Literature DB >> 29575356

Emerging threat of the 21st century lightscape to global biodiversity.

Erin L Koen1,2, Corneile Minnaar3, Carrie L Roever4, Justin G Boyles2,5.   

Abstract

Over the last century the temporal and spatial distribution of light on Earth has been drastically altered by human activity. Despite mounting evidence of detrimental effects of light pollution on organisms and their trophic interactions, the extent to which light pollution threatens biodiversity on a global scale remains unclear. We assessed the spatial extent and magnitude of light encroachment by measuring change in the extent of light using satellite imagery from 1992 to 2012 relative to species richness for terrestrial and freshwater mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. The encroachment of light into previously dark areas was consistently high, often doubling, in areas of high species richness for all four groups. This pattern persisted for nocturnal groups (e.g., bats, owls, and geckos) and species considered vulnerable to extinction. Areas with high species richness and large increases in light extent were clustered within newly industrialized regions where expansion of light is likely to continue unabated unless we act to conserve remaining darkness. Implementing change at a global scale requires global public, and therefore scientific, support. Here, we offer substantial evidence that light extent is increasing where biodiversity is high, representing an emerging threat to global biodiversity requiring immediate attention.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial light; biodiversity; conservation; global; light pollution; nocturnal; species richness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29575356     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Opinion: Eight simple actions that individuals can take to save insects from global declines.

Authors:  Akito Y Kawahara; Lawrence E Reeves; Jesse R Barber; Scott H Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Caroline T Dressler; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Illuminating the physiological implications of artificial light on an insectivorous bat community.

Authors:  Zachary M Cravens; Justin G Boyles
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Bats seek refuge in cluttered environment when exposed to white and red lights at night.

Authors:  Isabelle Le Viol; Kamiel Spoelstra; Kévin Barré; Christian Kerbiriou; Ros-Kiri Ing; Yves Bas; Clémentine Azam
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.600

5.  Urban Lighting Research Transdisciplinary Framework-A Collaborative Process with Lighting Professionals.

Authors:  Catherine Pérez Vega; Karolina M Zielinska-Dabkowska; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Environmental risks from artificial nighttime lighting widespread and increasing across Europe.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel; Jonathan Bennie; Emma Rosenfeld; Simon Dzurjak; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 14.957

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.