BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were also significantly higher than those in normal controls (RiboGreen-adjusted values) (E). The AUCs for IQGAP3 in G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.742, 0.880, and 0.885, respectively (F-H). AUC, area under the curve. *: P<0.001, #: P=0.001

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA expression in bladder cancer patients and those with hematuria according to tumor grade

IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were significantly higher than those in hematuria controls (PicoGreen-adjusted values) (A). The AUCs for IQGAP3 in G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.819, 0.927, and 0.943, respectively (B-D). IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NA levels in BC patients with G1, G2, and G3 tumors were also significantly higher than those in hematuria controls (RiboGreen-adjusted values) (E). The AUCs of IQGAP3 for G1, G2, and G3 tumors (compared with controls) were 0.745, 0.881, and 0.886, respectively (F-H). AUC, area under the curve. *: P<0.001, ¶: P=0.002

DISCUSSION

The results of the present study suggest that urinary levels of IQGAP3 cell-free NA are a valuable diagnostic marker for BC. Thus, IQGAP3 urinary NA levels could be a suitable non-invasive diagnostic tool for distinguishing those with BC from those with non-cancer-associated hematuria. The two main sources of urinary cell-free NAs are renal filtration of cell-free NAs from the blood or direct contact with the urinary tract [9]. However, urinary NA or DNA markers for urologic cancer cannot come from blood and most likely are transported directly into the urine. Hoque et al [10] detected methylated GSTP1 and RASSF1A genes in 65% of urine samples from patients with renal cancer, but in only 11% of serum samples from the same patients. Accordingly, cancer-specific urinary NAs might be shed directly into the urine by urologic cancers. Because the bladder is a temporary reservoir for urine, it is an ideal source of biomarkers for BC. Recent studies report that urinary NAs could be potential candidate diagnostic markers for BC. Casadio et al [7] identified urine cell-free DNAs derived from c-Myc, BCAS1, and HER2 in 51 BC patients, and reported a high AUC upon ROC curve analysis, suggesting that urine cell-free DNA could be a potential marker for early non-invasive BC. Our own previous study examining cell-free RNA revealed significantly higher levels in BC patients, again suggesting that they may be a valuable diagnostic marker for BC [11]. Urinary NA can be detected easily using non-invasive methods; therefore, we suggest that urinary NAs may be ideal biomarkers for BC. Isoleucine glutamine motif-containing GTAase-activating proteins (IQGAPs) are well conserved in organisms spanning yeasts to humans [12]. IQGAPs play roles in cell adhesion, cell migration, and extracellular signaling. IQGAP1 plays a role in cancer progression, whereas IQGAP2 seems to act as a tumor suppressor [13, 14], and IQGAP3 promotes cancer growth and metastases [15]. Yang et al [15] reported that expression of IQGAP3 is markedly increased in lung cancer tissues at both the mRNA and protein levels, and that overexpression of IQGAP3 promotes tumor cell growth, migration, and invasion by modulating EGFR-ERK signaling. In addition, Qian et al [16] showed that plasma levels of IQGAP3 protein are significantly higher in those with hepatocellular carcinoma than in normal controls, suggesting that IQGAP3 may be a novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma screening and diagnosis. Here, we found that tissue expression of IQGAP3 was markedly higher in BC patients than in normal controls (a result validated by real-time PCR of mRNA derived from BC and normal control tissue microarrays), and that levels of urinary IQGAP3 cell-free NA were higher in BC patients than in normal controls (a result consistent with that obtained from real-time PCR). Furthermore, we identified that urinary levels of IQGAP3 cell-free NA were higher in BC patients than in patients with hematuria (AUC = 0.910 (PicoGreen-adjusted) and AUC = 0.854 (RiboGreen-adjusted)). The volume and concentration of urine produced by humans fluctuates markedly depending on the time of collection, diet, hydration status, the presence of diabetes mellitus, renal disease, and pituitary disease, and the use of medications such as diuretics. Hanke et al [17] showed that urinary RNA levels fluctuate markedly between morning, midday, and evening. Schmidt et al [18] showed that quantitative assessment of CK20 might serve as a non-invasive method of identifying patients with BC. They used TATA box-binding protein (TBP) in both tissue and urine as a reference gene. However, they made no comment about the value of urinary TBP as a housekeeping reference gene. Casadio et al [7] did not use a reference gene in their study of urinary cell-free DNA as a potential diagnostic marker for BC. Thus, future studies should seek to identify and validate reference genes for urinary cell-free NA. Here, we used PicoGreen and RiboGreen-based quantifications as references to quantify total cell-free NA levels in urine. PicoGreen- and RiboGreen-based quantification of total cell-free NA in urine should make it easier to normalize expression of each urinary cell-free NA to that of a housekeeping gene. In our previous study, we tried to normalize expression of urinary cell-free RNA against GAPDH; however, we found that expression of GAPDH in urine was inconsistent, making it unsuitable for such a role [11]. An advantage of the present study is the real-time PCR-based validation of increased expression of genes identified in tissue microarrays. In BC, urinary cell-free NAs might be excreted directly by cancer tissues in the form of exosomes. Thus, increased expression of certain genes in cancer tissues might be reflected by increased expression in the urine. Another advantage is that we compared PicoGreen- and -RiboGreen-adjusted expression of urinary cell-free NAs. No previous study has directly compared PicoGreen- and RiboGreen-adjusted expression of urinary cell-free NAs. There are several limitations in this study. First, the expression of IQGAP3 also increased in lung cancer tissue and associated with poor prognosis [15]. Unfortunately, there was no experiment to explain the tissue specificity of urinary NAs of IQGAP3. Further studies are necessary to confirm the tissue specificity of NAs of IQGAP3 in BC. And although this study compared directly PicoGreen-and RiboGreen-adjusted expression of urinary cell-free NAs, there was no study which adjustment of urinary NAs is appropriate. Additional studies are necessary to confirm which adjustment of urinary NAs is appropriate. Second, because there were no results of cytology, we didn't compare the results of cytology and urinary NAs. Third, there was no validation study to confirm as a diagnostic marker in another cohort. Additional validation studies with another cohort patients with cytology are necessary. In conclusion, IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NAs in BC patients were significantly higher than those in normal controls or in patients with hematuria. High expression of IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NAs in BC reflects high expression in BC tissue. Therefore, IQGAP3 urinary cell-free NAs may be a complementary diagnostic biomarker for BC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study populations and samples

A total of 81 patients (74 BC and 7 normal controls; bladder trauma patients) were used for the tissue set, and 212 patients (92 BC and 120 normal controls) were used for the urine set. For the urine set, the age-adjusted controls comprised 66 healthy individuals (that visited the hospital for medical check-ups) and 54 patients with microscopic hematuria due to non-malignant conditions. Any patients diagnosed with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) and pyuria were excluded. Urine and tissue samples were collected and stored as described previously [11, 19]. Tumors were staged and graded according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification system and the 1973 WHO grading system, respectively. The methods used for sample collection and analysis were approved by the Ethics Committee of Chungbuk National University Hospital. All subjects provided written informed consent (IRB approval number: 2010-12-010).

RNA extraction from tissues and synthesis of cDNA

RNA was extracted from BC tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as described previously [8, 19], and cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using a first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Extraction of cell-free NAs from urine

Urinary cell-free NAs were extracted using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Briefly, each frozen urine sample (1 ml) was thawed at room temperature, treated with QIAGEN Proteinase K (125 μl), ACL buffer (1.1 ml), carrier RNA (5.6 μl), and ATL buffer (250 μl), and mixed by pulse-vortexing for 30 sec. The tube was then incubated at 60°C for 30 min. ACB buffer was added to the lysate and mixed thoroughly by pulse-vortexing for 15–30 sec. The lysate-ACB buffer mixture was incubated for 5 min on ice, and the lysate was applied to the tube extender of a QIAamp Mini column. The lysate was then drawn through the column under vacuum. Next, ACW1 buffer (600 μl) was applied to the QIAamp Mini column and drawn through under vacuum. This was repeated using ACW2 buffer (750 μl) and 100% ethanol. Finally, the QIAamp Mini column was centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 3 min. The assembly was then incubated at 56°C for 10 min to dry the membrane completely. After placement into a clean 1.5 ml elution tube, AVE buffer (50 μl) was added to the QIAamp Mini column membrane at room temperature for 3 min. The column was again centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 1 min to elute the NAs. Cell-free NAs were dissolved in EB buffer and stored at −20°C until use.

Real-time PCR

Expression of urinary cell-free NAs was measured by real-time PCR using a Rotor Gene 6000 instrument (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia), as described previously [11]. The sequences of the gene-specific primers used for real-time PCR are listed in Table 7. All samples were run in triplicate. For the tissue studies, expression of all identified genes was normalized to that of GAPDH. For the urine studies, the Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA Reagent and Kit (Molecular probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Reagent and Kit (Molecular probes, Eugene, OR, USA) were used as references to measure the concentration of total cell-free NAs purified from urine samples.
Table 7

Primers used in the study

GeneTissue mRNA expressionUrinary cell-free NAs
Primer (5’-3’)Size (bp)Primer (5’-3’)Size (bp)
CDC20S: ATC AGA AAG CCT GGG CTT TG175--
AS: GA AGG AAT GTA ACG GCA GGT
IQGAP3S: ATG AAC GCC TCA CAG CTG A188S: TCC ATG CAG CTG TTC TTG CC87
AS: AAA ACA GTG GCC TAG CTT GGAS: CAG CAC TGG GAT TCT GCA AG
TOP2AA: ATG CTG CGG ACA ACA AAC AA150S: GAC TGT CTG TTG AAA GAA TC88
AS: TGA GAG CTG GGA CAT ACA TCAS: ATT CCA CAG AAC CAA TGT AG
UBE2CS: GCT ACA GCA GGA GCT GAT GA179--
AS: CTG GCA TTT GGA GAA ACA GT

S, sense; AS, anti-sense.

S, sense; AS, anti-sense.

Statistical analysis

Expression of urinary cell-free NAs in the BC and control groups was compared using nonparametric methods because the data were not normally distributed and could not always be transformed to achieve normality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the candidate urinary cell-free NAs, and the optimal cut-off points for candidate marker selection were based on the highest combined sensitivity and specificity values obtained from ROC curve analysis. The diagnostic value of the urinary cell-free NAs was determined using univariate binary logistic regression models. The BC patient microarray data set (165 BC patients versus 68 controls; 58 normal looking bladder mucosa surrounding cancer, 10 normal bladder mucosa) is available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus public database (microarray data, GSE13507) [20]. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistic ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) and a P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
  18 in total

1.  Urine cell-free DNA integrity as a marker for early bladder cancer diagnosis: preliminary data.

Authors:  Valentina Casadio; Daniele Calistri; Michela Tebaldi; Sara Bravaccini; Roberta Gunelli; Giuseppe Martorana; Alessandro Bertaccini; Luigi Serra; Emanuela Scarpi; Dino Amadori; Rosella Silvestrini; Wainer Zoli
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  S100A9 and EGFR gene signatures predict disease progression in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients after chemotherapy.

Authors:  W T Kim; J Kim; C Yan; P Jeong; S Y Choi; O J Lee; Y B Chae; S J Yun; S C Lee; W J Kim
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of bladder cancer-related transcript markers in urine.

Authors:  Juliane Schmidt; Catharina Propping; Woei-Yun Siow; Andrea Lohse-Fischer; Marieta Toma; Anka Baldauf-Twelker; Oliver W Hakenberg; Manfred P Wirth; Susanne Fuessel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Quantitative detection of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in the tumor, urine, and serum DNA of patients with renal cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Obaidul Hoque; Shahnaz Begum; Ozlem Topaloglu; Carmen Jeronimo; Elizabeth Mambo; William H Westra; J A Califano; David Sidransky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends.

Authors:  Sebastien Antoni; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ariana Znaor; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Current bladder cancer tests: unnecessary or beneficial?

Authors:  Michael A Simon; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Extracellular Nucleic Acids in Urine: Sources, Structure, Diagnostic Potential.

Authors:  O E Bryzgunova; P P Laktionov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.845

8.  Expression and diagnostic value of CCT3 and IQGAP3 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  E-Na Qian; Shuang-Yin Han; Song-Ze Ding; Xun Lv
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Predictive value of progression-related gene classifier in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wun-Jae Kim; Eun-Jung Kim; Seon-Kyu Kim; Yong-June Kim; Yun-Sok Ha; Pildu Jeong; Min-Ju Kim; Seok-Joong Yun; Keon Myung Lee; Sung-Kwon Moon; Sang-Cheol Lee; Eun-Jong Cha; Suk-Chul Bae
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  UBE2C cell-free RNA in urine can discriminate between bladder cancer and hematuria.

Authors:  Won Tae Kim; Pildu Jeong; Chunri Yan; Ye Hwan Kim; Il-Seok Lee; Ho-Won Kang; Yong-June Kim; Sang-Cheol Lee; Sang Jin Kim; Yong Tae Kim; Sung-Kwon Moon; Yung-Hyun Choi; Isaac Yi Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-06
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Tumoral markers in bladder cancer (Review).

Authors:  Ovidiu Bratu; Dragos Marcu; Radu Anghel; Dan Spinu; Lucian Iorga; Irina Balescu; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Camelia Diaconu; Cornel Savu; Carmen Savu; Alexandru Cherciu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Urinary microRNA and mRNA in Tumors.

Authors:  Erika Bandini
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  An Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis towards the Identification of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Key Biomarkers for Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Michail Sarafidis; George I Lambrou; Vassilis Zoumpourlis; Dimitrios Koutsouris
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Management-Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Felice Crocetto; Gianluca Russo; Erika Di Zazzo; Pasquale Pisapia; Benito Fabio Mirto; Alessandro Palmieri; Francesco Pepe; Claudio Bellevicine; Alessandro Russo; Evelina La Civita; Daniela Terracciano; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone; Biagio Barone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Liquid biopsy: a step closer to transform diagnosis, prognosis and future of cancer treatments.

Authors:  Saife N Lone; Sabah Nisar; Tariq Masoodi; Mayank Singh; Arshi Rizwan; Sheema Hashem; Wael El-Rifai; Davide Bedognetti; Surinder K Batra; Mohammad Haris; Ajaz A Bhat; Muzafar A Macha
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 27.401

6.  lncRNA MIR4435-2HG Accelerates the Development of Bladder Cancer through Enhancing IQGAP3 and CDCA5 Expression.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Yan Li; Gang Wang; Liuxiong Guo; Fuzhen Sun; Shoubin Li; Xinna Deng; Junjiang Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 7.  Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood.

Authors:  Ann Tivey; Matt Church; Dominic Rothwell; Caroline Dive; Natalie Cook
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 65.011

Review 8.  The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?

Authors:  Rafaela Malinaric; Guglielmo Mantica; Lorenzo Lo Monaco; Federico Mariano; Rosario Leonardi; Alchiede Simonato; André Van der Merwe; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 9.  Urine as a Source of Liquid Biopsy for Cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Vijayashree Murthy; Hideo Takahashi; Michelle Huyser; Maiko Okano; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Omar M Rashid; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Urinary Markers in Bladder Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  Giorgio Santoni; Maria B Morelli; Consuelo Amantini; Nicola Battelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.