| Literature DB >> 29574457 |
Shinsuke Miyazaki1, Takatsugu Kajiyama2, Tomonori Watanabe2, Masahiro Hada2, Kazuya Yamao2, Shigeki Kusa2, Miyako Igarashi2, Hiroaki Nakamura2, Hitoshi Hachiya2, Hiroshi Tada3, Kenzo Hirao4, Yoshito Iesaka2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of phrenic nerve injury (PNI) varies owing to different definitions, balloon generations, balloon size, freezing regimen, and protective maneuvers. We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and outcome of PNI during cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in a large population. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: catheter ablation; complication; cryoballoon; phrenic nerve injury; pulmonary vein isolation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29574457 PMCID: PMC5907598 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Representative balloon position on the chest radiograph and PV anatomy on cardiac CT in patients with PNI during RSPV applications. A, Deep balloon position due to the large RSPV ostium (26×21.5 mm) resulted in PNI. B, Despite a proximal balloon position attributable to a small RSPV ostium (13.5×13 mm), PNI occurred. AP indicates anteroposterior view; CRA, cranial view; CS, coronary sinus; LA, left atrium; PA, postero‐anterior view; and RSPV, right superior pulmonary vein.
Figure 2Representative time course of diaphragmatic CMAPs in a patient with PNI. A, The baseline CMAP amplitude was 1.5 mV. The cryoapplication was terminated (red arrow) following the CMAP amplitude reduction (green arrows, 0.12 mV). B, The CMAP amplitude further reduced to 0 mV following the emergent termination; however, it gradually recovered to 0.78 mV over 20 minutes after termination. CMAP indicates compound motor action potential; and RA, right atrium.
Figure 3The representative time course of right PNI on the chest radiograph (A, baseline; B, 1 day; C, 1 month; D, 3 months; E, 5 months; and F, 12 months after the procedure). In this case, the timing of the emergent deflation was delayed by 50 seconds after a significant CMAP reduction (same patient as Figure 1B) and complete PNI recovery required 12 months.
Characteristics of the PNI Patients
| N | 34 |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 62.1±10.5 |
| Paroxysmal AF, n (%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| Initial procedure, n (%) | 34 (100%) |
| Female, n (%) | 14 (41.2%) |
| Structural heart disease, n (%) | 5 (14.7%) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 16 (47.0%) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.8±3.5 |
| LA diameter, mm | 36.3±5.9 |
| LV ejection fraction, % | 63.5±10.5 |
| Pro‐brain natriuretic peptide, pg/mL | 250±545 |
| Estimated GFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2 | 71.5±18.8 |
AF indicates atrial fibrillation; GFR, glomerular filtration ratio; LA, left atrial; and LV, left ventricular.
Parameters Associated With the Occurrence of PNI During RSPV Applications
| PNI During RSPV | No PNI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 30 | 520 | |
| Age, y | 62.1±10.6 | 63.6±11.2 | 0.479 |
| AF type | 0.017 | ||
| Paroxysmal AF, n | 22 (73.3%) | 429 (82.5%) | |
| Persistent AF, n | 5 (16.7%) | 81 (15.6%) | |
| Long‐standing persistent AF, n | 3 (10.0%) | 10 (1.9%) | |
| Female, n | 12 (40%) | 155 (29.8%) | 0.238 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.4±3.2 | 24.3±3.7 | 0.867 |
| LA diameter, mm | 37.4±5.3 | 38.0±5.6 | 0.540 |
| LV ejection fraction, % | 64.0±11.1 | 65.8±7.5 | 0.215 |
| RSPV diameter (coronal), mm | 19.5±4.2 | 17.7±2.8 | 0.001 |
| RSPV diameter (horizontal), mm | 16.0±4.7 | 14.4±2.6 | 0.001 |
| Proximal‐seal technique | 11 (36.7%) | 269 (51.7%) | 0.09 |
| Balloon position on chest radiograph | N=28 | N=474 | <0.0001 |
| A | 12 (42.9%) | 387 (81.6%) | |
| B1 | 13 (46.4%) | 80 (16.9%) | |
| B2 | 3 (10.7%) | 7 (1.5%) | |
| Nadir balloon temperature, °C | −53.5±4.5 | −54.7±5.0 | 0.213 |
| Time to −30°C, s | 27.0±3.1 | 28.2±4.5 | 0.150 |
| Time to −40°C, s | 39.5±7.9 | 44.0±17.2 | 0.166 |
AF indicates atrial fibrillation; LV, left ventricular; LA, left atrial; PNI, phrenic nerve injury; and RSPV, right superior pulmonary vein.
Figure 4A, The incidence of PNI in patients with different AF (atrial fibrillation) types. B, The incidence of PNI at different balloon positions on chest radiograph during the procedure. C, The CMAP (compound motor action potential) amplitude during the balloon deflation in patients with and without persistent PNI (phrenic nerve injury). D, Receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the best cutoff value (red arrow) of the CMAP amplitude when freezing was interrupted to predict PNI recovery by the next day of the procedure. PAF indicates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; PsAF, persistent atrial fibrillation.
Intraprocedural Parameters Associated With PNI Recovery
| Timing of PNI Recovery | <24 h | <1 mo | >1 mo |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 21 | 4 | 9 | |
| Baseline CMAP amplitude, mV | 0.79±0.33 | 0.75±0.27 | 0.64±0.20 | 0.454 |
| Timing of CMAP amplitude reduction, s | 105 (85–129) | 121 (109–131) | 80 (62–97) | 0.054 |
| Delay of emergent balloon deflation, s | 10 (6–25) | 28 (16–34) | 21 (15–35) | 0.094 |
| CMAP amplitude at the timing of emergent deflation, mV | 0.24±0.17 | 0.11±0.09 | 0.02±0.05 | 0.002 |
CMAP indicates compound motor action potential; and PNI, phrenic nerve injury.
Procedural Data in Patients Who Underwent Second Procedures
| Patient | TTI, s | PVI by CB Alone? | CB Application Time, s | Nadir Balloon Temperature, °C | Follow‐Up, mo | Durability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 19 | Yes | 155 | −50 | 8 | Durable |
| #2 | 29 | Yes | 68 | −49 | 9 | Reconnection |
| #3 | NA | Yes | 120 | −54 | 15 | Durable |
| #4 | NA | Yes | 58 | −45 | 15 | Reconnection |
| #5 | NA | No | 228+Touch‐up | −51 and −56 | 8 | Reconnection |
| #6 | 30 | Yes | 166 | −50 | 3 | Durable |
CB indicates cryoballoon; NA, not available; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; and TTI, time‐to‐isolation.