Literature DB >> 29572758

Does freedom make a difference? : An empirical investigation of differences between subjective well-being and perceived capabilities amongst cancer patients.

Philippe Tessier1, Josselin Thuilliez2.   

Abstract

Perceived capabilities-a subjective operationalization of Sen's concept of capability-and subjective well-being are increasingly regarded as relevant information about individual well-being to guide resources allocation in healthcare. Although they refer to different notions, both types of measures rely on self-reported information and little is known as to how they compare together empirically. The aim of this paper is to investigate differences between measures of subjective well-being and of perceived capabilities in terms of their correlation with dimensions of health-related quality of life using panel data concerning a sample of 293 breast cancer and melanoma patients. Regression analyses suggest that the measures capture quite different aspects of the patients' welfare. Differences in the correlation with dimensions of health also seem consistent with the underlying notions to which these measures refer. However, our findings also suggest that future researches should aim at determining how measures of perceived capabilities may be influenced by individual personality traits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capabilities; Health-related quality of life; Subjective well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29572758     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0967-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  29 in total

1.  High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Angus Deaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off.

Authors:  A Wagstaff
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

Authors:  E Diener; R A Emmons; R J Larsen; S Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1985-02

4.  Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?

Authors:  David G Blanchflower; Andrew J Oswald
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll.

Authors:  Angus Deaton
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2008

6.  Developing methods that really do value the 'Q' in the QALY.

Authors:  Paul Dolan
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2008-01

7.  Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: the spread of ideas in health economics.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Richard D Smith; Paula Lorgelly
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Valuing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D health states using subjective well-being: a secondary analysis of patient data.

Authors:  Clara Mukuria; John Brazier
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research.

Authors:  Judit Simon; Paul Anand; Alastair Gray; Jorun Rugkåsa; Ksenija Yeeles; Tom Burns
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Tim J Peters; John Brazier; Stirling Bryan; Terry N Flynn; Sam Clemens; Alison Moody; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  1 in total

1.  Personality (at Intrapsychic and Interpersonal Level) Associated With Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer (Lung and Colon).

Authors:  Maria Velia Giulietti; Anna Vespa; Marica Ottaviani; Rossana Berardi; Giancarlo Balercia; Giorgio Arnaldi; Pisana Gattafoni; Paolo Fabbietti; Mirko Di Rosa; Roberta Spatuzzi
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.