Literature DB >> 33664329

Using the Microwell-mesh to culture microtissues in vitro and as a carrier to implant microtissues in vivo into mice.

Melissa E Monterosso1,2, Kathryn Futrega2,3, William B Lott2,3, Ian Vela1,2,4,5, Elizabeth D Williams1,2,4, Michael R Doran6,7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are commonly propagated by serial transplantation of "pieces" of tumour in mice, but the cellular composition of pieces is not standardised. Herein, we optimised a microwell platform, the Microwell-mesh, to aggregate precise numbers of cells into arrays of microtissues, and then implanted the Microwell-mesh into NOD-scid IL2γ-/- (NSG) mice to study microtissue growth. First, mesh pore size was optimised using microtissues assembled from bone marrow-derived stromal cells, with mesh opening dimensions of 100×100 μm achieving superior microtissue vascularisation relative to mesh with 36×36 μm mesh openings. The optimised Microwell-mesh was used to assemble and implant PCa cell microtissue arrays (hereafter microtissues formed from cancer cells are referred to as microtumours) into mice. PCa cells were enriched from three different PDX lines, LuCaP35, LuCaP141, and BM18. 3D microtumours showed greater in vitro viability than 2D cultures, but neither proliferated. Microtumours were successfully established in mice 81% (57 of 70), 67% (4 of 6), 76% (19 of 25) for LuCaP35, LuCaP141, and BM18 PCa cells, respectively. Microtumour growth was tracked using live animal imaging for size or bioluminescence signal. If augmented with further imaging advances and cell bar coding, this microtumour model could enable greater resolution of PCa PDX drug response, and lead to the more efficient use of animals. The concept of microtissue assembly in the Microwell-mesh, and implantation in vivo may also have utility in implantation of islets, hair follicles or other organ-specific cells that self-assemble into 3D structures, providing an important bridge between in vitro assembly of mini-organs and in vivo implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33664329      PMCID: PMC7933425          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84154-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  40 in total

1.  LuCaP 35: a new model of prostate cancer progression to androgen independence.

Authors:  Eva Corey; Janna E Quinn; Kent R Buhler; Peter S Nelson; Jill A Macoska; Lawrence D True; Robert L Vessella
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Micromarrows--three-dimensional coculture of hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Matthew M Cook; Kathryn Futrega; Michael Osiecki; Mahboubeh Kabiri; Betul Kul; Alison Rice; Kerry Atkinson; Gary Brooke; Michael Doran
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  3D mesenchymal stem/stromal cell osteogenesis and autocrine signalling.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Kabiri; Betul Kul; William B Lott; Kathryn Futrega; Parisa Ghanavi; Zee Upton; Michael R Doran
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in low oxygen environment micropellet cultures.

Authors:  Brandon D Markway; Guak-Kim Tan; Gary Brooke; James E Hudson; Justin J Cooper-White; Michael R Doran
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Tissue engineering of human hair follicles using a biomimetic developmental approach.

Authors:  Hasan Erbil Abaci; Abigail Coffman; Yanne Doucet; James Chen; Joanna Jacków; Etienne Wang; Zongyou Guo; Jung U Shin; Colin A Jahoda; Angela M Christiano
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Reproducible, ultra high-throughput formation of multicellular organization from single cell suspension-derived human embryonic stem cell aggregates.

Authors:  Mark D Ungrin; Chirag Joshi; Andra Nica; Céline Bauwens; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Generation and Application of Patient-Derived Xenograft Model for Cancer Research.

Authors:  Jaeyun Jung; Hyang Sook Seol; Suhwan Chang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Heterogeneity at the invasion front of triple negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Koh Meng Aw Yong; Peter J Ulintz; Sara Caceres; Xu Cheng; Liwei Bao; Zhifen Wu; Evelyn M Jiagge; Sofia D Merajver
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The secreted protease Adamts18 links hormone action to activation of the mammary stem cell niche.

Authors:  Dalya Ataca; Patrick Aouad; Céline Constantin; Csaba Laszlo; Manfred Beleut; Marie Shamseddin; Renuga Devi Rajaram; Rachel Jeitziner; Timothy J Mead; Marian Caikovski; Philipp Bucher; Giovanna Ambrosini; Suneel S Apte; Cathrin Brisken
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A preclinical xenograft model of prostate cancer using human tumors.

Authors:  Mitchell G Lawrence; Renea A Taylor; Roxanne Toivanen; John Pedersen; Sam Norden; David W Pook; Mark Frydenberg; Melissa M Papargiris; Birunthi Niranjan; Michelle G Richards; Hong Wang; Anne T Collins; Norman J Maitland; Gail P Risbridger
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.