Susanne Kossatz1, Brandon Carney2,3, Christopher Farley3, Wolfgang A Weber2,4,5, Charles M Drain3, Thomas Reiner2,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York Kossatzs@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Hunter College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York. 4. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; and. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as potent antitumor drugs. Here, we describe the intrinsic fluorescence properties of the clinically approved PARP inhibitor rucaparib and its potential to directly measure drug distribution and target engagement-a critical factor for understanding drug action and improving efficacy. Methods: We characterized the photophysical properties of rucaparib and determined its quantum yield and lifetime. Using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, we imaged the intracellular distribution of rucaparib and measured uptake and release kinetics. Results: Rucaparib has an excitation/emission maximum of 355/480 nm and a quantum yield of 0.3. In vitro time-lapse imaging showed accumulation in cell nuclei within seconds of administration. Nuclear rucaparib uptake increased with higher PARP1 expression, and we determined an intracellular half-life of 6.4 h. Conclusion: The label-free, intrinsic fluorescence of rucaparib can be exploited to interrogate drug distribution and target binding, critical factors toward improving treatment efficacy and outcome.
Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as potent antitumor drugs. Here, we describe the intrinsic fluorescence properties of the clinically approved PARP inhibitor rucaparib and its potential to directly measure drug distribution and target engagement-a critical factor for understanding drug action and improving efficacy. Methods: We characterized the photophysical properties of rucaparib and determined its quantum yield and lifetime. Using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, we imaged the intracellular distribution of rucaparib and measured uptake and release kinetics. Results:Rucaparib has an excitation/emission maximum of 355/480 nm and a quantum yield of 0.3. In vitro time-lapse imaging showed accumulation in cell nuclei within seconds of administration. Nuclear rucaparib uptake increased with higher PARP1 expression, and we determined an intracellular half-life of 6.4 h. Conclusion: The label-free, intrinsic fluorescence of rucaparib can be exploited to interrogate drug distribution and target binding, critical factors toward improving treatment efficacy and outcome.
Authors: Michèle Rouleau; Anand Patel; Michael J Hendzel; Scott H Kaufmann; Guy G Poirier Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Claire E Knezevic; Gabriela Wright; Lily L Remsing Rix; Woosuk Kim; Brent M Kuenzi; Yunting Luo; January M Watters; John M Koomen; Eric B Haura; Alvaro N Monteiro; Caius Radu; Harshani R Lawrence; Uwe Rix Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Greg M Thurber; Katy S Yang; Thomas Reiner; Rainer H Kohler; Peter Sorger; Tim Mitchison; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mehran Makvandi; Kuiying Xu; Brian P Lieberman; Redmond-Craig Anderson; Samuel Sander Effron; Harrison D Winters; Chenbo Zeng; Elizabeth S McDonald; Daniel A Pryma; Roger A Greenberg; Robert H Mach Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Christopher P Irwin; Yasiri Portorreal; Christian Brand; Yachao Zhang; Pooja Desai; Beatriz Salinas; Wolfgang A Weber; Thomas Reiner Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Susanne Kossatz; Giacomo Pirovano; Paula Demétrio De Souza França; Arianna L Strome; Sumsum P Sunny; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Audrey Mauguen; Brandon Carney; Christian Brand; Veer Shah; Ravindra D Ramanajinappa; Naveen Hedne; Praveen Birur; Smita Sihag; Ronald A Ghossein; Mithat Gönen; Marshall Strome; Amritha Suresh; Daniela Molena; Ian Ganly; Moni A Kuriakose; Snehal G Patel; Thomas Reiner Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Aladdin Riad; Sarah B Gitto; Hwan Lee; Harrison D Winters; Paul M Martorano; Chia-Ju Hsieh; Kuiying Xu; Dalia K Omran; Daniel J Powell; Robert H Mach; Mehran Makvandi Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Hanwen Zhang; Diane Abou; Peng Lu; Abbie Meghan Hasson; Alexandria Villmer; Nadia Benabdallah; Wen Jiang; David Ulmert; Sean Carlin; Buck E Rogers; Norman F Turtle; Michael R McDevitt; Brian Baumann; Brian W Simons; Farrokh Dehdashti; Dong Zhou; Daniel L J Thorek Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Ramya Ambur Sankaranarayana; Alexandru Florea; Susanne Allekotte; Andreas T J Vogg; Jochen Maurer; Laura Schäfer; Carsten Bolm; Steven Terhorst; Arno Classen; Matthias Bauwens; Agnieszka Morgenroth; Felix M Mottaghy Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 3.434