Literature DB >> 29577380

The effect of medical and operative birth interventions on child health outcomes in the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age: A linked data population-based cohort study.

Lilian L Peters1,2,3, Charlene Thornton4, Ank de Jonge1,3, Ali Khashan5,6, Mark Tracy7, Soo Downe8, Esther I Feijen-de Jong1,2,3, Hannah G Dahlen9,10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous vaginal birth rates are decreasing worldwide, while cesarean delivery, instrumental births, and medical birth interventions are increasing. Emerging evidence suggests that birth interventions may have an effect on children's health. Therefore, the aim of our study was to examine the association between operative and medical birth interventions on the child's health during the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age.
METHODS: In New South Wales (Australia), population-linked data sets were analyzed, including data on maternal characteristics, child characteristics, mode of birth, interventions during labor and birth, and adverse health outcomes of the children (ie, jaundice, feeding problems, hypothermia, asthma, respiratory infections, gastrointestinal disorders, other infections, metabolic disorder, and eczema) registered with the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification codes. Logistic regression analyses were performed for each adverse health outcome.
RESULTS: Our analyses included 491 590 women and their children; of those 38% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth. Infants who experienced an instrumental birth after induction or augmentation had the highest risk of jaundice, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.61-2.91) compared with spontaneous vaginal birth. Children born by cesarean delivery were particularly at statistically significantly increased risk for infections, eczema, and metabolic disorder, compared with spontaneous vaginal birth. Children born by emergency cesarean delivery showed the highest association for metabolic disorder, aOR 2.63 (95% CI 2.26-3.07).
CONCLUSION: Children born by spontaneous vaginal birth had fewer short- and longer-term health problems, compared with those born after birth interventions.
© 2018 the Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth interventions; child's health; epidemiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29577380      PMCID: PMC6282837          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


INTRODUCTION

Worldwide cesarean delivery rates are increasing, while spontaneous vaginal birth rates are decreasing.1 The rate of cesarean delivery has risen steadily in Europe to 25%, in Australia to 33%, and the highest rates are reported in Latin America and the Caribbean (41%).1, 2 Instrumental birth (ie, forceps or vacuum) and medical birth interventions (ie, including the use of exogenous oxytocin for labor induction and/or augmentation) are increasing globally as well.3 There is emerging evidence that operative birth (ie, instrumental vaginal birth or cesarean) may have an effect on children's physical health and cognitive development in the longer term.4, 5, 6, 7 The Extended Hygiene Hypothesis (EHH) hypothesizes that infants born by cesarean delivery have different colonization of the gut flora compared with infants born by vaginal birth. This may potentially affect the neonatal immune response.8, 9 The EPIgenetic Impact of Childbirth (EPIIC) hypothesis raises concern over the effects of stress (too high and too low) caused by medical and operative birth interventions to the epigenetic regulation of gene expression in the immune system.10, 11 Studies have demonstrated that children born vaginally at term have different short‐ and longer‐term physical health outcomes than those born by cesarean, particularly when there has been no exposure.4, 6, 7 Epidemiological studies that analyzed population‐based registry data, reported conflicting associations between operative birth interventions, and the increased risk of several immune‐related diseases, including asthma, type 1 diabetes, obesity, and inflammatory bowel disease.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 These conflicting findings may be due to different statistical methods used, differences in study population characteristics (eg, maternal age, morbidity, smoking, and gestational age), and failure to differentiate between mode of birth and medical birth interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between operative and/or medical birth interventions on children's health outcomes in the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age, in a large population of healthy pregnant women and their children.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of women and their children born in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2008. Children's health was followed until August 31, 2013. The NSW Centre for Health Record Linkage utilized probabilistic data linkage techniques to merge data of the following data sets: Record Linkage from the Perinatal Data Collection (PDC), Admitted Patient Data Collection, Register of Congenital Conditions, NSW Registry of Birth Deaths and Marriages, the Australian Bureau of Statistics—Socio‐Economic Indexes for Areas. Probabilistic record linkage software assigns a “linkage weight” to pairs of records.19, 20, 21 For example, records that match perfectly or nearly perfectly on first name, surname, date of birth, and address have a high linkage weight and records that match only on date of birth have a low‐linkage weight.19, 20, 21 If the linkage weight is high, it is likely that the records truly match, and if the linkage weight is low it is likely that the records are not truly a match.19, 20, 21 This technique has been shown to have a false‐positive rate of 0.3% of records.19, 20, 21 Several studies have evaluated the validity of the NSW linkage data and reported a tendency toward underreporting of maternal medical conditions during pregnancy.22, 23 However, by comparing PDC and Admitted Patient Data Collection data with women's individual medical records, it showed that conditions and procedures regarding delivery and discharge status had high specificity, indicating that false positives were uncommon.23, 24 The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the NSW Population and Health Services Research Committee (HREC/10/CIPHS/96). The ethics privacy statement outlines that consent is waived due to the size of the data set, retrospective nature of the data, and the inherent difficulties in obtaining consent.

Data

Data were routinely collected from women who gave birth or had subsequent births in either a public or private hospital in NSW, Australia. Data of nulliparous and multiparous women were selected if they were low‐risk pregnant women according to the guideline of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on intrapartum care and in alignment with methodology previously utilized on this and other linked data sets.20, 25, 26 This resulted in a cohort of “healthy pregnant women” who had no preexisting or pregnancy‐related hypertension or diabetes, did not smoke or take drugs, were within the age range of 20‐35 years, and gave birth at 37‐41 weeks of gestation to a singleton baby in cephalic presentation with a birthweight of ≥2500 g. In addition, children with minor or major congenital conditions were excluded based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification codes (ICD‐10‐AM, Q0.0‐Q99.9).25 Minor malformations could be related to more major malformations, which could be caused by genetic factors, for example, and which may become apparent some time after birth. Moreover, women and their children were excluded from the analyses if stillbirth or death had occurred during the 5‐year follow‐up period. By making this selection, we aimed to include a population of healthy pregnant women and their healthy born children, to reduce confounding and to increase the likelihood of finding the true association between exposure (birth interventions) and outcomes (child's health short and longer term). Women or children with missing data on either mode of birth, maternal age, parity, gestational age, or birthweight were also excluded from the analyses since these variables have a potential effect on children's health. If missing data on other variables occurred, that is, country of birth, socioeconomic status, and infant gender, these variables were indicated as system missing in the linked data file and subsequently excluded from the logistic regression models.

Variables

Mode of birth and birth interventions were collected from the PDC file and included: spontaneous vaginal birth, instrumental birth, elective cesarean delivery, and an emergency cesarean (either with or without medical birth interventions). Medical birth interventions included induction or augmentation of labor with oxytocin, prostaglandin, and/or artificial rupture of membranes. The short‐term follow‐up data of infants during the first 28 days and of children up to 5 years of age included admissions to public and private hospitals located in NSW (Admitted Patient Data Collection file). The children were followed from the date of birth until their fifth birthday to identify any adverse health outcomes which occurred during this time period. The classifying diagnoses and reasons with accompanying hospital visit dates were registered with ICD‐10‐AM‐codes. Short‐term adverse health outcomes included jaundice, feeding problems, and hypothermia and often are part of the adaptation of the infant to being outside the uterus.7, 27, 28 The longer‐term adverse health outcomes included asthma, respiratory infections (eg, common cold, pneumonia, bronchitis), gastrointestinal disorders, other infections (eg, sepsis, streptococcus, cystitis), metabolic disorder (eg, hypoglycemia, neonatal diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2, localized adiposity), and eczema, based on the potential effect that mode of birth has on immune‐related diseases.5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 An overview of all adverse health outcomes and other covariates with corresponding ICD‐10‐AM codes are presented in the Supporting Information. Potential confounders of either women or children characteristics were selected from several data files. Women's characteristics were extracted from the PDC and NSW Registry of Birth Deaths and Marriages files and included, for example, age and country of birth. From the Socio‐Economic Indexes for Areas file, the socioeconomic status of women were collected and were based on area indices of income and education using women's postal codes and defined as low (10‐30 percentiles), medium (40‐60 percentiles) or high (≥70 percentiles). Pharmacological pain medication during labor and birth (ie, nitrous oxide, systematic opioid, local administered to perineum, pudendal, morphine, and pethidine), and anesthesia (ie, epidural, caudal, and spinal) were extracted from the PDC file. Children's characteristics were extracted from the PDC and Admitted Patient Data Collection files and included gender, gestational age, birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age, large‐for‐gestational age, and birth trauma (appendix).

Data analyses

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected linked data was performed. Baseline characteristics of the women and children were reported using descriptive statistics. Statistical differences in baseline characteristics in women and children in the different mode of birth and birth interventions groupings (ie, spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with induction or augmentation, instrumental birth, instrumental birth with induction or augmentation, elective cesarean delivery, emergency cesarean, and an emergency cesarean delivery after induction) were calculated with chi‐square tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between the exposure variable and each child outcome. Spontaneous vaginal birth without induction or augmentation of labor was used as the reference group. The logistic regression models were adjusted for maternal characteristics (maternal age, country of birth, socioeconomic status, parity), birth characteristics (pain medication during birth), and child characteristics (gender, gestational age, birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age, large‐for‐gestational age, birth trauma). Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. For all analyses, a P‐value of .01 was defined as significant and all statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

The total population linked data set contained the antenatal, birth, and postnatal details of 669 880 women and 1 097 762 births which occurred in public or private hospitals during the study period 2000‐2008 with a follow‐up until age 5 years. A total 548 815 births (50%) were excluded due to medical or obstetric risk factors (eg, maternal morbidity, preterm birth) or substance abuse in pregnancy (eg, smoking or drug abuse). We excluded 54 254 (4.9%) children with congenital abnormalities. After applying all other exclusion criteria, mortality was recorded for 1638 (0.1%) children during the study period. There were 653 stillbirths, 353 cases of neonatal mortality, and 632 of childhood mortality. The risk of neonatal mortality was similar across the different mode of births. Finally, 1465 cases were excluded due to missing data on either maternal characteristics (ie, age, mode of birth, parity) or child characteristics (ie, gestational age, birthweight). The final study cohort consisted of 491 590 healthy pregnant women and their children. The majority of the women were Australian born (69%) and had a mean age of 29 (SD 4) years. Fifty‐five percent of the women were nulliparous. About 38% had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 28% had a vaginal birth with induction or augmentation, 4% had an instrumental birth without induction or augmentation, and 8% had an instrumental birth with induction or augmentation. Eleven percent of these women had an elective cesarean delivery, 4% had an emergency cesarean, and 7% had an emergency cesarean delivery after induction or augmentation of labor (Table 1). Overall, 43% of the women included were induced before labor, or received augmentation during labor. The majority (88%) of women received pain medication and infant's birth trauma was experienced in 3% of the births. Maternal (eg, socioeconomic status), birth (eg, pain medication), and child characteristics (eg, gestational age) showed statistically significant differences across seven modes of the birth group (P ≤ .001, Table 1). Missing values ranged from 0.04% (ie, infant gender) to 0.3% (ie, socioeconomic status) in the final linked data set.
Table 1

Maternal, mode of birth, and child characteristics by type of birth interventions, New South Wales, Australia, 2000‐2008

Total populationSpontaneous vaginal birthVaginal birth with induction or augmentationa Instrumental birthInstrumental birth with induction or augmentationa Cesarean electiveCesarean emergencyCesarean emergency after induction or augmentationStatistical differences among groups that differed on mode of birth
N = 491 590 100% N (%)n = 185 883 37.8% n (%)n = 136 651 27.8% n (%)n = 19 865 4.0% n (%)n = 41 631 8.5% n (%)n = 55 499 11.3% n (%)n = 17 216 3.5% n (%)n = 34 845 7.1% n (%) P‐value
Maternal characteristics
Maternal age (y)
20‐2482 638 (16.8)360 51 (19.4)25 482 (18.6)2901 (14.6)6063 (14.6)4612 (8.3)2175 (12.6)5354 (15.4)≤.001
25‐29185 308 (37.7)71 439 (38.4)53 382 (38.3)7749 (39.0)16 514 (39.7)17 391 (31.3)6175 (35.9)13 658 (39.2)
30‐35223 644 (45.5)78 393 (42.2)58 787 (43.0)9215 (46.4)19 054 (45.8)33 496 (60.4)8866 (51.5)15 833 (45.4)
Country of birth
Australia339 072 (69.0)122 577 (65.9)99 432 (72.8)13 096 (65.9)27 620 (66.3)41 191 (74.2)11 653 (67.7)23 503 (67.5)≤.001
Not Australia151 335 (30.8)62 915 (33.8)36 926 (27.0)6730 (33.9)13 884 (33.4)14 124 (25.5)5508 (32.0)11 248 (32.3)
Missing1183 (0.2)391 (0.2)293 (0.2)39 (0.2)127 (0.3)184 (0.3)55 (0.3)94 (0.3)
Socioeconomic statusb
Low123 311 (25.1)52 186 (28.1)35 710 (26.1)3762 (18.9)7876 (18.9)12 449 (22.4)4000 (23.2)7328 (21.0)≤.001
Middle169 198 (34.4)65 892 (35.4)47 549 (34.8)6505 (32.7)13 325 (32.0)18 121 (32.7)5741 (33.3)12 065 (34.6)
High197 712 (40.2)67 344 (36.2)53 037 (38.8)9535 (48.0)20 222 (48.6)24 816 (44.7)7433 (43.2)15 325 (44.0)
Missing1369 (0.3)461 (0.2)355 (0.3)63 (0.3)208 (0.5)113 (0.2)42 (0.2)127 (0.4)
Parity
Nulliparous219 951 (44.7)63 906 (34.4)56 547 (41.4)15 163 (76.3)34 574 (83.0)11 560 (20.8)8788 (51.0)29 413 (84.4)≤.001
Multiparous271 639 (55.3)121 977 (65.6)80 104 (58.6)4702 (23.7)7057 (17.0)43 939 (79.2)8428 (49.0)5432 (15.6)
Mode of birth characteristics
Pain medication
None57 214 (11.6)42 889 (23.1)13 602 (10.0)418 (2.1)305 (0.7)≤.001
Pharmacological pain medicationa 231 106 (47.0)12 6011 (67.8)82 384 (60.3)10 080 (50.7)12 631 (30.3)
Epidural, caudal, spinal or general anesthesia200 942 (40.9)15 427 (8.3)40 017 (29.3)9326 (46.9)28 666 (68.9)55 461 (99.9)17 208 (100)34 837 (100)
Missing2328 (0.5)1556 (0.8)648 (0.5)41 (0.2)29 (0.1)38 (0.1)8 (0)8 (0)
Child characteristics
Gender
Female242 168 (49.3)94 616 (50.9)69 096 (50.6)8993 (45.3)19 367 (46.5)26 988 (48.6)7650 (44.4)14 458 (44.4)≤.001
Male249 242 (50.7)91 237 (49.1)67 517 (49.4)10 864 (54.7)22 246 (53.4)28 449 (51.3)9554 (55.5)19 375 (55.6)
Missing180 (0)30 (0)38 (0)8 (0)18 (0)62 (0)12 (0)12 (0)
Gestational age
37‐37 + 621 800 (4.4)8503 (4.6)5646 (4.1)885 (4.4)1251 (3.0)3303 (6.0)1358 (7.9)854 (2.5)≤.001
38‐40 + 6367 792 (74.8)149 685 (80.5)92 235 (67.5)15 646 (78.8)28 202 (67.7)49 328 (88.9)13 016 (75.6)19 680 (56.5)
41‐41 + 6101 998 (20.7)27 695 (14.9)38 770 (28.4)3334 (16.8)12 178 (29.3)2868 (5.1)2842 (16.5)14 311 (41.1)
Birthweight
≤2500 g4993 (1.0)1618 (0.8)1496 (1.1)174 (0.9)362 (0.9)729 (1.3)218 (1.3)396 (1.1)≤.001
2500‐3499 g240 896 (49.0)97 316 (52.4)63 789 (46.6)10 629 (53.5)19 811 (47.6)28 020 (50.5)8195 (47.6)13 136 (37.7)
3500‐3999 g176 014 (35.8)64 872 (34.9)50 361 (36.9)6947 (35.0)15 558 (37.4)19 029 (34.3)5692 (34.6)13 285 (38.1)
≥4000 g69 687 (14.2)22 077 (11.9)21 005 (15.4)2115 (10.6)5900 (14.2)7721 (13.9)2841 (16.5)8028 (23.0)
Small‐for‐gestational age2151 (0.4)720 (0.4)594 (0.4)88 (0.4)170 (0.4)327 (0.6)177 (0.7)135 (0.4)≤.001
Large‐for‐gestational age6182 (1.3)1165 (0.6)1990 (1.5)151 (0.8)626 (1.5)871 (1.6)324 (1.9)994 (2.9)≤.001
Birth trauma childd 16 460 (3.3)2954 (1.6)2530 (1.9)2570 (12.9)5475 (13.2)765 (1.4)689 (4.0)1477 (4.2)≤.001

Induction or augmentation with oxytocin, prostaglandin, and/or artificial rupture of membranes.

Socioeconomic status are index data of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage, low (deciles 0‐3), middle (deciles 4‐6), high (7‐10 deciles).

Pharmacological pain medication (ie, nitrous oxide, systematic opioid, local administered to perineum, pudendal, morphine, and pethidine).

Birth trauma refers to birth trauma to central or peripheral nervous system, birth trauma to scalp, birth trauma to skeleton, intracranial laceration, and hemorrhage due to birth trauma.

Maternal, mode of birth, and child characteristics by type of birth interventions, New South Wales, Australia, 2000‐2008 Induction or augmentation with oxytocin, prostaglandin, and/or artificial rupture of membranes. Socioeconomic status are index data of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage, low (deciles 0‐3), middle (deciles 4‐6), high (7‐10 deciles). Pharmacological pain medication (ie, nitrous oxide, systematic opioid, local administered to perineum, pudendal, morphine, and pethidine). Birth trauma refers to birth trauma to central or peripheral nervous system, birth trauma to scalp, birth trauma to skeleton, intracranial laceration, and hemorrhage due to birth trauma.

Outcomes at short‐term follow‐up (first 28 days)

The prevalence of jaundice, feeding problems, and hypothermia were, respectively, 4%, 3%, and 2%. Compared with infants who were born by spontaneous vaginal birth, all other infants born with either medical or operative birth interventions had significantly higher odds of jaundice and feeding problems, except for an elective cesarean delivery which was not associated with the risk of jaundice (P = .07). Infants born by instrumental vaginal birth after induction or augmentation showed the highest association of jaundice (crude OR 3.26 [95% CI 3.12‐3.41], adjusted OR [aOR] 2.75 [95% CI 2.61‐2.91]). Significantly higher odds of hypothermia were observed for infants born by all the specified cesarean groups compared with those born by spontaneous vaginal delivery (Table 2).
Table 2

Prevalence and associations between birth interventions and short‐term child health outcomes, New South Wales, Australia, 2000‐2013

Short‐term adverse health outcomesTotal population
No. of events N (%)Unadjusted OR (95% CI)Adjusteda OR (95% CI)
Jaundice
Spontaneous vaginal birth5299 (2.9)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation4986 (3.6) 1.28 (1.23‐1.33) b 1.36 (1.31‐1.42)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation1615 (8.1) 3.01 (2.84‐3.19) 2.34 (2.20‐2.49)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation3662 (8.8) 3.26 (3.12‐3.41) 2.75 (2.61‐2.91)
Elective cesarean1638 (3.0)1.02 (0.96‐1.07)1.07 (1.00‐1.14)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation686 (4.0) 1.39 (1.29‐1.51) 1.24 (1.14‐1.36)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation1375 (3.9) 1.38 (1.30‐1.46) 1.31 (1.22‐1.41)
Feeding problems
Spontaneous vaginal birth1886 (1.0)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation1907 (1.4) 1.37 (1.28‐1.46) 1.23 (1.15‐1.32)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation513 (2.6) 2.58 (2.34‐2.85) 1.44 (1.30‐1.60)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation1344 (3.2) 3.22 (3.00‐3.46) 1.73 (1.59‐1.89)
Elective cesarean1095 (2.0) 1.93 (1.79‐2.08) 1.81 (1.64‐1.99)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation450 (2.6) 2.58 (2.33‐2.87) 1.82 (1.61‐2.05)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation1090 (3.1) 3.10 (2.87‐3.34) 1.85 (1.67‐2.04)
Hypothermia
Spontaneous vaginal birth5537 (3.0)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation4484 (3.3) 1.09 (1.05‐1.14) 1.04 (1.00‐1.08)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation687 (3.5) 1.16 (1.07‐1.26) 0.96 (0.88‐1.04)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation1542 (3.7) 1.24 (1.17‐1.31) 1.01 (0.94‐1.08)
Elective cesarean2104 (3.8) 1.26 (1.20‐1.32) 1.16 (1.08‐1.24)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation742 (4.3) 1.45 (1.34‐1.56) 1.24 (1.13‐1.36)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation1775 (5.1) 1.72 (1.63‐1.82) 1.43 (1.33‐1.54)

Adjusted for maternal characteristics (ie, maternal age, country of birth, socioeconomic status, parity), birth characteristics (ie, pharmacological pain medication or anesthesia), and child characteristics (ie, gender, gestational age, birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age, large‐for‐gestational age, birth trauma).

Associations reported in bold reflect a statistical significant association (P ≤ .01).

Prevalence and associations between birth interventions and short‐term child health outcomes, New South Wales, Australia, 2000‐2013 Adjusted for maternal characteristics (ie, maternal age, country of birth, socioeconomic status, parity), birth characteristics (ie, pharmacological pain medication or anesthesia), and child characteristics (ie, gender, gestational age, birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age, large‐for‐gestational age, birth trauma). Associations reported in bold reflect a statistical significant association (P ≤ .01).

Outcomes at longer‐term follow‐up (up to 5 years of age)

Diagnosed respiratory infections had the highest prevalence of any of the medical conditions during the 5‐year follow‐up period, 14%. The lowest prevalence was observed for gastrointestinal disorders, 0.5%. Other bacterial infections, sepsis, otitis, cystitis, or urethritis, were reported in 8% of the children in the study. There was no evidence to suggest an association between mode of birth and the odds of asthma. Metabolic disorder was reported in 1% of children and 3% were diagnosed with eczema. Compared with children born after spontaneous vaginal birth without induction or augmentation, all other groups had higher odds of respiratory infections, metabolic disorder, and eczema (Table 3). Odds of gastrointestinal disorders were higher among children born after vaginal birth with induction or augmentation and after elective cesarean delivery. Other infections were more prevalent among all exposure groups compared with those born after spontaneous vaginal birth without induction or augmentation. No statistical significant associations between other infections and groups born after instrumental birth either without or with induction or augmentation were observed (P‐values .07 and .02, respectively). Compared with children born by spontaneous vaginal birth, children born by cesarean delivery had higher odds of longer‐term adverse health outcomes. Birth by elective cesarean delivery aOR 2.49 (95% CI 2.19‐2.82), an emergency cesarean aOR 2.63 (95% CI 2.26‐3.07), and emergency cesarean delivery after induction aOR 2.41 (95% CI 2.11‐2.76) was associated with increased odds of metabolic disorder.
Table 3

Prevalence and associations between birth interventions and longer‐term child health outcomes, New South Wales, Australia, 2000‐2013

Longer‐term adverse health outcomesTotal population
No. of events N (%)Unadjusted OR (95% CI)Adjusteda OR (95% CI)
Asthma
Spontaneous vaginal birth5738 (3.1)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation4294 (3.1)1.01 (0.97‐1.05)1.01 (0.96‐1.05)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation640 (3.2)1.04 (0.96‐1.13)1.07 (0.98‐1.17)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation1201 (2.9)0.92 (0.87‐0.98)0.97 (090‐1.04)
Elective cesarean1868 (3.4)1.07 (1.02‐1.13)1.04 (0.97‐1.11)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation604 (3.5) 1.12 (1.03‐1.23) b 1.09 (0.99‐1.20)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation1084 (3.1)0.99 (0.93‐1.06)1.03 (0.95‐1.12)
Respiratory infections
Spontaneous vaginal birth22 454 (12.1)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation18 653 (13.7) 1.14 (1.12‐1.16) 1.11 (1.08‐1.13)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation2960 (14.9) 1.27 (1.22‐1.33) 1.25 (1.20‐1.31)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation6538 (15.7) 1.34 (1.30‐1.38) 1.31 (1.27‐1.36)
Elective cesarean9660 (17.4) 1.50 (1.46‐1.54) 1.35 (1.31‐1.40)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation3030 (17.6) 1.53 (1.47‐1.60) 1.39 (1.32‐1.46)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation5497 (15.8) 1.34 (1.30‐1.38) 1.29 (1.23‐1.34)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Spontaneous vaginal birth665 (0.4)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation665 (0.5) 1.35 (1.21‐1.50) 1.22 (1.09‐1.37)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation97 (0.5) 1.36 (1.10‐1.69) 1.13 (0.90‐1.41)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation181 (0.4)1.20 (1.02‐1.42)0.96 (0.79‐1.16)
Elective cesarean330 (0.6) 1.63 (1.43‐1.86) 1.21 (1.02‐1.44)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation101 (0.6) 1.62 (1.31‐2.00) 1.24 (0.98‐1.57)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation193 (0.6) 1.53 (1.30‐1.79) 1.19 (0.98‐1.45)
Other infections
Spontaneous vaginal birth13 448 (7.2)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation11 750 (8.6) 1.20 (1.16‐1.23) 1.12 (1.09‐1.15)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation1678 (8.4) 1.18 (1.12‐1.24) 1.05 (1.00‐1.11)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation3589 (8.6) 1.20 (1.15‐1.24) 1.06 (1.01‐1.10)
Elective cesarean5326 (9.6) 1.33 (1.29‐1.38) 1.07 (1.03‐1.12)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation1630 (9.5) 1.32 (1.25‐1.39) 1.10 (1.04‐1.17)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation3218 (9.2) 1.28 (1.23‐1.33) 1.10 (1.05‐1.16)
Metabolic disorder
Spontaneous vaginal birth1041 (0.6)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation1124 (0.8) 1.46 (1.34‐1.59) 1.35 (1.23‐1.48)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation181 (0.9) 1.63 (1.39‐1.91) 1.28 (1.08‐1.52)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation463 (1.1) 1.98 (1.77‐2.21) 1.54 (1.35‐1.75)
Elective cesarean919 (1.7) 2.93 (2.68‐3.21) 2.49 (2.19‐2.82)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation338 (2.0) 3.51 (3.10‐3.97) 2.63 (2.26‐3.07)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation653 (1.9) 3.34 (3.02‐3.68) 2.41 (2.11‐2.76)
Eczema
Spontaneous vaginal birth3566 (1.9)ReferenceReference
Vaginal birth with induction or augmentation3529 (2.6) 1.34 (1.28‐1.41) 1.16 (1.10‐1.22)
Instrumental vaginal birth without induction or augmentation1171 (5.9) 3.20 (2.99‐3.42) 2.18 (2.03‐2.35)
Instrumental vaginal birth with induction or augmentation2817 (6.8) 3.68 (3.50‐3.87) 2.30 (2.16‐2.45)
Elective cesarean1541 (2.8) 1.43 (1.35‐1.52) 1.11 (1.03‐1.19)
Emergency cesarean without induction or augmentation1178 (6.8) 3.71 (3.46‐3.97) 2.54 (2.35‐2.75)
Emergency cesarean after induction or augmentation2476 (7.1) 3.85 (3.65‐4.06) 2.38 (2.22‐2.55)

Adjusted for maternal characteristics (ie, maternal age, country of birth, socioeconomic status, parity), birth characteristics (ie, pharmacological pain medication or anesthesia), and child characteristics (ie, gender, gestational age, birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age, large‐for‐gestational age, birth trauma).

Associations reported in bold reflect a statistical significant association (P ≤ .01).

Prevalence and associations between birth interventions and longer‐term child health outcomes, New South Wales, Australia, 2000‐2013 Adjusted for maternal characteristics (ie, maternal age, country of birth, socioeconomic status, parity), birth characteristics (ie, pharmacological pain medication or anesthesia), and child characteristics (ie, gender, gestational age, birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age, large‐for‐gestational age, birth trauma). Associations reported in bold reflect a statistical significant association (P ≤ .01).

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to examine the association between medical birth interventions and/or operative birth interventions on short‐ and longer‐term child health outcomes in healthy women and their children by analyzing population‐based linked data. Our results showed that newborns born by instrumental birth after induction or augmentation were more likely to experience jaundice. Children born by cesarean delivery were particularly at increased risk for adverse health outcomes in the longer term, that is, respiratory infection, other infection, and metabolic disorder. There is emerging evidence that some birth interventions may have an effect on the neonatal immune response and the child's health in the longer term.7, 29 There is evidence of short‐term health impacts for the infant after a cesarean delivery, such as hypothermia, impaired lung function, altered metabolism, altered blood pressure, and altered feeding, which is consistent with our results.7, 27, 28 Some of these changes might be due to a lack of labor stress, associated with physiological maladaptation after birth. Some epidemiological studies have linked the mode of birth (particularly cesarean delivery) to increasing rates of asthma and gastrointestinal disorders.15, 17 However, other epidemiological studies did not report higher rates of asthma, diabetes type 1, obesity, and inflammatory bowel disease for children born with birth interventions.12, 16 Several studies that included meta‐analyses reported that children born by cesarean delivery were at higher risk of developing obesity, diabetes, or asthma in childhood.4, 6, 30, 31 The EPIIC hypothesis postulated by some of the authors in this paper, proposes that nonphysiological interventions during the intrapartum period, and specifically the use of synthetic oxytocin, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery, may interrupt the normal stress of being born.10, 11 This could have an epigenetic effect on specific genes, such as those that program immune responses, including weight regulation and metabolism. In support of an epigenetic hypothesis in this area, an association between mode of birth and DNA methylation has previously been reported.32, 33 Schlinzig et al examined 37 term babies born by elective cesarean delivery (n = 16) or vaginal birth (n = 21) and found a higher global measure of DNA methylation if the infant was born by cesarean delivery. While there was a nonsignificant difference between vaginal birth and cesarean delivery at 3‐5 days postpartum, the pattern did not alter in the infants born vaginally but significantly decreased in infants born by cesarean delivery.33 Almgren et al32 undertook a more precise analysis, looking at DNA from hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+). Those in specific gene sites that programmed for immune‐mediated disease showed different methylation patterns in infants born by cesarean delivery than those born vaginally.32 Furthermore, those infants born after shorter labor showed similar DNA methylation patterns to those born by cesarean, suggesting that physiological labor stress over a certain period of time is required to program certain autoimmune responses in the neonate. An alternative theory, the Extended Hygiene Hypothesis suggests that in utero, during a vaginal birth, and following skin‐to‐skin contact and breastfeeding, the infant needs to gather a community of microbes that come from the mother and the surrounding environment.8, 9 Establishing the gut microbiota may be important in protecting the child, and later the adult, against atopic and immunological diseases.10, 34 Disturbances in this process could be linked to developing infectious, inflammatory, and allergic diseases later in life.10, 34 However, some studies associate the mode of birth with differences in the child's microbiota, other conflicting results showed that there was no effect of cesarean delivery on the early microbiota beyond the immediate neonatal period.35 Despite this, there is a global awareness that cesarean delivery rates are too high. Currently, the emphasis is on labor induction to address this issue, as in, for example, a recently reported randomized controlled trial on routine induction of labor at 39 weeks in nulliparous women.36 Although this study showed a reduced cesarean delivery, our population level analysis shows that replacing one technical intervention with another might not improve longer‐term outcomes. We suggest that those looking to reduce unnecessary intervention could consider results of systematic reviews that show that relationship‐based interventions, such as continuous support in labor, or continuity of midwifery care, are associated with decreased interventions, improved rates of physiological birth, and higher levels of maternal reports of well being, without adversely affecting mortality and morbidity, and at reduced cost for women and health systems.37, 38 Our study had several strengths and limitations. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has provided an overview of associations between all possible birth interventions and a wide range of adverse child health outcomes within a large population of healthy pregnant women and their children. In our analyses, we adjusted for a range of confounders, including maternal characteristics, birth characteristics, and child characteristics. However, our associations could still be affected by unmeasured confounding, such as maternal body mass index, antibiotic use during pregnancy or administered during childhood until the age of 5, breast or artificial feeding, paternal characteristics, and familial environmental and genetic factors. Moreover, we were unable to control for confounding by indication since the underlying reasons for the provided medical and operative birth interventions were unknown.39 All of these factors may independently be associated with some of the health outcomes seen in children and therefore our findings must be interpreted with caution. It is possible that the routine use of intrapartum antibiotics also plays a role in the disturbance of the microbiome. As a consequence, the infant may experience adverse outcomes. Furthermore, experimental and laboratory‐based studies are needed to determine the precise mechanism and contribution of the different factors to the outcome. While we included country of birth, we could not include ethnicity and this may also affect outcomes and associations. We were only able to examine admissions of the child to a hospital while visits to general practitioners were not incorporated, suggesting an underreporting of adverse outcomes. Unfortunately, population‐based linked data are restricted to the selection of variables and limited ability to verify the accuracy of the data, but do provide a cost‐effective way of establishing incidence and association of (rare) health outcomes and can direct future research. Further research is required to confirm or refute the findings from this study. Research ideally would include other population‐based data registries, including a longer follow‐up period for a wider range of adverse child health outcomes, particularly those that are found more commonly beyond 5 years of age (eg, asthma). More research is also needed to explain some of the potential mechanisms at play, including epigenetic and microbiome research. By analyzing linked population data, we obtained insight into the association of medical and operative birth interventions and short‐ and longer‐term child health outcomes. These results support the “Too little too late, too much too soon debate” in maternal care, in which Miller et al40 argued that unnecessary use of nonevidence‐based interventions can be harmful for healthy women and infants, as much as a lack of lifesaving interventions is damaging for those that need them. Our results should make consumers and maternal health care professionals aware of the potential harm that birth interventions may have in the longer term, encouraging a “precautionary principle” approach that weighs the possible benefits of the intervention against its potential detrimental effects for each mother and child.41 The aim should always be to provide the right amount of care at the right time in the right way to childbearing women, with a clear assessment of the potential consequences of just‐in‐case interventions.40

CONCLUSION

Children born by spontaneous vaginal birth had fewer short‐ and longer‐term health problems, compared with those born after birth interventions. This suggests that when examining labor interventions, researchers need to pay attention to use of exogenous oxytocin and to instrumental and operative birth, and that follow‐up should be continued into the longer term. Click here for additional data file.
  38 in total

1.  Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.

Authors:  Klaus Bodner; Franz Wierrani; Werner Grünberger; Barbara Bodner-Adler
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication.

Authors:  V A Danilack; D D Dore; E W Triche; J H Muri; M G Phipps; D A Savitz
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Trends and morbidity associated with oxytocin use in labour in nulliparas at term.

Authors:  Sarah L Buchanan; Jillian A Patterson; Christine L Roberts; Jonathan M Morris; Jane B Ford
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.100

4.  Mode of obstetrical delivery and type 1 diabetes: a sibling design study.

Authors:  Ali S Khashan; Louise C Kenny; Cecilia Lundholm; Patricia M Kearney; Tong Gong; Catarina Almqvist
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Influence of maternal and perinatal factors on subsequent hospitalisation for asthma in children: evidence from the Oxford record linkage study.

Authors:  Rebekah Davidson; Stephen E Roberts; Clare J Wotton; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.317

6.  Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  C R Cardwell; L C Stene; G Joner; O Cinek; J Svensson; M J Goldacre; R C Parslow; P Pozzilli; G Brigis; D Stoyanov; B Urbonaite; S Sipetić; E Schober; C Ionescu-Tirgoviste; G Devoti; C E de Beaufort; K Buschard; C C Patterson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Cesarean section and risk of severe childhood asthma: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Mette C Tollånes; Dag Moster; Anne K Daltveit; Lorentz M Irgens
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months.

Authors:  Meghan B Azad; Theodore Konya; Heather Maughan; David S Guttman; Catherine J Field; Radha S Chari; Malcolm R Sears; Allan B Becker; James A Scott; Anita L Kozyrskyj
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Associations between antibiotic exposure during pregnancy, birth weight and aberrant methylation at imprinted genes among offspring.

Authors:  A C Vidal; S K Murphy; A P Murtha; J M Schildkraut; A Soubry; Z Huang; S E B Neelon; B Fuemmeler; E Iversen; F Wang; J Kurtzberg; R L Jirtle; C Hoyo
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The association of birth by caesarean section and cognitive outcomes in offspring: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie A Blake; Madeleine Gardner; Jake Najman; James G Scott
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  A true choice of place of birth? Swiss women's access to birth hospitals and birth centers.

Authors:  Sebastian Rauch; Louisa Arnold; Zelda Stuerner; Juergen Rauh; Michael Rost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Estimating the effect of cesarean delivery on long-term childhood health across two countries.

Authors:  Ayya Keshet; Hagai Rossman; Smadar Shilo; Shiri Barbash-Hazan; Guy Amit; Maytal Bivas-Benita; Chen Yanover; Irena Girshovitz; Pinchas Akiva; Avi Ben-Haroush; Eran Hadar; Arnon Wiznitzer; Eran Segal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  The effect of medical and operative birth interventions on child health outcomes in the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age: A linked data population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lilian L Peters; Charlene Thornton; Ank de Jonge; Ali Khashan; Mark Tracy; Soo Downe; Esther I Feijen-de Jong; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  A good start in life is important-perinatal factors dictate early microbiota development and longer term maturation.

Authors:  Shaopu Wang; Muireann Egan; C Anthony Ryan; Patrick Boyaval; Eugene M Dempsey; R Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Caesarean section and severe upper and lower respiratory tract infections during infancy: Evidence from two UK cohorts.

Authors:  Neora Alterman; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Maria A Quigley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Realigning Expectations With Reality: A Case Study on Maternal Mental Health During a Difficult Breastfeeding Journey.

Authors:  Mason Elder; Lorann Murphy; Stacy Notestine; Ashley Weber
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.219

9.  Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Jacek Krzysztof Szymański; Michał Ciebiera; Beata Sarecka-Hujar; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Maternal bacteria to correct abnormal gut microbiota in babies born by C-section.

Authors:  Éadaoin M Butler; Valentina Chiavaroli; José G B Derraik; Celia P Grigg; Brooke C Wilson; Nicholas Walker; Justin M O'Sullivan; Wayne S Cutfield
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.