Literature DB >> 29573667

Glycaemic variability-based classification of impaired glucose tolerance vs. type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring data.

Enrico Longato1, Giada Acciaroli2, Andrea Facchinetti3, Liisa Hakaste4, Tiinamaija Tuomi5, Alberto Maran6, Giovanni Sparacino7.   

Abstract

Many glycaemic variability (GV) indices extracted from continuous glucose monitoring systems data have been proposed for the characterisation of various aspects of glucose concentration profile dynamics in both healthy and non-healthy individuals. However, the inter-index correlations have made it difficult to reach a consensus regarding the best applications or a subset of indices for clinical scenarios, such as distinguishing subjects according to diabetes progression stage. Recently, a logistic regression-based method was used to address the basic problem of differentiating between healthy subjects and those affected by impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a pool of 25 GV-based indices. Whereas healthy subjects were classified accurately, the distinction between patients with IGT and T2D remained critical. In the present work, by using a dataset of CGM time-series collected in 62 subjects, we developed a polynomial-kernel support vector machine-based approach and demonstrated the ability to distinguish between subjects affected by IGT and T2D based on a pool of 37 GV indices complemented by four basic parameters-age, sex, BMI, and waist circumference-with an accuracy of 87.1%.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes; Glycaemic variability; Support vector machine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29573667     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  4 in total

1.  Simple Linear Support Vector Machine Classifier Can Distinguish Impaired Glucose Tolerance Versus Type 2 Diabetes Using a Reduced Set of CGM-Based Glycemic Variability Indices.

Authors:  Enrico Longato; Giada Acciaroli; Andrea Facchinetti; Alberto Maran; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-31

2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications.

Authors:  Martina Vettoretti; Giacomo Cappon; Giada Acciaroli; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 3.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for Diabetes Management: A Review of Technologies and Applications.

Authors:  Giacomo Cappon; Martina Vettoretti; Giovanni Sparacino; Andrea Facchinetti
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.376

4.  Analysis of detrended fluctuation function derived from continuous glucose monitoring may assist in distinguishing latent autoimmune diabetes in adults from T2DM.

Authors:  Liyin Zhang; Qi Tian; Keyu Guo; Jieru Wu; Jianan Ye; Zhiyi Ding; Qin Zhou; Gan Huang; Xia Li; Zhiguang Zhou; Lin Yang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.055

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.