Literature DB >> 27528424

UBE2C cell-free RNA in urine can discriminate between bladder cancer and hematuria.

Won Tae Kim1, Pildu Jeong1, Chunri Yan1, Ye Hwan Kim1, Il-Seok Lee1, Ho-Won Kang1, Yong-June Kim1, Sang-Cheol Lee1, Sang Jin Kim2,3, Yong Tae Kim3, Sung-Kwon Moon4, Yung-Hyun Choi5, Isaac Yi Kim6, Seok Joong Yun1, Wun-Jae Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in circulating nucleic acids as cancer detection biomarkers. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify a key urinary cell-free RNA marker that may assist in the diagnosis of BC.
RESULTS: Five cell-free RNAs were selected as candidate cell-free RNAs from tissue microarray data. An area under the curve (AUC) cut-off value of 0.7 in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified four urinary cell-free RNAs for further analysis (CDC20, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9; AUC = 0.716, 0.704, 0.721, and 0.702, respectively). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that high expression of UBE2C was significantly associated with BC (OR, 1.754; CI, 1.147-2.682; p = 0.010). Analysis of UBE2C expression in urine samples from BC patients and hematuria controls yielded an AUC of 0.839, with a sensitivity of 82.5% and a specificity of 76.2%. UBE2C levels was significantly increased in G2 and G3 tumors compared to normal controls (p <0.001, respectively).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples from 212 BC patients and 106 normal controls (64 healthy individuals and 42 with hematuria) were examined. The candidate cell-free RNAs identified from tissue microarrays derived from BC and normal control tissues was then measured in the urine samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The levels of urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA were significantly higher in BC samples than in normal and hematuria control samples. The higher levels of urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA in BC might reflect high expression in BC tissues. Therefore, urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA may be a valuable diagnostic marker for BC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA; biomarkers; urinary bladder neoplasms; urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27528424      PMCID: PMC5295424          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer (BC) is the seventh most common cancer worldwide in men, and the 17th most common in women [1]. Every year, approximately 110,000 men and 70,000 women are diagnosed with BC, and about 17,000 patients in the United States and 40,000 patients in the European Union die from the disease [1]. Cystoscopy and urinary cytology are the gold standard diagnostic tools for BC. However, cystoscopy is both invasive and uncomfortable, and urine cytology has poor sensitivity [2, 3]. Therefore, a new noninvasive method with better sensitivity and specificity for detecting BC is necessary. Historically, a number of urine-based tests, including bladder tumor antigen (BTA), nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), have been developed [4, 5]. Recently, new noninvasive diagnostic methods based on metabolomics and on measurement of microRNA markers in urine have been reported [6-8]. However, the diagnostic capability of BTA, NMP22, and FISH has been insufficient and further validation studies are necessary to confirm whether metabolomics and microRNA markers can be used detect BC. Recent studies isolated circulating nucleic acids from body fluids such as serum, plasma, and urine [9-11]. Thus, there is a growing interest in circulating nucleic acids as cancer detection biomarkers. The origins of circulating nucleic acids remain unclear, but it is thought that they are released from apoptotic and necrotic cancer cells [12]. In bladder cancer, urine could be an ideal source of biomarker because it can experiences direct contact with cancer. In addition, the measurements of mRNA using RT-PCR in urine are reported to have a high sensitivity and specificity in BC patients [13]. The concentration of cell-free RNA in urine is three times higher than that of cell-free DNA [14]; therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify a key urinary cell-free RNA marker that may assist in the diagnosis of BC.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the study population

The mean age of the 212 BC patients (177 males and 35 females) was 65.75 ± 12.69 years and that of the 106 controls (60 males and 46 females) was 64.46 ± 9.55 years. Forty-nine, 93, and 70 patients had grade G1, G2, or G3 cancer, respectively, and 65, 78, 31, 18, and 20 patients had stage Ta, T1, T2, T3, or T4 cancer, respectively. Other baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study patients

Variables (%)UC casesControlsp-valueHealthy controlsHematuria controls
Number2121066442
Mean age ± SD65.75 ± 12.6964.46 ± 9.550.35965.77 ± 7.8762.48 ± 11.48
Gender< 0.001
 Male177 (83.5)60 (56.6)35 (54.7)25 (59.5)
 Female35 (16.5)46 (43.4)29 (45.3)17 (40.5)
Grade
 G149 (23.1)
 G293 (43.9)
 G370 (33.0)
T stage
 Ta65 (30.7)
 T178 (36.8)
 T231 (14.6)
 T318 (8.5)
 T420 (9.4)
N stage
 N0189 (89.2)
 N(1–3)23 (10.8)
M stage
 M0202 (95.3)
 M110 (4.7)
NMIBC size
 < 3 cm81 (56.6)
 ≥ 3 cm62 (43.4)
NMIBC number
 Single85 (59.4)
 Multiple58 (40.6)
MIBC prior radical cystectomy
 No31 (44.9)
 Yes38 (55.1)

Selection of candidate urinary cell-free RNAs from tissue mRNA array data

Table 2 lists the five candidate urinary cell-free RNAs selected from tissue mRNA array data derived from BC patients and normal controls. Eleven candidate genes were identified as the top ranked genes based on their increased levels in BC tissues compared with normal controls. However, six of these cell-free RNAs were not detected in urine by RT-PCR. Thus, five cell-free RNAs (CDC20, TOP2A, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9) were selected as candidate BC detection markers.
Table 2

Candidate cell-free RNAs in urine

Gene symbolTissue mRNA array (normal vs. BC)Urine
p-value- fold changePresent or not
CDC20P < 0.0013.9323197+
TOP2AP < 0.0013.2166836+
ESM1P < 0.0013.1806504+
UBE2CP < 0.0012.9033677+
CA9P < 0.0012.6839344+
IQGAP3P < 0.0013.3673384
WDR72P < 0.0013.3154834
NUSAP1P < 0.0012.8828531
LOC440157P < 0.0012.8201986
TTKP < 0.0012.8054334
IGF2P < 0.0012.7653014

These cell-free mRNAs were chosen because they showed the greatest increase of levels in bladder cancer tissue compared with controls on tissue microarrays.

Presented candidate cell-free RNAs in urine.

These cell-free mRNAs were chosen because they showed the greatest increase of levels in bladder cancer tissue compared with controls on tissue microarrays. Presented candidate cell-free RNAs in urine.

Levels of urinary cell-free RNAs in BC and normal control samples

As shown in Figure 1, the levels of CDC20, TOP2A, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 in urine samples from BC patients were significantly higher than those in samples from normal controls (p < 0.001, each). In addition, the levels of urinary cell-free RNAs from both NMIBC and MIBC patients were significantly higher than those from normal controls (p < 0.05, each) (Table 3).
Figure 1

Comparison of urinary cell-free RNA expression levels in samples from bladder cancer patients and normal controls

RT-PCR analysis of urinary cell-free RNA of CDC20, TOP2A, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 was performed as described in the Material and Methods section. P values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. BC: bladder cancer.

Table 3

The levels of urinary cell-free RNAs between NMIBC or MIBC and normal controls

Normal controlsNMIBCMIBC
Urinary cell-free RNAs(the levels, × 104copies/μg) Median (IQR)a(the levels, × 104copies/μg) Median (IQR)ap-valueb(the levels, × 104copies/μg) Median (IQR)ap-valueb
CDC209.6 (3.3–48.4)27.7 (8.8–138.2)< 0.001156.5 (44.7–1144.5)< 0.001
TOP2A159.2 (24.5–454.1)183.1 (44.1–1068.8)0.0221411.2 (302.5–8286.6)< 0.001
ESM1236.5 (49.3–916.5)488.2 (138.8–2845.6)< 0.0014462.8 (827.5–18258.3)< 0.001
UBE2C95.6 (24.8–367.6)208.8 (105.8–952.9)< 0.0011345.0 (368.7–9077.9)< 0.001
CA934.1 (10.9–40.4)78.9 (26.9–353.0)< 0.001705.7 (138.0–3918.6)< 0.001

IQR interquartile range.

Copy number of corresponding transcript per μg of total RNA used for cDNA synthesis.

Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare expression between 2 groups.

Comparison of urinary cell-free RNA expression levels in samples from bladder cancer patients and normal controls

RT-PCR analysis of urinary cell-free RNA of CDC20, TOP2A, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 was performed as described in the Material and Methods section. P values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. BC: bladder cancer. IQR interquartile range. Copy number of corresponding transcript per μg of total RNA used for cDNA synthesis. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare expression between 2 groups.

Selection of candidate urinary cell-free RNAs by ROC analysis

ROC curve analysis led to the selection of four urinary cell-free RNAs (CDC20, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9) that yielded an area under the curve (AUC) above the selected cut-off value of 0.7 (the AUCs for CDC20, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 were 0.716, 0.704, 0.721, and 0.702; respectively) (Figure 2). In addition, cut-off values for CDC20, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 (11.5101, 14.9784, 13.7558, and 13.4314, respectively) were selected based on the highest combined sensitivity (77.3%, 69.2%, 82.0%, and 64.5%, respectively) and specificity (54.4%, 61.2%, 53.4%, and 68.9%, respectively) for BC.
Figure 2

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of candidate urinary cell-free RNAs selected from microarray data

The AUCs for CDC20, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 were 0.716, 0.704, 0.721, and 0.702, respectively. AUC: the area under curve.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of candidate urinary cell-free RNAs selected from microarray data

The AUCs for CDC20, ESM1, UBE2C, and CA9 were 0.716, 0.704, 0.721, and 0.702, respectively. AUC: the area under curve.

Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to select urinary cell-free RNAs as markers of BC

Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis of cell-free RNA levels in urine samples revealed that high UBE2C was significantly associated BC [odds ratio (OR), 1.754; confidence interval (CI), 1.147–2.682; p = 0.010] (Table 4). Based on the cut-off value for UBE2C (13.7558) obtained from ROC curve analysis, the level of UBE2C in urine samples remained significantly associated with BC (OR, 3.232; CI, 1.316–7.940; p = 0.011). These data suggest that urinary levels of UBE2C can be used to discrimination BC patients from normal controls.
Table 4

Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to select the urinary cell-free RNAs as biomarkers for bladder cancer

Urinary cell-free RNABladder cancer present
Logistic regression (according to expression value)Logistic regression (according to cutoff value)
OR (95% CI)p-valueOR (95% CI)p-value
CDC201.013 (0.687–1.494)0.9470.999 (0.377–2.651)0.999
ESM10.954 (0.693–1.314)0.7731.076 (0.458–2.525)0.867
UBE2C1.754 (1.147–2.682)0.010*3.232 (1.316–7.940)0.011*
CA90.974 (0.735–1.292)0.8571.849 (0.836–4.086)0.129

OR: Odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

The results of multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were confirmed by backward elimination.

OR: Odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. The results of multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were confirmed by backward elimination.

UBE2C can discriminate between BC and hematuria

Urinary levels of UBE2C could be used successfully to discriminate BC patients from non-cancer patients with hematuria (AUC, 0.839; sensitivity, 82.5%; and specificity, 76.2%) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNA levels in bladder cancer patients and those with hematuria from benign conditions

Between BC patients and hematuria controls, the AUC of UBE2C was 0.839 and the sensitivity and specificity was 82.5% and 76.2%, respectively. AUC: the area under curve.

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNA levels in bladder cancer patients and those with hematuria from benign conditions

Between BC patients and hematuria controls, the AUC of UBE2C was 0.839 and the sensitivity and specificity was 82.5% and 76.2%, respectively. AUC: the area under curve.

Urinary cell-free RNA, UBE2C as a valuable diagnostic marker in NMIBC and MIBC

In NMIBC and MIBC, higher UBE2C levels was significantly associated with NMIBC (OR: 1.501, CI: 1.279–1.763, p < 0.001) and MIBC (OR: 2.134, CI: 1.696–2.685, p < 0.001) (Table 5). Using a ROC curve, the AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs in NMIBC and MIBC were 0.680 and 0.856, respectively (Figure 4). The highest combined sensitivity (specificity) of urinary cell-free RNAs of UBE2C in NMIBC and MIBC were 75.5% (54.7%) and 68.1% (87.7%), respectively.
Table 5

Binary logistic regression analysis of UBE2C cell-free RNA as a biomarker in NMIBC and MIBC

Urinary cell-free RNANMIBCMIBC
OR (95% CI)p-valueOR (95% CI)p-value
UBE2C1.501 (1.279–1.763)< 0.0012.134 (1.696–2.685)< 0.001

OR: Odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

Figure 4

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs in NMIBC and MIBC

The AUC values of NMIBC and MIBC were 0.680 and 0.856, respectively. AUC: the area under curve, NMIBC: non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, MIBC: muscle invasive bladder cancer.

OR: Odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs in NMIBC and MIBC

The AUC values of NMIBC and MIBC were 0.680 and 0.856, respectively. AUC: the area under curve, NMIBC: non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, MIBC: muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Urinary UBE2C levels according to tumor grade

UBE2C levels was significantly increased in G2 and G3 tumors compared to normal controls (p < 0.001, respectively). Using a ROC curve, the AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs according to tumor grade G1, G2, and G3 were 0.575, 0.745, and 0.836, respectively, when compared to normal controls (Figure 5-1). In addition, the AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs for G1, G2, and G3 were 0.732, 0.846, and 0.901, respectively, when compared to hematuria patients (p < 0.001, respectively) (Figure 5-2).
Figure 5

Urinary UBE2C levels according to tumor grade

UBE2C levels was significantly increased in G2 and G3 tumors compared to normal controls (1A–1D). The AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs according to tumor grade for G1, G2, and G3 were 0.575, 0.745, and 0.836 compared to normal controls. In comparison to hematuria patients, the AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs according to grade G1, G2, and G3 were 0.732, 0.846, and 0.901 compared to hematuria patients (2A–2D). AUC: the area under curve.

Urinary UBE2C levels according to tumor grade

UBE2C levels was significantly increased in G2 and G3 tumors compared to normal controls (1A–1D). The AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs according to tumor grade for G1, G2, and G3 were 0.575, 0.745, and 0.836 compared to normal controls. In comparison to hematuria patients, the AUC of UBE2C urinary cell-free RNAs according to grade G1, G2, and G3 were 0.732, 0.846, and 0.901 compared to hematuria patients (2A–2D). AUC: the area under curve.

DISCUSSION

The present study identified urinary levels of UBE2C cell-free RNA as a possible diagnostic marker for BC. Furthermore, measurement of urinary UBE2C levels is a suitable noninvasive tool for discriminating BC patients from non-cancer patients with hematuria. Thus, the present study is the first study to identify urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA as a diagnostic marker for BC. UBE2C is a E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that promotes tumor cell growth and malignant transformation [15]. Okamoto et al. [15] reported that the expression of UBE2C is high in cancer cell lines but extremely low in normal tissues. Also, UBE2C expression is high in lung, stomach, and uterine cancer compared with surrounding normal tissues. Other reports show that expression of UBE2C is elevated in breast, thyroid, and colon cancer, and in lymphoma [16-18]. In addition, high expression of UBE2C correlates with cancer progression or a poor prognosis [19, 20]. In BC, high UBE2C expression is associated with a poor prognosis after radical cystectomy, and with higher tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, and shorter cancer-specific survival [21]. Fristrup et al. [22] reported that UBE2C was an independent prognostic marker for progression from NMIBC to MIBC; these data were validated in Danish, Swedish, Spanish, and Taiwanese cohorts. With respect to BC, urine is an ideal source of biomarkers because the bladder is a temporary urine reservoir; therefore, analysis of urinary nucleic acids may yield potential candidate diagnostic biomarkers for BC. Indeed, some studies show that urinary cell-free nucleic acids derived from urogenital cancer did not come from the blood; rather, they arose from tumor cells or their breakdown products [23, 24]. Recently, Casadio et al. [10] isolated urine cell-free DNAs (sequences [> 250 bp] derived from c-Myc, BCAS1, and HER2) from 51 BC patients and reported an AUC of 0.834 upon ROC curve analysis. Thus, they concluded that urine cell-free DNA is a potential marker for early noninvasive BC. Because this detection method is easy, noninvasive, and cheap, we suggest that it might open up new avenues for the application of urinary nucleic acids as biomarkers for BC. Instead of urinary cell-free DNAs, urinary cell-free RNAs became the focus of our study. The source of urinary cell-free RNAs is the blood containing mRNA, rRNA, ncRNA, and miRNA, which can circulate as part of exosomes. These RNAs from the blood transport into urine through glomerular filtration, especially in bladder cancer. Subsequently, these RNAs in urine come in direct contact with the tumor. Bryzqunova et al. [14] reported that the concentration of urinary cell-free RNA was high, despite the fact that RNase activity was also high. It may be that urinary RNA is protected from nuclease-mediated degradation through forming complexes with biopolymers, as occurs in serum and plasma [25]. Here, we found that the levels of urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA were higher in BC patients than in normal controls (this result was consistent with that obtained from analysis of BC and normal control tissue arrays). Furthermore, urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA levels were higher in BC patients than in patients with hematuria (AUC = 0.839). This study follows our previous metabolomics study, which compared urine samples from BC patients and hematuria controls [7]. Unfortunately, however, no relationship between recurrence or progression and urinary UBE2C levels in NMIBC was observed (data not shown). With this, it is possible that the role of urinary UBE2C levels is limited to its diagnostic ability and that tissue analysis is a better prognostic marker in BC. Further studies on tissue marker for predicting prognosis in NMIBC are necessary. The volume of urine produced by BC patient's fluctuates markedly depending upon the time of collection, hydration status, diet, and presence of renal disease. For example, examination of intraday differences in urinary RNA levels revealed a significant difference between morning and midday urine production [26]. Accordingly, the present study used RiboGreen as a reference gene to quantify total cell-free RNA levels in urine. In theory, RiboGreen-based quantification of total cell-free RNA in urine should make it easier to normalize the expression of each urinary cell-free RNA against that of a housekeeping gene; however, when we tried to normalize the expression of cell-free RNA against that of GAPDH, we found that the expression pattern and level of GAPDH was inconsistent. Thus, GAPDH is not a suitable reference for urine-based studies. To our knowledge, there is no previous study in BC that has conducted a direct measurements of urinary cell-free RNA with RiboGreen-based quantification. The present study is also limited by a few weakness. This study is a single institution study with a limited number of participating patients. To address this, collaborations with other academic centers are being pursued and it is our hope that a large, prospective, randomized clinical trial on this topic will further validate our finding. In conclusion, the levels of urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA were significantly higher in samples from BC patients than in samples from normal healthy individuals or from patients with hematuria. The higher levels of urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA in BC might reflects high expression of UBE2C mRNA in BC tissues. Therefore, urinary UBE2C cell-free RNA may be a valuable diagnostic marker for BC, although further confirmatory studies are required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement

Collection and analysis of samples were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungbuk National University and each subject provided written informed consent (IRB approval number: 2010-12-010).

Patients and urine samples

A total of 318 patients (212 BC and 106 normal controls) were enrolled in the study between May 2001 and September 2012. Age-adjusted controls comprised 64 healthy controls who visited the hospital for medical check-ups and 42 patients with microscopic hematuria due to non-malignant conditions (25 BPH patients and 17 SUI patients). Urine samples were collected in the morning and centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant and sediment were then placed into separate Eppendorf tubes and stored at −20°C until required. All tumor samples were primary tumors and these were obtained from patients who underwent transurethral resection (TUR) or radical cystectomy. All were histologically verified as urothelial transitional cell carcinoma. Tumors were staged and graded according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification system and the 1973 WHO grading system, respectively.

Extraction of cell-free RNA from urine

Urinary cell-free RNAs were extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) from the supernatant urine after urine sediments had been removed by prior centrifuge. Each frozen urine sample (1 ml) was thawed at room temperature and treated with 1 ml of RLT buffer. One volume of 70% ethanol was then added to the lysate and mixed well by pipetting. The sample was then transferred to a column containing a membrane that binds cell-free RNA. The column was placed into a 2 ml collection tube and centrifuged for 15 s at 8,000 × g. The aqueous flow-through was discarded and the column replaced into the same collection tube. After addition of 700 μl of RW1 buffer, the column was centrifuged for 15 s at 8,000 × g and bound cell-free RNA was washed by addition of 500 μl of RPE buffer followed by centrifugation for 15 s. The aqueous flow-through was discarded and the column centrifuged for an additional for 15 s at 8,000 × g, after which it was placed into a clean 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube. Cell-free RNAs were eluted by addition of 50 μl EB buffer followed by centrifugation for 1 min at 13,000 rpm. The cell-free RNAs were dissolved in EB buffer were stored at −20°C until required. cDNA was prepared from 1 μg of random primer-RNA using a RNA to cDNA EdoDry Kit (TAKARA BIO INC., Otsu, Japan), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Real-time PCR

Urinary cell-free RNAs were quantified by real-time PCR using a Rotor Gene 6000 instrument (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia). Real-time PCR assays were performed in micro-reaction tubes (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia) containing SYBR Premix EX Taq (TAKARA BIO INC., Otsu, Japan). The sequences of the gene-specific primers used for real-time PCR are shown in Table 6. For the urine study, standard plasmids were included in the real-time PCR to generate standard curves based on copy number (105, 104, 103, 102, and 10) and threshold cycle (Ct) values. To construct the standard plasmids, a 360 bp sequence (that included the PCR target region) derived from each target gene was synthesized and ligated into pUC57 plasmid DNA (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ). The synthesized target regions were confirmed by capillary sequencing. The Ct values for each gene were plotted on a standard curve to calculate the copy number. All samples were run in triplicate. The Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA Reagent Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA Kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) were used to measure the concentration of total cell-free RNAs purified from the urine samples.
Table 6

Sequence, and amplicon size of genes used in the study

Gene symbolPrimerAmplicon Size (bp)
CDC20S: CTG AAC CTT GTG GAT TGG AG79
AS: ATG TCA CCA GAG CTT GCA CT
TOP2AS: GAC TGT CTG TTG AAA GAA TC87
AS: ATT CCA CAG AAC CAA TGT AG
ESM1S: GCA AGA GGA CAG TGC TCG AC95
AS: GCC ATC CAT GCC TGA GAC TG
UBE2CS: CCA CAG TGA AGT TCC TCA CG96
AS: ACA GGG CAG ACC ACT TTT CC
CA9S: AGT GAA GAG GAT TCA CCC AGA101
AS: GGC TTA ACT TCA GGT AGA TCC

TS, sense; AS, anti-sense

TS, sense; AS, anti-sense

Statistical analysis

The levels of urinary cell-free RNAs were compared between the BC and control groups using nonparametric methods because the expression data were not normally distributed and could not always be transformed to achieve normality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the candidate urinary cell-free RNAs, and the optimal cut-off points for candidate marker selection were determined based on the highest combined sensitivity and specificityvalues obtained from ROC curve analysis. The diagnostic value of the urinary cell-free RNAs was determined using binary logistic regression models. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistic ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY) and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
  25 in total

1.  Circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum. Recent developments.

Authors:  Peter B Gahan; R Swaminathan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Urine cell-free DNA integrity as a marker for early bladder cancer diagnosis: preliminary data.

Authors:  Valentina Casadio; Daniele Calistri; Michela Tebaldi; Sara Bravaccini; Roberta Gunelli; Giuseppe Martorana; Alessandro Bertaccini; Luigi Serra; Emanuela Scarpi; Dino Amadori; Rosella Silvestrini; Wainer Zoli
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells.

Authors:  S Jahr; H Hentze; S Englisch; D Hardt; F O Fackelmayer; R D Hesch; R Knippers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  DNA methylation biomarkers of prostate cancer: confirmation of candidates and evidence urine is the most sensitive body fluid for non-invasive detection.

Authors:  Shannon R Payne; Jurgen Serth; Martin Schostak; Jorn Kamradt; Arne Strauss; Paul Thelen; Fabian Model; J Kevin Day; Volker Liebenberg; Andrew Morotti; Su Yamamura; Joe Lograsso; Andrew Sledziewski; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  The value of combined use of survivin, cytokeratin 20 and mucin 7 mRNA for bladder cancer detection in voided urine.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Zhi-Ping Wang; Yi-Rong Chen; Xing-Huan Wang; Yi-Long Wu; Huai-Peng Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  UbcH10 is the cancer-related E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Okamoto; Toshinori Ozaki; Kou Miyazaki; Mineyoshi Aoyama; Masaru Miyazaki; Akira Nakagawara
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Current bladder cancer tests: unnecessary or beneficial?

Authors:  Michael A Simon; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Cell-Free microRNA-214 From Urine as a Biomarker for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Min Kim; Ho Won Kang; Won Tae Kim; Yong-June Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Sang-Cheol Lee; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-11-06

10.  High expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2C (UBE2C) correlates with nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression.

Authors:  Zhihua Shen; Xiaofan Jiang; Chao Zeng; Shaojiang Zheng; Botao Luo; Yumei Zeng; Ranran Ding; Hanguo Jiang; Qiyi He; Junli Guo; Wei Jie
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  14 in total

1.  Circulating cell-free high mobility group AT-hook 2 mRNA as a detection marker in the serum of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sana Sahengbieke; Jian Wang; Xiangwei Li; Yuhong Wang; Maode Lai; Jingjing Wu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  An Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis towards the Identification of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Key Biomarkers for Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Michail Sarafidis; George I Lambrou; Vassilis Zoumpourlis; Dimitrios Koutsouris
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Liquid biopsy: a step forward towards precision medicine in urologic malignancies.

Authors:  Ashley Di Meo; Jenni Bartlett; Yufeng Cheng; Maria D Pasic; George M Yousef
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 27.401

4.  The expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C and KAI1 in ovarian carcinoma and their clinical significance.

Authors:  Yingying Gong; Danna Wang; Lu Lin; Junjun Dai; Lan Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Identification of Key Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer: Evidence from a Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Chuan Zhang; Mandy Berndt-Paetz; Jochen Neuhaus
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 6.  Urine as a Source of Liquid Biopsy for Cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Vijayashree Murthy; Hideo Takahashi; Michelle Huyser; Maiko Okano; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Omar M Rashid; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  The clinicopathological significance of UBE2C in breast cancer: a study based on immunohistochemistry, microarray and RNA-sequencing data.

Authors:  Chao-Hua Mo; Li Gao; Gang Chen; Zhen-Bo Feng; Xiao-Fei Zhu; Kang-Lai Wei; Jing-Jing Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 8.  Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer: A Current Need for Patient Diagnosis and Monitoring.

Authors:  Iris Lodewijk; Marta Dueñas; Carolina Rubio; Ester Munera-Maravilla; Cristina Segovia; Alejandra Bernardini; Alicia Teijeira; Jesús M Paramio; Cristian Suárez-Cabrera
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Urinary Markers in Bladder Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  Giorgio Santoni; Maria B Morelli; Consuelo Amantini; Nicola Battelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Urinary cell-free nucleic acid IQGAP3: a new non-invasive diagnostic marker for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Won Tae Kim; Ye Hwan Kim; Pildu Jeong; Sung-Pil Seo; Ho-Won Kang; Yong-June Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Sang-Cheol Lee; Sung-Kwon Moon; Yung-Hyun Choi; Geun Taek Lee; Isaac Yi Kim; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.