Literature DB >> 29576569

Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses.

Yoshimasa Takeuchi1,2, Hiroyasu Koizumi3,4, Mika Furuchi1,2, Yohei Sato5, Chikahiro Ohkubo5, Hideo Matsumura3,4.   

Abstract

Accurate impressions are essential in fabri-cating dental restorations and fixed dental prostheses. During the last decade, digital impression systems have improved substantially. This review discusses the accuracy of digital impression systems for fabrication of dental restorations and fixed dental prostheses. A literature search in PubMed was performed for the period from July 2010 through June 2017. The search keywords were Cerec, digital impression, direct digitalization, indirect digitalization, and intraoral scanner. Only relevant studies are summarized and discussed in this review. In general, the latest systems have considerably reduced the time required for impression making, and the accuracy and marginal fit of digital impression systems have recently improved. Restorations and fixed dental prostheses fabricated with currently available digital impression systems and intraoral scanners exhibit clinically acceptable ranges of marginal gap in both direct and indirect procedures.

Keywords:  digital impression; digitalization; intraoral scanner

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29576569     DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Sci        ISSN: 1343-4934            Impact factor:   1.556


  12 in total

1.  [Application of biocopy function of temporary crown occlusal morphology in patients with severe attrition].

Authors:  Z Li; Y S Liu; S M Wang; R Zhang; L Jia; H Q Ye; W J Hu; W Y Zhao; Y S Liu; Y S Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-25

2.  Repeatability of Intraoral Scanners for Complete Arch Scan of Partially Edentulous Dentitions: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Je-Hyeon Yun; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo; Hyung-In Yoon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.

Authors:  Pokpong Amornvit; Dinesh Rokaya; Sasiwimol Sanohkan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Efficacy of Constructing Digital Hybrid Skull-Dentition Images Using an Intraoral Scanner and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Joo-Hee Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun; Sang-Min Yi; In-Young Park; Byoung-Eun Yang; Hye-Lim Lee
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  Assessment of the readiness of restorations manufactured by CAD/CAM in terms of marginal fit (Part I).

Authors:  Radek Mounajjed; Marwan Al-Akkad; Thomas Taylor; Omar Hamadah; Iva Voborná
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.061

6.  Can Dental Office Lighting Intensity Conditions Influence the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning?

Authors:  Anca Jivanescu; Andrei-Bogdan Faur; Raul Nicolae Rotar
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 7.  Accuracy of marginal adaptation of posterior fixed dental prosthesis made from digital impression technique: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hanuman Chalapathi Kumar; Tannamala Pavan Kumar; Surapaneni Hemchand; Chinni Suneelkumar; Anirudhan Subha
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-04-07

8.  Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Marginal Fit of E.Max Press and E.Max Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Assisted Manufacturing Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Afra Hassan Elrashid; Amjad Hamod AlKahtani; Shatha Jarallah Alqahtani; Nouf Bati Alajmi; Fatimah Hussain Alsultan
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2019-02-13

9.  Evaluation of marginal adaptation in three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and powder-free digital impression techniques.

Authors:  Hasan Kocaağaoğlu; Haydar Albayrak; Sezgi Cinel Sahin; Ayşegül Güleryüz Gürbulak
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Digital scanning is more accurate than using a periodontal probe to measure the keratinized tissue width.

Authors:  Jung-Seok Lee; Yoon-Sun Jeon; Franz-Josef Strauss; Hoi-In Jung; Reinhard Gruber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.