Literature DB >> 29581612

Association between the perspective of adult inpatients with digestive cancer regarding the nursing service and their quality of recovery on postoperative day 3.

Kumiko Sasaki1, Koji Tamakoshi1.   

Abstract

Although qualitative research that focuses on inpatients' experience immediately after surgery has continued to elucidate the efficacy of the nursing service for postoperative recovery, there has been little quantitative research. Our aim was to quantitatively clarify the association between inpatients' perception of the nursing service and the quality of postoperative recovery. Seventy-one digestive cancer patients who underwent surgery were recruited. Participants completed two self-administered questionnaires, including the Japanese version of the 40-item postoperative Quality of Recovery scale (QoR-40J) and the Nursing Service Quality Scale for Japan (NURSERV-J) which has 22 items and five dimensions (tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy) on postoperative day 3. There were significant positive associations between the global scores of the NURSERV-J and the QoR-40J. The global score of the QoR-40J was compared between patients who gave full marks for each dimension of the NURSERV-J (the entirely satisfied group) and those who did not (the not entirely satisfied group). The entirely satisfied groups regarding tangibles, reliability and responsiveness had a significantly higher global score for the QoR-40J than the respective not entirely satisfied groups. Adjusted for age, gender, operative procedure, and duration of surgery, the entirely satisfied groups regarding tangibles and responsiveness had a significant higher global score for the QoR-40J than the respective not entirely satisfied groups. Patients who perceived that they had received a nursing service of high quality were likely to attain a high quality of postoperative recovery. Nursing services related to tangibles, reliability, and responsiveness especially contributed to postoperative recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digestive cancer; nursing services; postoperative recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581612      PMCID: PMC5857499          DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.80.1.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  17 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  Kirsten B Kluivers; Ingrid Riphagen; Mark E Vierhout; Hans A M Brölmann; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  The lived experience of the early postoperative period after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  C A Jonsson; A Stenberg; G H Frisman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.

Authors:  P S Myles; B Weitkamp; K Jones; J Melick; S Hensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.

Authors:  Yuu Tanaka; Takafumi Wakita; Shunichi Fukuhara; Makoto Nishiwada; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Preparatory education for cancer patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review of volume and quality of research output over time.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Kristy Forshaw; Jamie Bryant; Mariko Carey; Allison Boyes; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-05-23

6.  Development and validation of the Surgical Recovery Scale (SRS).

Authors:  Johanna S Paddison; Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Francisco J Herrera; Jean Wong; Frances Chung
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  After colonic surgery: The lived experience of participating in a fast-track programme.

Authors:  Annelise Norlyk; Ingegerd Harder
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2009-09-01

9.  Recovering from cardiac surgery: what patients want you to know.

Authors:  Lynn V Doering; Anthony W McGuire; Darlene Rourke
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario?

Authors:  M M Cohen; W Young; M E Thériault; R Hernandez
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of High-Quality Nursing Service for the Patients during the Anesthesia Recovery Period: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Heng Wang; Yan Pan; Qian Huang; Xueping Li; Xiaoqi Zeng; Li Zhou
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 1.664

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.