W Nathaniel Brennen1, John T Isaacs1. 1. Department of Oncology, Prostate Cancer Program, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Presently, ∼85 serially transplantable human prostate cancer xenografts spanning the phenotypic, epigenetic, and genetic heterogeneity seen clinically are available in a variety of laboratories throughout the world. If distributed to the prostate cancer research community, these can provide an experimental platform for resolving the specificity versus generalizability of basic cancer biology principles (eg, credentialing of therapeutic molecular targets) and for validating translational approaches for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Thus, there is an urgent need to distribute the already established serially transplantable human prostate cancer xenografts and to develop robust methods for establishing new ones. METHODS: To accelerate the development of such additional xenografts, particularly from patients treated with the newer standard of care agents (ie, abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel, alpharadin, etc), a historic review of the field will be presented. RESULTS: Over the last 50 years, multiple groups throughout the world have developed methods for the successful establishment of serially transplantable human prostate cancer xenografts using a variety of immune deficient mice. These are summarized chronologically. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE: With the ever growing appreciation of the value of personalized medicine (aka precision medicine), methods need to be developed that allow efficient and timely growth of primary patient derived prostate cancer xenografts (PDXs), which can be used as "avatars" for defining optimal therapy for that specific patient. Such development should be based upon the leads obtained from the successful establishment of serially transplantable prostate cancer xenografts described in this review.
BACKGROUND: Presently, ∼85 serially transplantable humanprostate cancer xenografts spanning the phenotypic, epigenetic, and genetic heterogeneity seen clinically are available in a variety of laboratories throughout the world. If distributed to the prostate cancer research community, these can provide an experimental platform for resolving the specificity versus generalizability of basic cancer biology principles (eg, credentialing of therapeutic molecular targets) and for validating translational approaches for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Thus, there is an urgent need to distribute the already established serially transplantable humanprostate cancer xenografts and to develop robust methods for establishing new ones. METHODS: To accelerate the development of such additional xenografts, particularly from patients treated with the newer standard of care agents (ie, abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel, alpharadin, etc), a historic review of the field will be presented. RESULTS: Over the last 50 years, multiple groups throughout the world have developed methods for the successful establishment of serially transplantable humanprostate cancer xenografts using a variety of immune deficient mice. These are summarized chronologically. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE: With the ever growing appreciation of the value of personalized medicine (aka precision medicine), methods need to be developed that allow efficient and timely growth of primary patient derived prostate cancer xenografts (PDXs), which can be used as "avatars" for defining optimal therapy for that specific patient. Such development should be based upon the leads obtained from the successful establishment of serially transplantable prostate cancer xenografts described in this review.
Authors: Joseph Aldahl; Eun-Jeong Yu; Yongfeng He; Erika Hooker; Monica Wong; Vien Le; Adam Olson; Dong-Hoon Lee; Won Kyung Kim; Charles L Murtaugh; Gerald R Cunha; Zijie Sun Journal: Differentiation Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 3.880
Authors: Nelson T Gross; Jianmin Wang; Michael V Fiandalo; Eduardo Cortes Gomez; Anica Watts; Alejandro S Godoy; Gary J Smith; Yue Wu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Melissa E Monterosso; Kathryn Futrega; William B Lott; Ian Vela; Elizabeth D Williams; Michael R Doran Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Federico La Manna; Marta De Menna; Nikhil Patel; Sofia Karkampouna; Maria Rosaria De Filippo; Irena Klima; Peter Kloen; Lijkele Beimers; George N Thalmann; Rob C M Pelger; Estela Jacinto; Marianna Kruithof-de Julio Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 6.244