Literature DB >> 29571664

The Mythical Number Two.

David E Melnikoff1, John A Bargh2.   

Abstract

It is often said that there are two types of psychological processes: one that is intentional, controllable, conscious, and inefficient, and another that is unintentional, uncontrollable, unconscious, and efficient. Yet, there have been persistent and increasing objections to this widely influential dual-process typology. Critics point out that the 'two types' framework lacks empirical support, contradicts well-established findings, and is internally incoherent. Moreover, the untested and untenable assumption that psychological phenomena can be partitioned into two types, we argue, has the consequence of systematically thwarting scientific progress. It is time that we as a field come to terms with these issues. In short, the dual-process typology is a convenient and seductive myth, and we think cognitive science can do better.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  automaticity; dual process; dual system; type 1; type 2

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29571664     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  30 in total

1.  Examining neural reactivity to gambling cues in the age of online betting.

Authors:  Damien Brevers; Guillaume Sescousse; Pierre Maurage; Joël Billieux
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-23

2.  Hands-on false memories: a combined study with distributional semantics and mouse-tracking.

Authors:  Daniele Gatti; Marco Marelli; Giuliana Mazzoni; Tomaso Vecchi; Luca Rinaldi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 3.  Improving clinical decision-making in psychiatry: implementation of digital phenotyping could mitigate the influence of patient's and practitioner's individual cognitive biases.

Authors:  Stéphane Mouchabac; Ismael Conejero; Camille Lakhlifi; Ilyass Msellek; Leo Malandain; Vladimir Adrien; Florian Ferreri; Bruno Millet; Olivier Bonnot; Alexis Bourla; Redwan Maatoug
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hutchinson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-04-16

Review 5.  Embracing integration and complexity: placing emotion within a science of brain and behaviour.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2018-09-11

6.  Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.

Authors:  Melanie Killen; Audun Dahl
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 7.  Associations do not energize behavior: on the forgotten legacy of Kurt Lewin.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; David Dignath
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-12-24

8.  Women's perceptions of factors influencing their food shopping choices and how supermarkets can support them to make healthier choices.

Authors:  Preeti Dhuria; Wendy Lawrence; Sarah Crozier; Cyrus Cooper; Janis Baird; Christina Vogel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Emotional processes in binge drinking: A systematic review and perspective.

Authors:  Séverine Lannoy; Theodora Duka; Carina Carbia; Joël Billieux; Sullivan Fontesse; Valérie Dormal; Fabien Gierski; Eduardo López-Caneda; Edith V Sullivan; Pierre Maurage
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 10.  The Knowledge Map of Sport and Exercise Psychology: An Integrative Perspective.

Authors:  Alexander T Latinjak; Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.