Literature DB >> 29577448

Surgical approach, cost, and complications of appendectomy in kidney transplant recipients.

Sandra R DiBrito1, Israel O Olorundare1, Courtenay M Holscher1, Claudia S Landazabal1, Babak J Orandi2, Nabil N Dagher3, Dorry L Segev1,4, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang1.   

Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have greater morbidity and length of stay (LOS) following certain surgical procedures than non-KTR. Given that appendectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures, we investigated differences in outcomes between 1336 KTR and 2 640 247 non-KTR postappendectomy at transplant and nontransplant centers in the United States from 2000 to 2011, using NIS data and adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level factors. Postoperative complications were identified using ICD-9 codes. Among KTR, there were no post-appendectomy in-hospital deaths, compared to a 0.2% in non-KTR (P = .5). Overall complications were similar among KTR and non-KTR (17.0% vs 11.6%; aOR:0.77 1.121.61 ). LOS and costs were greater for KTR compared to non-KTR (LOS ratio 1.19 1.311.45 ; cost ratio 1.11 1.171.26 ). Only 44.8% of KTR had laparoscopic approach compared to 54.5% of non-KTR, but had similar complication rates (10.6 vs 8.7%, P = .5). When treated at transplant centers, KTR had similar complications (aOR 0.44 0.791.43 ), but longer LOS (ratio 1.21 1.371.55 ) and greater hospital-associated costs (ratio 1.19 1.291.41 ) than non-KTR. Conversely, at nontransplant centers, KTR and non-KTR had similar complications (aOR 0.75 1.232.0 ), LOS (ratio 0.84 0.961.09 ), and cost (ratio 0.93 1.011.10 ). Contrary to other procedures, KTR did not constitute a high-risk group for patients undergoing appendectomy.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appendectomy; general surgery; kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29577448      PMCID: PMC5992085          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  29 in total

1.  Acute abdominal pain in a lung transplant recipient. Diagnosis: Acute appendicitis in the presence of a pin.

Authors:  J W van den Berg; E A Verschuuren; J P Ouwens; C Rottier; G H Koëter; W J de Boer; W van der Bij
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 2.  Perioperative concerns for transplant recipients undergoing nontransplant surgery.

Authors:  James Whiting
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  The transplant center and business unit as a model for specialized care delivery.

Authors:  A Osama Gaber; Roberta L Schwartz; David P Bernard; Susan Zylicz
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Effective communication of standard errors and confidence intervals.

Authors:  Thomas A Louis; Scott L Zeger
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Infections in renal transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate versus azathioprine-based immunosuppression.

Authors:  M Bernabeu-Wittel; M Naranjo; J M Cisneros; E Cañas; M A Gentil; G Algarra; P Pereira; F J González-Roncero; A de Alarcón; J Pachón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Wound healing complications with de novo sirolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen in cardiac transplant recipients.

Authors:  S Kuppahally; A Al-Khaldi; D Weisshaar; H A Valantine; P Oyer; R C Robbins; S A Hunt
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Gastrointestinal surgical emergencies following kidney transplantation.

Authors:  E Bardaxoglou; G Maddern; L Ruso; F Siriser; J P Campion; P Le Pogamp; J M Catheline; B Launois
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.782

9.  Comparison of sirolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil on surgical complications and wound healing in adult kidney transplantation.

Authors:  John F Valente; Donald Hricik; Kelly Weigel; David Seaman; Thomas Knauss; Christopher T Siegel; Kenneth Bodziak; James A Schulak
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus.

Authors:  Patrick G Dean; William J Lund; Timothy S Larson; Mikel Prieto; Scott L Nyberg; Michael B Ishitani; Walter K Kremers; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acute Care Surgery for Transplant Recipients: A National Survey of Surgeon Perspectives and Practices.

Authors:  Sandra R DiBrito; Mary Grace Bowring; Courtenay M Holscher; Christine E Haugen; Sarah V Rasmussen; Mark D Duncan; David T Efron; Kent Stevens; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients Experience Higher Risk of Complications Compared to the General Population after Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Jordyn M Perdue; Alejandro C Ortiz; Afshin Parsikia; Jorge Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.