Literature DB >> 29574974

A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients.

R Ter Heine1, N P van Erp1, H J Guchelaar2, J W de Fijter3, M E J Reinders3, C M van Herpen4, D M Burger1, D J A R Moes2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Everolimus is a drug from the class of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors used for both immunosuppressant and oncological indications. We postulate that there is room for improvement of dosing, as the optimal immunosuppressive dose in calcineurin-free regimens is unknown and since the once daily dosing regimen for oncological indications is often associated with treatment-limiting toxicity.
METHODS: We developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model for everolimus in cancer and transplant patients and explored alternative dosing regimens.
RESULTS: We found that formulation did not influence bioavailability and that use of >20 mg prednisolone daily increased everolimus clearance. In transplant patients, the approved dose of 0.75-1 mg twice daily (BID) results in subtherapeutic trough levels (<6 μg l-1 ) and that a higher starting dose of 2.25-3 mg BID is required.
CONCLUSION: For oncological indications, our results encourage the investigation of dosing everolimus 3.75 mg BID in terms of superiority in safety and noninferiority in efficacy.
© 2018 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; dose individualization; everolimus; nonmem; population pharmacokinetics; transplant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29574974      PMCID: PMC6005589          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  48 in total

1.  Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus provides equivalent efficacy to oral daily dosing in mouse xenograft models of human cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Laborde; Fatos Oz; Mitko Ristov; Daniel Guthy; Dario Sterker; Paul McSheehy
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Inherent correlation between dose and clearance in therapeutic drug monitoring settings: possible misinterpretation in population pharmacokinetic analyses.

Authors:  Jae Eun Ahn; Angela K Birnbaum; Richard C Brundage
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Rapamycin derivatives reduce mTORC2 signaling and inhibit AKT activation in AML.

Authors:  Zhihong Zeng; Dos D Sarbassov; Ismael J Samudio; Karen W L Yee; Mark F Munsell; C Ellen Jackson; Francis J Giles; David M Sabatini; Michael Andreeff; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Allometric size: The scientific theory and extension to normal fat mass.

Authors:  Nick H G Holford; Brian J Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Power estimation using a population pharmacokinetics model with optimal design by clinical trial simulations: application in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies.

Authors:  Shuying Yang; Misba Beerahee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  De novo therapy with everolimus, low-dose ciclosporine A, basiliximab and steroid elimination in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  L Pape; G Offner; M Kreuzer; K Froede; J Drube; N Kanzelmeyer; J H H Ehrich; T Ahlenstiel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Everolimus-based, calcineurin-inhibitor-free regimen in recipients of de-novo kidney transplants: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Klemens Budde; Thomas Becker; Wolfgang Arns; Claudia Sommerer; Petra Reinke; Ute Eisenberger; Stefan Kramer; Wolfgang Fischer; Harald Gschaidmeier; Frank Pietruck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Cancer and mTOR Inhibitors in Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Johan W de Fijter
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Using Akaike's information theoretic criterion in mixed-effects modeling of pharmacokinetic data: a simulation study.

Authors:  Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-03-04

10.  Everolimus pharmacokinetics and its exposure-toxicity relationship in patients with thyroid cancer.

Authors:  D de Wit; T C Schneider; D J A R Moes; C F M Roozen; J den Hartigh; H Gelderblom; H J Guchelaar; J J van der Hoeven; T P Links; E Kapiteijn; N P van Erp
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  5 in total

1.  A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients.

Authors:  R Ter Heine; N P van Erp; H J Guchelaar; J W de Fijter; M E J Reinders; C M van Herpen; D M Burger; D J A R Moes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Everolimus: External Validation in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Tom C Zwart; Dirk Jan A R Moes; Paul J M van der Boog; Nielka P van Erp; Johan W de Fijter; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Ron J Keizer; Rob Ter Heine
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  Anna Mueller-Schoell; Stefanie L Groenland; Oliver Scherf-Clavel; Madelé van Dyk; Wilhelm Huisinga; Robin Michelet; Ulrich Jaehde; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  From Cancer to Immune-Mediated Diseases and Tolerance Induction: Lessons Learned From Immune Oncology and Classical Anti-cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Stephan Klöß; Susann Dehmel; Armin Braun; Michael J Parnham; Ulrike Köhl; Susanne Schiffmann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Hyaluronic Acid-Decorated Chitosan Nanoparticles for CD44-Targeted Delivery of Everolimus.

Authors:  Enrica Chiesa; Rossella Dorati; Bice Conti; Tiziana Modena; Emanuela Cova; Federica Meloni; Ida Genta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.