| Literature DB >> 29571225 |
Sunlei Pan1,2, Huahua Liu2, Feidan Gao2, Hangqi Luo2, Hui Lin1,2, Liping Meng2, Chengjian Jiang2, Yan Guo2, Jufang Chi1,2, Hangyuan Guo1,2.
Abstract
Many studies support the cardioprotective effects of folic acid (FA). We aimed to evaluate the utility of FA supplementation in preventing the development of atherosclerotic in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (LDLR-/-) mice and to elucidate the molecular processes underlying this effect. LDLR-/- mice were randomly distributed into four groups: control group, HF group, HF + FA group and the HF + RAPA group. vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were divided into the following four groups: control group, PDGF group, PDGF + FA group and PDGF + FA + RAPA group. Blood lipid levels, oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines were measured. Atherosclerosis severity was evaluated with oil red O staining. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to assess atherosclerosis progression. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antismooth muscle α-actin (α-SMA) antibodies and anti-osteopontin (OPN) antibodies that demonstrate VSMC dedifferentiation. The protein expression of α-SMA, OPN and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR)/p70S6K signalling was detected by Western blot analysis. FA and rapamycin reduced serum levels of total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, LDL, inhibiting oxidative stress and the inflammatory response. Oil red O and H&E staining demonstrated that FA and rapamycin inhibited atherosclerosis. FA and rapamycin treatment inhibited VSMC dedifferentiation in vitro and in vivo, and FA and rapamycin attenuated the mTOR/p70S6K signalling pathway. Our findings suggest that FA attenuates atherosclerosis development and inhibits VSMC dedifferentiation in high-fat-fed LDLR-/- mice by reduced lipid levels and inhibiting oxidative stress and the inflammatory response through mTOR/p70S6K signalling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: LDLR−/− mice; atherosclerosis; dedifferentiation; folic acid; vascular smooth muscle cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29571225 PMCID: PMC5980198 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Bodyweight and biochemical parameters in each groups of mice
| Parameters | NC | HF | HF + FA | HF + RAPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bodyweight(g) | 23.37 ± 1.35 | 27.94 ± 1.07 | 27.52 ± 0.84 | 27.67 ± 0.96 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 216 ± 15 | 675 ± 42 | 481 ± 30 | 321 ± 29 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 120 ± 6 | 235 ± 7 | 186 ± 6 | 143 ± 8 |
| LDL‐C (mg/dL) | 139 ± 12 | 600 ± 35 | 420 ± 17 | 273 ± 25 |
| VLDL‐C (mg/dL) | 26 ± 3 | 45 ± 2 | 39 ± 3 | 32 ± 2 |
| HDL‐C (mg/dL) | 60 ± 4 | 30 ± 3 | 37 ± 5 | 45 ± 4 |
TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein; VLDL‐C, very low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein; FA, folic acid.
The values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 5).
P < .05 vs the NC group.
P < .05 vs the HF group.
Figure 1Effect of folic acid on the levels of oxidative stress and inflammation. A, Serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) level; B, serum glutathione peroxidase(GSH‐Px) level; C, malondialdehyde (MDA) level; D, serum interleukin (IL)‐6 level; E, serum IL‐1β level; F, serum tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) level. The values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 5). *P < .05 vs the NC group; # P < .05 vs the HF group
Figure 2Effect of folic acid on atherosclerotic lesion area. (A) (B) Atherosclerotic lesions shown with oil red O staining and quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic lesion area (n = 3 for each group). *P < .05 vs the NC group; # P < .05 vs the HF group. (C) (D) representative images and quantification of haematoxylin and eosin staining of the aortic sinus. Scale bar = 500 μm. The values are expressed as the mean ±standard error of the mean (n = 5 for each group). *P < .05 vs the NC group; # P < .05 vs the HF group
Figure 3Effect of folic acid on vascular smooth muscle cell dedifferentiation. (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images showing protein expression of α‐smooth muscle actin (SMA) and osteopontin (OPN) in the thoracic aorta; (B) (C) (D) Western blot analyses show the expression of α‐SMA and OPN, and quantifiable results of Western blot analyses. Scale bar = 500 μm. The values are expressed as the mean±standard error of the mean (n = 5 for each group). *P < .05 vs the NC group; # P < .05 vs the HF group
Figure 4Effect of folic acid on the mTOR/p70S6K signalling pathway in vivo and in vitro. (A) (B) Western blot analyses show the expression of the phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and p70S6K in vivo, and quantifiable results of Western blot analyses; (C) (D) Western blot analyses show the expression of α‐SMA and osteopontin (OPN) in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and quantifiable results of Western blot analyses; (E) (F) Western blot analyses show the expression of the phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and p70S6K in vitro, and quantifiable results of Western blot analyses. The values are expressed as the mean±standard error of the mean (n = 5 for each group). *P < .05 vs the NC group; # P < .05 vs the HF group