Literature DB >> 23218437

Valuing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D health states using subjective well-being: a secondary analysis of patient data.

Clara Mukuria1, John Brazier.   

Abstract

The economic evaluation of health care technologies employs a standard economic approach based on preferences to provide utility information. Previous studies have used happiness rather than preferences to weight health states using general population data. However, these data may not reflect the full range and scope of health and happiness experienced by patients. This paper applies a similar approach to a large patient sample (N = 15,184) from a hospital in Wales, UK collected between 2002 and 2004. Logit regression models were used to assess the relationship between happiness and the health state classifications of two measures, the EQ-5D and the SF-6D. The results suggest a different weighting across dimensions to that from preference elicitation techniques such as time trade-off and standard gamble. While mental health (depression and anxiety), vitality and social functioning were found to have a large significant association with the patients' own happiness assessment, pain was less so and physical health had no association.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23218437     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Does freedom make a difference? : An empirical investigation of differences between subjective well-being and perceived capabilities amongst cancer patients.

Authors:  Philippe Tessier; Josselin Thuilliez
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-03-23

2.  Do More of Those in Misery Suffer from Poverty, Unemployment or Mental Illness?

Authors:  Sarah Flèche; Richard Layard
Journal:  Kyklos (Oxford)       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  Are preferences over health states informed?

Authors:  M Karimi; J Brazier; S Paisley
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Happy with Your Capabilities? Valuing ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A States Based on Experienced Utility Using Subjective Well-Being Data.

Authors:  Sebastian Himmler; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Sick but satisfied: the impact of life and health satisfaction on choice between health scenarios.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Georgios Kavetsos; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Examining the incremental impact of long-standing health conditions on subjective well-being alongside the EQ-5D.

Authors:  Mengjun Wu; John Brazier; Clare Relton; Cindy Cooper; Christine Smith; Joanna Blackburn
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Subjective Happiness Scale: evidence from the Hong Kong FAMILY Cohort.

Authors:  Hairong Nan; Michael Y Ni; Paul H Lee; Wilson W S Tam; Tai Hing Lam; Gabriel M Leung; Ian McDowell
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-08

8.  Improving Cross-Sector Comparisons: Going Beyond the Health-Related QALY.

Authors:  John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.561

9.  Exploratory Study of Dimensions of Health-related Quality of Life in the General Population of South Korea.

Authors:  Seon-Ha Kim; Min-Woo Jo; Minsu Ock; Sang-Il Lee
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-11

10.  Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it.

Authors:  John Brazier; Donna Rowen; Milad Karimi; Tessa Peasgood; Aki Tsuchiya; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.