| Literature DB >> 29572498 |
Tyler W Benson1, Neal L Weintraub2, Ha Won Kim1, Nichole Seigler3, Sanjiv Kumar1, Jonathan Pye1, Tetsuo Horimatsu1, Rod Pellenberg1, David W Stepp1, Rudolf Lucas1,4, Vladimir Y Bogdanov5, Sheldon E Litwin6, Julia E Brittain7, Ryan A Harris3.
Abstract
High-fat meal (HFM) consumption can produce acute lipemia and trigger myocardial infarction in patients with atherosclerosis, but the mechanisms are poorly understood. Erythrocytes (red blood cells, RBCs) intimately interact with inflammatory cells and blood vessels and play a complex role in regulating vascular function. Chronic high-fat feeding in mice induces pathological RBC remodeling, suggesting a novel link between HFM, RBCs, and vascular dysfunction. However, whether acute HFM can induce RBC remodeling in humans is unknown. Ten healthy individuals were subjected to biochemical testing and assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before and after a single HFM or iso-caloric meal (ICM). Following the HFM, triglyceride, cholesterol, and free fatty acid levels were all significantly increased, in conjunction with impaired post-prandial FMD. Additionally, peripheral blood smears demonstrated microcytes, remodeled RBCs, and fatty monocytes. Increased intracellular ROS and nitration of protein band 3 was detected in RBCs following the HFM. The HFM elevated plasma and RBC-bound myeloperoxidase (MPO), which was associated with impaired FMD and oxidation of HDL. Monocytic cells exposed to lipid in vitro released MPO, while porcine coronary arteries exposed to fatty acids ex vivo took up MPO. We demonstrate in humans that a single HFM induces pathological RBC remodeling and concurrently elevates MPO, which can potentially enter the blood vessel wall to trigger oxidative stress and destabilize vulnerable plaques. These novel findings may have implications for the short-term risk of HFM consumption and alimentary lipemia in patients with atherosclerosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29572498 PMCID: PMC6342280 DOI: 10.1038/s41374-018-0038-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lab Invest ISSN: 0023-6837 Impact factor: 5.662
Fig. 1Quantification of oxidized HDL modifications before and after the HFM and ICM. HDL was interrogated in EDTA anticoagulated plasma using ELISA with IgG raised against MPO-oxidized HDL (Cl-HDL). Other modified sites (HNE and MDA) were also detected by ELISA (Generon). a High-fat pre, b High-fat post, c ICM pre, d ICM post. *Significant from HFM pre and ICM (n = 10 HFM, n = 6 ICM)
Participant characteristics
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| N | 10 |
| Age (years) | 26 ±3 |
| Height (cm) | 184±7 |
| Weight (kg) | 83.8 ± 14.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.7 ± 3.9 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 117±12 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 65 ±4 |
| Body fat (%) | 22.5 ± 4.2 |
| Framingham risk score | −5.9 ± 2.7 |
| VO2 peak (ml/kg/min) | 56.7 ± 9.4 |
Values are mean ± SD
BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure
Blood testing following the high fat and iso-caloric meals
| Variable | PreHFM | Post HFM | Pre ICM | Post ICM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 162±12 | 173 ±14[ | 148±9 | 146 ± 10 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 48 ± 5 | 49 ± 5 | 47 ± 5 | 46 ±5 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 100±9 | 86 ±12 | 92 ± 7 | 85 ±4 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 87 ±12 | 211 ±42[ | 83 ± 6 | 98 ±5 |
| Free fatty acids μm/l) | 135±15 | 203 ±12[ | 109 ± 17 | 40± 11 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 90 ± 3 | 86 ± 2 | 90 ± 2 | 85 ±6 |
Values are mean ± SEM
HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low density lipoprotein
Significant from pre HFM
Parameters of flow-mediated dilation testing
| Variable | Pre HFM | Post HFM | Pre ICM | Post ICM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline diameter (mm) | 0.382 ±0.009 | 0.0388 ±0.010 | 0.374 ±0.014 | 0.037 ±0.014 |
| Peak diameter (mm) | 0.409 ±0.010 | 0.410 ±0.010 | 0.040 ±0.014 | 0.398 ±0.013 |
| Absolute change (mm) | 0.026 ±0.004 | 0.022 ±0.004 | 0.024 ±0.003 | 0.025 ± 0.004 |
| Shear rate (s-1, AUC) | 35216 ±2248 | 34962 ± 3454 | 33608 ± 3246 | 34473 ± 2420 |
| FMD/shear (%/S−1, AUC) | 0.194 ±0.029 | 0.163 ±0.027[ | 0.0196 ±0.021 | 0.210 ±0.034 |
| Time to peak dilation (s) | 38 ±3 | 44±4 | 41 ± 4 | 45 ± 3 |
Values are mean ± SEM
Significant from pre HFM
Fig. 2Changes in erythrocyte morphology and blood monocytes following HFM. a Effects of HFM and ICM on changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Effects of ICM (b) and HFM (c–e) on RBC morphology. Note the appearance of microcytosis (c), acanthocytosis (d), and echinocytosis (e) following HFM. Foamy monocytes (f) and lipid-laden monocytes (g) post HFM. b–e ×400 magnification, f–g ×1000
Erythrocyte morphology change score following the HFM and ICM
| Erythrocyte scoring summary | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Acanthocytes | Echinocytes | MCVe | |
| Change following HFM | 2+ | 3 | 74 [63.0, 80.7] |
| Change following ICM | ND | ND | 97 [86.0, 103] |
Values are presented as mean of observer scores with “+” indicating averaged value fell between 2 and 3. MCVe values are shown as median with [interquartile range]
ND none detected
Fig. 3Effects of HFM and ICM on levels of ROS and oxidative stress in RBCs. a Intracellular ROS were detected in washed RBCs loaded with the probe CM-H2DCFDA and subjected to flow cytometry. Representative histograms show a positive shift in fluorescence 4 h post HFM (left), while there was no significant shift following ICM (right). b Quantification of the fold change in fluorescence post meal. Each dot represents an individual subject value, and the horizontal lines denote the mean values (n = 10 HFM, n = 8 ICM). Tyrosine nitration of band 3 isolated from RBC membranes was increased in HFM group (c), while no change was observed in ICM group (d). *Significant from ICM. †Significant from Pre-meal (n = 6)
Fig. 4Changes in MPO activity following the HFM and ICM and monocitic exposure to neutral fat. a Individual plasma MPO activity levels before (pre) and after (post) the HFM and ICM. b Pre and post plasma MPO activity following the HFM (top) and ICM (bottom) in EDTA or heparin anticoagulated samples. c Relative changes in MPO activity and inflammatory marker expression (ELISA) in response to THP-1 monocyte exposure to neutral fat for 4 h. *Significant from pre. **Significant from untreated. †Significant from EDTA post (n = 6)
Fig. 5Effects of free fatty acids on MPO uptake by porcine coronary artery. Porcine coronary arterial rings were exposed to varying concentrations of a bovine serum albumin-conjugated sodium palmitate or oleic acid for 4 h, or to b 300 μM sodium palmitate or oleic acid for variable durations, followed by incubation with purified human MPO (100 nM) for 2 h. MPO activity in the arterial rings was then quanti-fied. *Significant from vehicle treatment (n = 3)